Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf

Hi, Am Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:33:53PM -0700 schrieb Steven Eker: > I like that solution since I believe there are 64-bit platforms where long > is 32-bits. I've updated my development version thus: > >   // >   //    timeValue.tv_sec is 64-bit since Linux kernel 5.6 but GMP doesn't > yet have

Processed: Re: nvi: FTBFS: ../dist/../common/options_f.c:324:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'conv_enc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066285 [src:nvi] nvi: FTBFS: ../dist/../common/options_f.c:324:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'conv_enc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066285:

Bug#1066285: nvi: FTBFS: ../dist/../common/options_f.c:324:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'conv_enc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: nvi Followup-For: Bug #1066285 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: *

Bug#1066694: netdiag: FTBFS: getservent.c:121:38: error: implicit declaration of function ‘atoi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: netdiag Followup-For: Bug #1066694 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * debian/patches/gcc13.patch: Add multiple missing headers and

Processed: Re: netdiag: FTBFS: getservent.c:121:38: error: implicit declaration of function ‘atoi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066694 [src:netdiag] netdiag: FTBFS: getservent.c:121:38: error: implicit declaration of function ‘atoi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066694: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066694 Debian

Bug#1067911: marked as done (FTBFS: error: ‘-Werror=’ argument ‘-Werror=implicit-function-declaration’ is not valid for C++ [-Werror])

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 02:38:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067911: fixed in zeroc-ice 3.7.10-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067911, regarding FTBFS: error: ‘-Werror=’ argument ‘-Werror=implicit-function-declaration’ is not valid for C++ [-Werror] to be

Bug#1067911: Diff for fix of FTBFS bug

Attached is the NMUdiff for fixing FTBFS Bug #1067911 which would keep zeroc-ice from migrating to Testing.    -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us diff -Nru zeroc-ice-3.7.10/debian/changelog zeroc-ice-3.7.10/debian/changelog --- zeroc-ice-3.7.10/debian/changelog 2024-02-29

Processed: closing 1067267

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1067267 Bug #1067267 [src:coq-deriving] coq-deriving: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1067267:

Bug#1065761: marked as done (m4api: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/m4api.c:413:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘m4SetBinary’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 01:04:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065761: fixed in m4api 0.3~0.9646fd-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065761, regarding m4api: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/m4api.c:413:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘m4SetBinary’

Bug#1060795: marked as done (bluez: Troubles with bluetooth after upgrade from bookworm to testing (trixie): br-connection-unknown)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 00:49:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1060795: fixed in bluez 5.73-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1060795, regarding bluez: Troubles with bluetooth after upgrade from bookworm to testing (trixie): br-connection-unknown to be marked as done.

Bug#1066654: mlpcap: FTBFS: utils.c:184:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘camlidl_ml2c_pcap_pcap_handle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: mlpcap Followup-For: Bug #1066654 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Please find attached a patch for this issue that has been uploaded to Ubuntu. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a

Processed: Re: mlpcap: FTBFS: utils.c:184:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘camlidl_ml2c_pcap_pcap_handle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066654 [src:mlpcap] mlpcap: FTBFS: utils.c:184:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘camlidl_ml2c_pcap_pcap_handle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066654:

Processed: Re: kcemu: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1067141 [src:kcemu] kcemu: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration Added tag(s) patch. -- 1067141: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067141 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1067141: kcemu: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Package: kcemu Followup-For: Bug #1067141 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * debian/patches/add-missing-includes.patch: Add missing

Bug#1067621: FTBFS on 32-bit time64 architectures: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gzopen64’

Package: berkeley-abc Followup-For: Bug #1067621 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Fix the build failure caused by missing function

Processed: Re: FTBFS on 32-bit time64 architectures: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gzopen64’

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1067621 [src:berkeley-abc] FTBFS on 32-bit time64 architectures: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gzopen64’ Added tag(s) patch. -- 1067621: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067621 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: Re: libdigidoc: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/libdigidoc/DigiDocService.c:327:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ddocAddSignatureFromMemory’ [-Werror=implicit-function-dec

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1065774 [src:libdigidoc] libdigidoc: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/libdigidoc/DigiDocService.c:327:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ddocAddSignatureFromMemory’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1065774:

Bug#1065774: libdigidoc: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/libdigidoc/DigiDocService.c:327:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ddocAddSignatureFromMemory’ [-Werror=implicit-function-decla

Package: libdigidoc Followup-For: Bug #1065774 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Please find attached a patch for this issue that has been uploaded to Ubuntu. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and

Bug#1066512: latencytop: FTBFS: fsync.c:330:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gettimeofday’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: latencytop Followup-For: Bug #1066512 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Please find attached a patch for this issue which has been uploaded to Ubuntu. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and

Processed: Re: latencytop: FTBFS: fsync.c:330:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gettimeofday’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066512 [src:latencytop] latencytop: FTBFS: fsync.c:330:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gettimeofday’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066512:

Processed: Re: kdrill: FTBFS: init.c:171:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isMapped’; did you mean ‘IsUnmapped’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066689 [src:kdrill] kdrill: FTBFS: init.c:171:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isMapped’; did you mean ‘IsUnmapped’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066689:

Bug#1066689: kdrill: FTBFS: init.c:171:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isMapped’; did you mean ‘IsUnmapped’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: kdrill Followup-For: Bug #1066689 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Please find attached a patch for this issue which has been uploaded to Ubuntu. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a

Processed: Re: jabberd2: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [Makefile:538: libsx_la-websocket.lo] Error 1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1067259 [src:jabberd2] jabberd2: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [Makefile:538: libsx_la-websocket.lo] Error 1 Added tag(s) patch. -- 1067259: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067259 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1067259: jabberd2: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [Makefile:538: libsx_la-websocket.lo] Error 1

Package: jabberd2 Followup-For: Bug #1067259 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Please find attached a patch for this issue that has been uploaded to Ubuntu. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a

Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf

I like that solution since I believe there are 64-bit platforms where long is 32-bits. I've updated my development version thus:   //   //    timeValue.tv_sec is 64-bit since Linux kernel 5.6 but GMP doesn't yet have support   //    for long long which is a problem on platforms where long is

Bug#1068737: marked as done (locales fails to install: locales failed to preconfigure, with exit status 2)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 22:07:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068737: fixed in glibc 2.37-17 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068737, regarding locales fails to install: locales failed to preconfigure, with exit status 2 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf

Steven Eker writes: > This is harmless on 64-bit architectures since Index will be a signed > 64-bit integer and if it works on 32-bit architectures, it's a work > around until GMP is fixed (hopefully before 2038). I know this suggestion is unorthodox, and quite possibly moot at this point in

Processed: Re: epic5: FTBFS: functions.c:7547:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’; did you mean ‘strftime’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066505 [src:epic5] epic5: FTBFS: functions.c:7547:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’; did you mean ‘strftime’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066505:

Bug#1068737: marked as pending in glibc

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1068737 in glibc reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1068737 marked as pending in glibc

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1068737 [locales] locales fails to install: locales failed to preconfigure, with exit status 2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1068737: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068737 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1066505: epic5: FTBFS: functions.c:7547:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’; did you mean ‘strftime’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: epic5 Followup-For: Bug #1066505 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: *

Bug#1068723: marked as done (quickflux: binary-any FTBFS)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:49:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068723: fixed in quickflux 1.1.3+git20201110.2a37acf-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068723, regarding quickflux: binary-any FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1065969: ike-scan: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: configure: error: cannot determine snprintf format string for long long int

Package: ike-scan Followup-For: Bug #1065969 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Please find attached a patch for this issue that has been uploaded to Ubuntu. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a

Processed: Re: ike-scan: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: configure: error: cannot determine snprintf format string for long long int

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1065969 [src:ike-scan] ike-scan: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: configure: error: cannot determine snprintf format string for long long int Added tag(s) patch. -- 1065969: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065969 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1068723: marked as pending in quickflux

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1068723 in quickflux reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1068723 marked as pending in quickflux

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1068723 [src:quickflux] quickflux: binary-any FTBFS Added tag(s) pending. -- 1068723: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068723 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1068655: lomiri-telephony-service FTBFS with abseil 20230802.1

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:02:50PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Hi Adrian, Hi Mike, >... > I'd appreciate if you could take a look and shed some light on this. >... I would have mentioned if I had a clue about this, but I don't. In places like #debian-devel there might be people who understand

Bug#1068030: marked as done (FTBFS on armel: undefined reference to `__atomic_load_8')

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:19:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068030: fixed in maildir-utils 1.12.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068030, regarding FTBFS on armel: undefined reference to `__atomic_load_8' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1068655: lomiri-telephony-service FTBFS with abseil 20230802.1

Hi Adrian, On Mo 08 Apr 2024 20:36:54 CEST, Adrian Bunk wrote: Source: lomiri-telephony-service Version: 0.5.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lomiri-telephony-service=amd64=0.5.3-1%2Bb3=1712518065=0 ...

Processed: Re: httest: FTBFS: socks_module.c:115:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘atoi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066672 [src:httest] httest: FTBFS: socks_module.c:115:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘atoi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066672: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066672 Debian

Bug#1066672: httest: FTBFS: socks_module.c:115:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘atoi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: httest Followup-For: Bug #1066672 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Please find attached a patch for this issue which has been uploaded to Ubuntu. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a

Bug#1065777: clblas: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/src/library/blas/gens/symv.c:955:29: error: implicit declaration of function ‘abs’; did you mean ‘fabs’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declarati

Package: clblas Followup-For: Bug #1065777 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Apologies, the patch I attached fixed a real missing include, but not the one mentioned in this bug and the package still failed to build. Attached is

Bug#1067309: marked as done (xerces-c: FTBFS: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/libfontmanager.so: libharfbuzz.so.0: cannot open shared

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:35:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067309: fixed in xerces-c 3.2.4+debian-1.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067309, regarding xerces-c: FTBFS: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:

Processed: Re: clblas: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/src/library/blas/gens/symv.c:955:29: error: implicit declaration of function ‘abs’; did you mean ‘fabs’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declara

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1065777 [src:clblas] clblas: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/src/library/blas/gens/symv.c:955:29: error: implicit declaration of function ‘abs’; did you mean ‘fabs’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Ignoring request to alter tags of bug

Processed: Tag patch for crmsh dep8 failure

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1068562 patch Bug #1068562 [src:crmsh] crmsh: autopkgtest regression: unsupported operand type(s) for -: 'NoneType' and 'int' Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1068562:

Bug#1068562: Upstream proposed fix for unit test failure

Hi, I submitted a salsa MR at https://salsa.debian.org/ha-team/crmsh/-/merge_requests/7 with a fix for this one. -- Athos Ribeiro

Bug#1067309: xerces-c: FTBFS: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/libfontmanager.so: libharfbuzz.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No

I am uploading a NMU to fix this. The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru xerces-c-3.2.4+debian/debian/changelog xerces-c-3.2.4+debian/debian/changelog --- xerces-c-3.2.4+debian/debian/changelog 2024-02-29 07:28:56.0 + +++ xerces-c-3.2.4+debian/debian/changelog 2024-04-10

Processed: Re: i2pd: FTBFS on armel: Host compiler appears to require libatomic for 64-bit operations, but cannot find it.

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 > https://github.com/PurpleI2P/i2pd/commit/6b33250c599f138d8834fb00bfe9f936bc9d8894 Bug #1060787 [src:i2pd] i2pd: FTBFS on armel: Host compiler appears to require libatomic for 64-bit operations, but cannot find it. Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#1060787: i2pd: FTBFS on armel: Host compiler appears to require libatomic for 64-bit operations, but cannot find it.

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/PurpleI2P/i2pd/commit/6b33250c599f138d8834fb00bfe9f936bc9d8894 This is fixed with upstream v2.50. See forwarded URL.

Bug#1068770: linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: Local privilege escalation vulnerability in kernel n_gsm driver

Control: tags -1 + confirmed pending Control: found -1 6.1.82-1 Hi, On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 12:16:21PM -0700, LW wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 6.1.76-1 > Severity: critical > Tags: upstream security > Justification: root security hole > X-Debbugs-Cc: lw-deb-...@greyskydesigns.com,

Processed: Re: Bug#1068770: linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: Local privilege escalation vulnerability in kernel n_gsm driver

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed pending Bug #1068770 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: Local privilege escalation vulnerability in kernel n_gsm driver Added tag(s) pending and confirmed. > found -1 6.1.82-1 Bug #1068770 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: Local

Processed: severity of 1068770 is grave

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1068770 grave Bug #1068770 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: Local privilege escalation vulnerability in kernel n_gsm driver Severity set to 'grave' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#1068770: linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: Local privilege escalation vulnerability in kernel n_gsm driver

Package: src:linux Version: 6.1.76-1 Severity: critical Tags: upstream security Justification: root security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: lw-deb-...@greyskydesigns.com, Debian Security Team Dear Maintainer, A Reddit thread[1] linked to a Github page[2] with a local root escalation exploit. This

Bug#1066359: aview: FTBFS: main.c:30:86: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

control: tags -1 patch diff -Nru aview-1.3.0rc1/debian/changelog aview-1.3.0rc1/debian/changelog --- aview-1.3.0rc1/debian/changelog 2024-04-01 05:32:50.0 + +++ aview-1.3.0rc1/debian/changelog 2024-04-10 18:19:03.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +aview (1.3.0rc1-9.2ubuntu1)

Processed: Re: aview: FTBFS: main.c:30:86: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066359 [src:aview] aview: FTBFS: main.c:30:86: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1066359 to the same tags previously set -- 1066359:

Bug#1066359: aview: FTBFS: main.c:30:86: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: aview Followup-For: Bug #1066359 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Please find attached a patch for this issue which has been uploaded to Ubuntu. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a

Processed: Re: aview: FTBFS: main.c:30:86: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066359 [src:aview] aview: FTBFS: main.c:30:86: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066359: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066359 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1065904: marked as done (nim: hardcoded (build-)dependencies on libssl3)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:20:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065904: fixed in nim 1.6.14-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065904, regarding nim: hardcoded (build-)dependencies on libssl3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1065761: m4api: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/m4api.c:413:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘m4SetBinary’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: m4api Followup-For: Bug #1065761 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to fix the implicit declarations. * debian/patches: fix several implicit declarations (LP:

Processed: Re: m4api: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/m4api.c:413:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘m4SetBinary’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1065761 [src:m4api] m4api: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/m4api.c:413:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘m4SetBinary’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1065761:

Bug#1066872: marked as done (mozjs102: Fails to build with Python 3.12)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:59:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066872: fixed in mozjs102 102.15.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066872, regarding mozjs102: Fails to build with Python 3.12 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1039034: marked as done (ruby-arel: obsolete, integrated into ruby-activerecord, incompatible with ruby-activerecord 6.1.x)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:40:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068712: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1039034, regarding ruby-arel: obsolete, integrated into ruby-activerecord, incompatible with ruby-activerecord 6.1.x to be marked as

Bug#1025016: marked as done (onedrivesdk: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: module 'asyncio' has no attribute 'coroutine')

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:38:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068472: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1025016, regarding onedrivesdk: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: module 'asyncio' has no attribute 'coroutine' to be

Bug#893023: marked as done (librsl FTBFS with flex 2.6.4-6)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:38:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068397: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #893023, regarding librsl FTBFS with flex 2.6.4-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1068359: marked as done (gir1.2-keybinder-0.0 still depends on libkeybinder0 on most architectures.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:36:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067870: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1068359, regarding gir1.2-keybinder-0.0 still depends on libkeybinder0 on most architectures. to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1066895: marked as done (python-reactivex: duplicate of src:python-rx)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:35:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066901: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1066895, regarding python-reactivex: duplicate of src:python-rx to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1066230: marked as done (tk707: FTBFS: tcl2c.c:57:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:36:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068156: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1066230, regarding tk707: FTBFS: tcl2c.c:57:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’

Bug#1058814: marked as done (flint-arb: FTBFS: /<>/fmpz_extras.h:208:1: error: static declaration of ‘fmpz_ui_pow_ui’ follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:37:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068265: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1058814, regarding flint-arb: FTBFS: /<>/fmpz_extras.h:208:1: error: static declaration of ‘fmpz_ui_pow_ui’ follows non-static

Bug#1066288: marked as done (libauthen-krb5-perl: FTBFS: Krb5.xs:499:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_gen_portaddr’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:26:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068258: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1065768, regarding libauthen-krb5-perl: FTBFS: Krb5.xs:499:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_gen_portaddr’

Bug#1065768: marked as done (libauthen-krb5-perl: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: Krb5.xs:1040:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_free_address’; did you mean ‘krb5_free_addresses’? [-Werror=implic

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:26:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068258: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1065768, regarding libauthen-krb5-perl: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: Krb5.xs:1040:17: error: implicit declaration of function

Bug#1066379: loqui: FTBFS: loqui-core-gtk.gob:256:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘account_list_dialog_open_for_connect’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: loqui Followup-For: Bug #1066379 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, This FTBFS is due to a missing include of account_list_dialog.h. In Ubuntu we applied this patch to fix it. * debian/patches: fix

Processed: Re: loqui: FTBFS: loqui-core-gtk.gob:256:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘account_list_dialog_open_for_connect’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066379 [src:loqui] loqui: FTBFS: loqui-core-gtk.gob:256:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘account_list_dialog_open_for_connect’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066379:

Bug#1066860: marked as done (libprelude ftbfs on time_t64 archs)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:50:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066860: fixed in libprelude 5.2.0-5.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066860, regarding libprelude ftbfs on time_t64 archs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1066507: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Guillem Jover ) (Bug#1066507: fixed in kannel 1.4.5-14)

Hi! On Sat, 2024-03-16 at 01:12:07 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the src:kannel package: > > #1066507: kannel: FTBFS: configure: error: Either get a multithread-enabled > SSL or configure with

Bug#1067911: FTBFS: error: ‘-Werror=’ argument ‘-Werror=implicit-function-declaration’ is not valid for C++ [-Werror]

On 4/10/24 10:02, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:52:44AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: Removing -Werror looks like it would be a simple patch, it seems to be set here: config/Make.rules.Linux:cppflags    = -Wall -Wextra -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wdeprecated -Werror

Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf

Hi, I'd suggest to set Build-Depends: architecture-is-64-bit, architecture-is-little-endian and remove 32bit architectures of maude. Kind regards Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de

Bug#1066532: marked as done (microbiomeutil: FTBFS: NAST-iEr.c:106:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isprint’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:37:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066532: fixed in microbiomeutil 20101212+dfsg1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066532, regarding microbiomeutil: FTBFS: NAST-iEr.c:106:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isprint’

Bug#1060311: marked as done (vitrage: Please Build-Depends: python3-asn1)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:27:12 +0200 with message-id <0bd4ffb5-2d8e-4d0d-9ba0-893bffc69...@debian.org> and subject line Fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #1060311, regarding vitrage: Please Build-Depends: python3-asn1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1064038: marked as done (masakari: fails TestObjectVersions.test_versions)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:25:23 +0200 with message-id <6e12dd5e-bc10-4243-a9bb-ce63cbb2e...@debian.org> and subject line fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #1064038, regarding masakari: fails TestObjectVersions.test_versions to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1067911: FTBFS: error: ‘-Werror=’ argument ‘-Werror=implicit-function-declaration’ is not valid for C++ [-Werror]

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:52:44AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: > > > Apparently this new bug got introduced with the time_t 64bit transition: > > Yes, but it's a valid bug in the package, not a bad thing accidentally > > introduced by the transition. > That doesn't sound right. > The zeroc-ice

Bug#1067911: FTBFS: error: ‘-Werror=’ argument ‘-Werror=implicit-function-declaration’ is not valid for C++ [-Werror]

On 4/10/24 04:32, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:50:37PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: Apparently this new bug got introduced with the time_t 64bit transition: Yes, but it's a valid bug in the package, not a bad thing accidentally introduced by the transition. That doesn't

Bug#1068713: closing 1068713

close 1068713 2.5.10-1 thanks This bug is already fixed in upstream release 2.5.10

Processed: closing 1068713

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1068713 2.5.10-1 Bug #1068713 [oar-common] oar-common: Submitting jobs does not work on a fresh installation of OAR Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1068713 to the same values previously set Bug #1068713 [oar-common]

Processed: fixed 1068713 in 2.5.10-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1068713 2.5.10-1 Bug #1068713 [oar-common] oar-common: Submitting jobs does not work on a fresh installation of OAR Marked as fixed in versions oar/2.5.10-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#1061869: marked as done (sssd: Drop -extensions from openssl command if there is no -x509.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:20:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061869: fixed in sssd 2.9.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061869, regarding sssd: Drop -extensions from openssl command if there is no -x509. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1067570: marked as done (freeipa: [time_t] Replace hardcoded librpm9 depends)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:19:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067570: fixed in freeipa 4.11.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067570, regarding freeipa: [time_t] Replace hardcoded librpm9 depends to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: forwarded qrcode issue

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1068295 https://github.com/lincolnloop/python-qrcode/issues/361 Bug #1068295 [src:python-qrcode] qrcode fails its autopkg tests with pillow 10.3 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/lincolnloop/python-qrcode/issues/361'.

Bug#1068758: strace fails to build it's tests on arm-linux-gnueabihf with 64bit time_t

Package: src:strace Version: 6.5-0.1 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie ftbfs Forwarded: https://github.com/strace/strace/issues/296 strace fails to build it's tests on arm-linux-gnueabihf with 64bit time_t: make[5]: Entering directory '/<>/build/tests' depbase=echo _newselect.o | sed

Bug#1068757: python-musicpd: FTBFS: dh_installchangelogs: error: could not find changelog

Package: src:python-musicpd Version: 0.8.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --with

Bug#1068754: circe: FTBFS: failing tests

Package: src:circe Version: 2.12-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules build dh build --with elpa

Bug#1068711: marked as done (oar-web-status: the Monika CGI page does not work - missing dependency.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:04:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068711: fixed in oar 2.5.10-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068711, regarding oar-web-status: the Monika CGI page does not work - missing dependency. to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1068045: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#1068045: libssl3: breaks YAPET

Hello, On Mon 08 Apr 2024 at 07:15pm +02, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 06:43:01PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> control: tags -1 patch >> control: reassign -1 yapet 2.6-1 >> >> On 2024-04-08 08:32:58 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> > There

Bug#1066385: marked as done (file-kanji: FTBFS: file2.c:52:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:49:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066385: fixed in file-kanji 1.1-21 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066385, regarding file-kanji: FTBFS: file2.c:52:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Bug#1066243: Patch for FTBFS

Hi, In ubuntu we applied the upstream's patch at https://sourceforge.net/p/bristol/patches/3/ that I'll attach here for fixing this FTBFS. I am sending this for your consideration, and I hope that it helps. Best, Miriam -- [image: Canonical-20th-anniversary] Miriam España Acebal Software

Bug#1068040: marked as done (Update Build-Depends for the time64 library renames)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:49:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068040: fixed in deepin-deb-installer 5.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068040, regarding Update Build-Depends for the time64 library renames to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1068750: moment-timezone.js: FTBFS everywhere

Package: src:moment-timezone.js Version: 0.5.32+dfsg1-2+2021a Severity: serious Tags: bullseye bookworm trixie sid ftbfs Dear maintainer: This package currently fails to build from source in all supported distributions. make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>' dh_clean debian/rules binary dh

Bug#1066440: librep: FTBFS: ././conftest.c:48:(.text.startup+0xb): undefined reference to `mpz_init'

On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:03:36 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: librep > Version: 0.92.5-3.1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package

Bug#1068741: marked as done (librust-lazy-regex-dev: librust-lazy-regex-proc-macros-dev is now packaged separately)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 06:27:50 -0400 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1068741: librust-lazy-regex-dev: librust-lazy-regex-proc-macros-dev is now packaged separately has caused the Debian Bug report #1068741, regarding librust-lazy-regex-dev:

Bug#1066481: marked as done (trueprint: FTBFS: language.c:134:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dm’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:07:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066481: fixed in trueprint 5.4-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066481, regarding trueprint: FTBFS: language.c:134:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dm’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Bug#1068656: closing 1068656

close 1068656 1.6.0-2 thanks This was fixed in the package, but the changelog entry for -2 didn't make it into the .changes file for the version that was later uploaded.

  1   2   >