On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
As I understand it the best gain this change in the debhelper
compatibility level at this point could bring us, is that the package
builds just as well as with the existing level. So why did you do that now
instead of after the freeze?
Well, there
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:17:15PM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
Changing to a new version of a build system really isn't something
that's garunteed to be 100% trouble free. Your other packages will have
had more than a month, and I'd like to shin
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:22:28PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Well, there was no response to my diff from RM so I guess it is accepted
the way I tried to address their concerns. I just uploaded
Thanks, ACCEPTed.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top
3 matches
Mail list logo
