Bug#949339: was able to side-step this but unable to install freecad because python3-pyside2uic is still at 5.13.2-2.2 unlike others which do have an experimental version 5.14.0-1~exp1

Dear all, I was able to side-step this one a bit as I was able to download all the experimental versions of pytside2 binaries except python3-pyside2uic which is still at 5.13.2-2.2 and hence unable to install freecad. $ sudo aptitude install freecad-python3 The following NEW packages will be

Bug#948552: any update on the soname issue in libschroedinger-maeparser1

Dear all, Any update on the soname issue in getting the libschroedinger-maeparser1 issue resolved, just pinging. It's the only reason for not installing openbabel. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0

Bug#930774: any idea when guile-2.2 will be fixed ?

at bottom :- On 02/01/2020, Rob Browning wrote: > shirish शिरीष writes: > >> Just saw this, any idea when this FTFBS will be fixed. Somebody even >> shared a patch, maybe that fixes the issue. > > I'll plan to investigate this weekend. (I've been unfortunately >

Bug#930774: any idea when guile-2.2 will be fixed ?

Hi all, Just saw this, any idea when this FTFBS will be fixed. Somebody even shared a patch, maybe that fixes the issue. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Bug#936251: bup python 3 port

Hi all, I do see the plan of bup as shared in https://github.com/bup/bup/commit/b49607da4c0403bc1903caf2abd9640b03baff12 and subsequent commits. Dunno how hard it would be for someone who already has used bup for the move from python2 to python3 especially with backups. -- Regards,

Bug#945840: I would like to help with boost 1.71 just as I did before.

Dear Giovanni, Do you want help with getting packages compiled and seeing which fail and which work just like last year ? I do have space and time to do the needful if you can provide the script and instructions as you did last time. This way we would have libboost 1.71 with python3 instead of

Bug#942135: Bug#891877: Have either synaptic removed or have it rebuilt with libgtk3-perl in it recommends.

Reply in-line :- On 14/10/2019, Michael Vogt wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 05:58:30AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: >> Hi, > Hi, > Hi, >> shirish शिरीष: >> > Dunno if this is the right place to discuss it or not. Integri asked >> > hence sharing. > [..]

Bug#942135: Have either synaptic removed or have it rebuilt with libgtk3-perl in it recommends.

at bottom :- On 13/10/2019, intrigeri wrote: > > Jeremy Bicha filed #891877 a while ago, requesting that Synaptic's > dependencies are updated accordingly. I believe the actions Jeremy > suggested on #891877 will solve the problem shirish is raising here, > improve the life of Synaptic's

Bug#942135: Have either synaptic removed or have it rebuilt with libgtk3-perl in it recommends.

Dear all, Dunno if this is the right place to discuss it or not. Integri asked hence sharing. There is also another package synaptic which still uses libgtk2-removal. $ aptitude why libgtk2-perl i task-mate-desktop Recommends synaptic i A synaptic Recommends libgtk2-perl (>= 1:1.130)

Bug#897975: I'm sure I'm pretty late with this but better late than never.

Dear rastersoft, I read your comment specifically at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897975#62 While I'm sure you might have got what you were looking for. If not, see https://wiki.debian.org/BuildingAPackage I have used the instructions in the past and they worked good. --

Bug#941837: got the same issue, is there some sort of temporary workaround ?

Dear all, Got hit by the same bug while upgrading - Preparing to unpack .../32-texlive-fonts-extra_2019.20190930-2_all.deb ... Unpacking texlive-fonts-extra (2019.20190930-2) over (2019.20190830-1) ... dpkg: error processing archive

Bug#895990: has there been any update on this as it still shows up a bug in debian testing

Dear all, I have been trying to install the package without much success. I did read the bug-report but it doesn't tell whether libgjs have been fixed in testing or not. Can somebody share an update on the situation please. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My

Bug#930256: Ignoring Provides line with non-equal DepCompareOp for package firefox-l10n-bn-bd

at bottom :- On 10/06/2019, Ansgar wrote: > Hi, > >> I'm rising the severity since this causes errors in dose-debcheck, which >> might affect QA or other infrastructure: > > I removed the problematic package from experimental earlier; that should > make it a bit less urgent to upload a new

Bug#928511: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#928511: torbrowser-launcher hasn't updated itself to 60.6.2esr

Hi all, Seems https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1548973 is tracking parts of the bug. I also saw https://blog.torproject.org/noscript-temporarily-disabled-tor-browser but it doesn't indicate that a new release is supposed to be out soon. Of the new comments the only thing I could

Bug#928511: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#928511: torbrowser-launcher hasn't updated itself to 60.6.2esr

at bottom :- On 06/05/2019, intrigeri wrote: >> I looked at #928415 and updated to firefox-esr 60.6.2esr-1 as can be >> seen below - > > I assume you mean "Tor Browser", not torbrowser-launcher. > Tor Browser 8.0.9 is not out yet. It should be released later today. > yup, meant the same. Thank

Bug#928415: could somebody look into #928511

Dear all, Could somebody look at #928511 . This is though in respect of torbrowser though . -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com E493

Bug#928511: torbrowser-launcher hasn't updated itself to 60.6.2esr

Package: torbrowser-launcher Version: 0.3.1-2 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, I looked at #928415 and updated to firefox-esr 60.6.2esr-1 as can be seen below - $ apt-cache policy firefox-esr firefox-esr: Installed: 60.6.2esr-1 Candidate: 60.6.2esr-1 Version table: *** 60.6.2esr-1 500

Bug#926062: and it happened today as well, giving more info.

at bottom :- On 02/04/2019, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > Hopefully the above info. should make things more easier to figure out. > > -- > Regards, > Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल > My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 >

Bug#926062: and it happened today as well, giving more info.

Dear Maintainer, Hopefully the above info. should make things more easier to figure out. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com E493 D466

Bug#926062: qbitorrent crashes, blames QNetworkAccessM

Package: qbittorrent Version: 4.1.5-1 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, Sharing below the debugging session - $ gdb qbittorrent GNU gdb (Debian 8.2.1-2) 8.2.1 Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is

Bug#845397: could we think of removing leafpad and use one of the leafpad lookalikes from github

Dear all, Leafpad is dead upstream. Maybe we could use one of the forks from github perhaps ? https://github.com/EEVV/leafpad3 https://github.com/stevenhoneyman/l3afpad I am sure that gtk2 would probably be on its way out soonish as now gtk3 is more or less mainstream and even gtk4 is there in

Bug#880324: any update on ruby-license-finder ftbfs issue ?

Dear all, Any update on the ruby-license-finder fails to build from source (ftbfs) since we now use ruby 2.5 $ ruby -v ruby 2.5.3p105 (2018-10-18 revision 65156) [x86_64-linux-gnu] Also the ruby-license-finder is now at 5.6.0 upstream as also shown by

Bug#789008: At least on Debian testing it upgraded without an issue.

Dear all, At least here it updated without any issues - $ sudo aptitude install insserv -y The following packages will be upgraded: insserv 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/64.7 kB of archives. After unpacking 8,192 B will be used.

Bug#913953: fixed in the new version qbittorrent 4.1.3-1+b1

fixed 913953 4.1.3-1+b1 thanks

Bug#913953: qbittorrent crashes when starting talks of symbol lookup error

Package: qbittorrent Version: 4.1.3-1 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, Qbittorrent crashes and cites symbol lookup error for the crash. $ qbittorrent qbittorrent: symbol lookup error: qbittorrent: undefined symbol: _ZN10libtorrent7session5startEiRKNS_13settings_packEPN5boost4asio10io_serviceE I

Bug#908945: I am surprised why isn't the bug marked grave

Hi all, I was surprised and was hit with this bug today. $ apt-cache policy lxqt-common lxqt-common: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.11.2-2 Version table: 0.11.2-2 500 500 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages $ sudo aptitude install lxqt-common The

Bug#864657: Any updates of ca-certificates-java being dependant on default-jre ?

Hi all, As shared in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864657#14 Also shouldn't openjdk-jre-8 be taken out of the mix now that openjdk-10-jre and now openjdk-11-jre are in the mix. s$ aptitude show default-jre Package: default-jre Version: 2:1.11-69 State: installed

Bug#910911: Could there be any databases built by Debian which might be affected.

Dear all, While upgrading my system, I came across this bug (shared by apt-listbugs) . I wonder if there are any gdbm databases which are built and have that database. The one example that was shared by6 Niko was of libmarc-charset-perl an optional component. Maybe some core packges might be

Bug#850921: you could help with jgit perhaps ?

Dear Rudy, Just saw your response on https://bugs.debian.org/850921 . There is ongoing discussion on gradle bug https://bugs.debian.org/909905 . Maybe packaging a new jgit (if possible) may make it easier. You could join https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/ and also talk to people there.

Bug#793668: there would be an attempt to have an updated angband build with SDL2

Dear Andreas, There are attempts being made at angband forums to have an updated SDL2 frontend . http://angband.oook.cz/forum/showthread.php?t=9076 your expertise may prove to be invaluable as you know about Debian more than me. Just giving you a heads-up in case you become interested. --

Bug#908463: can confirm the issue at my end as well as the presence of the three conffiles -

Dear all, Unable to do anything on tor either using the experimental or using the 0.2.9-4 version - ###!!! [Parent][MessageChannel] Error: (msgtype=0x2C000A,name=PContent::Msg_InitProfiler) Channel error: cannot send/recv [Parent 5116, Main Thread] WARNING: FileDescriptorSet destroyed with

Bug#903579: FWIW I have filed the bug on Debian's behalf

Dear all, While I know barely anything about python, I did however file the bug as shared by Bas and maintained by Sandro Tosi as https://bugs.python.org/issue34684?@template=item&@pagesize=50&@startwith=0 @Sandro Tosi maybe you could enlighten upstream more about the issue and see if a fix is

Bug#908068: The apparmor issue is also documented while upgrading to the experimental version, hope it gets fixed too.

Dear all, Sorry for adding more noise to the report but got the same thing at my end - first there is - torbrowser-launcher Tor Browser Launcher By Micah Lee, licensed under MIT version 0.2.9-3 https://github.com/micahflee/torbrowser-launcher Launching './Browser/start-tor-browser --detach'...

Bug#888423: Are you getting the segfault on the new release as well i.e. 62.0-1

Dear Dmitry E. Oboukhov, Are you still getting crashes with the new release as well ? $ apt-cache policy firefox firefox: Installed: (none) Candidate: 62.0-1 Version table: 62.0-1 100 100 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages $ apt-cache policy

Bug#887666: any update on fixing the javahelper bug ?

Dear all, Any update on getting the javahelper bug fixed ? -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4

Bug#906380: libtool: FTBFS in buster/sid

at bottom :- On 31/08/2018, Juhani Numminen wrote: > Dear Shirish, > > shirish शिरीष kirjoitti 31.08.2018 klo 07:58:> Could you upload the built > libtool binary somewhere so I could install >> it and see if the issue goes away ? > > I've now put the build sources

Bug#906380: libtool: FTBFS in buster/sid

Dear Juhani Numminen, Could you upload the built libtool binary somewhere so I could install it and see if the issue goes away ? Thank you. I'll share my findings on the bug itself. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC

Bug#906380: libtool: FTBFS in buster/sid

at bottom :- On 30/08/2018, Juhani Numminen wrote: > Control: tags -1 patch > > shirish शिरीष kirjoitti 30.08.2018 klo 07:51:> I, and I guess others would > welcome a test build if it helps to see >> if the issue is resolved. See how to apply patch [1] and see if you >

Bug#906380: libtool: FTBFS in buster/sid

at bottom :- On 30/08/2018, Juhani Numminen wrote: > Hello, > > Looking at the log[1] at reproducible builds, it looks like a test failure: > >> Support for older libltdl interfaces. >> >> 102: Makefile.incFAILED >> (old-ltdl-iface.at:134) > > I had a look at

Bug#862373: any update on the libyaml-libyaml-perl bug ?

Dear all, I was trying to install lintian when saw the above - $ sudo aptitude install lintian -y The following NEW packages will be installed: libyaml-libyaml-perl{a} lintian 0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/1,161 kB of archives. After

Bug#905841: looking forward to see the issue getting resolved.

Dear all, I was lookint to install libltdl-dev when I came across this as it prevents me from building local packages. Look forward to an updated solution. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0

Bug#888423: How to get a backtrace

Dear Jiri, See https://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace? . I posted a gist somedays back, maybe that might help you as well. https://gist.github.com/shirishag75/b27ea2231b529a98e524a1c68af0063c -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed

Bug#892394: could somebody share the link of the new mailing list ?

Dear all, Was looking into this bug. Can somebody share the link of the new mailing list as the alioth lists have been archived and lists.debian.org/completeindex.html doesn't tell or show any pkg-boost-devel mailing list :( -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My

Bug#850921: why do we still have openjfx-java version 8 in unstable ?

Dear maintainer, Why do we have libopenjfx-java version 8 in unstable - $ apt-cache policy libopenjfx-java libopenjfx-java: Installed: (none) Candidate: 8u161-b12-1 Version table: 8u161-b12-1 100 100 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages When

Bug#877773: seems the soname version bump is fixed with the commit

Hi all, Can somebody look at https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/6942f6afc6321dcbaabb36ffe2de4b67db6efe4b Maybe the maintainer can take a look at it. There are also some further optimizations which has been made to leveldb library, for instance support or requirement for C++11

Bug#893751: fixed but had to remove earlier version

fixed 893751 2.2.1 thanks Dear all, What had happened is that I had taken the binaries from Vincent's personal repo. at https://people.debian.org/~vlegout/qalc/ and due to that was facing the issue. When I removed/purged the binaries from Vincent's repo. and installed the ones from

Bug#893751: fixed but had to remove earlier version

fixed 893751 2.2.1 Dear all, What had happened is that I had taken the binaries from Vincent's personal repo. at https://people.debian.org/~vlegout/qalc/ and due to that was facing the issue. When I removed/purged the binaries from Vincent's repo. and installed the ones from experimental, the

Bug#893751: libqalculate14: dpkg error, cannot overwrite libqalculate.mo which are both in libqalculate14 and libqalculate14-data

Package: libqalculate14 Version: 2.2.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I tried to install the new package from experimental, got the following - ~$ sudo aptitude install libqalculate14-data The following NEW packages will be installed:

Bug#887856: they have backdated it to 20171117

Dear Julien, I tried the microcode today and this is what it says - ~$ apt-cache policy intel-microcode intel-microcode: Installed: 3.20180108.1+really20171117.1 Candidate: 3.20180108.1+really20171117.1 Version table: *** 3.20180108.1+really20171117.1 900 900

Bug#888236: torbrowser-launcher: broken by Tor Browser 7.5: No such file or directory: '.../Docs/sources/versions'

On 30/01/2018, intrigeri wrote: > Antoine Beaupre: >> This bug makes torbrowser-launcher completely unusable on Debian >> stretch, as soon as the browser is updated (as it should). > >> What's expected from stable users here? Is there going to be a stable >> update for this?

Bug#822595: Raising severity to serious for packages depending on gksu

at bottom :- On 31/12/2017, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Mike Gabriel > wrote: >> I will drop severity temporarily for this bug, because we need >> caja-extensions 1.18 in testing

Bug#877085: a possible workaround and did not crash my system.

Dear Andy, While Michael Biebl is right and perhaps those dmesg logs might give an answer to what actually happened, the criticalness you gave to the bug had me using a work-around which didn't crash the system. 1. Do CTRL+ALT+F1...F6 (anyone) 2. Login as a normal user 3. Do sudo

Bug#874216: aggressive polling by libmtp resulting in multiple messages.

reassign 874216 gvfs-backends thanks Hi there, Thank you for maintaining libmtp all these years and at times it has been a lifesaver. Although now, It seems aggresive polling is being used by libmtp as I get notifications of denial as shared in screenshots and there are a multiple ones at that.

Bug#874216:

at bottom :- On 04/09/2017, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > What is making the screenshots? libadb can't do that. Also, where do > you see the message "Unable to mount Samsung Samsung Android/"? Where > are you seeing a prompt that asks permission for phone access? > I meant

Bug#874216:

Package: android-libadb Version: 1:7.0.0+r33-2 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, I get screenshots saying "Unable to mount Samsung Samsung Android/" and constantly asks permissions for phone access. This usen't used to before. I am unablto diagnose whether

Bug#873853: youtube-dl: unable to download channels - please update to 2017.08.27.1 with code from issue 14083 upstream

Package: youtube-dl Version: 2017.05.18.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I have been unable to download channel content from evening itself. A web search/surf revealed that youtube has changed the rules again and some proposed code is shared in

Bug#868280: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#868280: even after purging and installing fresh torbrowser-launcher doesn't work.

Reply in-line :- On 22/07/2017, intrigeri wrote: > Hi shirish! > Hi intrigeri, >> I purged and reinstalled amd getting the same error - > > Do you mean you purged the package, or also ~/.local/share/torbrowser/? > I actually had done both and it still showed the error.

Bug#868280: even after purging and installing fresh torbrowser-launcher doesn't work.

Dear maintainer, I purged and reinstalled amd getting the same error - [$] LC_ALL=C torbrowser-launcher Tor Browser Launcher By Micah Lee, licensed under MIT version 0.2.7 https://github.com/micahflee/torbrowser-launcher Launching './Browser/start-tor-browser --detach'... ./Browser/execdesktop:

Bug#868280: torbrowser-launcher: after update torbrowser-launcher doesn't work, the binary is not in its place.

Package: torbrowser-launcher Version: 0.2.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, Thank you for maintaining torbrowser-launcher as long as you have. As a privacy advocate and user, I appreciate the security the browser brings. I had been ill for a while and

Bug#866629: It seems to an issue with regular bootable non-free iso as well.

at bottom :- On 03/07/2017, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hi Shirish, > > I've just tested locally using > > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/9.0.0+nonfree/amd64/iso-cd/firmware-9.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso > > and I see no such issue. Are you

Bug#866629: It seems to an issue with regular bootable non-free iso as well.

Dear all, We were doing a release party for Stretch in Pune when we were hit with this bug. Notice the UI, it seems even regular (not just live) is also hit with the same bug. The picture was captured by Gaurav. As we were in midst of things, I forgot to see what messages were coming on the

Bug#820381: Can't reproduce

at bottom :- On 25/02/2017, Hilko Bengen wrote: > Hi, > > I can reproduce the bug on neither amd64 (4.9.0-1-amd64) nor i386 > (4.9.0-1-686-pae). > > Cheers, > -Hilko > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to 820381-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org. > Could you share what attempts you

Bug#849845: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#849845: Bug#849845: dirmngr: Can't resolve keyserver hostname anymore

at bottom :- On 08/01/2017, intrigeri <intrig...@debian.org> wrote: > shirish शिरीष: >> ─[$] gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DAD95197 > >> gpg: keyserver receive failed: No keyserver available > >> Tried it multiple times but get the above failure. >

Bug#849845: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#849845: Bug#849845: dirmngr: Can't resolve keyserver hostname anymore

at bottom :- On 08/01/2017, intrigeri <intrig...@debian.org> wrote: > shirish शिरीष: >> in-line :- > >> On 07/01/2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: >>> Have you restarted dirmngr since the upgrade? > >> how do I restart

Bug#849845: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#849845: Bug#849845: dirmngr: Can't resolve keyserver hostname anymore

in-line :- On 07/01/2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > On Fri 2017-01-06 17:49:04 -0500, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> But issue is still continuing - >> >> ─[$] gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DAD95197 >> >> [4:22:18] >>

Bug#849845: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#849845: Bug#849845: dirmngr: Can't resolve keyserver hostname anymore

Hi all, I was able to get the new version - ─[$] sudo aptitude install gnupg=2.1.17-3 dirmngr=2.1.17-3 gpgv=2.1.17-3 gnupg-agent=2.1.17-3 gpgsm=2.1.17-3 scdaemon=2.1.17-3 -y Installed it perfectly ─[$] apt-cache policy gnupg [4:19:09] gnupg: Installed: 2.1.17-3 Candidate: 2.1.17-3

Bug#849845: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#849845: Bug#849845: dirmngr: Can't resolve keyserver hostname anymore

at bottom :- On 07/01/2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Fri 2017-01-06 12:49:32 -0500, Jaden Peterson wrote: >> I have no place in the topic of this bug, but I installed the patches >> you provided on January 5th onto my Debian Testing system. I would like >> to

Bug#849845: got hit as well

Hi all, Got hit on one of my machines which upgraded before the serious bug was invoked - └─[$] apt-cache policy gnupg dirmngr gnupg: Installed: 2.1.17-2 Candidate: 2.1.17-2 Version table: *** 2.1.17-2 600 600 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages

Bug#849602: not a bug

at bottom :- On 04/01/2017, Patrick Mutwiri wrote: > thats how fonts are installed. > > > this is not a bug. > > > > > *Kind Regards,* > > > Patrick Mutwiri / _dev > > +254 727 542 899 > > Nairobi, Kenya > > http://patric.xyz > > [image: Twitter]

Bug#847143: any updates to this please ?

Hi all, Any updates to the speech-dispatcher-ng breaks+replaces bug please. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE

Bug#846079:

Hi all, I also didn't get any messages except a few by adequate but don't think they are anything to do with the issue the OP shared - At the very end - adequate found packaging bugs - procps: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /bin/kill =>

Bug#844701: dpkg: buggy dpkg 1.8.11 and above ? Package: dpkg

in-line :- On 21/11/2016, Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 01:47:45 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> The patch didn't work :( > > Well that it didn't work was actually also very useful! Because in > your case it should not h

Bug#844701: dpkg: buggy dpkg 1.8.11 and above ? Package: dpkg

at bottom :- On 21/11/2016, shirish शिरीष <shirisha...@gmail.com> wrote: > at bottom :- > Trying with the new versions got this (again) - > > [$] sudo aptitude reinstall cme libconfig-model-perl > libconfig-model-dpkg-perl fonts-arphic-uming > [1:46:39]

Bug#844701: dpkg: buggy dpkg 1.8.11 and above ? Package: dpkg

at bottom :- On 20/11/2016, Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: retitle -1 dpkg-maintscript-helper: Version comparison fails for > supposedly valid versions > Control: severity -1 serious > > Hi! > > On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 14:02:39 +0530, shirish शि

Bug#842939: I had done the RFP and some more analysis

Hi all, Blame me as I had done the RFP for the package but then I was influenced by statements of FSF, HTTPS Everywhere and I think even the Guardian Project which had endorsed the add-on. When such big hitters of FOSS and free software values endorse something, we are bound to think it's

Bug#827395: get less on 49.0. at my end -

Package: firefox Version: 49.0-4 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I used wireshark to find out as can be seen at http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/315315/how-to-get-list-of-sites-domains-linked-to-in-wireshark and in a new profile in firefox 49.0 the situation doesn't seem to be so dire,

Bug#833902: jitsi: unable to install jitsi on Debian testing

Source: jitsi Version: 2.5.5313-1 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, Jitsi is still uninstallable on amd64 - [$] sudo aptitude install jitsi -y [sudo] password for shirish: The following NEW packages will be installed: jitsi{b} jitsi-common{a}

Bug#746005: lilypond 2.19.45 was just released few days back.

Hi all, It would be nice if we can get lilypond 2.19.x series in experimental than not having it at all. I read the whole discussion and I would suggest Dr. Tobias Quathamer if possible to atleast make an NMU targetting experimental and share/give some sort of roadmap or timeline as to when 2.20

Bug#825791: caja crashes

Package: caja Version: 1.14.1-1 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, Trying to start caja on the Desktop gives me the following output on the CLI - [$] caja (caja:24636): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:63:28: The :prelight pseudo-class is

Bug#825789: kshisen crashes

Package: kshisen Version: 4:16.04.1-1 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, Get the following when trying to launch the new kshisen on Debian testing - [$] kshisen [4:10:59] AL lib: (WW)

Bug#807323: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#807323: gparted needs policykit-1 but its neither in depends or recommends

at bottom :- On 23/12/2015, Phillip Susi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Control: reopen -1 > > On 12/22/2015 08:11 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >> First, please CC the package when you re-assign a bug report. > > Why? The BTS forwards the message

Bug#807323: gparted needs policykit-1 but its neither in depends or recommends

at bottom :- On 13/12/2015, Phillip Susi <ps...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 12/08/2015 04:49 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> You would have to share the whole command, because I'm not so >> familiar with u

Bug#807323: gparted needs policykit-1 but its neither in depends or recommends

at bottom :- On 08/12/2015, Phillip Susi <ps...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 12/07/2015 11:57 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> Yup, have udisks2 installed. > > Just to confirm, can you run /usr/lib/udisks2/udisks2-inh

Bug#807323: gparted needs policykit-1 but its neither in depends or recommends

On 07/12/2015, Phil Susi wrote: > Do you have udisks2 installed? The only connection I can think of from > gparted to policykit is through udisks, as the gparted script tries to > run udisks-inhibit to stop auto mounting. I'm guessing that is where > this bug needs reassigned.

Bug#807323: gparted needs policykit-1 but its neither in depends or recommends

Package: gparted Version: 0.19.0-3+b2 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, This is how gparted currently looks. [$] aptitude show gparted Package: gparted State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 0.19.0-3+b2 Priority: optional Section: gnome

Bug#780162: shouldn't the bug be tackled at upstream - i.e. smartmontools upstream ?

Hi all, @ Chris - could you share the relevant bug number where you posted the scripts/patch upstream ? >From the initial bug you reported " (The scripts have been posted upstream without response, but it is still a distro resposibility to ensure that insta(The scripts have been posted upstream

Bug#785782: ran into the same issue here.

Dear Maintainer, I ran into the same issue. I had to revert to lightdm due to the issues above. I have saved the journal but instead of sharing it fully, would like to share only the excerpts. Are there any keyword or keywords that you could share that I could grep and share with you the results.

Bug#789038: jitsi: Unable to install on sid/unstable

Dear Kurt, Any news from ftp-masters ? Did you ping them recently ? Or we going to wait out the stretch cycle, we are already near alpha 4 and there hasn't been any possibility of testing jitsi as libjitsi is stuck in new. Look forward to know if you have been able to make any progress. --

Bug#753669: seems there is no movement on the qemu side.

Hi all, There doesn't seem to be any movement on the qemu front. @Martin Berends any updates ? It perhaps would be better to move/fork the project to alioth and have a git repo. and maintain it there in case if you really want to do it. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष

Bug#789038: jitsi: Unable to install on sid/unstable

ping, any updates on getting jitsi for talking to people ? -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4

Bug#774149: Workaround working

Dear Rogério, I would simply say go ahead with your plan. If you are able to resolve the issues with a new release, then nothing like it. I am already subscribed to the package in case a new one comes out :) Although at my end, it is also ntfs which shows the same problem as external usb-hdd.

Bug#789038: jitsi: Unable to install on sid/unstable

at bottom :- On 6/17/15, shirish शिरीष shirisha...@gmail.com wrote: at bottom :- On 6/17/15, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote: libjitsi is still in NEW. You will have to wait for that. Kurt Thank you for informing Kurt. Dear Kurt, Any updates ? If not, try connecting to ftp-master

Bug#774149: mounting and unmounting manually.

addition at bottom :- On 7/8/15, jean-marc montanier montanier.jeanm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Just a quick message to report that the nasty workaround is anyway efficient. It's working on my Jessie, thanks. If udisks2 is covering the functionalities of usbmount and has an active

Bug#791349: downloading texlive-latex-extra and then doing dpkg -i --force-overwrite

at bottom :- On 7/4/15, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: On Sat, 04 Jul 2015, shirish शिरीष wrote: But the 'excuse' given by Norbert does not hold as the same root issue What are you complaining - fixed packages are already on the Debian server ;-) Not complaining at all, was just

Bug#791349: downloading texlive-latex-extra and then doing dpkg -i --force-overwrite

Hi all, While the workaround that Norbert shares works :- $] sudo aptitude download texlive-latex-extra=2015.20150703-1 [sudo] password for shirish: Get: 1 http://httpredir.debian.org//debian/ unstable/main texlive-latex-extra all 2015.20150703-1 [9,670 kB] Fetched 9,670 kB in 2min 36s (61.6

Bug#781094: any updates gentleman to the openssl issue ?

Hi all, Any updates that are shareable with us for the new version of openssl ? -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE

Bug#790051: texlive-music: fails to install and configure because same file is present in different package

Package: texlive-music Version: 2015.20150524-1 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, I was upgrading tex*-all when was hit with this :- Preparing to unpack .../texlive-music_2015.20150625-1_all.deb ... D01: process_archive oldversionstatus=installed

Bug#789346: mate-sensors-applet: Cannot install mate-sensors-applet-common because a .mo file is also present in mate-sensors-applet

in-line :- On 6/20/15, Vlad Orlov mon...@inbox.ru wrote: Hi, Hi Vlad, Sorry, my mistake - set too old version in Replaces/Breaks field. This commit might fix the problem: https://github.com/mate-desktop/debian-packages/commit/c73060e541bfbb137782921bd28e6a13aa117a47 Probably you or Mike

Bug#789444: mate-indicator-applet: Cannot install mate-indicator-applet due to duplicate .mo file in both the packages

Package: mate-indicator-applet Version: 1.10.0-1~exp1 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, I was upgrading mate-indicator-applet when ran into this :- [$] sudo aptitude install mate-indicator-applet=1.10.0-1~exp1 mate-indicator-applet-common=1.10.0-1~exp1 -y

Bug#789348: mate-applets: Unable to install mate-applets because of a file conflict in mate-applets-common

Package: mate-applets Version: 1.10.0+dfsg1-1~exp1 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, I was trying to install mate-applets when ran into this :- [$] sudo aptitude install mate-applets=1.10.0+dfsg1-1~exp1 mate-applets-common=1.10.0+dfsg1-1~exp1 The following

  1   2   >