close 955432
thanks
On 2010年12月29日 02:42, Julien Cristau wrote:
On 12/06/2010 01:56 AM, Andrew Lee wrote:
Both newer version of libfm and pcmanfm are bug fixes release from
upstream. Would this be an exception, please?
Sorry but those have big changes. I'm not sure that it's wise to accept
them at this stage
On 2010年12月06日 05:13, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 12/01/2010 10:21 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Am 01.12.2010 10:13, schrieb Andrew Lee:
Thanks Alexander for the reminder. Since there is no response and
we are in a freeze status. I assume this has been fixed, and close
this bug now
Hi,
Thanks for reporting. We've noticed this problem and co-work with
upstream on it.
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Eugene,
Eugene Apollonsky wrote:
Package: pcmanfm
Version: 0.9.5-2
Severity: serious
I just uploaded pcmanfm 0.9.7-1. Please wait untail you can get it from
sid, and re-test this bug. I'd close this bug in a few days if I don't
hear any feedback.
Thanks,
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
I cannot reproduce this FTBFS as the package builds fine event run
'fakeroot debian/rules clean' first.
However, the .glade files is not available in upstream release tarball,
but .ui files are there.
Would you mind to explain how to reproduce this step by step?
Best regards,
-Andrew
Thanks for catch this bug.
This version won't work with libmenu-cache1. I'd report
and push upstream to make a new release.
Kindly regards,
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
LUK ShunTim wrote:
It seems that upgrading lxde-common to 0.5.0-3 in sid does not solve the
problem :-(, I still got a seg fault with lxsession (it's started with
startx).
Please let me know what further testing/information on my side is needed to
help to
solve it.
I guess you probably
Hi Luca,
2010/4/3 luca boncompagni lbo...@gmail.com
I installed lxde-common version 0.4.2-3
I think version 0.5.x would fix this problem for you. Please give it a
try.
Just keep in mind the lxde-common has been blocked by lxpanel to bulid
binary packages for kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64.
Hi Luca,
LucaB wrote:
when i log into my system i get a popup with the following text:
Thanks for reporting this problem. May I know what version of
lxde-common do you installed on the system?
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi,
TheGZeus wrote:
Thanks for reporting this bug. May I know if you have lxde-common 0.5.0
installed?
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Please do not. Please read the whole log for #537744 and then also for
#558412.
I think this is just a mistake as he uploaded a wrong patch file on his
filesystem. He is going to upload the correct one as he mentioned earlier.
Cheers for debian wine from mini-DebCamp
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Please do not. Please read the whole log for #537744 and then also for
#558412.
I think this is just a mistake as he uploaded a wrong patch file on his
filesystem. He is going to upload the correct one as he mentioned earlier.
Cheers for debian wine from mini-DebCamp
tags 572154 +patch
Hi Anibal,
Just check statoverride database before updating it.
Patch attached from Thailand Mini-DebCamp 2010 BSP:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianThailand/MiniDebCamp2010/BSP
Cheers,
-Andrew
diff -Nru ssmtp-2.64/debian/postinst ssmtp-2.64/debian/postinst
---
tags 570971 + moreinfo unreproducible - patch
thanks
Hi Guido, (hi Anibal),
The -C option works for me with 2.64-3 + patch from #572154:
# cp /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp-1.conf
# vi /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf (change mailhub to invaild place)
Create a test file contain:
This is very simple fix bug open for one month. I'd do a NMU to fix this.
Hello from the 2010 Thai BSP:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianThailand/MiniDebCamp2010/BSP
Cheers,
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
在 2010/3/12 3:35 時，Ralf Treinen trei...@free.fr 寫到：
Hello,
Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
(according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
slightly out of sync):
/usr/lib/libmenu-cache/libexec/menu-cache-gen
Dear Daniel,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Andrew Lee wrote:
The lxnm and lxpanel-netstat-plugin are both deprecated. Please feel
free to drop it in live-helper's lxde package list. And use wicd or
network-manager-gnome instead.
i've replaced it with wicd, thanks for the note.
Thanks for replaced
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for reassigned this from package 'live-helper' to 'lxnm', so
that I noticed this problem.
The lxnm and lxpanel-netstat-plugin are both deprecated. Please feel
free to drop it in live-helper's lxde package list. And use wicd or
network-manager-gnome instead.
I'd request RM from
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for reporting this. That was my fualt as I forgot to upload
lxinput 0.1.1-2 together with lxde-common 0.4.2-3. I just uploaded
lxinput 0.1.1-2 to solve this problem.
Please wait a while for the mirror to sync.
Best regards,
-Andrew
Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
Package: lxde
Hi Till,
I just uploaded new version of pcmanfm to sid. Would you please
confirm if the new version solved this problem?
Regards,
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Till,
I remember there was a similar bugreport long time ago. It was problem
from PolicyKit, not from PCManFM. And already put the work-arounds
provide from the bug owner in README.Debian.
Could you please read through the PolicyKit parts in README.Debian and
see if that helps?
Kindly
LIU Qi wrote:
So now this bug is pending for your stardict-dictionary package upload.
Let me know if you need help.
I am sorry for the late reply. I am getting a little busy these days. I
will finish this package in the next two days. Thanks.
No problem. Take your time. :)
ps:
tags 521238 + fixed pending
thanks
LIU Qi wrote:
I am getting more and more work on LXDE packages. Would you mind to help
to maintain this stardict-dictionary package since it's zh_CN only?
ok. I will upload this package in several days. Also I could help to
maintain the stardict package
Dear Aníbal,
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 09:47:28PM +0200, Andrew Lee wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 04:20:13AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Andrew, could you create a pseudo binary package named stardic in your
source package stardict in such a way
Dear Liu,
LIU Qi wrote:
I just found that the dictionary from stardic in stardict format could
be downloaded. Please refer to this:
http://stardict.sourceforge.net/Dictionaries_zh_CN.php
(stardict1.3 dictionary(en - zh_CN))
Also there are lots of GPL licensed dictionaries in this webpage.
Hi Aníbal,
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:42:55PM +0800, LIU Qi wrote:
I would like to adopt this package, but as far as I known little people
still use this package any more, because in fact the package stardict
is the newer version of stardic. I think the package
Dear security team,
My package 'stardict' got CVE-2009-2260 report:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2814932group_id=80679atid=560632
I am preparing a updated package for unstable based on the patches from
RedHat's Bugzilla. I will upload it to unstable within 6 hours.
Please let
Hi Pavel,
I am not sure what's the best way to solve this issue.
I guess we can make a GConf schema registration scripts for the
package. But it seems to me that only stardict-gnome can be benefit by
the script and stardict-gtk doesn't.
Does anyone has better soultion than completely disable
Hi Micah,
Micah Anderson wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I appreciate the help with the package, although typically a NMU is done
after a patch is not being applied, so sending a patch and doing a 2-day
NMU at the same time is a little aggressive. I'm also wondering how you
can do this NMU because as far
/debian/changelog
+++ util-vserver-0.30.216~r2772/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+util-vserver (0.30.216~r2772-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Remove owned and unowned files after purge (Closes:#527065)
+
+ -- Andrew Lee and...@linux.org.tw Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:12:09
Hi Roman,
Roman Mamedov wrote:
This bug is not fixed in 0.1.4+svn20090316-1.
The other issue is that it still does not have the -T option, as the original
submitter mentioned.
My guess this would be feature requests and should be forwarded to upstream.
Also, while the changes are being
Package: jigdo-file
Version: 0.7.3-2
Severity: grave
Dear Maintainer,
I am the mirror admin of ftp.tw.d.o. I found jigdo-mirror keep reports
'Error - template checksum mismatch' even the templates checksum are all
correct.
On our website[0], we encouraged mirror admins as 'Mirroring using
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim, 2008-09-21 at 11:30 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Package: pcmanfm
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3 - 12.5
Additionnaly with the problem of embedding a copy of exo which is bad, there
nothing about exo copyright in
Hello Nico,
This is my first time fixed the security related bug. Thanks for pointed
me this is wrong in changelog. I will pay my attation to use CVE id next
time in changelog. :)
Cheers,
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
severity #497005 normal
retitle #497005 gpicview not confirms to save images
thanks
Hi caleb,
It's so confused. What exactly data loss you mean?
If what you mean is the jpeg has lossy rotation and compression, it's
documented in jpeg's faq. It's a limitation in jpeg algorithm. As it can
also
Hi,
Thanks for notice this. I am currently working with upstream to get
gpicview problems fixed and upload it as soon as possible.
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello caleb,
Do you mean the file changed after rotation is a data loss? Or any data
from the image are lost after rotation?
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity #497005 normal
severity #497006 normal
merge #497005 #497006
retitle gpicview not confirms to save a image when auto_save_rotated is on.
thanks
Hi caleb,
As Paul Liu said, The lossless rotation of jpeg can only be applied on
certain image size, not all image size. So I don't see it
Hi Lucas,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
It seems built fine and installed alrady in buildd. See the buildd logs:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=lxde-common
I am not sure why it builds failed on your server. could
Hi Mert,
I found foka. He has been really busy. I am merging your changes, and it
would be uploaded soon.
Cheers,
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mert Dirik wrote:
I'm also waiting for sponsorship :). Should I search for sponsors or will you
find another sponsor for yourself?
I have no problem to find sponsors. :)
I respect Anthony Fok who is stardict maintainer.
Anthony, I'd like to ask sponsor to upload this in 5 days. If you have
Hello Mert,
Mert Dirik wrote:
Here is my proposed nmu diff.
I have prepared new package to foka for upload a few weeks ago. Not sure
he is still working on my changes or he has been very busy.
However the package haven't uploaded yet. If you can upload the package
shortly, I think you can go
Package: openbox
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 11.8.4.
This package installs openbox-session as x-window-manager which is
violate debian policy 11.8.4. It's not a window manager, but a desktop
session.
I have read #434497. If you wants to use openbox-session for autostart,
please
tags 472829 +patch
thanks
Nico Golde wrote:
Do I miss anything or is the only thing needed to fix this
bug:
[skip]
Also need following changes:
- provides: x-session-manager
- create x-window-manager link for openbox
- create x-session-manager link for openbox-session
- remove the wrong
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Strange, I can build the package without problem on my i386 sid even
with pbuilder.
Looks like I accidently enabled espeak in last upload. I think I should
actually disable it in next upload.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The fix_intltool.dpatch works fine, and already included in upstream.
Now this bug is pending for libchewing3 pass the NEW queue.
Thanks for everyone who helped on this.
- -Andrew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
fix_intltool.dpatch
Description: Binary data
If someone who can reproduce the build loop, please try the attached
patch.
TIA
-Andrew
Dear folks,
We have a trouble on building new version of scim-chewing. It builds
on my machine both on system and pbuilder, but it fails which has an
infinite loop in po/ directory on my sponsor's system, and I cannot
reproduce it.
We were thinking of the problem is in rules file that
在 2006/5/17 下午 7:02 時，Pierre HABOUZIT 寫到：
ping, any progress here ? we have an RC bug that could have been
solved 1 month ago rotting, that's not good. Do you have anything
coming
?
I have been working on several other important issues with upstream
authors, and I known they will make
在 2006/4/20 下午 8:16 時，Martin Michlmayr 寫到：
* Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-20 13:08]:
When adding this patch, it still fails:
creating chewing-imengine-setup.la
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libXcursor.la: No such file or
directory
No, that's just a temporary X.Org problem.
tag 358310 +patch
Thanks
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
[...]
mips-linux-gnu-g++: @LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS@: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [chewing.la] Error 1
The attchment is a patch from Hou ZhengPeng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which solve this problem.
-Andrew
diff -ruNad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
found 328209 0.30.204-5sarge2
tags +patch
thanks
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I'm aware of this problem. Not really sure that it should be considered
grave but as we have a solution to it I do not really bother.
I considered it as grave beause
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Micah,
Thank you for your tests, I have downloaded the testfs-0.11.sh and did
the similar tests as yours to help confirm the results.
Test #1
Using all debian sarge componants:
kernel-source: 2.4.27-10 (debian sarge)
util-vserver:
Hi Ola,在 2005/10/3 上午 1:54 時，Ola Lundqvist 寫到：How did you tested and found what kind of security problem?I assume you found you couldn't pass the test 109,121 of testfs.sh script, right? Actually I run the rootesc program and saw that it was possible toescape.I think the rootesc program is only
Hi Ola,
在 2005/10/3 上午 3:39 時，Ola Lundqvist 寫到：
Now I have run the entire test suite...
zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/
loop4 -M /mnt/t
Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204
VCI: none
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I do not have access to a 2.6 kernel patched with vserver but I
can check on a patched 2.4 kernel with old style patch.
Okay, I have a machine running 2.6 kernel patched with vserver 2.0, so
what can I help you on 2.6 kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Is util-vserver from sid necessary for this or is it just the kernel
patch that is needed to fix it?
Not sure yet, I have successed passed the test of testfs.sh script on
powerpc with util-vserver from sid(applied the fix02
Package: kernel-patch-vserver
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge
Justification: root security hole
Dear maintainer(s),
I found the kernel-patch-vserver and util-vserver in sarge can not pass
the testfs.sh script[1] which provide by upstream author. After some more
tests, upstream author discoveryed
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge
Justification: root security hole
Dear Ola,
I found the util-vserver in sarge can not pass the test 109 and 121 of
testfs.sh script[1] which provide by upstream author. After more tests,
upstream author discoveried
Package: scim
Version: 1.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 5.6.9.
Dear maintainer(s),
I knew only one DD for help uploading package is not enought, and I
am very appreciate that he has done so much for scim package.
I hope more DD will stand up for helping on pkg-ime
61 matches
Mail list logo
