Bug#1061743: Gramps in Debian

Am 03.06.24 um 06:55 schrieb Ross Gammon: I will try and take a look this week. But if I fail, either of you are welcome to lose patience, merge it to master, and upload it for me. :-) Hi Ross, I've decided to lose patience. :-) No, seriously, I've built Gramps locally and did some test runs

Bug#1072241: src:manpages: fails to migrate to testing for too long: RC bug and B-D not in testing

Am 31.05.24 um 10:32 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer: I couldn't find any explanation in the commit messages or debian/changelog. What's the reason for all those additional dependencies? Can't we get rid of them? I don't see how they are needed for building the package. I did not get a response

Bug#1072241: src:manpages: fails to migrate to testing for too long: RC bug and B-D not in testing

Am 30.05.24 um 22:30 schrieb Paul Gevers: Source: manpages Version: 6.05.01-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 6.8-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1072158 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that

Bug#1061743: Gramps in Debian

Am 27.05.24 um 15:38 schrieb IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian GNU|Linux): On 5/26/24 23:56, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: The package builds on my machine, although I had to disable a single test for now. You'll find it in the newly created patch. Maybe you have an idea what's causing the failure

Bug#1061743: Gramps in Debian

Am 24.05.24 um 21:23 schrieb Ross Gammon: Hi Tobias, There are no blockers other than real life getting in the way. I did start working on 5.2.0 in the experimental branch on Salsa. From memory, there was a problem with fuzzy patches, and the tedious checking of copyrights still to do. But I

Bug#1061743: Gramps in Debian

Hi Ross, I'd like to get gramps back into Debian, and from my (very limited) research it seems that gramps v5.2.1 fixed the build failure on Debian. Are you planning to update the package? Or is there another blocker which I didn't spot? Thanks for taking care of gramps in Debian!

Bug#1052772: isoquery: diff for NMU version 3.3.3-1.1

Am 27.04.24 um 14:08 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: Control: tags 1052772 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for isoquery (versioned as 3.3.3-1.1). The diff is attached to this message. Regards. Hi Sebastian, thanks a lot for your NMU. Unfortunately, the fix from Steve is not

Bug#1068243: bsdgames: fails to configure

Am 02.04.24 um 17:19 schrieb Sven Joachim: Package: bsdgames Version: 2.17-31 Severity: serious Your package fails to configure in a fresh installation (but not when upgrading from a previous version). This is what happens in a throwaway chroot (unrelated lines stripped from apt/dpkg output):

Bug#1053463: quilt: quilt functions corrupt patches if awk is not gawk

control: tag -1 pending Am 05.10.23 um 19:18 schrieb Sven Joachim: If you would like a merge request on Salsa, I can do that. But applying the upstream patch is trivial, the only question is what name you want to give it. Cheers, Sven Hi Sven, thanks for filing this bug and

Bug#1053500: quilt: dh_quilt_unpatch broken in the absence of a series file

05.10.2023 10:18:25 Julien Cristau : > Source: quilt > Version: 0.67+really0.67-2 > Severity: grave > X-Debbugs-Cc: jcris...@debian.org, s...@debian.org > > Hi, > > As explained by Sune in > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053444#17, reverting > the change from the previous

Bug#1031660: Upload of fava

Am 21.02.23 um 13:19 schrieb Bastian Germann: I think, the reason is for the .egg-info not being included anymore. Tobias, you changed the watch file for subsequent uploads to come from GitHub instead of PyPI. This came into effect only with Blair's upload. I guess when we change the orig

Bug#1031660: Upload of fava

Hi Travis, thanks for your bugreport, I can confirm that fava does no longer work. I'm getting the same error as you. @Blair and @Bastian: The contents of the binary package are missing quite a lot of important files, so I think the latest upload (version 1.23.1) should be reverted. My

Bug#1030781: quilt: makes libxau FTBFS

Am 07.02.23 um 14:30 schrieb Helmut Grohne: The quilt upload makes libxau FTBFS. I think it is the wrong time to upload a breaking change like this. Thus filing against quilt. Hi Helmut, thanks for filing this bug. I didn't discover this side effect during my testing. The cause of this

Bug#1027376: marked as pending in hugo

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1027376 in hugo reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1029234: lyx: Graphic problems editing a lyx file

control: tag -1 unreproducible control: severity -1 important Am 20.01.23 um 15:21 schrieb Stefano Simonucci: I get the following messages: sudo apt build-dep lyx [sudo] password di stefano: Lettura elenco dei pacchetti... Fatto Lettura elenco dei pacchetti... Fatto Generazione albero delle

Bug#1022437: rapid-photo-downloader: diff for NMU version 0.9.33-1.1

On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:50:58 +0200 Stefano Rivera wrote: Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for rapid-photo-downloader (versioned as 0.9.33-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Hi Stefano, many thanks! I'm on the LowNMU list, so if

Bug#1004634: A way to include openscenegraph in bookworm?

Am 24.10.22 um 12:57 schrieb Alberto Luaces: No problem! Yes, it was more of a philosophical issue.  That is the reason why I am leaving this bug report open, in case we get a patch in time or if some dependency really needs this plugin. Regards, Alberto Yes, the bug is still not

Bug#1004634: A way to include openscenegraph in bookworm?

Am 24.10.22 um 10:24 schrieb Alberto Luaces: Hi, those are currently my thoughts as well. I'm going to prepare a release like that, and we can see if any of the reverse dependencies is actively using this plugin; maybe some games as openmw are displaying movies, we will see. Regards,

Bug#1004634: A way to include openscenegraph in bookworm?

Hi, I think it would be a pity to release bookworm without openscenegraph, also because there a quite a lot of reverse dependencies. Unfortunately, there hasn't been much progress yet, and the freeze is coming nearer. I've just spotted how Ubuntu solved this:

Bug#1015128: FTBFS probably already resolved

Dear APT Development Team, just as a quick info: this FTBFS bug is most likely already resolved with the new upload of po4a. See https://bugs.debian.org/1015087 for a little longer explanation. I'm not closing this bug, however, because I didn't try to build apt and therefore cannot be sure

Bug#1008428: marked as pending in golang-github-kurin-blazer

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1008428 in golang-github-kurin-blazer reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#995909: python3-fava: Fails to start with jinja2 3.0.1

On Sun, 05 Dec 2021 12:50:32 +0100 intrigeri wrote: Here's a merge request that updates Fava to 1.20.1: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/fava/-/merge_requests/1 I did not dare uploading because I resorted to a rather ugly hack for the tests to pass:

Bug#998565: Errors due to changes in iso-codes data

On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:30:06 -0500 Scott Kitterman wrote: I looked at this a bit today and it looks like the test failures are due to updates in the iso-codes data used by the tests, not any real failures. I think disabling the failing tests for now would be a reasonable way to keep this in

Bug#991653: isoquery: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Am 29.07.21 um 17:11 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > Source: isoquery > Version: 3.2.4-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20210728 ftbfs-bullseye > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build > on

Bug#991647: libisocodes: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Am 29.07.21 um 17:13 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > Source: libisocodes > Version: 1.2.3-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20210728 ftbfs-bullseye > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build >

Bug#978079: heads up: rapid-photo-downloader might not make it to bullseye

Am 25.01.21 um 16:35 schrieb Antoine Beaupré: > On 2021-01-24 23:53:20, Damon Lynch wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 8:44 PM Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> >>> Maybe then there is an easy fix to keep RPD in Debian if >>> rawkit disappears. >>> >>> >> There is no need for any kind of fix in the code

Bug#960424: simgear: diff for NMU version 1:2019.1.1+dfsg-3.1

Am 16.06.20 um 13:57 schrieb Sudip Mukherjee: > Control: tags 960424 + patch > Control: tags 960424 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for simgear (versioned as 1:2019.1.1+dfsg-3.1) and > uploaded it to mentors for sponsoring. Please feel free to tell me if I > should remove

Bug#960759: marked as pending in golang

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #960759 in golang reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#871563: Downgrading severity of manpages-fr-extra bug

control: severity -1 important Hi, I'm downgrading this bug to allow the NMU of manpages-fr-extra to migrate to testing. The latest upload replaces the previous package with a transitional dummy package which depends on manpages-fr and manpages-fr-dev. Those packages are now generated from the

Bug#956013: Fails to install

Am 06.04.20 um 20:13 schrieb David Prévot: > Anyway, you could simply upload a manpages-fr-extra update providing the > dummy package instead of adding it in manpages-l10n (and be bugged by > version handling and NEW processing) if you want this issue resolved > quickly. Right, thanks for this

Bug#956013: Fails to install

Am 6. April 2020 18:51:31 MESZ schrieb "David Prévot" : >Le 06/04/2020 à 02:39, Dr. Tobias Quathamer a écrit : > >> I think that this bug is now fixed in git. If you have the time, I'd >> value your input if I've thought of everything before I start another >>

Bug#956013: Fails to install

Am 06.04.20 um 08:38 schrieb David Prévot: > Thanks for updating those translations. Unfortunately, there is an > unhandled upgrade path (missing Breaks and Replace on manpages-fr-extra > (<< 20151231something), and of course the manpages-fr-extra counterpart > update). Hi David, I think that

Bug#956013: Fails to install

Am 06.04.20 um 08:38 schrieb David Prévot: > Hi, > > Thanks for updating those translations. Unfortunately, there is an > unhandled upgrade path (missing Breaks and Replace on manpages-fr-extra > (<< 20151231something), and of course the manpages-fr-extra counterpart > update). Hi David, thanks

Bug#954033: marked as pending in pdfarranger

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #954033 in pdfarranger reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#954033: Fixed in new upload

Hi Jacob, thanks for filing this bug, it slipped through my testing. A new package is on its way to unstable. Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#945522: Bug#943608: tests segfault when run with Python 3.8

[Changed the BTS bug address to the python3.8 bug] Am 26.11.19 um 13:35 schrieb Matthias Klose: > thanks. was this checked with python3.8 3.8.0-4 or -5? Hi, hm, I don't know about upstream. However, I've just tried to build beancount in sid with python3.8 3.8.0-5 and can still confirm this bug.

Bug#943608: tests segfault when run with Python 3.8

control: clone 943608 -1 control: reassign -1 src:python3.8 control: retitle -1 python3.8: Py_BuildValue("(s#O)", ...) segfaults if entered with exception raised control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.python.org/issue38913 control: affects -1 src:beancount control: block 943608 by -1 Am 27.10.19 um

Bug#941537: Merge request

control: tag -1 pending Am 24.10.19 um 20:35 schrieb Adrian Heine: > I opened a merge request: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lilypond/merge_requests/1 Merged, thanks. Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#934962: marked as pending in syncthing

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #934962 in syncthing reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#934962: marked as pending in syncthing

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #934962 in syncthing reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#933958: The golang FTBFS on amd64 should be fixed

control: reopen -1 control: reassign -1 src:golang-1.12 control: found -1 1.12.7-2 Am 05.08.19 um 20:59 schrieb Shengjing Zhu: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:03 AM Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: >> >> the FTBFS of golang should be fixed. It was due to the GOCACHE changes

Bug#933958: The golang FTBFS on amd64 should be fixed

control: reassign -1 dh-golang control: found -1 1.39 control: fixed -1 1.41 control: close -1 Hi, the FTBFS of golang should be fixed. It was due to the GOCACHE changes from Go 1.11 to Go 1.12. Anthony Fok has just fixed this in dh-golang. I can confirm that golang-1.12 builds fine in an

Bug#919759: Downgrade bug severity

control: severity -1 normal Hi, in order to re-sync the golang package versions in unstable and testing (see [1] and [2] for more details), gokey has been uploaded with the previous version, which does not FTBFS. I'm therefore downgrading this bug to enable the migration of gokey to testing. In

Bug#929446: marked as done (wireshark: CVE-2019-12295)

Am 27.05.19 um 19:04 schrieb Balint Reczey: > Hi Tobias, > > Thank you for taking care of packages with open security issues, but > I'm wondering why you chose to do an immediate NMU. > I planed uploading 2.6.9-1 today following the usual process we agreed > on with the Security Team and I

Bug#871105: Status of debian-faq

Dear FTP Masters, the package "debian-faq" has been uploaded three months ago and contains various important fixes. It's currently stuck in BYHAND. Is there any chance that we can get this package into buster? Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#920548: Bug #920548 in golang marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #920548 in golang reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#918508: Should golang-1.10 be shpped in buster?

control: retitle -1 RM: golang-1.10 -- ROM; superseeded by golang-1.11 control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org control: severity -1 normal Am 06.01.2019 um 21:11 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > Source: golang-1.10 > Severity: serious > > With golang-1.11 as default now, should golang-1.10 > be shipped in

Bug#919500: golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-grpc-gateway: build dependency on golang-google-genproto-dev must be bumped to (>= 0.0~git20190111.db91494)

Am 17.01.2019 um 06:09 schrieb Arnaud Rebillout: >   Dear Go team, > > I pushed a fix on Salsa, can you please review and upload these changes? > Thanks! Hi Arnaud, thanks for your fix, it's uploaded now with a minor change (I've removed the Debian version "-1" from the build dependency

Bug#919198: manpages-de: missing Breaks+Replaces: login (<< 1:4.5-1.1)

Am 13.01.2019 um 19:39 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > Package: manpages-de > Version: 2.10-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > 'stable'. > It installed fine in 'stable',

Bug#918414: Bug #918414 in golang-github-jacobsa-ogletest marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #918414 in golang-github-jacobsa-ogletest reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#871105: Status of debian-faq

Am 10.01.2019 um 06:46 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić: > Saw you've uploaded "byhand: 9.0" on november 17, great! Upload is now > displayed at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html. > > I'll keep an eye on the progress of the NEW queue handling and plan to work on > the SGML-XML conversion. Hi

Bug#918508: Should golang-1.10 be shpped in buster?

Am 06.01.2019 um 21:11 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > Source: golang-1.10 > Severity: serious > > With golang-1.11 as default now, should golang-1.10 > be shipped in buster? Hi Adrian, probably not, but I'd like to keep it in buster for a little longer, just to make sure that golang-1.11 is a sane

Bug#916236: golang-golang-x-net-dev: FTBFS on s390x - rawconn.go undefined: getsockopt

Am 14.12.2018 um 14:28 schrieb Martín Ferrari: > Tobias: I see you did the latest upload, but you did not follow the git > workflow I had started, and instead of following git commits, you merged > a snapshot.. I will need to rewrite git history now :( Hi Martín, I'm really sorry that I messed

Bug#915059: RM: fuji -- RoQA; low popcon, RC buggy

control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org control: retitle -1 RM: fuji -- RoQA; low popcon, RC buggy control: severity -1 normal control: tags -1 - buster sid Dear FTP team, please remove the package fuji from unstable. It has been RC buggy for over a year (#876827) without a maintainer response. I've

Bug#915581: Bug #915581 in golang-github-gorilla-rpc marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #915581 in golang-github-gorilla-rpc reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#915059: fuji: Should the package be removed?

Source: fuji Severity: serious Dear maintainer, I was wondering if the fuji package should be removed. There hasn't been an upload for more than 2 years, and the package has an open FTBFS RC bug for over a year (https://bugs.debian.org/876827). The upstream homepage says that the development of

Bug#871105: Status of debian-faq

Am 17.11.2018 um 09:04 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić: > Hi Tobias, >> I plan to work on the Debian FAQ at > https://wiki.debian.org/BSP/2019/01/nl/Venlo . However, IIRC currently the > FAQ > is next to ready for upload. I will likely _not_ work on it before the BSP. > So: any action from your

Bug#871105: Status of debian-faq

Hi Joost, are you still planning to do an upload of debian-faq? Or are any other members of the maintaining team planning an upload? Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#911418: closed by to...@debian.org (Dr. Tobias Quathamer) (Bug#911418: fixed in rapid-photo-downloader 0.9.12-2)

; >> #911418: missing dependency: ImportError: cannot import name 'sip' >> >> It has been closed by to...@debian.org (Dr. Tobias Quathamer). > > ... I did not quite mean for you to take the patch I provided as-is > without investigating further. :) > > Upstream is unhappy

Bug#909995: Pending upload for LyX

control: tag -1 pending Hi Jonathan, many thanks for the investigation and patch. I've included it in the git repository. However, currently the build fails due to the recent upload of the Qt stack (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qtbase-opensource-src). Once all those libraries have been built

Bug#909624: flightgear: broken symlink: /usr/share/games/flightgear/Phi/3rdparty/sprintf/sprintf.min.js -> ../../../../../../lib/nodejs/sprintf-js/src/sprintf.min.js

control: reassign -1 flightgear-phi 2018.1.1+dfsg1-1 Am 26.09.2018 um 00:42 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > Package: flightgear > Version: 1:2018.2.2+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package

Bug#907993: lyx: FTBFS with Qt 5.11

Am 06.09.2018 um 09:26 schrieb Juhani Numminen: > This patch fixes the FTBFS, and is in use by LyX upstream, Gentoo and Fedora. Hi Juhani, thanks for the pointer, I'm preparing a new upload. Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#907466: Package doesn't ship xml files anymore

Am 30.08.2018 um 22:43 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Hi Tobias > > On 8/30/18 22:35, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: >> thanks for your investigation. I've deprecated those XML files more than >> two years ago and thought that this time might suffice to switch over to >> the

Bug#907466: Package doesn't ship xml files anymore

Am 30.08.2018 um 14:47 schrieb Michael Biebl: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:49:43 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Possibly affected: >> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=iso-codes.*xml > > The list might be even longer: > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=iso_.*%5C.xml [...]> > Given that,

Bug#897856: https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team/sdcc.git

Am 21. Juli 2018 19:44:33 MESZ schrieb Geert Stappers : > >There is now an empty git repository >at https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team/sdcc.git >which is intended for Debian packaging of sdcc > > >Convenience links for the both bugreports in the To: > >

Bug#895475: openshot-qt: non-DFSG assets in package

Am 11.04.2018 um 23:48 schrieb Alex Krusemark: > Dear Maintainer, > > I found that this package includes a bundled font "Ubuntu Regular", > which was determined to be non-DFSG > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-licence/+bug/769874). It > installs to the path >

Bug#894619: sdcc FTBFS with lyx 2.3.0-2

control: tag -1 patch control: affects -1 = control: reassign -1 src:sdcc 3.5.0+dfsg-2 Am 02.04.2018 um 17:01 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > Package: lyx > Version: 2.3.0-2 > Severity: serious > Control: affects -1 src:sdcc > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/sdcc.html

Bug#890102: openshot: Openshot 2.4.1-2 will not start

control: severity -1 important Am 11.02.2018 um 10:48 schrieb Svein Engelsgjerd: > Dear Maintainer, > > When I start openshot the GUI constantly flickers between the main > window and the "welcome window" / tutorial dialog. It is not possible > to click the next button so the welcome window

Bug#889492: lyx: FTBFS twice in a row due to leftover lyx-dbg handling

control: found -1 2.2.3-2 Am 03.02.2018 um 21:46 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > Hi, > > lyx/experimental fails to build twice in a row, the package in unstable > probably has the same problem. > [...]> > This looks like there are leftover commands for creating the >

Bug#785562: Status update

Am 01.01.2018 um 17:55 schrieb gregor herrmann: > On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 23:41:05 +0100, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: >> Am 15.12.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: [...] >>> Why was this renamed to openshot-qt? Upstream is still called 'openshot', >>> so I'm

Bug#785562: Status update

Am 15.12.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 15/12/17 15:23, gregor herrmann wrote: >> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:52:19 +0100, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: >> >>> I've just uploaded openshot-qt to Debian, it's sitting in the NEW queue. >>> Once it's ac

Bug#882222: Document security problems with system.3 and popen.3 (argument injection)

control: severity -1 important Am 20.11.2017 um 12:29 schrieb Bastien ROUCARIES: > Please document the implication of system.3 and popen.3, particularly > argument injection. Hi, thanks for the bug report, I'll take this upstream and we'll see how to get this better documented. Do you have a

Bug#858630: Package still FTBFS

control: reopen -1 control: found -1 1.1+git20160910.0.6b7015e-1 Hi, unfortunately, this bug is not yet fixed. While the package did build fine in my chroot, it FTBFS in the arch:all buildd. Don't know why yet, any help would be appreciated. Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description:

Bug#855876: tagged as pending

automatically by 'git-post-receive-tag-pending-commitmsg' hook). --- commit 0afc17c8a5f3ebbc6387a7223ae8192f8e3bd626 Author: Dr. Tobias Quathamer <to...@debian.org> Date: Mon Nov 20 23:06:26 2017 +0100 Exclude the sockets from the MD5 sum generation. Closes: #855876

Bug#785562: Status update

Hi, I've just uploaded openshot-qt to Debian, it's sitting in the NEW queue. Once it's accepted, I plan to remove openshot from Debian, so that this bug can be resolved. Also, as I understand it, pygoocanvas could then be removed as well. Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Bug#878631: [pkg-fgfs-crew] Bug#878631: flightgear build depends on libsimgear-dev (<= 1:2017.2.999) but 1:2017.3.1+dfsg-1 is to be installed

Am 15. Oktober 2017 11:27:31 MESZ schrieb Adrian Bunk : >Source: flightgear >Version: 1:2017.2.1+dfsg-4 >Severity: serious > >The following packages have unmet dependencies: >builddeps:flightgear : Depends: libsimgear-dev (<= 1:2017.2.999) but >1:2017.3.1+dfsg-1 is to be installed

Bug#875969: marked as pending

e526581f4f7c9a6d9526ea9455ab3dfc7dd2b836 Author: Dr. Tobias Quathamer <to...@debian.org> Date: Tue Sep 26 16:57:52 2017 +0200 Debian release 0.1.8+ds1-1 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 8257abc..1af3613 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +libopenshot

Bug#866024: Followup for removal of pygpgme from unstable

Am 09.08.2017 um 14:13 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer: > Dear Jonathan, > > a few days ago, pygpgme has been autoremoved from testing. Are you going > to ask ftpmaster to remove it from unstable now, as announced in #846314 > and #866026? Or does anything still prevent this? The

Bug#874205: A fix is almost ready ...

control: tag -1 fixed-upstream There seems to be a fix available. However, the next upstream release is not yet done because of another bug which needs to be fixed first. See issue on Gitlab for details. Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#874205: FTBFS test failure

forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/esr/open-adventure/issues/41 Hi, thanks for reporting this bug, I'll get in contact with upstream about this. Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#866024: Followup for removal of pygpgme from unstable

Dear Jonathan, a few days ago, pygpgme has been autoremoved from testing. Are you going to ask ftpmaster to remove it from unstable now, as announced in #846314 and #866026? Or does anything still prevent this? Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#870225: manpages-dev: fails to upgrade from 'stretch' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/explicit_bzero.3.gz

Am 31.07.2017 um 06:03 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > 'stretch'. > It installed fine in 'stretch', then the upgrade to 'buster' fails > because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a >

Bug#862804: NMU for aubio

+ + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Remove python-related alternates from Build-Depends. + * Fix d/rules to invoke tests with correct version of Python 3. +Thanks to Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hud...@ubuntu.com> for +the bug report and patch. Closes: #862804 + + -- Dr. Tobias Qua

Bug#866024: pygpgme: Should not be released with buster

Source: pygpgme Version: 0.3-1.2 Severity: serious Hi, I'm filing this RC bug very early in our next release cycle, so that the two depending packages have a chance to switch to an alternative. The package pygpgme has been abandoned upstream about four years ago. The packages python-gpg and

Bug#860633: [pkg-go] Bug#860633: Bug#860633: golang-gopkg-asn1-ber.v1: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: go test -v -p 1 gopkg.in/asn1-ber.v1 returned exit code 2

Am 06.05.2017 um 15:45 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer: Hi, I would suggest that we remove this package from testing (stretch). Removal request: https://bugs.debian.org/862190 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#861959: Fix for unstable?

Hi, thanks a lot for adopting the package and taking care of it! Are you planning to upload a fix for unstable, too? Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#860633: [pkg-go] Bug#860633: golang-gopkg-asn1-ber.v1: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: go test -v -p 1 gopkg.in/asn1-ber.v1 returned exit code 2

Am 01.05.2017 um 02:31 schrieb Roger Shimizu: There's a pull-request patch upstream: https://github.com/go-asn1-ber/asn1-ber/pull/7/commits/4563065 But unfortunately it's not clean, and only consider 32-bit system. Need to figure out a better way. Hi, I would suggest that we remove this

Bug#859462: NMU for stretch release

/debian/changelog 2017-05-03 22:56:53.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +telepathy-qt (0.9.6.1-6.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add fix-failing-test.patch to fix failing tests on some architectures +(Closes: #859462) + + -- Dr. Tobias Quathamer <to...@debian.org>

Bug#860710: [pkg-go] Bug#860710: golang-google-api: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test

Am 01.05.2017 um 17:06 schrieb Roger Shimizu: On Mon, 1 May 2017 16:07:07 +0200 "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <to...@debian.org> wrote: This is not correct. Unblocks are never triggered automatically. You always need to file an unblock request. See this mail for mor

Bug#860710: [pkg-go] Bug#860710: golang-google-api: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test

Am 01.05.2017 um 15:50 schrieb Roger Shimizu: Thanks for your help to upload! I find if RC bug is closed by the upload, unblock will be triggered automatically (or release team is monitoring on these, so they will unblock when see it). This is not correct. Unblocks are never triggered

Bug#860710: [pkg-go] Bug#860710: golang-google-api: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test

Am 27.04.2017 um 17:15 schrieb Roger Shimizu: Control: tag -1 +patch I pushed a fix commit to stretch branch in git repo. Confirmed that FTBFS fixed on DoM: http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/distribution#unstable/golang-google-api/0.0~git20161128.3cc2e59-2/buildlog Package also uploaded to

Bug#860678: [pkg-go] Bug#860678: golang-github-spf13-viper: FTBFS on i386

Unblock request: https://bugs.debian.org/861275 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#859655: Status update?

Hi Michael, how is the status of this bug? There has not been visible activity in the bug log for about 10 days ... Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#858008: [pkg-go] Bug#858008: hugo FTBFS: cannot use (type **jwalterweatherman.Feedback) as type logPrinter in field value

Am 16.04.2017 um 15:53 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer: Once the upload has been accepted into unstable, I'll file an unblock request for jwalterweatherman. Done: <https://bugs.debian.org/860422> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#858008: [pkg-go] Bug#858008: hugo FTBFS: cannot use (type **jwalterweatherman.Feedback) as type logPrinter in field value

Am 13.04.2017 um 17:46 schrieb Ivo De Decker: Can you please revert this change? We want to rebuild hugo, because it has outdated built-using, but this cannot be done in unstable (because of this bug), but it also cannot be done in testing, as the archive doesn't allow the version in testing to

Bug#858008: [pkg-go] Bug#858008: hugo FTBFS: cannot use (type **jwalterweatherman.Feedback) as type logPrinter in field value

control: tag -1 sid thanks Am 17.03.2017 um 10:45 schrieb Adrian Bunk: Source: hugo Version: 0.18.1-1 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hugo=sid ... github.com/spf13/hugo/livereload github.com/spf13/hugo/hugofs github.com/spf13/hugo/helpers #

Bug#850207: Status of upload?

Am 20.01.2017 um 16:18 schrieb Markus Wanner: Hello Tobias, On 01/20/2017 04:06 PM, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: Any news on this? Another week has passed without an upload. That's not quite correct. I uploaded the last Sunday, but unfortunately something went wrong and I'm unclear what. I

Bug#850207: Status of upload?

Am 13.01.2017 um 08:37 schrieb Markus Wanner: Dear Tobias, On 01/12/2017 05:42 PM, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: what's the status of this bug? There's a fix available, are you planning an upload soon? The package is now marked for autoremoval on February 3, so there's not much time left. ...I

Bug#850207: Status of upload?

Am 13.01.2017 um 08:37 schrieb Markus Wanner: Dear Tobias, On 01/12/2017 05:42 PM, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: what's the status of this bug? There's a fix available, are you planning an upload soon? The package is now marked for autoremoval on February 3, so there's not much time left. ...I

Bug#850207: Status of upload?

Dear FlightGear Crew, what's the status of this bug? There's a fix available, are you planning an upload soon? The package is now marked for autoremoval on February 3, so there's not much time left. It would be a real shame if flightgear would not be part of the Stretch release ... :-) If

  1   2   >