Bug#1065725: adns: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: FAILED ./case-1stservbroken - WRONG OUTPUT - lines of syscall remaining 0

2024-03-14 Thread Dan Bungert
Greetings! I took a look at this bug today. I found that the regress testsuite make use of some negative offsets, which seem to perplex the reader on 32 bit systems. Please see the attached patch, which has allowed this to build for Ubuntu. -Dan Author: Dan Bungert Description: Fix reads

Bug#1060173: ruby-hiredis FTBFS with hiredis 1.2.0-6

2024-01-26 Thread Dan Bungert
I examined this bug a bit. In test/reader_test.rb, test_nil / test_null_multi_bulk are both failing. If these tests are commented out, the package build will complete. Doesn't sound like a great idea though as it's not clear to me why these tests regressed. -Dan

Bug#1040633: pilkit autopkg tests fail with pillow 10.0.0

2023-07-20 Thread Dan Bungert
Upstream proposal resolves this: https://github.com/matthewwithanm/pilkit/pull/66/commits/e2eb73e1798865a201e570fced0bac195b2a590c -Dan

Bug#1040853: python-lockfile autopkg test fail with setuptools 68

2023-07-18 Thread Dan Bungert
Just wanted to quickly confirm that the same fix proposed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=1040854;filename=python-tinyrpc_0.6-4ubuntu1.debdiff;msg=10 works well for python-lockfile. -Dan

Bug#1004629: motion: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0

2022-07-26 Thread Dan Bungert
Dear Maintainer, I backported the work merged upstream around ffmpeg 5. Please see attached. This was sufficient to address the FTBFS both for Sid and Ubuntu Kinetic. -Dan Description: Backport ffmpeg 5 fixes. Author: Dan Bungert Origin: https://github.com/Motion-Project/motion/pull

Bug#1010095: performous: FTBFS on ppc64el

2022-07-25 Thread Dan Bungert
Just saw the existing merge request. Oh well, I guess I can treat this as +1 for merging https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/performous/-/merge_requests/1 .

Bug#1010095: performous: FTBFS on ppc64el

2022-07-25 Thread Dan Bungert
Hi Maintainer, I was able to get it building again, at least on the ppc64el machine I tested, by not using with -mno-altivec. Builds both with Sid and Ubuntu Kinetic, if you use my patch from bug 1004616 and no longer set -mno-altivec. See also this commit:

Bug#1004616: performous: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0

2022-07-25 Thread Dan Bungert
/commits/80d5b08d34a97db16fe12f82e9060570087ef0f0 Author: Dan Bungert Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982781 Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004616 Forwarded: not-needed Last-Update: 2022-07-25 Extended above commit to handle an additional const

Bug#1004805: xmms2: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0

2022-07-20 Thread Dan Bungert
Dear Maintainer, I backported the work merged upstream around ffmpeg 5. Please see attached. This was sufficient to address the FTBFS both for Sid and Ubuntu Kinetic. -Dan Description: ffmpeg 5 compat Author: Dan Bungert Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/xmms2/+bug

Bug#1004797: xpra: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0

2022-07-20 Thread Dan Bungert
Dear Maintainer, I backported the work done by upstream around ffmpeg 5. Please see attached. This was sufficient to address the FTBFS both for Sid and Ubuntu Kinetic. -Dan Subject: Backport ffmpeg 5 fixes Author: Dan Bungert Origin: https://github.com/Xpra-org/xpra Bug

Bug#1006374: graphicsmagick breaks ruby-mini-magick autopkgtest: Failure/Error: expect(subject["EXIF:Flash"]).to eq "0"

2022-02-24 Thread Dan Bungert
Hi All, I investigated debbug 1006374 today and found that revision 16603:ba930c1fc380 of graphicsmagick appears to be causing the regression to ruby-mini-magick. A rebuild of graphicsmagick minus this commit allows ruby-mini-magick to pass autopkgtest. I did my testing against Ubuntu but

Bug#1003307: restfuldb: FTBFS against sqlite3 3.37 or newer

2022-01-10 Thread Dan Bungert
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:06:31PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > On 2022-01-08 00:02, Dan Bungert wrote: > > When built against sqlite 3.37 or newer, the build will fail in test. > > tests/cases/Database.pm_001.sh:FAILED: > > 2c2 >

Bug#997756: python-meshplex: FTBFS: sed: no input files

2021-11-30 Thread Dan Bungert
tags 997756 patch thanks Hi, I ran across this FTBFS today and investigated. Here's a patch. The forkme sed now appears unneeded, and the other one needs a URL update. -Dan diff -Nru python-meshplex-0.15.13/debian/rules python-meshplex-0.15.13/debian/rules ---

Bug#977805: ntopng: FTBFS in sid

2021-05-10 Thread Dan Bungert
tags 977805 + security buster sid thanks There is a security angle to this FTBFS. Because ntopng is currently unable to build against ndpi 3.4, it still links against ndpi 3.0, a known vulnerable version, and users of ntopng are thus getting this vulnerable ndpi 3.0 library. ndpi (3.4-1)