Bug#821795: lttng-modules-dkms: module FTBFS in jessie against Linux 3.16: error: conflicting types for 'trace_mm_page_alloc_extfrag'

* Michael Jeanson wrote: > Hi Jon, > > Here is an updated debdiff, it works on a fully updated jessie. Should > we track these updates in a branch of the collab-maint repo? Excellent, thanks. This patch works and I've put it into a dedicated stable branch 'jessie' so this

Bug#821795: lttng-modules-dkms: module FTBFS in jessie against Linux 3.16: error: conflicting types for 'trace_mm_page_alloc_extfrag'

* Michael Jeanson wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a debdiff against the current package fixing the build > failure, I'll ask Jon to make a new upload. Hey Michael, I just attempted a build with your diff and I'm seeing the attached errors. It looks like the debian-specific

Bug#821795: lttng-modules-dkms: module FTBFS in jessie against Linux 3.16: error: conflicting types for 'trace_mm_page_alloc_extfrag'

* Michael Jeanson wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a debdiff against the current package fixing the build > failure, I'll ask Jon to make a new upload. Thanks Michael, I'm traveling this week and next, I'll try to get to this as soon as I can but it may be a week or two before I

Bug#767632: ust: FTBFS on most architectures

* Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org wrote: package: ust severity: serious version: 2.5.1-1 Hi, The latest upload of ust fails on most architectures, but built fine in the past. This prevents migration to testing. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ust Thanks, this is my

Bug#753832: Fwd: Re: udt_4.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

- Forwarded message from Jon Bernard - Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:42:49 -0400 From: Jon Bernard To: Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org Subject: Re: udt_4.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED * Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: udt_4.11

Bug#751336: babeltrace: FTBFS on armel (test failure)

* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote: tags 751336 + patch upstream fixed-upstream thanks. On 2014-06-11 22:29:48 [+0200], Julien Cristau wrote: See the build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=babeltracearch=armelver=1.2.1-2stamp=1395846913

Bug#751337: [PATCH] tests: test_ctf_writer: replace HOST_NAME_MAX

* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote: This patch replaces HOST_NAME_MAX by xgethostname() which is a wrapper around malloc() + gethostname() to get a large enough buffer to fit the hostname. xgethostname.c was stolen from coreutils and slightly changed so it works without

Bug#745891: ltt-control: FTBFS on armel (selected processor does not support ARM mode `dmb')

* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Source: ltt-control Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Hi, your package no longer builds on the armel buildds:

Bug#741687: ust: FTBFS: error: no suitable Python interpreter found

* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: Source: ust Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source ust FTBFS on some architectures: | dh build-arch |dh_testdir -a |debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure | make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'

Bug#728256: liblttng-ust2: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/lttng-ust.3.gz

* Ralf Treinen trei...@free.fr wrote: Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblttng-ust-fork.so.0

Bug#723850: 2.3.0 version does not compile properly

* Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org wrote: Package: lttng-modules-dkms Version: 2.3.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #723850 Hi! I have added this at the end of the dkms file to solve this issue: if [ $KCONFIG = true ] [ -n $CONFIG_KPROBES ]; then BUILT_MODULE_NAME[$i]=lttng-kretprobes

Bug#688779: (no subject)

notfound 688779 liburcu/0.7.4-1 found 688779 ltt-control/2.1.0~rc4-1 thanks -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Faidon Liambotis parav...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:04:59PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: Package: liburcu1 Version: 0.7.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 8.6 This is a bug report against liburcu/0.7.4-1 but you seem to have closed it in an ltt-control

Bug#705827: babeltrace: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

* Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz wrote: Package: babeltrace Version: 1.1.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD. The value ENODATA is linux specific, please use some

Bug#705037: FTBFS on sparc

* Faidon Liambotis parav...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:47:19PM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: I suspect the buildd (schroeder in this case) has a 32bit userland and thus has a HOSTTYPE of sparc instead of sparc64. I should be a one-line patch, but the only available

Bug#705037: FTBFS on sparc

* Faidon Liambotis parav...@debian.org wrote: Package: liburcu Version: 0.7.6-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package seems to be marked Architecture: any but seems to FTBFS on multiple architectures, some of them even release architectures. mipsel has already been marked as Not-For-Us.

Bug#701779: Clarification

* Glenn McGrath glenn.l.mcgr...@gmail.com wrote: The previous fix was fro the debian files in ust-2.1.1 source package, then you can rebuild ltt-control (unchanged) and all the debs install. Yep, you're right. UST's install file is incorrect. I'm not sure how this one slipped by me, I test the

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org wrote: * Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org writes: Is there an easier way of doing this without searching through the source to find all liburcu calls and then pinning them to a specific version in the symbols

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Aaron M. Ucko a...@alum.mit.edu wrote: 3 would have been in lieu of 2, which is in retrospect a better choice in this case, and will give you the opportunity to tighten liblttng-ctl0's own shlibs while you're at it. Please take care to have ltt-control build-depend on a version of

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org writes: Is there an easier way of doing this without searching through the source to find all liburcu calls and then pinning them to a specific version in the symbols file? - or is that how it's done? You can run

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote: Package: liburcu1 Version: 0.7.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 8.6 lttng-tools's postinst fails on my system, which still has liburcu1 0.6.7-2 (from testing), demonstrating that liblttng-ctl0 needs a versioned dependency on liburcu1. I

Bug#688730: lttng-tools: lttng-sessiond init script not working

* Michael Lundkvist brels.deb...@solske.net wrote: Package: lttng-tools Version: 2.1.0~rc3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I just tried installing lttng-tools, but the installation hangs when trying to start lttng-sessiond. It seems like the

Bug#652252: ust: diff for NMU version 0.15-3.1

* gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: tags 652252 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ust (versioned as 0.15-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Would you mind delaying this one day longer? I'm right now

Bug#652252: ust: diff for NMU version 0.15-3.1

* gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:11:34 -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: I've prepared an NMU for ust (versioned as 0.15-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Would you mind delaying this one day longer

Bug#637636: fixed in ust 0.15-2

* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: found 637636 0.15-2 kthxbye On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 15:10:35 +, Jon Bernard wrote: ust (0.15-2) unstable; urgency=low . * [0fb2d5c] Update liburcu version dependency (Closes: #637636) So you changed it to: Depends

Bug#555711: Reopening

* Dhaval Giani dhaval.gi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 8:53 AM, MT mt_v...@warpmail.net wrote: Hi, I installed cgroup-bin on my system (Ubuntu 10.10, kernel 2.6.36), and experienced similar problems as the original bug reporter, so I'm reopening this bug. My system would

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

* Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:13:22PM -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: * Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:06:24AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:52:00 -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: diff -Nru ust-0.5/debian/changelog ust-0.5/debian/changelog --- ust-0.5/debian/changelog2010-07-02 11:34:52.0 -0400 +++ ust-0.5/debian/changelog2010-11-30 21:23

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

* Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:06:24AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.release as well. Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: | Newsgroups:

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

* Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:06:24AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.release as well. Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: | Newsgroups:

Bug#598309: ust: NMU diff for 0.7-2.1 (Intent to NMU)

* jari.aa...@cante.net jari.aa...@cante.net wrote: Dear maintainer, Here is the NMU diff according to DevRef 5.11.1[1][2] for bug: #598309. See the debian/patches directory for the important fixes. Excellent, thank you. Please let me know if it's ok to proceed with the NMU. Yes, please

Bug#555711: Quick update

tags 555711 moreinfo unreproducible stop I have had a chance to test this on a machine that suspends and everything works fine for me, I cannot reproduce this bug at the moment. I have pinged the submitter a few times with no response. Without additional information (a configuration file at the

Bug#549480: closed by Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org (Bug#549480: fixed in libcgroup 0.34-2)

* Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: unarchive 549480 found 549480 0.34-2 thanks * Fix initscript dependencies (Closes: #549480) - thanks to Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com The implemented patch created new problems. The archive wide check of init.d script

Bug#549480: closed by Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org (Bug#549480: fixed in libcgroup 0.34-2)

* Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: unarchive 549480 found 549480 0.34-2 thanks * Fix initscript dependencies (Closes: #549480) - thanks to Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com The implemented patch created new problems. The archive wide check of init.d script

Bug#555711: breaks suspend/resume when started on a system

* Guido Trotter ultrot...@debian.org wrote: Package: cgroup-bin Version: 0.34-2 Severity: critical Hi, Hi Guido, thanks for the bug report. I installed cgroup-bin on my system, and when its system services (cgconfig and cgred) are started my system cannot suspend, hibernate just hangs.

Bug#549778: libgems-ruby FTBFS patch

tags 549778 patch Attached is a patch that fixes this. Ubuntu has just applied and uploaded it, see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgems-ruby/+bug/447677 -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#549778: libgems-ruby FTBFS patch

Oops!, here's the patch -- Jon diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index d0658d7..b0a1e37 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ install/rubygems1.9.1:: mv $(CURDIR)/debian/$(cdbs_curpkg)/lib/* $(CURDIR)/debian/$(cdbs_curpkg)/$(RUBY19LIBDIR)/ rm

Bug#470863: feh: patch for #470863 to fix .fehbg issue

tags 470863 + patch Hey LJ, attached is a diff that should take care of #470863. I'll be happy to NMU this if you like, your call, just let me know. -- Jon Bernard diff --git a/feh.1 b/feh.1 index 254949e..e56b46a 100644 --- a/feh.1 +++ b/feh.1 @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ it, or will fall back to X

Bug#470863: patch update

It occurred to me that debian packages should not modify the original upstream source directly. I'll work up a patch that uses dpatch and post it here soon. I'll ping Tom (the upstream author) on this issue as well. -- Jon Bernard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject