On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:45:02 +0200 Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:
> Hi, > > I tried to apply the patch that is supposed to solve the problem below > but I was running in another problem which sounds quite familiar from > other gcc-4.7 issues. I tried to fix the problem in Git > > git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/poco.git > > and created a branch NMU/1.3.6p1-1.1 where I created a dpatch file > debian/patches/gcc-4.7.dpatch which unfortunately just reiterates > the original problem and ends up in > > /tmp/buildd/poco-1.3.6p1/Foundation/include/Poco/String.h: In instantiation > of 'S Poco::replace(const S&, const typename S::value_type*, const typename > S::value_type*, typename S::size_type) [with S = std:: basic_string<char>; > typename S::value_type = char; typename S::size_type = long unsigned int]': > src/X509Certificate.cpp:175:55: required from here > /tmp/buildd/poco-1.3.6p1/Foundation/include/Poco/String.h:448:2: error: > 'replaceInPlace' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were > found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation > [-fpermissive] > /tmp/buildd/poco-1.3.6p1/Foundation/include/Poco/String.h:480:4: note: > 'template<class S> S& Poco::replaceInPlace(S&, const S&, const S&, typename > S::size_type)' declared here, later in the translation unit > > > Unfortunately my C++ knowledge is to limited to find an easy clue how to > fix this and would be more than happy if somebody could provide some fix. > > BTW, it seems to me that libpoco development only happens in experimental > and unstable does not deserve the attention it would need. Please help > fixing the problem to make sure the reverse depends can stay in testing. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > ----- Forwarded message from Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> ----- > > Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:23:26 +0200 > From: Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> > To: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malate...@gmail.com>, 680...@bugs.debian.org, > Krzysztof Burghardt <krzysz...@burghardt.pl>, > 650...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#680798: sitplus: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > there is a long standing (>6 month) RC bug filed against poco including > a patch for this problem. When applying the patch and trying to build > the package I realised another FTBFS problem when building with gcc-4.7. > I'm currently trying to fix this problem and if I succeede I will upload > to DELAYED/2. Otherwise I'll ask for help on debian-mentors and will > NMU-upload once the problem is solved. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:52:33AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > 'lo > > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:38:24AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > >> I believe this is because libpoco-dev was removed from testing: > > >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/poco/news/20120619T163916Z.html > > > > > > I came to the same conclusion but I have no idea how we (in terms > > > of sitplus maintainers) could solve this. > > > > The patch looks straighfoward to apply but for some reason was never > > applied. So I simply ping'd the maintainers again: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650059#16 > > > > We'll see. > > -- > > Mathieu Hi all, as someone already mentioned, the development of poco happened in experimental in the last year. I never did upload to unstable because there was a problem with reverse-deps and the boost libraries. Although I stopped uploading to experimental some months ago, it still builds fine and contains a lot of patches (some submitted upstream). I'll try to fix the ftbfs for the version of poco in unstable and make an upload as soon as possible. Thanks, -- Cristian Greco GPG key ID: 0xCF4D32E4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature