On 2023-07-28 18:04:24 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Note that I would like to keep unison-2.52 (even if a newer version
> is packaged) at least in trixie, to allow synchronizing between
> bookworm and trixie.
Is this version really needed?
/usr/share/doc/unison-2.52/NEWS.md.gz says:
##
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1041789 [src:unison-2.51+4.13.1] RM: unison-2.51+4.13.1 -- RoQA; newer
version packaged
Bug reassigned from package 'src:unison-2.51+4.13.1' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions unison-2.51+4.13.1/2.51.5-1.
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Le 23/07/2023 à 18:49, Bastian Germann a écrit :
Source: unison-2.51+4.13.1
Version: 2.51.5-1
Severity: serious
Why is unison-2.51+4.13.1 not removed yet when unison-2.52 is available?
It is OK to remove unison-2.51+4.13.1 from unstable now.
Note that I
Source: unison-2.51+4.13.1
Version: 2.51.5-1
Severity: serious
Why is unison-2.51+4.13.1 not removed yet when unison-2.52 is available?
4 matches
Mail list logo