On 12/10/23 12:08, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 02:18:38AM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
[Catch 2]
While it is definitely possible to port the
openMSX tests to use catch2 v3, we will be departing from what
upstream supports, and that seems like it could lead to way more work
than
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 02:18:38AM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> > [Catch 2]
> While it is definitely possible to port the
> openMSX tests to use catch2 v3, we will be departing from what
> upstream supports, and that seems like it could lead to way more work
> than necessary (for instance, what
Alright, so apparently I can't read. I totally missed that you had mentioned
there was already a bug report against Lintian about this problem. I think we
probably should override the errors anyway for now since I am not an
experienced Lintian or Perl developer and it will take me some time to
Is this bug something we're still actively working on? It's been a few
days. If I missed something, feel free to let me know.
--
Aaron Rainbolt
Lubuntu Developer
Matrix: @arraybolt3:matrix.org
IRC: arraybolt3 on irc.libera.chat
GitHub: https://github.com/ArrayBolt3
On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 2:04 AM Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is starting to look great, thanks a lot of all the work. :-) However, I
> still see a few issues with it:
>
> - the references to C-BIOS in the XML configuration files should not be
> removed. When running, they are usually
Hi,
This is starting to look great, thanks a lot of all the work. :-) However, I
still see a few issues with it:
- the references to C-BIOS in the XML configuration files should not be
removed. When running, they are usually availably from the cbios package.
And if the user didn't install
Alright, here's the latest openMSX package with all C-BIOS binaries
patched out. Now that there's no new binaries, I can just send this as a
debdiff attachment. Keep in mind all the binary files mentioned in the
diff have to be deleted from the source tree.
Thanks for collaborating with me so
On 11/29/23 14:40, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 01:52:46PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
It appears that the C-BIOS package in Debian only ships the most recent
C-BIOS files. I think we can't just depend on it for this reason, since the
older C-BIOS ROMs are needed to avoid save
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 01:52:46PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> It appears that the C-BIOS package in Debian only ships the most recent
> C-BIOS files. I think we can't just depend on it for this reason, since the
> older C-BIOS ROMs are needed to avoid save state breakage. See
>
It appears that the C-BIOS package in Debian only ships the most recent C-BIOS
files. I think we can't just depend on it for this reason, since the older
C-BIOS ROMs are needed to avoid save state breakage. See
Contrib/cbios-old/README in the openMSX package.
--
Aaron Rainbolt
Lubuntu
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:17 AM Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot for not just finding those issues, but also fixing them! That is
> much appreciated.
>
> As for the license, Manuel (who is upstream) pointed out that the entire
> source
> code is (and always has been) GPL-2 only.
Hi,
Thanks a lot for not just finding those issues, but also fixing them! That is
much appreciated.
As for the license, Manuel (who is upstream) pointed out that the entire source
code is (and always has been) GPL-2 only. The only issue with that is the
packaging, which is GPL-3+. But that was
I had a Debian Developer review my packaging work. I got the package
version string wrong and was slightly vague about the debhelper version
update in the changelog. Both of those things are now fixed and I have
the fixed files pushed to the same GitHub repo as last time,
On 11/27/23 15:02, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
On 27-11-2023 02:11, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
Alright, I have fully rebuilt the copyright file. I also ended up
adding the source code for several releases of C-BIOS into the
packaging. As this code is in the form of zipped files for the sake
of size,
On 27-11-2023 02:11, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
Alright, I have fully rebuilt the copyright file. I also ended up
adding the source code for several releases of C-BIOS into the
packaging. As this code is in the form of zipped files for the sake of
size, it's not exactly practical to provide the new
Alright, I have fully rebuilt the copyright file. I also ended up adding
the source code for several releases of C-BIOS into the packaging. As
this code is in the form of zipped files for the sake of size, it's not
exactly practical to provide the new source package changes as a debdiff
since
Failed to reply to the right address, so forwarding.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Aaron Rainbolt
Date: Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#1056780: openmsx: Source-less Windows binary in
source package (and other packaging issues)
To: Manuel Bilderbeek
Thanks! I
On 26-11-2023 18:39, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
Further investigation trying to rebuild the copyright file has
revealed more binaries without source code (the C-BIOS ROMs for
instance). So I'll have to find the sources for those also. Thanks for
your patience.
The C-BIOS ROMs have their source
Further investigation trying to rebuild the copyright file has revealed
more binaries without source code (the C-BIOS ROMs for instance). So
I'll have to find the sources for those also. Thanks for your patience.
--
Aaron Rainbolt
Lubuntu Developer
Matrix: @arraybolt3:matrix.org
IRC:
My reasoning here is that the openMSX code specifies "Some source
files contain a license notice; all other source files are licensed
under the GNU Public License (GPL), of which you can find a copy in
the file 'GPL.txt'." That file contains a GPL-2 license, so the
repository-wide license is
Hi,
The license of openMSX has always been GPL 2 only.
Is there a problem somewhere?
Op zo 26 nov. 2023 09:57 schreef Dr. Bas Wijnen :
> Hi,
>
> First of all, thank you for the report and patch. I'll look in more detail
> shortly.
>
> However, after quickly looking over it, I have one question:
Hi,
First of all, thank you for the report and patch. I'll look in more detail
shortly.
However, after quickly looking over it, I have one question: you change the
license from "GPL (any version)" to "GPL (version 2)". Why did you do that?
The upstream license information is admittedly not very
Uh... ok so apparently either Gmail or the Debian BTS ate my patch, so
here's a second attempt, this time as a file attachment.
Also, it appears that the openMSX maintainer's debian.org email address
must be pointing to an Apple support address since I've now gotten two
"Thank you for
Here's a debdiff between the current version of the openMSX package and
a proposed new version that fixes this bug. **Note**: It is necessary to
also delete the Contrib/codec/Win32/zmbv.dll file in the source package
tree (debdiffs don't seem to communicate deleted binary files very well).
Package: openmsx
Version: 19.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: arraybo...@ubuntu.com
Packages in the Debian `main` archive area *must* comply with the DFSG, of
which section 2 states "The program must include source code, and must allow
distribution in source code as
25 matches
Mail list logo
