On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:11:14 +0200 Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:
> Hi Cristian, > > I have seen that you cherry picked from the experimental branch patches > to close several bugs but I think due to bug #642733 the package can not > yet go to testing and thus there is the danger that its reverse depends > will be kicked as well. Would you please consider fixing #642733 as > well? Hi Andreas, this bug has been fixed in unstable with the upload of poco 1.3.6p1-2. It is just a copy of #654238, but I didn't notice because it was already marked as fixed by the upload of poco 1.4.2p1-1 in experimental. Also, bug #680798 in sitplus is already fixed for me. Please let me know if there is something more I can do to let poco and its deps enter wheezy. Thanks, -- Cristian Greco GPG key ID: 0xCF4D32E4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
