Bug#1024898: mozc: FTBFS on armel

Hi Nobuhiro, On 2022-12-09 01:52, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: Thanks for your help! 2022年12月9日(金) 9:03 Gunnar Hjalmarsson : Under the assumption that it's better to have mozc without the armel arch in testing than seeing mozc go away (see ), I'm about to do an

Bug#1024898: mozc: FTBFS on armel

Hi, Thanks for your help! 2022年12月9日(金) 9:03 Gunnar Hjalmarsson : > > On 2022-12-01 11:28, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > > How important is it that mozc is available on armel? Would it be an > > option to drop the armel support in bookworm? > > Under the assumption that it's better to have mozc

Bug#1024898: mozc: FTBFS on armel

On 2022-12-01 11:28, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: How important is it that mozc is available on armel? Would it be an option to drop the armel support in bookworm? Under the assumption that it's better to have mozc without the armel arch in testing than seeing mozc go away (see

Bug#1024898: mozc: FTBFS on armel

How important is it that mozc is available on armel? Would it be an option to drop the armel support in bookworm? -- Gunnar

Bug#1024898: mozc: FTBFS on armel

In the hope that working around https://bugs.debian.org/1023525 would fix also this build failure on armel, I NMU'ed a workaround to experimental: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mozc/-/commit/cc5301a0 It made no difference wrt the armel FTBFS, though. -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson

Bug#1024898: mozc: FTBFS on armel

Source: mozc Version: 2.28.4715.102+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mozc=armel=2.28.4715.102%2Bdfsg-2=1669203429=0