Bug#1035949: mariadb: upgrade issue: mariadb-server-10.5 fails to stop after all other -10.5 packages were removed

2023-06-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: tag -1 patch On 01/06/2023 12.31, Andreas Beckmann wrote: That worked for me for zoph, but a new failure occurred in tt-rss. I'm now trying a transitional mariadb-server-10.5 package which seems to work for both these cases. Will do a complete set of piuparts upgrade tests for all

Processed: Re: Bug#1035949: mariadb: upgrade issue: mariadb-server-10.5 fails to stop after all other -10.5 packages were removed

2023-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #1035949 [src:mariadb] mariadb: upgrade issue: mariadb-server-10.5 fails to stop after all other -10.5 packages were removed Added tag(s) patch. -- 1035949: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035949 Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed: Re: Bug#1035543: init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed

2023-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1035543 normal Bug #1035543 [e2fsprogs] init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > retitle 1035543 e2fsprogs: on an upgrade from

Bug#1035543: init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed

2023-06-01 Thread Theodore Ts'o
severity 1035543 normal retitle 1035543 e2fsprogs: on an upgrade from bullseye e2scrub-reap.service may be wanted by default.target instead of multi-user.target thanks On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 07:40:25PM +0100, James Addison wrote: > > So it's not a big deal; is that correct so this patch is not

Bug#1035543: init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed

2023-06-01 Thread James Addison
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 15:48, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > In addition to Bookworm being hard frozen, I question the importance > of this patch, the bug priority, and whether the title is correct. > After all, at least with respect to e2fsprogs systemd unit *will* > still be enabled. It will just be

Bug#1036256: golang-github-pin-tftp: FTBFS in testing

2023-06-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi all, On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:31:25 -0300 Thiago Andrade wrote: I've tested golang-github-pin-tftp locally and everything looks perfect. I looked at the results on the reproducible build infrastructure and the package seems to regularly fail. This may hint that the tests are flaky. Also

Processed: reopen tracker 32-bit time bug

2023-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 1035903 Bug #1035903 {Done: Jeremy Bícha } [src:tracker] tracker: datetime build tests failing on 32-bit 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to

Bug#1035903: marked as done (tracker: datetime build tests failing on 32-bit)

2023-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jun 2023 14:36:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035903: fixed in tracker 3.5.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1035903, regarding tracker: datetime build tests failing on 32-bit to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1035543: init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed

2023-06-01 Thread Theodore Ts'o
In addition to Bookworm being hard frozen, I question the importance of this patch, the bug priority, and whether the title is correct. After all, at least with respect to e2fsprogs systemd unit *will* still be enabled. It will just be enabled using ../multi-user.target/wanted instead of

Bug#1037012: gconf: Intent to remove from Debian

2023-06-01 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: gconf Version: 3.2.6-8 Severity: serious Tags: unstable trixie I intend to file a bug requesting that ftpmasters remove gconf from Debian Unstable soon after the Debian 12 release. gconf is only included in Debian 12 to provide the migration utility away from gconf for alarm-clock-applet

Processed: Bug#1035903 marked as pending in tracker

2023-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1035903 [src:tracker] tracker: datetime build tests failing on 32-bit Added tag(s) pending. -- 1035903: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035903 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1035903: marked as pending in tracker

2023-06-01 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1035903 in tracker reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1035979: redmine-plugin-pretend: fails to install: rake aborted! LoadError: cannot load such file -- redmine_pretend

2023-06-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 01/06/2023 14.16, Paul Gevers wrote: On Fri, 12 May 2023 09:16:32 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote: Package: redmine-plugin-pretend during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a release, thus

Bug#1036778: marked as done (ckbuilder: must be rebuilt against rhino 1.7.14)

2023-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2023 15:24:33 +0200 with message-id <2461c83e-9956-97ed-483e-218c763fa...@debian.org> and subject line Re: ckbuilder: must be rebuilt against rhino 1.7.14 has caused the Debian Bug report #1036778, regarding ckbuilder: must be rebuilt against rhino 1.7.14 to be marked

Bug#1035543: init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed

2023-06-01 Thread James Addison
Package: e2fsprogs Followup-For: Bug #1035543 X-Debbugs-Cc: jspri...@debian.org On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:53:18 +0200, Jochen wrote: > * James Addison [2023-06-01 12:44]: > >Would reverting the Install.WantedBy modification[1][2], restoring > >e2scrub_reap > >enablement using 'default.target' on

Bug#1035543: init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed

2023-06-01 Thread James Addison
Package: e2fsprogs Followup-For: Bug #1035543 Control: tags -1 patch >From 9ad481148456520f15f92973cdd0cf6caa16a088 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Addison Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:20:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "e2scrub: use WantedBy=multi-user.target in e2scrub_reap.service" This

Processed: Re: init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed

2023-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1035543 [e2fsprogs] init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed Added tag(s) patch. -- 1035543: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035543 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1035979: redmine-plugin-pretend: fails to install: rake aborted! LoadError: cannot load such file -- redmine_pretend

2023-06-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, [Release Team member here.] On Fri, 12 May 2023 09:16:32 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote: Package: redmine-plugin-pretend during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a release, thus the

Bug#1035543: init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed

2023-06-01 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
* James Addison [2023-06-01 12:44]: Would reverting the Install.WantedBy modification[1][2], restoring e2scrub_reap enablement using 'default.target' on relevant systems, be a sensible approach for bookworm until we can figure out the debhelper-system behaviour when that setting changes? No,

Bug#1035543: init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed

2023-06-01 Thread James Addison
Followup-For: Bug #1035543 X-Debbugs-Cc: ty...@mit.edu, bi...@debian.org, hel...@subdivi.de, jspri...@debian.org, ans...@debian.org, a...@debian.org, debian.bugrep...@wodny.org, debian-rele...@lists.debian.org [ re-introducing the larger cc list audience, plus debian-release ] Would reverting

Bug#1035650: marked as done (elpa-org version older than built-in Org in bookworm)

2023-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jun 2023 11:33:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035650: fixed in org-mode 9.5.2+dfsh-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1035650, regarding elpa-org version older than built-in Org in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1035949: mariadb: upgrade issue: mariadb-server-10.5 fails to stop after all other -10.5 packages were removed

2023-06-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 26/05/2023 19.16, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: I filed now https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-server/-/merge_requests/47 as an exploration to fix this issue. That worked for me for zoph, but a new failure occurred in tt-rss. I'm now trying a transitional mariadb-server-10.5 package

Bug#1035871: flare-engine: broken symlink: /usr/share/games/flare/mods/default/fonts/unifont-10.0.06.ttf -> ../../../../../fonts/truetype/unifont/unifont.ttf

2023-06-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Dear maintainers, [Release Team member here.] On Wed, 10 May 2023 13:54:11 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote: fonts-unifont does no longer ship unifont.ttf or other *.ttf. There are only the *.otf variants left in most cases. How bad is this in practice? Does flare-engine break completely or is