On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 08:36:06AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
What is the relation of grep-excuses with a NMU made like 10 months
ago :?
Grep-excuses told me that the bug was still open and blocking. Also,
there was this from DDPO:
=== chrony:
= 2 Release Critical bug(s):
- #637526
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 21:09 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 08:36:06AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
What is the relation of grep-excuses with a NMU made like 10 months
ago :?
Grep-excuses told me that the bug was still open and blocking. Also,
there was this from
chrony is failing to migrate because it FTBFS...
Yes, I know. faq.html is not being created on the buildds (though it is
here). I was testing my next version when I found out about that.
Oddly, no FTBS bugs were filed.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
It appears that the buildds are running binary-arch before binary-indep,
while locally (and previously on the buildds) binary-indep runs first.
Binary-arch runs dh_installdocs which tries and fails to install
faq.html because it has not yet been created. I'll move the faq stuff
into binary-arch
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 15:37 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
It appears that the buildds are running binary-arch before binary-indep,
No, they're *only* running binary-arch and have done for a while (since
#229357 finally got fixed in dpkg 1.16.2). buildds don't build arch:all
packages, so there's no
Adam writes:
buildds don't build arch:all packages, so there's no reason for them
to run binary-indep.
So I must include the binary-indep target but I may not put anything in
it? Whatever. Doesn't really matter to any of my packages now that I
am aware of it.
--
John Hasler
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 04:13:28PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Package: chrony
Version: 1.26-1
Should have been mentioned in changelog.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
This bug was already closed by a NMU.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 07:41:42AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
This bug was already closed by a NMU.
Yet it showed up in grep-excuses.
What is the relation of grep-excuses with a NMU made like 10 months ago :?
BTW, you removed the changelog entry of my NMU, that is not nice.
Ana
--
To
This bug was already closed by a NMU.
Yet it showed up in grep-excuses.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
What is the relation of grep-excuses with a NMU made like 10 months
ago :?
Grep-excuses told me that the bug was still open and blocking. Also,
there was this from DDPO:
=== chrony:
= 2 Release Critical bug(s):
- #637526 http://bugs.debian.org/637526
incorrect copyright file
- #628919
10 matches
Mail list logo
