Hi,
This is very convoluted issue.
Disclaimer: I use (n)vim and anthy and voted for non-free-firmware=yes (i.e.,
prioritize user experience)
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 09:42 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 16:46:35 +0900, YOSHINO Yoshihito
Hi,
Debian official packages are required to build without downloading external
files during their build. (Builddd is in isolated network environment only with
access to the Debian package repository.
> Tags: ftbfs
So if it requires wget file access, it is ftbfs. Don't make build script to
Control: affects 919058 - src:debmake-doc
Since debmake-doc has stopped using its-tools from 1.16-1 this is no longer
issue.
po4a is used to handle xml.
Osamu
Hi,
I just uploaded 2.77 addressing all the issues.
I also made a merge of Boyan's changes while overriding them.
I hope this is OK since my change history should have most of the fixes
proposed. If I am wrong, let me know. That goes to 2.78.
On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 14:40 +0900, Osamu Aoki
Hi,
I think it is time to fix this bug and upload package. Let me make
final check. Osamu
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 23:28 -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 在 2021-01-08星期五的 09:49 +0800，xiao sheng wen(肖盛文)写道：
> > Hi,
> >
> > libopencc2-data had change name to libopencc-data in bullseye
> >
, 2020-10-21 at 22:41 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:43:49PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 02:28:44PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:11:43AM -0600, Charles Caza
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
Thanks for the log which helps
It only breaks for javascript/nodejs.
Javascript/nodejs support is new and needs help. Besides
(You shouldn't file a grave RC bug without throurough review against
policy.)
On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 21:39 +0530, Pirate
Control: affects -1 debmake-doc
Although FTBFS bugs aren't filed, I see FTBFS on i386 and armhf with
debmake-doc 1.14-1. amd64 and arm64 seems to do OK.
(debmake-doc 1.13-1 and older had other issues.)
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/armhf/debmake-doc.html
itstool
Hi,
Thanks to Boyuan Yang, this bug was quickly fixed in 0.37-1.
I thought I checked by looking at contributed patch. But these typos
were so easy to overlook ;-(
I realized, this could have been prevented by introducing build time
automatic syntax check just like we do for devscripts. Thus I
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:06:18PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> do you plan to fix #899958 and #899538 soon? I could not find updates
> nor any Git repo on Salsa.
Yah, I am behind. I just uploaded few packages with salsa.
getmail
maildrop
maint-guide
...
> These bugs caused ibus-anthy
Hi Boyuan Yang,
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:59:48PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: maint-guide
> Version: 1.2.40
> Severity: serious
> Tags: buster sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild
Hi,
I trust your patch is a good one. I don't have time now to update for
upload.
Please commit them to salsa and upload with my pre-approval, if you can
also update git repo to the new salsa site:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ibus
Also update maintainer group address to the new one as:
Hi,
I am a bit confused...
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 05:51:42PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 01:30:20AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > I don't see my patchies applied on salsa git repo.
>
> Yes they are.
>
> > I guess you are testing my old co
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:22:40PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Source: devscripts
> Version: 2.18.1
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org>
>
> Hi Osamu-san :)
>
> the new uscan_ftp tests seems to misbehave on mipsel/m
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Thu 2017-12-21 00:48:44 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >
> > # Always use debian/getmail as destination (not debian/tmp)
> > # even when dummy getmail4 package exists
> >
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 06:36:15PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Tue 2017-12-19 16:47:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > somehow /usr/bin/getmail got dropped from the getmail 5.5-1 packaging :/
>
> I've pushed some changes to the master branch of
>
Hi,
Thanks for the reply ;-)
Please don't feel to "sorry". My comments are not meant to blame you but to
be educational one to get you involved smoothly.
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 03:04:46PM -0800, Van Goodwin wrote:
> Hello,
...
> I did use this package seriously. I have used it since I first
control: tags -1 - l10n
control: retitle -1 rewrite ibus-tegaki with GObject introspection (GI)
control: reassign -1 ibus-tegaki
control: tags -1 jessie
control: tags -1 stretch
Hi,
This bug report was very difficult to understand for me initially ...
When filing bug a report, please make sure
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:28:13AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
>
> What exactly is the problem the missing library causes? This sounds
> like a normal library transition that Debian does all the time. The
> old library (libanthy0) is removed because everything in
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 04:38:08PM +0900, Takatsugu Nokubi wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:20:39 +0900 Osamu Aoki <aoki.os...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:14:22AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > This FTBFS can be easily fixed with:
&g
Source: anthy
Severity: grave
Version: 1:0.3-5.1
In short, my NMU was bad.
I need to upload new version based on 1:0.3-5.
(Maybe with typo fix.)
Although NMU tries to accomodate slow library migration, it doesn't
reach its goal.
This is due to binary packages anthy and anthy-common arn't
control: tags -1 - buster
thanks
This FTBFS was caused by the upload of anthy to unstable/sid.
Those broken versions are blocked by the RC bug to stay in unstable.
The testing/buster has the same version of anthy as the one in
stable/stretch.
Thus tagging this as buster bug is wrong ;-)
control: severity -1 important
control: tags -1 pending
thanks
I just made an NMU of anthy with delayed 7 days.
So this will not be pressing problem.
Of course, it will be nice to update packages to newer version.
But the order will be ibus and ibus-anthy :-)
Regards,
Osamu
control: severity -1 important
control: tags -1 pending
thanks
Hi
With the delayed 7 day upload of anthy, this problem is gone.
Osamu
Hi,
Uploaded after adding changelog entry as delayed 7 days.
Regards,
Osamu
From 506f093cbd075df4491001d4b85f59e0d116f86e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 22:56:53 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Bump -dev package name
Since this is not just EUC
control: reassign 789927 src:anthy
control: reassign 874708 src:anthy
forcemerge 789927 874708
Hi,
Here is an updated patch with matched package name.
I will make delayed upload.
Regards,
Osamu
From d1c044efb9bca24f60c3a8241e249425ade52a3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Osamu Aoki <
uot;s cosmetic and I didn't do it here.)
Also, it will take some time for us to update ibus/fcitx/uim/...
In order to have smooth transition, I bumped -dev package version too.
This include one typo fix.
Osamu
From 6d6d67a0dfb9499bc628943236e4faaa26822006 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Osamu Aok
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:14:22AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Source: ibus-anthy
> Version: 1.5.9-2
> Followup-For: Bug #873860
>
> Hola!
>
> This FTBFS can be easily fixed with:
>
> --- ibus-anthy-1.5.9.orig/data/zipcode-textdic.py
> +++ ibus-anthy-1.5.9/data/zipcode-textdic.py
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:14:22AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Source: ibus-anthy
> Version: 1.5.9-2
> Followup-For: Bug #873860
>
> Hola!
>
> This FTBFS can be easily fixed with:
>
> --- ibus-anthy-1.5.9.orig/data/zipcode-textdic.py
> +++ ibus-anthy-1.5.9/data/zipcode-textdic.py
control: tags -1 pending
Thanks for the tip. Committed to git.
Now that I know better, I better make nice cover page.
Regards,
Osamu
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:00:52AM +0900, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks. Now, I understand (I didn't know that fully). I should have
> learned before uploading to Sid.
After I failed to make ibus transition like your case, I made
Hi,
https://bugs.debian.org/873860#10
If what NOKUBI Takatsugu's comment is correct, I wonder why anthy is
upgraded without coordinating with key users:
ibus
uim
fcitx
(Please note these have many dependence packages so the testing
migration is slow if package version dependency is correctly
control: severity -1 important
Hi,
I see 2 problems:
1. wget chokes when $HOME is not writable (New feature of them.)
2. pdf generation chokes while building with new texlive.
texlive-binaries amd64 2017.20170613.44572-3 [8082 kB]
For texlive bugs related to the pdf generation, seriously
Hi,
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:09:03PM +0200, Víctor Cuadrado Juan wrote:
> On 21/05/17 22:05, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
> > I've been unable to reproduce this using either jessie or sid's uscan
> > (running on a jessie host, admittedly). I'd be interested if anyone else
> > can reproduce this
Hi,
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:26:28PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 09:05:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Is there any particular reason you're not using something simpler, along
> > the lines suggested by the manpage? This gives the expected result for
> > me:
>
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 08:48:47AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: debmake-doc
> Version: 1.6-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161202 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
...
> > dpkg-buildpackage: error: check-commmand
control: severity -1 normal
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04:19:29PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Package: devscripts
> Version: 2.16.8
> Severity: grave
^ Please read the policy.
> at download a new release with uscan the repack failed.
>
> At the call of debian/repack.sh
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Package: maildrop
> Version: 2.7.1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi,
>
> with courier-authlib 0.66.4-5 release the libcourierauth*so were
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:34:46AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi Osamu,
>
> I had to fix FTBFS in unstable (something about debcomp not found, I
> have to delete pregenerated Makefile.in to make it work) and while at it
> I also update the package to latest upstream (2.8.3), added
>
control: reopen -1
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:22:53PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System:
> > This package is caught up in the package transition which caused:
> >
> > > make[1]: nsgmls: Command not found
> >
> > With recent NMU of debiandoc-sgml changing by Niel its
Control: severity 813111 normal
Control: tags 813111 moreinfo
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:57:43AM +0300, Strelok wrote:
> Package: ibus
> Version: 1.5.9-1
> Severity: grave
Just because you are facing hard time using this program, it does not
get "grave" rating. See
s.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782614
Found in version getmail4/4.46.0-1
Fixed in versions getmail4/4.48.0-1, getmail4/4.46.0-1+deb8u1
Done: Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org>
> I looked at the jessie package and I didn't saw the new MAXLINE part in
> the file _retrieverbases.py
&
Hi,
This reproduceble build bug is really reproduceble :-)
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:31:37PM +0100, Chris West (Faux) wrote:
> Source: debmake-doc
> Version: 1.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> Tags: sid stretch
> User:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
Package: axel-kapt
Version: 2.4-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
please remove the package axel-kapt from the Debian archive. It depends
on the package kaptain, which is about to be removed from the archive
as well. The
Hi,
I am a bit confused. If this is 2.2-2+deb8u1 update on 2.2-2, why there
is change for Makefile.am. I thought your change only happens in
debian/patches/*
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 01:59:48PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 19:43 +0800, ChangZhuo Chen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:08:55PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
So 8.0 is out now, can we get that into 8.1?
Is backport good enough for this issue?
Package: debmake
Version: 4.1.7-2
Severity: serious
Since I found error in copyright holder list generation, this is best
not to release for Jessie.
It is a bit too rough to stay in stable.
Osamu
PS: It is still useful in most cases. Anyway, I am uploading fiixed one
soon for post-jessie.
--
/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Charles Cazabon search-web-for-addr...@pyropus.ca wrote:
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
If you release very soon, I will keep Debian bug status as 'grave' since
it causes data loss. I will update Debioan package as soon as you
release to get it accepted to Jessie
HI,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:10:53PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Johannes Weißl jar...@molb.org wrote:
If e.g. `delete_after=7`, getmail will delete *all* retrieved messages
after running for 7 days in IDLE mode (like `delete=True`).
Thanks very much for the patch! It will be in the
Source: getmail4
Version: 4.46.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
As reported in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.getmail.user/5341
I discovered a bug with the IMAP IDLE implementation in getmail
4.46.0,
which manifests itself when using an option such as `delete_after`.
If e.g.
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:41:57PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Si I should change getmail4 (4.46.0-1~deb7u1) wheezy-security as:
* Version: 4.46.0-1~deb6u1 change
* target: squeeze-security change
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:05:08PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
...
OK. I signed with my latest GPG key with the new debsign command in
jessie.
Note:
Package itself is build in the squeeze chroot as expected.
Only the signiture was made under jessie.
Osamu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:04:57PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Although I am not comfortable to package this way if I do it again (I
inherited it and did not touch it back then.), I should do the same
strange packaging style again considering
control: severity 771024 important
control: tags 771024 moreinfo
control: tags 771024 unreproducible
Hi,
I guess the original bug reporter is not familiar with the Debian BTS
and no one from SCIM maintaining people is interested enough to clean up
BTS.
Just a simple housekeeping ...
FYI: My
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:39:36PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Osamu Aoki wrote:
We can consider a new upstream version for squeeze-lts
and we can ask the security team's opinion for wheezy
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Osamu Aoki wrote:
By the way, I uploaded getmail4_4.46.0-1~bpo70+1_amd64
We can consider a new upstream version for squeeze-lts
and we can ask the security team's opinion for wheezy.
Would you
Hi,
Thanks for your comment. (Charles is the upstream,)
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 01:30:41PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
In Debian, its security update policy prohibits any new feature added
with security updates.
It's kind of a bogus distinction
Hi,
By the way, I uploaded getmail4_4.46.0-1~bpo70+1_amd64
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/getmail4_4.46.0-1~bpo70%2B1.html
What do I have to do to get it pushed to backports? Did I have to
upload it to another server? I do not know why it is stack there. I
just used dput. In
(resent after subscribing with proper return path mail address)
Hi,
In Debian, its security update policy prohibits any new feature added
with security updates.
There are needs for updating 4.32.0 and 4.20.0 for the MITM security
issues.
CVE-2014-7273
CVE-2014-7274
CVE-2014-7275
I for one
Hi,
In Debian, its security update policy prohibits any new feature added
with security updates.
There are needs for updating 4.32.0 and 4.20.0 for the MITM security
issues.
CVE-2014-7273
CVE-2014-7274
CVE-2014-7275
I for one as being its maintainer in Debian see it possible but
am scared
of documentation. Thanks: Osamu Aoki.
-fix Header instance has no attribute 'strip' error which cropped up
in some configurations. Thanks: Krzysztof Warzecha.
Version 4.43.0
25 August 2013
-add IMAP IDLE support. Thanks: Jon Gjengset.
Version 4.42.0
3 August 2013
-fix problem
control: tags 761001 moreinfo
control: severity 761001 important
Hi,
Since I do not have NVIDIA GPU on my system, I removed all its non-free
drivers from my system. Then my problem is gone.
For my case, non-free NVIDIA software seems to be interfering with the
GPU detection for GLX on Intel
Hi Kurt,
What is your system (CPU/GPU)? Do you see the same kind of syslog as I
quote below?
I see linux-kernel mesa and mutter are updated on my system yesterday.
Maybe one of these are causing this.
Here is my situation.
* GDM3 crashes after upgrade yesterday (testing).
upgrading to
Hi,
Looking at the date of OP's situation, problem may be different.
Booting with the older kernel linux-image-3.16-2-amd64 did not fix my
situation. My problem may be mutter or mesa.
Osamu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi,
I can reproduce this FTBFS bug. (libpcrc3 and related packages are at
hold with testing version)
| dh_install --fail-missing -X.la
| dh_install: usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gi/overrides/IBus.py exists in
debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere
| dh_install:
is better. (gir* is easier for me...)
See more as below and let us know your thought.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 06:04:44PM +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
2014-07-20 (일), 15:18 +0900, Osamu Aoki:
...
In debian speak, this is something like ibus-py2override package.
I have no idea
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 08:50:55PM +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
Source: ibus
Version: 1.5.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
ibus fails to build from source if python-gi-dev is installed.
Error part:
...
dh_install --fail-missing -X.la
dh_install:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 02:14:49PM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
The only problem for using uversionmangle is:
I: librime source:
debian-watch-file-should-dversionmangle-not-uversionmangle line 3
N:
N:The version of this package contains dfsg, ds, or debian, but a
N:misleading
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 02:11:18AM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
You did not present rationale to do extrastep with the second option.
There seems to be something more than ABI break.
librime 1.0 modified several struct
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:30:52AM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
For this, I think it's easier to add a Files-Excluded line to
debian/copyright
header, and let uscan do the repacking: [1]
Files-Excluded: thirdparty/bin/curl.exe
thirdparty/src/opencc-windows/opencc.dll
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 12:01:49PM -0400, GUO Yixuan wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 08:27:12PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 01:45:32AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:33 AM, GUO Yixuan culu@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just waiting
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 01:45:32AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:33 AM, GUO Yixuan culu@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just waiting for a confirmation on the librime-dev = librime1-dev
renaming, from Aron, as we discussed in a previous thread. [1]
As said before, I don't
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 01:50:39PM -0400, GUO Yixuan wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 01:18:53AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
...
This seems to be not-so-correct package dependency in the debian/control
case which breaks with binNMU.
It seems to be no binNMU-safe way for a maximum version
Hi,
Why are not we uploading the new librime?
Osamu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Simon, thanks for quick help.
Uploading it.
Osamu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Gnome folks and Niels,
Ibus is the input method GNOME uses as default and I am adding the
wayland support.
I need help on the ibus bug #750902 but can not locate good examples to
follow.
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 11:31:51AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
The ibus package added an unconditional
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 07:35:56AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Package: librime-dev
Version: 0.9.9-1
Severity: grave
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-outdated
librime-dev can no longer be installed in sid since it depends on
librime0 0.9.9-1+1~. However, the version of
Hi,
Thanks for the patch and updating git repo for 1.5.6. I should have
pushed my updated repo.
gi transition and python3/wayland support are the reason of my delay.
The vala issue was fixed by the upstream developer (in Fedora) and I am
using that fix now in here.
Now that ibus-pinyin is out
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:07:09PM +0200, David Suárez wrote:
Source: ibus
Version: 1.5.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Upstream fixed this in new upstream release 1.5.6
I can
control: reopen 737090
control: fixed 737090 ibus-pinyin/1.5.0-1
control: unfound 737090 ibus-pinyin/1.0.1-3
control: unfound 737090 ibus-pinyin/1.0.1-4
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 08:49:03PM -0800, Hongzheng Wang wrote:
I have installed and tested your new version (1.0.1-4). It works fine.
control: block 737090 by 737136
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:02:56PM -0800, Hongzheng Wang wrote:
The package ibus-pinyin in sid just updated to 1.5.0. I noticed that it no
longer depends on ibus-pinyin-db-open-phrase/android. My question is where
the new ibus-pinyin gets pinyin
control: clone 737090 -1
control: severity -1 important
control: reassign -1 libpyzy
control: retitle -1 Please include pyzy-database-1.0.0
Let's keep grave for 737090 to prevent testing migration.
Considering urgent situation of fixing this 737090 bug;
So they include
control: severity 736612 normal
Hi,
FYI: I do not have any problem here
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 05:14:29PM +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
Package: im-config
Version: 0.24-1
This is sid/testing version
Severity: grave
This should not be used to indicate you are extremely annoyed.
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:01:29AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On Wednesday, 19. June 2013 14:48:16 Osamu Aoki wrote:
ibus-input-pad (1.4.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Team upload.
* Fix libexecdir to match ibus-setup expectation.
Closes: #712577
Hi,
while
Hi,
Although fixing this serious bug is not a big deal but another NMU for
very outdated version does not make much sense to me.
I tried newer 0.11.4-0ubuntu5 Ubuntu source package which builds OK.
https://launchpad.net/sbackup
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup
(I see some rooms
control: forcemerge 721489 723721
Hi,
gnome-terminal as installed is set to use system default color for text
and background. Let's start it under different DE:
Under GNOME3, gnome-terminal is black text on white background.
Under XFce, gnome-terminal is black text on black background.
Under
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 07:35:42PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
...
... because both input-pad and ibus-input-pad must use the *same* gtk
version, be it gtk2 or gtk3, to avoid this clash.
Thanks for kind explanation.
With the recent upload of ibus-input-pad, I hope I fixed this bug.
diff
control: reassign 724226 libinput-pad-dev
control: retitle 724226 libinput-pad-dev: Should depend on libgtk-3-dev (not
libgtk2.0-dev)
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 03:03:19PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
tag 724226 - unreproducible
severity 724226 serious
retitle 724226 FTBFS: input-pad =
control: severity 725134 normal
control: retitle 725134 add Depends: gir1.2-gtk-3.0
Hi, I think I figured out the cause
Recently I know testing had ibus 1.5 transioton and missing dependency
package issues but I thought all these are fixed now.
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 11:49:34AM -1000,
control: tags 724226 - serious
control: tags 724226 + unreproduceble
Thanks David for your valuable work. But unlike your other reports,
this one can not be reproduced under pbuilder as below.
I can not identify possible cause for your case ...
May I close this bus since this may be some
Hi,
Thanks David.
Although Yao Wei does not face this bug on his system, as I checked, I
faced a bit different bugi with a newer source:
...
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/osamu/src/gcin/ftbfs/gcin-2.8.1+dfsg'
Makefile:3: config.mak: No such file or directory
Makefile:277: .depend: No such
Hi,
FYI: ibus in testing had gone through 1.4 - 1.5 library transition.
At the same time python binding method and its dependency situation has
changed.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:53:46PM +0200, frydo wrote:
Package: ibus-table-latex
Version: 1.3.0.20100528-3
Severity: grave
Justification:
Source: ibus-client-clutter
Version: 0.0+git20090728.a936bacf-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
ibus-client-clutter
FTBFS,
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ibus-client-cluttersuite=sid
Also, will you consider to join pkg-ime group like other IM related
package for this one?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 02:52:35PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
Please see the Ubuntu patch:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/146107977/ibus-client-clutter_0.0%2Bgit20090728.a936bacf-5_0.0%2Bgit20090728.a936bacf-5ubuntu1.diff.gz
Oh, I overlooked it. I will NMU. Thanks for reminder.
--
To
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:24:48PM +0200, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:31:43 +0900
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Try install python-gi
This is needed for some rare case.
Sorry if I wasn't clear.
At least for cangjie and quick it works.
I did
Hi,
Try install python-gi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 08:44:48PM +0200, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
I can confirm the problem and having installed gir1.2-gtk-3.0 doesn't
seem to work here.
Question is what ibus modules are you using.
If you are using ibus-* packages listed as bad in
control: severity 715568 important
control: retitle 715568 IM icon etc. missing
control: found 715568 1.5.3-2
control: found 715568 1.5.3-3
Hi,
I just uploaded 1.5.3-3. I think it is better based on newer 1.5.3
based FC19 using their site publishing rc.rpm
Hi #715568,
Changed path of dbus is related following commit:
https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/458945e7308ab2661355edbf6880102c5f628dbe
This commit was from June 13th and was included in my 1.5.2-3 package as patch
0015-*.
Of course, 1.5.3-1 include this. Does this require any patch
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 02:18:50PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
Hi #715568,
Changed path of dbus is related following commit:
https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/458945e7308ab2661355edbf6880102c5f628dbe
This commit
1 - 100 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
