Bug#1023284: libevent: FTBFS with glibc 2.36

2023-03-03 Thread Nicolas Mora
Hello, The patch was submitted upstream for their feedback [1], and was finally agreed. So I will upload a new package very soon then. /Nicolas [1] https://github.com/libevent/libevent/issues/1393#issuecomment-1453924054

Bug#1023284: libevent: FTBFS with glibc 2.36

2023-03-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, It seems a fix for this is sitting git, but hasn't been uploaded. Is there a reason it's not been uploaded yet? Kurt

Bug#1023284: libevent: FTBFS with glibc 2.36

2023-01-16 Thread Nicolas Mora
Hello, I opened an issue upstream [1] to ask for feedbacks. Azat suggest to change the function signature from void evutil_secure_rng_add_bytes(const char *buf, size_t n); to: int evutil_secure_rng_add_bytes(const char *buf, size_t n) and make evutil_secure_rng_add_bytes to return -1, to

Bug#1023284: libevent: FTBFS with glibc 2.36

2023-01-04 Thread Nicolas Mora
Hello all, I'm forwarding my questions and thoughts about this patch. Le 2023-01-04 à 11 h 39, Shengjing Zhu a écrit : So Just make evutil_secure_rng_add_bytes noop with glibc's implemtation of arc4random. Please see following patch. In the libevent repo, azat mentions that nooping

Bug#1023284: libevent: FTBFS with glibc 2.36

2023-01-04 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 10:56:09AM -0500, Nicolas Mora wrote: > Hello, > > Le 2022-11-17 à 04 h 15, Benjamin Drung a écrit : > > > > We did a library transition in Ubuntu to remove this symbol: > > https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990941 > > Attached the patch we applied. > > > Thanks, I've made a

Bug#1023284: libevent: FTBFS with glibc 2.36

2022-11-25 Thread Nicolas Mora
Hello, Le 2022-11-17 à 04 h 15, Benjamin Drung a écrit : We did a library transition in Ubuntu to remove this symbol: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990941 Attached the patch we applied. Thanks, I've made a new package based on your patch lately, libevent_2.1.12-stable-7 is in NEW for now [1].

Bug#1023284: libevent: FTBFS with glibc 2.36

2022-11-17 Thread Benjamin Drung
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 00:32:52 +0100 Samuel Thibault wrote: > Nicolas Mora, le mer. 02 nov. 2022 19:14:51 -0400, a ecrit: > > If I understand correctly, removing the symbols evutil_secure_rng_add_bytes from the symbols files is enough to fix this bug? > > It will make the package build again. But

Bug#1023284: libevent: FTBFS with glibc 2.36

2022-11-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Nicolas Mora, le mer. 02 nov. 2022 19:14:51 -0400, a ecrit: > If I understand correctly, removing the symbols evutil_secure_rng_add_bytes > from the symbols files is enough to fix this bug? It will make the package build again. But possibly some binaries in Debian are using that symbol, that'd

Bug#1023284: libevent: FTBFS with glibc 2.36

2022-11-02 Thread Nicolas Mora
Hello, If I understand correctly, removing the symbols evutil_secure_rng_add_bytes from the symbols files is enough to fix this bug? If no objection, I'll upload the fixed package tomorrow.

Bug#1023284: libevent: FTBFS with glibc 2.36

2022-11-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Source: libevent Version: 2.0.21-stable-2+deb8u1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hello, Since the upload of glibc 2.36 in unstable (2.36-3), libevent fails to build from source: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below