Bug#958692: node-matrix-js-sdk: Remove dependency to node-request

On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 00:27:36 +0530, Pirate Praveen said: > On 2/11/23 10:27 PM, Hubert Chathi wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 22:43:55 +0530, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil >> said: >> >>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:52:39 +0200 y...@debian.org wrote: >>>> Upstre

Bug#958692: node-matrix-js-sdk: Remove dependency to node-request

always upload a new version later. -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368

Bug#1035844: matrix-sydent fails to purge without adduser

On Wed, 17 May 2023 20:22:37 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues said: > Hi Hubert, Quoting Hubert Chathi (2023-05-17 00:43:00) >> On Tue, 16 May 2023 23:31:16 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues >> said: > since time is running short, I am going to >> NMU m

Bug#1035844: matrix-sydent fails to purge without adduser

uld block it from migrating. -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368

Bug#1018691: reportbug: nheko fails to start. Undefined symbol

cESaIcEEEmmb This is a bug with spdlog: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015742 I believe it will be fixed the next time nheko gets built (either as a binNMU or as a new upload -- which I should be doing soon to fix https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881965). -- Hubert Chat

Bug#1011712: olm: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binaryen (< 105+) but 106-1 is to be installed

the mean time, I don't have any objection to someone doing something to resolve the situation temporarily. -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368

Bug#1005653: (no subject)

the next few days. -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368

Bug#986519: nheko: FTBFS: internal compiler error

If that doesn't work, then I will apply your patch. -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368

Bug#980629: nheko: FTBFS: internal compiler error

Will a fixed version be uploaded to unstable soon? I'd like to upload a newer version of nheko, but it won't build until a fixed gcc is available. Thanks -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8

Bug#980629: nheko: FTBFS: internal compiler error

this to GCC is the right thing to do. On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 19:59:15 -0500, Hubert Chathi said: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:42:22 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum > said: >> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build >> on amd64. > This version of nheko was jus

Bug#980651: quaternion: FTBFS: dh_auto_configure: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None -DCMAKE_INSTALL_SYSCONFDIR=/etc -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LOCALSTATE

not do this, but the bad binary package still remains. But I will be uploading a new version of quaternion soon, which will use libquotient instead of libqmatrixclient, so this will be fixed then. -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/Gnu

Bug#980629: nheko: FTBFS: internal compiler error

pe = > std::allocator >]’ >> /usr/include/c++/10/bits/vector.tcc:115:30: required from > ‘std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::reference std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc> ::emplace_back(_Args&& ...) [with _Args = {float&}; _Tp = > tweeny::detail::tweenpoint; _Alloc = > std:

Bug#978640: undefined symbol: _ZTIN3fmt2v612format_errorE

On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 23:26:38 +0530, Utkarsh Gupta said: > Hi Hubert, > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 11:17 PM Hubert Chathi wrote: >> Hmm. Can you try installing libfmt7 (from sid) and see if that fixes >> it? > The issue could be fixed by rebuilding nheko against the newly

Bug#978640: undefined symbol: _ZTIN3fmt2v612format_errorE

y idea what caused this regression or failure? Any > workaround this? Hmm. Can you try installing libfmt7 (from sid) and see if that fixes it? -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368

Bug#977185: nheko: switch to Boost 1.74

itch to 1.74 or to the unversioned boost packages. Thanks. The hard-coding was done when the default boost in sid was too old for nheko. I'll switch to the unversioned boost packages. -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 409

Bug#954541: cmark: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j4 test ARGS\+=-j4 returned exit code 2

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 08:53:46 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum said: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. [...] It looks like the test failure would be fixed by this commit from upstream:

Bug#890086: ufraw: diff for NMU version 0.22-3.1

, then go ahead. -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368

Bug#890086: ufraw: diff for NMU version 0.22-3.1

. I have no objections to it. -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368

Bug#914065: nheko FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "MatrixClient"

2457b9e7580f99b5aa > No such file or directory Yup, I noticed that too. I don't know much about CMake, so if anyone has any insights, it would be much appreciated. -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73

Bug#901383: whalebuilder is broken after the ruby upgrade

omatic] > ruby-gpgme/unstable,unstable,now 2.0.16-1+b1 amd64 > [installed,automatic] -- Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368

Bug#898376: quaternion: overly generic header name: /usr/include/util.h

he header files at all, so thank you for bringing that to my attention. I was already planning on making another upload soon, so I will include the changes in my next upload. -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/

Bug#897545: node-bluebird: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat '/<>/node-bluebird-3.5.1+dfsg2/js/release/*': No such file or directory

to work fine after updating the debian/patches/walk.patch to point to the new location. -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368

Bug#896739: revolt: missing build dependency on dh-python

/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base) at (eval 7) line 1. BEGIN > failed--compilation aborted at (eval 7) line 1. > make: *** [debian/rules:18: clean] Error 2 -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key:

Bug#892201: nlohmann-json build issues with gcc 7.2

On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 11:50:31 +0100, Muri Nicanor said: > Hi Dominique, uhoreg offered to package version 3 > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885540) of > nlohmann-json and already created an ITP for that: >

Bug#885797: [Pkg-matrix-maintainers] Bug#885797: revolt: please build-depend on libglib2.0-dev-bin

aintainer would > prefer to take care of this, a suitable patch is attached. Hi Simon, Thank you for the report and for the NMU. I don't think we have any uploads for Revolt planned in the near future, so we can just let the NMU go through. -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- https://ww

Bug#881914: [Pkg-matrix-maintainers] Bug#881914: nheko FTBFS: Qt5LinguistTools*.cmake moved to qttools5-dev

> qttools5-dev. ... Thanks for the report. I'll try to do a new upload this weekend. -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Matrix: @uhoreg:matrix.org PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/F24C F749 6C73 DDB8 DCB8 72DE B2DE 88D3 113A 1368

Bug#853692: ufraw: diff for NMU version 0.22-1.2

pstream's patch is to change i and c to int instead of unsigned, and I will upload a new package soon that does that. However, please feel free to leave your NMU in DELAYED/2, as that will force me to actually upload my package soon. ;) Thanks -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- https://

Bug#856227: ufraw FTBFS on architectures where char is unsigned

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:38:34 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> said: > The attached debdiff contains a patch that fixes the issue. > Let me know if you are okay with me performing the NMU. Thanks for the quick fix. Please go ahead with the NMU. -- H

Bug#835085: noweb: FTBFS: build-depends on iconc which didn't work and it was removed

e available at: https://debian.uhoreg.ca/unstable/ (In addition to the diff you provided, I also updated the upstream's homepage.) Thanks again. -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/113A1368 https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: F24C F749 6C7

Bug#818882: CVE-2015-8366

ll create a new package to fix other issues. > Please get also in touch with the security team (as in the Developer > Reference 5.8.5) In the past, they haven't seemed to be very interested in issuing DSAs for ufraw, but I'll let them know that it's been fixed anyways. -- Hubert Chathi

Bug#818882: CVE-2015-8366

r... (My patch for this issue is https://vcs.uhoreg.ca/git/cgit/debpkg-ufraw/commit/?id=54688b5896b39003becdfee3c803c58c94f14df3) -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/113A1368 https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: F24C F749 6C73 DDB8

Bug#817307: ufraw: diff for NMU version 0.20-3.1

d not having a sufficiently connected new key). If I prepare a new package in the next few days that merges your NMU, would you be willing to upload it for me? Thanks -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/113A1368 https://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fing

Bug#818882: CVE-2015-8366

On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 10:54:08 -0400, Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> said: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:06:38 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff > <j...@debian.org> said: >> CVE-2015-8366 in dcraw also affects ufraw. The dcraw upstream fix is >> https://g

Bug#818882: CVE-2015-8366

craw-derived packages) is also affected by CVE-2015-8367 https://github.com/LibRaw/LibRaw/commit/490ef94d1796f730180039e80997efe5c58db780 which I'll fix as well in the next ufraw upload. -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 4096R/113A1368 htt

Bug#814639: noweb: unowned file /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R after purge (policy 6.8, 9.1.2)

or) bug). Unfortunately, I don't have a valid key in the keyring (due to my 1024D being too weak, and not being able to get my new key signed). If you are willing to sponsor my upload, the packages are available at https://debian.uhoreg.ca/experimental/noweb/. Otherwise, I will try to find anot

Bug#775842: [moodle-packaging] Bug#775842: Bug#775842: 3 left

to see the issue. I can read it. The issue is still unfixed and under embargo. Michael closed the issue as Not a bug. It looks like the consesus was that the issue could only be done by an administrator, and that administrators need to be trusted. -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub

Bug#755202: NetworkManager creates broken eth0

Just to add another data point, this bug used to affect me, and then I rebooted, and the issue seems to have disappeared. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#710590: ufraw: Same error with RAF in standalone tool

and convert the picture. -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#716845: windows-el: fails to upgrade from testing: cp: '/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/windows//windows.el' and '/usr/share/emacs23/site-lisp/windows/windows.el' are the same file

gets run twice (once from the emacs upgrade, and once from the windows-el upgrade). I'll try to fix it within the next few days. Are you able to re-test with piuparts if I send you a new package, or should I just re-upload to sid? -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca

Bug#710590: segmentation fault when importing a CR2 into gimp: 'file-ufraw-load' returned no return values

Hi Ralf, I just uploaded ufraw 0.19.2. Can you confirm whether or not it fixes this bug? Thanks -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA

Bug#701056: FTBFS: notangle: not found

that isn't working like it used to. I guess I'll have to add the Makefile to debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch - -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA

Bug#701056: FTBFS: notangle: not found

, I'm attaching the debdiff file. Thanks. Assuming that the patch was tested, I have no objections to the upload. Michael, can you verify if the patch fixes the issue for you? - -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http

Bug#701056: FTBFS: notangle: not found

- -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http

Bug#684417: license for Asymptote reference card

Hi John, A Debian user noticed that the copyright license for the Asymptote reference card does not explicitly allow for modifications (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684417), which goes against the Debian Free Software Guidelines. Can you clarify whether or not modifications

Bug#684417: asymptote: doc/asyRefCard.tex non-free

clarified with upstream, and they have updated the license to explicitly allow modifications. http://asymptote.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/asymptote/trunk/asymptote/doc/asyRefCard.tex?r1=5444r2=5458 I will prepare a new package with the clarified license. Hubert -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org

Bug#668481: noweb: diff for NMU version 2.11b-7.1

tags 668481 - patch thanks Sorry, Monica, but your patch is incorrect. The package is built so that it should not need to re-tangle the code files. I need to investigate why it is trying to re-tangle the files. Please remove your NMU. Thanks -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber

Bug#668481: noweb: FTBFS /bin/sh: 1: notangle: not found

name, it looks like you are building from the git repository, rather than the source packages. Is that correct? -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA

Bug#668481: noweb: diff for NMU version 2.11b-7.1

On 06/05/12 12:28 PM, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: Please remove your NMU. I've just cancelled it. Thanks. (And, sorry, I should have started my last message by saying, Thank you for trying to help.) -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D

Bug#668481: noweb: FTBFS /bin/sh: 1: notangle: not found

that there's much that can be done without massive changes to the build system. -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#653532: Should this package be removed?

it of course, but would not protest too loudly if it were removed. -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc

Bug#644185: cannot install -- errors in byte compilation

It looks like this was due to cedet-common being installed; removing cedet-common seems to have fixed the problem. So it might be good to add a Conflicts: cedet-common. -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca

Bug#644185: cannot install -- errors in byte compilation

Package: ecb Version: 2.40+cvs20110608-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid When I try to install ecb, I get the following output in the byte compilation step: install/ecb: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs23 Loading 00debian-vars... Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50cedet-common.el (source)...

Bug#589062: FTBFS: Cannot execute latex

shortly. -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Bug#571483: tla-buildpackage: installs files to /usr/local with Python 2.6 as default

) in tla-buildpackage, and I have also asked the reported to go ahead with an NMU if he wanted, so if you want to do an NMU, please coordinate with him. Thanks. -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca

Bug#571483: Bug#571758: [PATCH] python-apt 0.8 API transition: Please update tla-buildpackage to new API

. Shouldn't it be an QA upload then? I have attached an QA upload diff which also fixes the python 2.6 bug; and would upload it if there are no objections. Yes, I suppose it should be a QA upload. I have no objections. Thanks for your help. -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub

Bug#550306: FTBFS: mv: cannot move `debian/asymptote/usr/share/doc/asymptote/examples'

On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:47:51 +0100 Julian Gilbey j...@polya.uklinux.net wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 09:27:20AM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote: On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:27:38 +0100 Julian Gilbey j...@polya.uklinux.net wrote: I'm bemused, incidentally, how your package ever built

Bug#550306: FTBFS: mv: cannot move `debian/asymptote/usr/share/doc/asymptote/examples'

, and doesn't happen during a full package build. -- Hubert Chathi - Email/Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc

Bug#550306: FTBFS: mv: cannot move `debian/asymptote/usr/share/doc/asymptote/examples'

for the Makefile and info files being installed in the html directory, and you should give the customary delays after filing that bug before doing an NMU to fix it. -- Hubert Chathi - Email/Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available

Bug#489279: gnustep-base-doc: package is empty

compared to anything else. Would be nice to ship them post-Lenny. I don't know of any reason. It's removed mostly for historical reasons (i.e. it was that way when I took over the package). I wouldn't have any problems removing the removal. -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL

Bug#493310: iceweasel: fails to start (after initial start)

On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:32:22 +0200 Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 11:32:10AM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote: Yes, I use uim. Does it work better if you disable it ? OK, I tried removing uim-gtk2.0, and upgrading uim* to the latest version in unstable

Bug#493310: iceweasel: fails to start (after initial start)

On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:29:40 +0200 Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 07:52:20PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote: The first time I start iceweasel, everything seems to work fine. The next time I try to start it (and subsequent times after that), I get either: Error

Bug#493310: iceweasel: fails to start (after initial start)

Package: iceweasel Version: 3.0.1-1 Severity: grave The first time I start iceweasel, everything seems to work fine. The next time I try to start it (and subsequent times after that), I get either: Error: in (function call): procedure or syntax required but got: Error: fatal: looped fatal

Bug#490087: Bug#489845: Pending gnustep uploads (lynkeos.app, lusernet.app, mpdcon.app)

, maybe Hubert will find the time to review and upload them. Yes, I will review and upload them later today. (If nobody else beats me to it.) -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7

Bug#490087: FTBFS: shouldn't try to write in homedir during install

to the GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DIR = $(HOME) line in GNUMakefile. Which makes me unsure exactly how the package gets properly built at all... -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719

Bug#487143: gnustep-gui-common: images under non-free license

the GPL. [1] [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnustep-dev/2008-06/msg00096.html -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#479074: libgnustep-base1.14: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/GNUstep/Bundles/SSL.bundle/SSL', which is also in package libgnustep-base1.15

builds, it won't currently run because it would be linked against a different version of gnustep-base than renaissance.) -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B

Bug#479074: libgnustep-base1.14: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/GNUstep/Bundles/SSL.bundle/SSL', which is also in package libgnustep-base1.15

On Sat, 03 May 2008 16:56:44 -0400, Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Yes, libgnustep-base1.15 is supposed to conflict with/replace libgnustep-base1.14. Err... correction: the next upload of libgnustep-base1.15 won't include the SSL bundle, since it is no longer needed. I don't think any

Bug#471612: gnumail: FTBFS: CWTCPConnection.h:59: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'SSL_CTX'

-dev to gnumail. -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Bug#449173: ghostscript doesn't print .. gs-* packages do ...

with LogLevel (which is right at the top in the default Debian config), and replace set it to info or debug. -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA

Bug#449173: ghostscript doesn't print .. gs-* packages do ...

, and foomatic-filters. [1] in particular, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=449173#65 as well as Loïc's latest message. To fix this bug, you may need to collaborate with the foomatic-* maintainer. -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D

Bug#449173: ghostscript doesn't print .. gs-* packages do ...

be reassigned to that package, or coordinated with the foomatic package maintainer. My guess is that the foomatic drivers are somehow still looking for gs-esp instead of gs, but I'm not completely sure. -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA

Bug#449173: ghostscript doesn't print .. gs-* packages do ...

of plain gs? -- Hubert Chathi - Email/Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA

Bug#457503: gnumail.app: segfault on selecting preferences

backtrace. This will give more useful information. http://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/gnumail.app-dbg/download Thanks. -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7

Bug#457503: gnumail.app: segfault on selecting preferences

experimental, and see if it still crashes when you click on preferences? http://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/gnumail.app/download Thanks -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7

Bug#461453: Fw: Bug#461453: gnumail.app: GNUMail close and said read failed on startup

Brochard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fw: Bug#461453: gnumail.app: GNUMail close and said read failed on startup Thanks Hubert, it works! Regards Xavier Hubert Chathi a écrit : Hi Xavier, Ludovic Marcotte wrote this: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:10:51 -0500

Bug#461453: Fw: Bug#461453: gnumail.app: GNUMail close and said read failed on startup

Hi Xavier, Ludovic Marcotte wrote this: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:10:51 -0500 (EST) From: Ludovic Marcotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fw: Bug#461453: gnumail.app: GNUMail close and said read failed on startup Hi Ludovic, I received this bug report

Bug#459769: gnustep-make: Fails to upgrade, file conflicts with the old gnustep-make-doc

will require another Replaces. I'll try to get that done soon. -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#457503: gnumail.app: segfault on selecting preferences

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:51:03 -0500, Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : OK, can you try one more thing? Can you install libgnustep-ba/usr/share/GNUstep/Makefiles/filesystem.shse1.14, gnustep-base-common, and gnustep-base-runtime from the experimental distribution (deb http

Bug#457503: gnumail.app: segfault on selecting preferences

On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:48:27 +0100 Xavier Brochard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:56:37 -0700, Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : OK, can you try one more thing? Can you install libgnustep-ba/usr/share/GNUstep/Makefiles/filesystem.shse1.14, gnustep-base-common

Bug#457503: gnumail.app: segfault on selecting preferences

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:06:55 +0100 Xavier Brochard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:55:49 -0700, Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : I run debugapp GNUMail, here's the backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread

Bug#457503: gnumail.app: segfault on selecting preferences

) Did you try removing the PGP bundle as suggested in the last message of that bug? I'm on AMD64 regards xavier -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B

Bug#456861: renaissance: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `/build/user/renaissance-0.8.0/debian/tmp////usr/include/GNUstep/ren aissance': No such file or directory

reassign 456861 gnustep-make thanks On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:45:34 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] dh_install -plibrenaissance0-dev --sourcedir=/build/user/renaissance-0.8.0/debian/tmp/ cp: cannot stat

Bug#456861: renaissance: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `/build/user/renaissance-0.8.0/debian/tmp////usr/include/GNUstep/ren aissance': No such file or directory

reassign 456861 renaissance thanks On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:31:28 -0700 Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ugh. I think this is actually a bug in gnustep-make. If you get similar errors in other GNUstep packages, don't bother reporting it. Whoops. Actually, it *is* a bug in renaissance

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

of ffcall, but I want to do some more testing before I upload it, since it is a rather large change. I don't think it's worth holding back the GNUstep transition for this yet, so I'm downgrading this bug to non-RC. -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:11:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On 11/12/07 at 21:10 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote: Do you have any security-related features enabled? PaX, grsecurity, SELinux, etc.? It could be related to GNUstep bug #18968. http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=18968 -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

this bug be serious or important? /me considers, again, whether to just give up on ffcall, and switch to libffi... -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B

Bug#451952: popplerkit.framework: FTBFS with poppler/0.6.2

that Etoile has updates for this. Ondrej, I know that in the past you have notified us of new uploads of poppler. Please continue to do this, as popplerkit will almost certainly break with any API changes. Thanks. -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key

Bug#449163: gnustep-base: FTBFS on arm: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

need to). -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#449163: gnustep-base: FTBFS on arm: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

hasn't been updated for a long time). What does everyone think about this? -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#450457: gnustep-ppd: FTBFS: /bin/sh: /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh: No such file or directory

#446190), hence this bug will not be fixed. Thanks for your QA efforts. -- Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#436384: gnustep-back: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libgnustep-gui-dev(inst 0.11.0-2 ! = wanted 0.12.0)

retitle 436384 gnustep-back: FTBFS, uninstallable in sid thanks On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 08:06:09 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum said: Package: gnustep-back version: 0.12.0-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a