On 07/05/2023 20:34, David Bremner wrote:
Maxim Nikulin writes:
Severity: serious
Installing elpa-org package to current Debian testing (bookworm) results
in older Org version than Org shipped with Emacs. I consider it as a
really bad surprise for people who will upgrade from bullseye when
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 01:48:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#993714: fixed in debsums 3.0.2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #993714,
regarding debsums: false positives on removed conffiles retaining a
remove-on-upgrade entry in Conffiles
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 01:48:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#993714: fixed in debsums 3.0.2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #993714,
regarding conffile which got removed during upgrade reported missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 01:48:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035483: fixed in debsums 3.0.2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035483,
regarding debsums: false positives on removed conffiles retaining a
remove-on-upgrade entry in Conffiles
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2023 01:48:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035483: fixed in debsums 3.0.2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035483,
regarding conffile which got removed during upgrade reported missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #993714 in debsums reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #993714 [debsums] conffile which got removed during upgrade reported missing
Bug #1035483 [debsums] debsums: false positives on removed conffiles retaining
a remove-on-upgrade entry in Conffiles
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #993714 to
I've updated the package on salsa to rename the config.json file on
install, I've attached the debdiff file if someone is willing to review
the changes.
/Nicolasdiff -Nru glewlwyd-2.7.5/debian/changelog glewlwyd-2.7.5/debian/changelog
--- glewlwyd-2.7.5/debian/changelog 2023-01-17
Package: cpl-plugin-xshoo-calib
Version: 3.5.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 3.5.3+dfsg-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 3.5.3+dfsg-1
Bug #1035703 [cpl-plugin-xshoo-calib] cpl-plugin-xshoo-calib:
xshoo-kit-3.5.0*.tar.gz is no longer downloadable
Marked as fixed in versions cpl-plugin-xshoo/3.5.3+dfsg-1.
--
1035703: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035703
Package: cpl-plugin-vimos-calib
Version: 4.1.1+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 4.1.6+dfsg-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 4.1.6+dfsg-1
Bug #1035702 [cpl-plugin-vimos-calib] cpl-plugin-vimos-calib:
vimos-kit-4.1.1*.tar.gz is no longer downloadable
Marked as fixed in versions cpl-plugin-vimos/4.1.6+dfsg-1.
--
1035702: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035702
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 6.1.6+dfsg-1
Bug #1035701 [cpl-plugin-uves-calib] cpl-plugin-uves-calib:
uves-kit-6.1.3*.tar.gz is no longer downloadable
Marked as fixed in versions cpl-plugin-uves/6.1.6+dfsg-1.
--
1035701: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035701
Package: cpl-plugin-uves-calib
Version: 6.1.3+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 6.1.6+dfsg-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 4.4.10+dfsg-1
Bug #1035700 [cpl-plugin-naco-calib] cpl-plugin-naco-calib:
naco-kit-4.4.9*.tar.gz is no longer downloadable
Marked as fixed in versions cpl-plugin-naco/4.4.10+dfsg-1.
--
1035700: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035700
Package: cpl-plugin-naco-calib
Version: 4.4.9+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 4.4.10+dfsg-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 2.8.5+dfsg-1
Bug #1035699 [cpl-plugin-muse-calib] cpl-plugin-muse-calib:
muse-kit-2.8.3*.tar.gz is no longer downloadable
Marked as fixed in versions cpl-plugin-muse/2.8.5+dfsg-1.
--
1035699: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035699
Package: cpl-plugin-muse-calib
Version: 2.8.3+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 2.8.5+dfsg-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 2.16.8+dfsg-1
Bug #1035697 [cpl-plugin-giraf-calib] cpl-plugin-giraf-calib:
giraf-kit-2.16.7*.tar.gz is no longer downloadable
Marked as fixed in versions cpl-plugin-giraf/2.16.8+dfsg-1.
--
1035697:
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 2.4.9+dfsg-1
Bug #1035698 [cpl-plugin-hawki-calib] cpl-plugin-hawki-calib:
hawki-kit-2.4.8*.tar.gz is no longer downloadable
Marked as fixed in versions cpl-plugin-hawki/2.4.9+dfsg-1.
--
1035698: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035698
Package: cpl-plugin-hawki-calib
Version: 2.4.8+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 2.4.9+dfsg-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too
Package: cpl-plugin-giraf-calib
Version: 2.16.7+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 2.16.8+dfsg-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 5.5.7+dfsg-1
Bug #1035696 [cpl-plugin-fors-calib] cpl-plugin-fors-calib:
fors-kit-5.5.6*.tar.gz is no longer downloadable
Marked as fixed in versions cpl-plugin-fors/5.5.7+dfsg-1.
--
1035696: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035696
Package: cpl-plugin-fors-calib
Version: 5.5.6+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 5.5.7+dfsg-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 4.4.1+dfsg-1
Bug #1035695 [cpl-plugin-amber-calib] cpl-plugin-amber-calib:
amber-kit-4.4.0*.tar.gz is no longer downloadable
Marked as fixed in versions cpl-plugin-amber/4.4.1+dfsg-1.
--
1035695: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035695
Package: cpl-plugin-amber-calib
Version: 4.4.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: fixed -1 4.4.1+dfsg-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too
Package: jed-common
Version: 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
an upgrade test with piuparts revealed that your package installs files
over existing symlinks and possibly overwrites files owned by other
packages. This usually means
Package: python3-aiosmtpd
Version: 1.4.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
an upgrade test with piuparts revealed that your package installs files
over existing symlinks and possibly overwrites files owned by other
packages. This usually means an old
On 07/05/2023 19.50, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2023-05-07 11:07:16 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 07/05/2023 10.49, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
#1034758x2goserver-common x2goserver-common: fails to purge -
command (deluser|delgroup) in postrm not found
#1035291
Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2023 21:33:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1033752: fixed in sniproxy 0.6.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033752,
regarding sniproxy: CVE-2023-25076
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
> I'm afraid this fix is incomplete. The source package still contains the
> data files with a non-free license and hence Debian is redistrbuting
> them. golang-v2ray-core needs to be repacked to completly get rid of the
> files.
Yes, current fix just removes the geoip data from binary package.
Hello,
On Sun 07 May 2023 at 04:42PM -04, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Is there a practical argument against adding versioned Provides to
> either emacs-common or emacs-el (as appropriate)? Something like
>
> Provides: elpa-org (= 9.5.5)
>
> The idea is that emacs-common (or -el) would replace
On 5.05.2023 at 23:14 +0200, bud wrote:
Package: openbox
Version: 3.6.1-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc:budheal...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Install release candidate 2 and select openbox, then login.
* What
David Bremner writes:
> Note that by filing this bug with severity serious, you are proposing to
> remove elpa-org from bullseye. This might be the right course of action,
> I'm not sure.
>
At this time, this would mean that at least elpa-org-contrib will also
be dropped. I don't know if there
Maxim Nikulin writes:
> Package: elpa-org
> Version: 9.5.2+dfsh-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Installing elpa-org package to current Debian testing (bookworm) results
> in older Org version than Org shipped with Emacs. I consider it as a
> really bad surprise for people who will upgrade from
Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2023 19:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1034930: fixed in libswe 2.10.03-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034930,
regarding swetest: missing Breaks+Replaces for libswe-dev when upgrading from
bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1033432 + pending
Bug #1033432 [src:pyramid-jinja2] pyramid-jinja2: FTBFS in testing:
ImportError: cannot import name 'contextfilter' from 'jinja2'
(/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/__init__.py)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping
On 2023-05-07 13:52:50 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > With such a change I would have expected upgrade/piuparts tests from
> > bullseye to bookworm that tried to remove adduser a various stages and
> > check for the fallout. Given that Andreas is only doing them now, that's
> > too late for
Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2023 17:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1034963: fixed in gnuradio 3.10.5.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034963,
regarding gnuradio-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces for gr-soapy when upgrading
from bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: sane-utils
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package removes files that
were installed by another package.
This was observed after an upgrade from bullseye to bookworm.
>From the
On 2021-02-18 Simon McVittie wrote:
[...]
> So elpa-pdf-tools-server is linked to libpoppler-glib, and because the
> (parts of the) libpoppler-glib API that it uses has not changed for a
> while, it is happy with an old version; but then during a partial
> upgrade, it can get this
>
Control: tags -1 + bookworm
Hi Sebastian,
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 10:49:40AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Even if we fix these bugs in the packages, people may still upgrade
> > their systems and remove them rather than upgrading. Then, once the
> > upgrade is finished (and adduser is
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + bookworm
Bug #1035654 [src:apt] non-essential adduser poses problems to purging packages
Added tag(s) bookworm.
--
1035654: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035654
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
[resending to the bug]
On 07/05/2023 10.49, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
#1034758x2goserver-common x2goserver-common: fails to purge -
command (deluser|delgroup) in postrm not found
#1035291desktop-autoloader desktop-autoloader: fails to purge -
command
Source: flask
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for flask.
CVE-2023-30861[0]:
| Flask is a lightweight WSGI web application framework.
Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2023 14:48:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035621: fixed in ncurses 6.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035621,
regarding ncurses: FTBFS: dh_autoreconf error on various architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 01:04:49PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reassign -2 autoconf-dickey
> Control: tags -2 - ftbfs
> Control: retitle -2 autoreconf-dickey runs in all subdirectories
>
> On 2023-05-06 16:44 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 06, 2023
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # autopkgtest regressions are RC buggy
> severity 1034371 serious
Bug #1034371 [src:gcc-sh-elf] gcc-sh-elf: autopkgtest fails
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2023 12:05:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1034953: fixed in slop 7.6-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034953,
regarding libslopy-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces for slop when upgrading from
bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1034998 [pcp-export-pcp2elasticsearch] pcp-export-pcp2elasticsearch:
missing Breaks+Replaces for pcp when upgrading from bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1034998: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034998
Debian Bug Tracking
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1034983 [pcp-export-pcp2json] pcp-export-pcp2json: missing Breaks+Replaces
for pcp when upgrading from bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1034983: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034983
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1034973 [pcp-export-pcp2zabbix] pcp-export-pcp2zabbix: missing
Breaks+Replaces for pcp when upgrading from bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1034973: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034973
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1034966 [pcp-doc] pcp-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces for pcp when upgrading
from bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1034966: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1034932 [pcp-export-pcp2spark] pcp-export-pcp2spark: missing
Breaks+Replaces for pcp when upgrading from bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1034932: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034932
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1034922 [pcp-export-pcp2xml] pcp-export-pcp2xml: missing Breaks+Replaces
for pcp when upgrading from bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1034922: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034922
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags -1 pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pcp (versioned as 6.0.3-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
kind regards
Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1034895 [pcp-zeroconf] pcp-zeroconf: missing Replaces: pcp (<< ?)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1034895: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034895
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1035621 [src:ncurses] ncurses: FTBFS: dh_autoreconf error on various
architectures
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1035621: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035621
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1034367 {Done: Roger Shimizu } [v2ray] v2ray geoip data
has problematic license
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer
Control: reopen -1
On 2023-04-24 01:36:59 +, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> Hello,
>
> Bug #1034367 in golang-v2ray-core reported by you has been fixed in the
> Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
> message below and you can check the diff of
Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2023 09:18:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1034996: fixed in libomemo 0.8.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034996,
regarding libomemo0: missing Breaks+Replaces for libomemo-dev when upgrading
from bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that
On 2023-05-07 10:49:40 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Even if we fix these bugs in the packages, people may still upgrade
> > their systems and remove them rather than upgrading. Then, once the
> > upgrade is finished (and adduser is removed), they may consider purging
> > them and boom
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1034996 [libomemo0] libomemo0: missing Breaks+Replaces for libomemo-dev
when upgrading from bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1034996: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034996
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1034996 in libomemo reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Source: apt
Version: 2.5.4
Severity: serious
On 2023-05-04 11:17:50 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi release team,
>
> Andreas Beckmann does wonderful QA work and recently figured that some
> packages use deluser during purge (e.g. #1035494 and #1035495). deluser
> is shipped with adduser and
65 matches
Mail list logo
