Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions

Op wo 19 apr 2023 om 06:04 schreef Anton Gladky : > > Hi, > > boost-defaults_1.81.0 is in experimental. But boost1.81 > is also available in the Debian Bookworm [1]. > > [1] https://packages.debian.org/source/testing/boost1.81 Hi Anton, Ah, it's even available in bpo, thanks a lot! -- Olaf

Bug#990069: openssh-server: Not accepting new connections during Debian 10 -> 11 upgrade

Package: libc6 Version: 2.31-13 Followup-For: Bug #990069 X-Debbugs-Cc: olafvds...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, The original issue of not being able to open a new SSH connection during the upgrade still seems to be present. Greetings, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: 11.0 APT

Bug#990708: [debian-mysql] Bug#990708: Bug#990708: mariadb-server-10.5: upgrade problems due to galera-3 -> galera-4 switch

On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 1:19 AM Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 1:12 PM Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:24 PM Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > I wish somebody could contribute with exact steps on how to reproduce > > >

Bug#990708: [debian-mysql] Bug#990708: Bug#990708: mariadb-server-10.5: upgrade problems due to galera-3 -> galera-4 switch

On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:24 PM Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > I wish somebody could contribute with exact steps on how to reproduce > the issue. So far I've gotten some half attempts at that but they > haven't been actionable for me. Hi Otto, I'd point to

Bug#988089: [debian-mysql] Bug#988089: Bug#988089: mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade Debian 10 -> 11

> Op za 22 mei 2021 om 23:30 schreef Otto Kekäläinen : > > Would somebody like to review/test it? Doesn't seem to be working for me: # apt full-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following

Bug#988089: [debian-mysql] Bug#988089: Bug#988089: mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade Debian 10 -> 11

Op za 22 mei 2021 om 23:30 schreef Otto Kekäläinen : > > Hello! > > On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 4:18 PM Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > > > >> > But as said, the bug #988089 can only be fixed by a change in galera-4 > >> > debian/control. Changing the mariadb-10.5 debian/control to > >> >

Bug#988089: [debian-mysql] Bug#988089: Bug#988089: mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade Debian 10 -> 11

Op vr 14 mei 2021 om 09:53 schreef Otto Kekäläinen : > Investigating (0) galera-4:amd64 < none -> 26.4.7-3 @un uN Ib > > Broken galera-4:amd64 Conflicts on galera-3:amd64 < 25.3.25-2 -> > 25.3.31-2+b1 @ii umU Ib > > Considering galera-3:amd64 0 as a solution to galera-4:amd64 0 > Holding Back

Bug#928077: [debian-mysql] Bug#928077: mariadb-server-10.3: fails to start. init files don't create directory /run/mysqld

On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 5:27 PM Michael Farmbauer wrote: > in the latest update the pid and socket files have been moved from > /var/run/mysqld to /run/mysqld. > > The directory /run/mysqld must be created in the init files: > > /etc/init.d/mysql > /var/lib/systemd/system/mariadb* > > Those file

Bug#916310: Unstable?

Should it be in unstable? -- Olaf

Bug#863596: mytop can't installed

u be willing to continue maintaining mytop if the conflict with mariadb was resolved? Greetings, -- Olaf van der Spek

Bug#914565: php7.3-intl: Segfaults after apache2 graceful restart

/1.1.1a configured -- resuming normal operations [Mon Nov 26 14:14:21.281526 2018] [core:notice] [pid 3554] AH00094: Command line: '/usr/sbin/apache2' -- Olaf van der Spek

Bug#914172: [debian-mysql] Bug#914172: mariadb-server-10.1: mariadb-server sec-update (10.1.37-0+deb9u1) uninstalls default-mysql-server, mysql-server, mariadb-server-10.1 & mariadb-client-10.1

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:45 AM Jeremy Davis wrote: > As of the (automated) installation of today's MariaDB server security update > (10.1.37-0+deb9u1) > all of our user's LAMP based appliances uninstalled mariadb-server (i.e. > default-mysql-server, > mysql-server, mariadb-server-10.1 &

Bug#888095: [debian-mysql] Bug#888095: Bug#888095: Bug#888095:

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > su 17. kesäk. 2018 klo 10.27 Pirate Praveen (prav...@debian.org) kirjoitti: >> >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:57:18 +0800 Andy Li wrote: >> > I'm sure you have been busy, but this issue has been there unfixed for >> > several months. >> > I

Bug#892394: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#892394: boost1.63: build-depends on GCC 6

Dimitri John Ledkov: > boost1.65 has been rejected by ftp-masters, on copyright reasons. Hi Dimitri, Got a link? Not having Boost in Debian would be unfortunate. I'm sure there's a way to resolve this. Gr, -- Olaf

Bug#888095: [debian-mysql] Bug#888095: Bug#888095:

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:24 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > MariaDB 10.3 needs to be finalized and imported into Debian. After > that all the mess that are a fallout of a misfortunate upload of > mariadb-10.2 to Debian unstable will start to become resolved. Until > then

Bug#853008: mysql-server-5.7: purge could delete mariadb-server files with inadequate warning

Hi, > Anyone else have any good ideas on how to handle this? I do. The solution is quite simple: do not, ever, remove user data / databases. It makes everything so much simpler, both on the user side and on the dev side. No weird questions when installing, no databases gone by accident.. --

Bug#862899: rsync: insufficient escaping/quoting of arguments

Hi, Any updates? -- Olaf

Bug#874367:

Same as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854382 but that one was only fixed in unstable, not stable.. -- Olaf

Bug#874367: awscli: 'AWSHTTPSConnection' object has no attribute 'ssl_context'

Dear Python team, Is there anything I can do to help fix this bug? Gr, -- Olaf

Bug#874367: awscli: 'AWSHTTPSConnection' object has no attribute 'ssl_context'

Package: awscli Version: 1.11.13-1 Severity: serious Justification: unkn Dear Maintainer, $ aws s3 ls 'AWSHTTPSConnection' object has no attribute 'ssl_context' Gr, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Bug#861913: mariadb-client-10.1: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/mytop', which is also in package mytop 1.9.1-4

2017-05-29 10:12 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý : > I am not sure about that. We still live in the strange dichotomy where > we consider that MySQL server might get installed from different > repository (or unstable) and the original "mytop" is meant to be used > with MySQL server (from

Bug#861913: mariadb-client-10.1: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/mytop', which is also in package mytop 1.9.1-4

eba všeho druhu > > On Mon, May 8, 2017, at 12:08, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> 2017-05-08 11:42 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org>: >> > Definitely, I am just building the fixed version. I did a cleanup of >> > upstream files not being installed in the last bigg

Bug#861913: mariadb-client-10.1: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/mytop', which is also in package mytop 1.9.1-4

2017-05-08 11:42 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý : > Definitely, I am just building the fixed version. I did a cleanup of > upstream files not being installed in the last bigger mariadb update, > and I was just not aware mytop was already packaged. Sorry for the > troubles. Shouldn't it

Bug#861913: mariadb-client-10.1: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/mytop', which is also in package mytop 1.9.1-4

Hi Ondřej, Shouldn't it conflict / replace the mytop pkg? 2017-05-08 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý : > Hi Olaf, > > mytop is part of MariaDB a version that fixes little bugs here and > there: > > +=item Michael "Monty" Widenius > + > +Fixed a couple of minor

Bug#843160: udev: Me Too

Package: udev Followup-For: Bug #843160 Dear Maintainer, I've got an unstable system (for dev/testing) in a VM running 686-pae and I'm affected as well.. What's the simplest way to recover? I don't seem to end up on a recovery shell. Gr, Olaf P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00 E:

Bug#731104: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#731104: lighttpd: missing automake dependency

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: lighttpd currently fails to build when using pbuilder. This is due to a missing automake build dependency. Isn't automake part of autotools-dev? There's a dep on autotools-dev -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#682232: [debian-mysql] Bug#682232: mysql-server-5.5: Fails to upgrade squeeze - wheezy, does not start

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho a...@debian.org wrote: [FAIL] Starting MySQL database server: mysqld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . failed! Indeed, starting manually fails as well: What do the logs (syslog etc) say? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#682210: [debian-mysql] Bug#682210: CVE-2012-1735 CVE-2012-0540 CVE-2012-1757 CVE-2012-1756 CVE-2012-1734 CVE-2012-1689

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff muehlenh...@univention.de wrote: Maybe we can switch to a FLOSS-friendly fork like mariadb after Wheezy release... Postgres might be a better alternative. -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#675304: [debian-mysql] Bug#675304: reassigning

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote: However it is also clear that an application with an embedded MySQL server, like amarok, should avoiding making use of system wide MySQL config files to insulate itself not  just to changes in the Debian packaging

Bug#674122: [debian-mysql] Fwd: Re: Bug#674122: otrs2: fails to upgrade from squeeze: Can't create table 'otrs2.#sql-1712_71

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote: Patrick,        Some ideas. Not sure how the application works so not sure which is most liekly to be deoable. * There is a  --default-storage-engine=type start up option. If you let the standard mysql scripts

Bug#672928: [debian-mysql] libdbi-drivers FTBS against latest MySQL

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote: Thomas,        I attach a patch to enbale libdbi-drivers to build against the latest Are you sure this is right? Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found automatically? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#672928: [debian-mysql] libdbi-drivers FTBS against latest MySQL

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote: Are you sure this is right? Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found automatically? Olaf Normally yes, but I am pretty sure that the patch would not be backwards compatible. What patch, exactly? -- Olaf

Bug#670636: [debian-mysql] Bug#670636: Multiple security issues in April security release

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote: Moritz,        The Debian MySQL team is debating pushing mysql 5.5 into unstable (including the latest upstream releases), transitioning the dependencies and dropping mysql 5.1. As such you probably won't see  any

Bug#660206: [debian-mysql] Bug#660206: Bug#660206: This is a regression

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:59 PM, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote: I agree. However, the reality is that the security upgrade brought in unrelated changes to the security upgrade and caused unrelated software to break. The problem is that Oracle does not release individual security

Bug#627300: Why grave?

Hi, Severity: grave Why grave? Mytop works fine for most users. I'd suggest to downgrade this bug. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#627300: Why grave?

On 28-3-2012 14:41, Andreas Ulm wrote: IMO it's grave because a main functionality of mysql is that you can write your own my.cnf and run mysql with your user. But because of this bug you can't use mytop while running mysql as your user. At my company each developer has his/her own mysql daemon

Bug#613592: /sbin/fdisk: Can't create at sector 63

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Alexander Kurtz kurtz.a...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 18:24 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote: So what's the advantage of c/sfdisk? Well, it's smaller, has fewer dependencies and is installed on almost every system. And since most administrators

Bug#613592: /sbin/fdisk: Can't create at sector 63

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Alexander Kurtz kurtz.a...@googlemail.com wrote: Isn't it kind of silly to have so many tools that try to do the same thing? GNU parted has way more features than {c,s,}fdisk  will probably ever have; the most popular being perhaps support for a lot of

Bug#613592: /sbin/fdisk: Can't create at sector 63

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Alexander Kurtz kurtz.a...@googlemail.com wrote: That's hardly a bug: True      * If you delete something, data loss is the expected outcome. True, but deleting and recreating was advised in a number of how to's.      * If you want to do advanced operations

Bug#613589: /sbin/cfdisk: Bad Table error after fresh Squeeze install

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Karel Zak k...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:36:28AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote: Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com writes: In that case it should

Bug#613589: /sbin/cfdisk: Bad Table error after fresh Squeeze install

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote: if (last = total_size) {    *errmsg = _(Partition ends in the final partial cylinder);    return -1; } and the check was added in commit 7eda085c41faa3445b4b168ce78ab18dab87d98a Author: Karel Zak

Bug#613589: /sbin/cfdisk: Bad Table error after fresh Squeeze install

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote: Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com writes: In that case it should be forwarded upstream. Sure, but I couldn't find the upstream BTS. I was just adding extra info to the bug report since I hit the same bug

Bug#614044: mysql-5.1-server: fails to build from source

| [Changing misc_word_char(X) into something which is still valid:] Does it work if you don't change anything? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#614716: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#614716: Bug#614716: lighttpd: leaves dangling alternatives on upgrade

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: What's the real problem of a dangling alternative? I'm not sure exactly which section (probably 6.8) but this is or should be a policy violation. Alternatives aren't mentioned in 6.8. -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#614716: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#614716: lighttpd: leaves dangling alternatives on upgrade

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: lighttpd split out the spawn-fcgi binary and manual page to spawn-fcgi but does not handle removal of the alternatives. As a result anyone Would be nice if this was taken care of automatically (by dh, dpkg or something else).

Bug#613589: /sbin/cfdisk: Bad Table error after fresh Squeeze install

Package: util-linux Version: 2.17.2-9 Severity: serious File: /sbin/cfdisk Justification: Doesn't start Hi, Just installed Squeeze. cfdisk refuses to start: FATAL ERROR: Bad primary partition 1: Partition ends in the final partial cylinder fdisk says: Disk /dev/sda: 17.2 GB, 17179869184 bytes

Bug#613592: /sbin/fdisk: Can't create at sector 63

Package: util-linux Version: 2.17.2-9 Severity: serious File: /sbin/fdisk Justification: Near Data Loss Hi, I wanted to resize a partition, so I deleted it and recreated it (is there no better way?). After this, the system no longer booted... Turns out the old partition started at sector 63

Bug#606543: clamav-freshclam: affected by privilege escalation vulnerability in logrotate

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote: These lines from this package's maintainer scripts suggest that it likely is affected by the vulnerability: --- chmod 640 $FRESHCLAMLOGFILE chown

Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: On 08/26/2010 01:39 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: The upload itself can probably be arranged one way or the other. Of more immediate concern would be if the release team would accept such an upload into squeeze - if not it's

Bug#595321: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#595321: lighttpd: daemon fails to start

On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Will Boyd whb...@wesleyan.edu wrote: I am at something of a loss to diagnose or debug this, since the FamErrlist message is apparently harmless and no other information is forthcoming. Try strace -s 80 lighttpd -D -f /etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf Does cat

Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: lighttpd: can't bind to port: :: 80 Address already in use

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: # killall apache2 # dpkg --configure -a Setting up lighttpd (1.4.28-1) ... Starting web server: lighttpd. # echo $? 0 I had uninstalled but not purged apache and clearly I do not know how to use netstat. :( You're

Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: lighttpd: can't bind to port: :: 80 Address already in use

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:  net.ipv6.bindv6only = 1 Wait, wasn't that changed back in netbase?  Well, yes, for _new_ installs, but this is a conffile so it keeps the existing value for existing installations. That sucks, IMO it should've been

Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default

On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org wrote: That are not your changes. I thought Mehdi wanted the contents. If you want, that your new build gets uploaded to Debian by a sponsor, you have to build and check your package+changes+diff and after that upload the

Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default

On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: No upload yet? Waiting on someone with upload rights. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default

On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: On 08/29/2010 05:59 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: No upload yet? Waiting on someone with upload rights. Do you have a .dsc ready somewhere? I do

Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default

The upload itself can probably be arranged one way or the other. Of more immediate concern would be if the release team would accept such an upload into squeeze - if not it's probably better to also not put it into sid. Hi release team, The Lighttpd version in testing depends on ipv6only =

Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org wrote: SVN contains a fixed version, 1.4.27. It can be uploaded, but it seems Eloy isn't around to do that. The upload itself can probably

Bug#582937: xdebug doesn't show local variables with PHP 5.3

Package: php5-xdebug Version: 2.0.5-1+b1 Severity: grave Hi, Does the packaged version of xdebug support 5.3 at all? Mine just crashed and upstream appears to say xdebug = 2.1 is required for 5.3. Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy:

Bug#582937: xdebug doesn't show local variables with PHP 5.3

Given that 2.1.0rc1 has been released, please package it. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#582937: xdebug doesn't show local variables with PHP 5.3

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Martin Meredith m...@debian.org wrote: On 16/06/10 16:54, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Given that 2.1.0rc1 has been released, please package it. An RC is not a stable release, I know, but it's better than the current version. I'll consult with Derick

Bug#572031: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#572031: closed by John Ham buraphalinuxser...@gmail.com (Bug#572031: fixed in lighttpd 1.4.26-1.1)

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Michal Čihař mic...@cihar.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:39:17 + ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) napsal(a): This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was

Bug#577009: php5-cgi: php-cgi uses 500+ mb memory

Package: php5-cgi Version: 5.3.1-5 Severity: serious Justification: Memory leaks might affect the entire system Hi, I'm not sure why php is using so much memory. The system has 8 gb real and 4 gb swap and the OOM killer has been invoked several times already. /etc/php5/cgi/php.ini:

Bug#571255: (no subject)

Can't udev depend on the newer kernel required so it gets installed automatically? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#574283: samba: Doesn't bind to IPv4

Package: samba Version: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: IPv4 is kinda required Hi, Samba binds only to IPv6 and not to IPv4. I think this breaks stuff. Greetings, Olaf $ sudo netstat -nlp Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address

Bug#568735: lighttpd: Security Announce: slow request DoS/OOM attack

Package: lighttpd Version: 1.4.25-1 Severity: critical Hi, http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-1987 doesn't appear to be fixed in unstable yet. Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'unstable'), (1, 'testing')

Bug#545751: (no subject)

Looks like a dupe of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539479 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#535044: Still vulnerable?

Hi, I installed a new server with Debian Lenny last week. phpMyAdmin was working, now it's not. Is pMA still vulnerable? /var/lib/phpmyadmin# ls -l total 8 -rw-r- 1 root www-data 60 2009-09-15 19:20 blowfish_secret.inc.php -rw-rw 1 root www-data 635 2009-09-20 18:00 config.inc.php #

Bug#538449: (no subject)

Your title and body don't seem consistent... Should it be with or without 16? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#526222: = 4.6

Hi, Just wondering, why doesn't it depend on like libdb-dev = 4.6? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#536668: lighttpd: Static HTML file results in Content-Type: application/octet-stream

Package: lighttpd Version: 1.4.23-2 Severity: normal Hi, GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: 192.168.1.7 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8

Bug#483822: (no subject)

martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.06.17.1109 +0200]: So this won't be fixed in stable? No. Doesn't that make this package fairly useless in stable? It does not, for me. Your usage scenario is quite special, it seems. You also didn't provide any

Bug#483822: -

Package: molly-guard Version: 0.2.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #483822 Hi, On a fresh minimal Debian system, via SSH: debian:~# reboot molly-guard: SSH session detected! Please type in hostname of the machine to reboot: Good thing I asked; I won't reboot debian ... debian:~# su - olaf [EMAIL

Bug#483822: -

Package: molly-guard Followup-For: Bug #483822 And it appears to be fixed in testing: debian:~# reboot W: molly-guard: SSH session detected! Please type in hostname of the machine to reboot: Good thing I asked; I won't reboot debian ... W: aborting reboot due to 30-query-hostname exiting with

Bug#483822: (no subject)

So this won't be fixed in stable? Doesn't that make this package fairly useless in stable? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#477668: (no subject)

since mysql doesn't bother to fix this, maybe debian will, or at least debian could not put affected mysql servers into stable So Lenny should ship MySQL 4.1? Or not ship MySQL at all? That doesn't seem like an improvement over the current situation, as many, many users are using MySQL and

Bug#466663: Stable?

Hi, What about stable? Greetings, Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#451889: netselect-apt: Etch is affected

Package: netselect-apt Version: 0.3.ds1-10 Followup-For: Bug #451889 Hi, Etch is affected. It would be nice to get this fixed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel:

Bug#434546: closed by Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#434546: fixed in lighttpd 1.4.16-1)

On 7/27/07, Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Urgency: low Shouldn't updates containing security fixes be uploaded with a high(er) urgency? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#434546: lighttpd: 1.4.16 has been released and contains security fixes

Package: lighttpd Version: 1.4.15-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, Lighttpd 1.4.16 has been released and contains security fixes, see http://www.lighttpd.net/2007/7/24/1-4-16-let-s-ship-it -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable

Bug#433806: (no subject)

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=428368 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#433962: libc6-dev: error including netinet/if_fddi.h

This is not a bug, it is because you have to #include linux/types.h now that we used the headers officially exported by the linux tree, and not linux-kernel-headers anymore. Why doesn't the header include that file itself if it's always needed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#426330: sqwebmail: Reproduced

On 6/17/07, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Olaf van der Spek wrote: Package: sqwebmail Version: 0.53.3-5 Followup-For: Bug #426330 Hi, I reproduced this on a fresh Etch install, see below. However, I think this is a bug in Apache, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Bug#426330: sqwebmail: Reproduced

Package: sqwebmail Version: 0.53.3-5 Followup-For: Bug #426330 Hi, I reproduced this on a fresh Etch install, see below. However, I think this is a bug in Apache, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=415698 # ls -l /usr/lib/cgi-bin ls: /usr/lib/cgi-bin: No such file or

Bug#422254: lighttpd: When?

Package: lighttpd Followup-For: Bug #422254 Hi, This bug doesn't look harmless. What is the reason it hasn't been fixed yet? Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux

Bug#418672: (no subject)

i think it's fairly common knowledge that this is to be expected when installing mysql, as you will find this to be the case for every other distribution of unix/linux that includes mysql. Unfortunately, yes. It's also upstreams fault. But why can't Debian do better? A apt-get install

Bug#418672: mysql-server-5.0: Creates root accounts without password on upgrade

Hi, Cc: Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED], I didn't receive your mail. :( mysql -e 'update mysql.user set password=PASSWORD(foo) where user=root; flush privileges;' mysql -pfoo -e 'delete from mysql.user where user=root and host=copelandia; flush privileges;' That's not what I did

Bug#418672: mysql-server-5.0: Creates root accounts without password on upgrade

Package: mysql-server-5.0 Version: 5.0.38-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole Hi, I pressed Enter when it asked for a new password for root (root already had a password). Three rows were inserted into mysql.user: (0x6c6f63616c686f7374, 0x726f6f74, '', 'Y', 'Y',

Bug#391864: Removing apache2-common fails: API module structure `actions_module' in file /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?

processing: apache2-common E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# -- Olaf van der Spek http://xccu.sf.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#386661: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#386661: sysv-rc: Quick way out: exim4 - exim?

Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Olaf van der Spek] The quick way out fix doesn't appear to be safe. :( Yes. Terribly sorry I did not discover its problem with removed but not purged packages before uploading it. This script is safer: for p in `dpkg -S /etc/init.d/*|cut -d: -f1|sort -u

Bug#375088: acknowledged by developer (Fixed)

Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:22 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Are you sure? Yes: It worked for me too today. But not yesterday

Bug#375088: acknowledged by developer (Fixed)

Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Are you sure? $ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This

Bug#375088: linux-image-2.6-686 has unmet dependencies

Package: linux-image-2.6-686 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, $ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation

Bug#374777: ntp-server: init scripts fails on upgrade and upgrade fails

Package: ntp-server Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, The new version seems to have an issue with the init script too, although the previous bugs have been closed. $ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency

Bug#374777: closed by Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#374777: ntp-server: init scripts fails on upgrade and upgrade fails)

Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: So, it's the version 8.2 that failed to stop at this point. dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... Stopping NTP server: ntpdinvoke-rc.d: initscript ntp-server, action stop failed. This is the new version of the prerm script, but not the new

Bug#373901: dpkg: error processing python2.3 (--configure): TypeError: unindexable object

Package: python2.3 Version: 2.3.5-14 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, Setting up python2.3 (2.3.5-14) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 1365, in ? main() File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 1359, in main rv =

Bug#341705:

http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=16218 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341705: Crashing again in 5.0.16

the crash. Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld_safe[4218]: Number of processes running now: 0 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld_safe[4220]: restarted -- Olaf van der Spek http://xccu.sf.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341705: more information?

brave soul to test them out that there are no problems, i'll go ahead and send them to tpu if there are no objections. It seems I've ran out of testing virtual machines and I'm away this weekend. I'll not be able to test before Tuesday. -- Olaf van der Spek http://xwis.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#341705: more information?

been solved. -- Olaf van der Spek http://xwis.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341705: more information?

sean finney wrote: hi olaf, On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: See for example http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=13545 The server is running custom game lobby servers (http://xwis.net/), scripts and dynamic web pages and it kept restarting within a minute. I

  1   2   >