Bug#1041789: RM: unison-2.51+4.13.1 -- RoQA; newer version packaged

2023-07-29 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2023-07-28 18:04:24 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Note that I would like to keep unison-2.52 (even if a newer version > is packaged) at least in trixie, to allow synchronizing between > bookworm and trixie. Is this version really needed? /usr/share/doc/unison-2.52/NEWS.md.gz says: ##

Processed: Re: Bug#1041789: RM: unison-2.51+4.13.1 -- RoQA; newer version packaged

2023-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #1041789 [src:unison-2.51+4.13.1] RM: unison-2.51+4.13.1 -- RoQA; newer version packaged Bug reassigned from package 'src:unison-2.51+4.13.1' to 'ftp.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions unison-2.51+4.13.1/2.51.5-1.

Bug#1041789: RM: unison-2.51+4.13.1 -- RoQA; newer version packaged

2023-07-28 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Le 23/07/2023 à 18:49, Bastian Germann a écrit : Source: unison-2.51+4.13.1 Version: 2.51.5-1 Severity: serious Why is unison-2.51+4.13.1 not removed yet when unison-2.52 is available? It is OK to remove unison-2.51+4.13.1 from unstable now. Note that I

Bug#1041789: RM: unison-2.51+4.13.1 -- RoQA; newer version packaged

2023-07-23 Thread Bastian Germann
Source: unison-2.51+4.13.1 Version: 2.51.5-1 Severity: serious Why is unison-2.51+4.13.1 not removed yet when unison-2.52 is available?