Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2023 05:37:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052072: fixed in ontospy 2.1.1~dfsg2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052072,
regarding package ontospy contains license CC-BY-1.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2023 05:37:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052235: fixed in orpie 1.6.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052235,
regarding FTBFS with OCaml 4.14.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2023 04:36:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1054099: fixed in helvum 0.5.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054099,
regarding helvum: Needs update for rust-pipewire 0.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: libtk-img
Version: 1:1.4.15+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: o...@wanadoo.es
Dear Maintainer,
$ wish
% package require img::jpeg
couldn't load file
"/usr/lib/tcltk/x86_64-linux-gnu/Img1.4.15/libjpegtcl9.5.0.so":
Package: rust-fd-find
Version: 8.7.0-3
Severity: serious
This bug affects both 8.7.0-3 in testing and 8.7.0-4 in unstable.
I recently uploaded clap 4.4.6, since this was not a semver bump I was not
expecting any breakage. Unfortunately it turns out it broke fd.
There are (at least) two issues,
Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2023 18:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041242: fixed in libheif 1.17.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041242,
regarding libheif1: 1.16.2-1+b1 breaks displaying any pictures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Same issue also all my systems (with various displays...and also on
remote display)
--
Cu stima,
Ioan Rusan
Hi Michael,
I tried the update but there are build time test failures[1].
Could you have a look?
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/spdlog/-/jobs/4795796
Am Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 08:11:13PM +0200 schrieb Drew Parsons:
> Source: spdlog
> Version: 1:1.10.0+ds-1
>
Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2023 15:50:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1054022: fixed in ncurses 6.4+20231016-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054022,
regarding libncursesw6: broken in GNU Screen
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1054022 [libncursesw6] libncursesw6: broken in GNU Screen
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1054022: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054022
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1054022 in ncurses reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1042533 netdata-dashboard: embedded pako
Bug #1042533 [src:netdata] netdata: Please use packaged pako
Changed Bug title to 'netdata-dashboard: embedded pako' from 'netdata: Please
use packaged pako'.
> tag 1042533 pending
Bug #1042533
Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:04:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052854: fixed in python-vulndb 0.1.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052854,
regarding python-vulndb: FTBFS: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or
directory:
Hello,
I haven't seen that many of these. A few, yes, maybe 3?
3 under my personal ddpo, e.g. borgbackup this one and some others.
In any case, I agree with your proposal, borgbackup is already "fixed" in some
way, and I plan to workaround
vulndb too.
G.
On balance, it still seems like
Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2023 10:19:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1043415: fixed in netdata 1.43.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1043415,
regarding netdata: Integrated web server displays "File does not exist, or is
not accessible: "
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1054024 [hdf5] hdf5: FTBFS: Testing JUnit-TestH5Fbasic Failure
Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist'
--
1054024: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
16 matches
Mail list logo