Source: traitlets
Version: 5.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.14.3-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: mame
Version: 0.261+dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.264+dfsg.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1069544
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: python-ppmd
Version: 0.3.3-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.5.0-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: alttab
Version: 1.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.7.1-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: python-watson-developer-cloud
Version: 7.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 8.0.0-1
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: matrix-synapse
Version: 1.100.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.103.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1069763
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: postsrsd
Version: 1.10-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.10-2.1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1068053
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: python-uinput
Version: 0.11.3-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.0.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1067083
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: remmina
Version: 1.4.34+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.4.35+dfsg-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070063
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: python-dmidecode
Version: 3.12.3-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.12.3-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: creduce
Version: 2.11.0~20231125-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.11.0~20240312-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for
Source: cvise
Version: 2.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.10.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: libfiu
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.2-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1066938
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for
Source: r-cran-pracma
Version: 2.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.4.4-2
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: rust-gsettings-macro
Version: 0.1.20-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.2.0-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1068142
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between
Source: skimage
Version: 0.22.0-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: pyt...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:pytest
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of pytest the autopkgtest of skimage fails in
testing on
Source: fpdf2
Version: 2.7.9-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: pyt...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:pytest
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of pytest the autopkgtest of fpdf2 fails in testing
when
Source: sccache
Version: 0.7.7-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.8.0-3
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: kmod
Version: 31+20240202-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 32-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: rust-debversion
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.3.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: tracker
Version: 3.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.7.3-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1068468
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: diffoscope
Version: 259
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 267
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: fakeroot
Version: 1.33-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.34-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: geoalchemy2
Version: 0.13.3-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.14.6-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: gnome-shell-extension-arc-menu
Version: 49+forkv29-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 55-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen
Version: 27
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: ndcube
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: specutils
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: tea-cli
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: ngspetsc
Version: 0.0~git20240318.f83b50a-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Hi Ben (and all the rest),
On 15-05-2024 9:56 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
Apologies for leaving this bug for so long.
NP, part of live I guess.
Is this bug still occurring?
I don't know. The problem was severe enough for us to abandon the idea
of running the backport kernels on our arm64
Source: nbd
Version: 1:3.25-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.26.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Lucas,
[Please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the bug]
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 15:09:56 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Do you have any idea why we don't see the same failure on
Source: prettytable
Version: 3.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.6.0-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1066757
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: sqlmodel
Version: 0.0.8-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0.8-6
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1066771
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: audit
Version: 1:3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.1.2-2.1
X-Debbugs-CC: vor...@debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070327
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are
Source: eclib
Version: 20231212-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 20240408-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1069515
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: praat
Version: 6.4.05+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release
Source: ukui-power-manager
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.0.0.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070426
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: ruby-parslet
Version: 1.8.2-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.0.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: q2-feature-table
Version: 2023.9.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2024.2.0+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: tiktoken
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.6.0-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: click
Version: 0.5.0-10
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.5.2-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On 06-04-2024 9:58 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
Anyways, it looks like we could just lower the timeout to 1 second and
hope were fine for some time to come.
No. 1 second is *too short* for the PodmanRunner.test_copy_timeout test
on salsa. So I'll just disable
Source: libcbor
Version: 0.10.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.10.2-1.2
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: wsdd
Version: 2:0.7.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2:0.7.1-5
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: snapraid
Version: 12.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 12.3-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: camelot-py
Version: 0.11.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.11.0-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1063891
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: unattended-upgrades
Version: 2.9.1+nmu4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.10
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: multiqc
Version: 1.14+dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.18+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote:
The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this
is not a regression.
Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on
libpng16-16t64-udeb where the version in testing depends on
libpng16-16-udeb. The later
Control: reassign -1 src:tracker
Control: found -1 3.4.2-3
Control: affects -1 src:sqlite3
Hi László,
On 05-05-2024 11:24 a.m., László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
It's the tracker autopkg testing that needs fixing.
So, I'm inclined to agree with your assessment, so let's reassign this
to
Source: intel-vc-intrinsics
Version: 0.18.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't
Source: mac-widgets
Version: 0.10.0+svn416-dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: vagrant
Version: 2.3.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: gnome-snapshot
Version: 46~beta-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: rapiddisk
Version: 9.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it recently started
failing in unstable and testing. Can you please investigate the
situation and fix it? I copied
Source: diffoscope
Version: 259
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
clone 1035474 -1
block 1035474 by -1
reassign -1 xorg-dev
retitle -1 xorg-dev: drop dependency on libdmx-dev
found -1 1:7.7+23
thanks
On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:50:16 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff
wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:28:02AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti
Hi Bastian,
On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 19:03:07 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Can you please elaborate? I'm not seeing anything serious in this bug
report.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:42:34 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote:
> kbd-chooser is no longer in use, I think.
> Or am I
Source: netplan.io
Version: 0.107.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails on s390x (and maybe on armel/armhf, but that's
hard to tell because of the
Source: slurm-wlm
Version: 23.11.4-1.4
X-Debbugs-CC: bdr...@debian.org, vor...@debian.org, mckins...@debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of slurm-wlm the autopkgtest of slurm-wlm fails in
testing when that
Hi
On 21-04-2024 5:56 p.m., Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
The problem is that libcrypt-smime-perl < 0.29 fails with openssl >= 3.2.0.
This was solved by the Perl team with their 0.29 upload. This and 0.30
didn't migrate to testing and in the meantime we got OpenSSL into
unstable which relies
Source: openssl, libcrypt-smime-perl
Control: found -1 openssl/3.2.1-3
Control: found -1 libcrypt-smime-perl/0.28-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of openssl the autopkgtest of
Hi,
On 20-04-2024 3:22 p.m., Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: libreoffice-draw-nogui but it is
not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
apt-get failed.
I recall rene
Source: oscar4
Version: 5.2.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: mdevctl
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Hi,
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:37:03 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
This package is a key package (hence we can't trivially remove it from
testing) and the failure is blocking the time_t transition. Can this
Source: gem2deb
Version: 2.2.2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: ruby...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:ruby3.1
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of ruby3.1 (in the time_t transition) the
autopkgtest of
Source: crmsh
Version: 4.6.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it started to fail in
testing several days ago. Can you please investigate the situation and
fix it? I copied some of the
control: notfixed -1 1.15.5-1
On 04-04-2024 6:04 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
So, marking the bug as not affecting the version in testing to avoid
autoremoval.
And also removing the fixed version. There was only a *time* that
liferea was broken (by liblzma), not a version of liferea, nor
The mystery continues.
On 04-04-2024 10:08 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I forgot that on amd64, autopkgtest's autopkgtest now runs in qemu which
doesn't benefit yet as much from tmpfs as lxc does, so it's not a good
comparison.
On ci-worker13:
"""
root@elbrus:/tmp/autopkgte
Hi William,
I noticed you "binNMU"-ed siridb-server in Ubuntu where it built
successfully on all arches. In Debian I got the bug below reported. Any
idea what the difference could be between the state of Debian and the
state of Ubuntu that causes this?
reproducible-builds [1] confirms that
Control: retitle -1 autopkgtest: test_copy_timeout fails on tmpfs
Hi,
On 04-04-2024 10:08 a.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
Overall, I
expect the host to be *faster* than the old hosts, but ironically the
tests that seems to fail is: __main__.SchrootRunner.test_copy_timeout.
Yes, it's too fast
control: notfound -1 1.15.4-1
On 04-04-2024 5:42 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I've scheduled retries on the reproducible build infrastructure.
amd64 and i386 both build fine (while on amd64 there was the same
failure in the past as in this bug report).
So, marking the bug as not affecting
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 22:42:34 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
The problem is somewhere in liblzma.
In hind-sight, this is all to likely that it's caused by CVE-2024-3094,
the xz backdoor.
I've scheduled retries on the reproducible build infrastructure. As the
version in unstable is stuck
Source: pytest-testinfra
Version: 10.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: ruby-graphlient
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: ruby-asana
Version: 0.10.13-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: translate-toolkit
Version: 3.12.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: pcp
Version: 6.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed from
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:48:24 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI wrote:
tilix fails to build on armhf, s390x.
But on armhf, there currently are no binaries in any suite and on s390x
it never build. So, this is no regression and hence not serious (this
bug is blocking
Source: autopkgtest
Version: 5.33
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it recently started to fail a lot on ppc64el. The failures seem
related to the host that runs the
user release.debian.org
usertag 1064533 time-t-downgrade
severity 1064533 important
Hi
On 04-04-2024 4:25 a.m., handsome_feng wrote:
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
The excuses shows
Source: siridb-server
Version: 2.0.51-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails. From a distance, this looks like a race
condition. Should the test
Source: libcdk5
Version: 5.0.20230201-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails. Can you
please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some of the output
at the bottom of this
Hi all,
[s390x porters in CC, maybe they can help?]
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 22:22:54 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: gnome-keyring
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in
testing [1]. Your
Source: supysonic
Version: 0.7.6+ds-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails. What's worse, sometimes that failure is due to
it timing out
Hi,
Disclaimer: I only now saw your e-mail. By default the Debian bug
tracking system doesn't CC replies to the submitter of bugs.
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 13:07:04 -0800 David Caldwell wrote:
> Your package is only blocked because the arch:all binary package(s)
> aren't built on a buildd.
Hi Niko, gregor,
On 14-03-2024 8:16 p.m., Niko Tyni wrote:
[Paul: copying you for eyeballs as this seems to have been your pet
package at some point :)]
I'm receiving the bugs of this package, but thanks. It is (or I fear
was) a dependency of a package I still have the ambition to package
Hi,
On 12-03-2024 10:18 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 06/03/2024 06.20, Paul Gevers wrote:
Unfortunately the test still takes upto 33 GB at least (see below).
Did you have time to test the -12 version, yet?
I just did. The biggest rise I saw (and I didn't even stop parallel
runners
Source: rocm-compilersupport
Version: 5.2.3-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 6.0+git20231212.4510c28+dfsg-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: magic-wormhole
Version: 0.12.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: expat
Version: 2.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.6.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: beaker
Version: 1.12.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.12.1-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1052336
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Hi,
On 06-03-2024 10:30 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Do you have the log from running that autopkgtest?
I have no idea what's happening here. At least the buildd build only
used 500 MB.
Attached.
Paul
debug.log.xz
Description: application/xz
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hi Julien,
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 14:40:13 +0100 julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
A case of eigenbug where you compile three times and it only fails one?
If it's one in three that would be too much. For ci.d.n I'm having my
"flaky" bug filing threshold between 1/5 and 1/8, but I think it should
Hi Andreas,
On 05-03-2024 10:16 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
But first I'd like to see the s390x build happen and your confirmation
that this unbreaks the CI infrastructure. But at least ppc64 and sparc64
built with 500MB instead of 40GB now ;-)
Feel free to block 15-17 temporarily, too.
Hi
On 05-03-2024 10:16 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Feel free to block 15-17 temporarily, too.
I already did that ;).
I'll try when I see 14 in the archive on s390x.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for the upload.
On 04-03-2024 12:26 p.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-LLVM-Translator/issues/2397
On 03/03/2024 20.52, Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: spirv-llvm-translator-14
Version: 14.0.0-10
In the upstream report
1 - 100 of 4223 matches
Mail list logo
