Bug#317963: quodlibet: fails to start on x86_64

2006-06-15 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, why is this bug report still open? I see that it is fixed in quodlibet = 0.15, and both testing (0.20) and unstable (0.21) have versions that work. Perhaps it makes sense to add the stable tag to this, since it only applies to the current version

Bug#317963: quodlibet: fails to start on x86_64

2006-06-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:06:50AM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: why is this bug report still open? It isn't, it's marked as fixed in version 0.15-2 and above. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and

Bug#317963: quodlibet: fails to start on x86_64

2006-06-15 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ah, sorry about the false alarm. I saw the bug in the RC list at http://bts.turmzimmer.net/, but I assume they don't track versions. Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlüssel `. `'

Bug#317963: quodlibet: fails to start on x86_64

2005-11-19 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:20 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Yes, this failure is due to a bug in python2.3, but seriously -- this isn't Java, and zip files aren't cool. I really can't see any good reason for obfuscating the python files in this manner within the Debian package. So read

Bug#317963: quodlibet: fails to start on x86_64

2005-11-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 01:01:16AM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote: On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:20 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Yes, this failure is due to a bug in python2.3, but seriously -- this isn't Java, and zip files aren't cool. I really can't see any good reason for obfuscating the python