Bug#712797: libtorrent-rasterbar: FTBFS on kfreebsd

2013-06-20 Thread Pino Toscano
tag 712797 + fixed-upstream thanks Alle mercoledì 19 giugno 2013, Cristian Greco ha scritto: Although the patch seems more than reasonable, I'd prefer to wait for a bit of feedback from Arvid before introducing it. Arvid fixed the issue already (!), although I did not check the actual patch

Processed: Re: Bug#712797: libtorrent-rasterbar: FTBFS on kfreebsd

2013-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 712797 + fixed-upstream Bug #712797 [src:libtorrent-rasterbar] libtorrent-rasterbar: FTBFS on kfreebsd Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 712797:

Bug#712797: libtorrent-rasterbar: FTBFS on kfreebsd

2013-06-20 Thread Cristian Greco
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:21:31 +0200 Pino Toscano p...@debian.org wrote: tag 712797 + fixed-upstream thanks Alle mercoledì 19 giugno 2013, Cristian Greco ha scritto: Although the patch seems more than reasonable, I'd prefer to wait for a bit of feedback from Arvid before introducing it.

Bug#712797: libtorrent-rasterbar: FTBFS on kfreebsd

2013-06-19 Thread Pino Toscano
Source: libtorrent-rasterbar Version: 0.16.10-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Control: found -1 libtorrent-rasterbar/0.16.9-1 Hi, libtorrent-rasterbar 0.16.9/10

Bug#712797: libtorrent-rasterbar: FTBFS on kfreebsd

2013-06-19 Thread Cristian Greco
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0200 Pino Toscano p...@debian.org wrote: Hi, libtorrent-rasterbar 0.16.9/10 does not compile on kFreeBSD[1][2]. The issue, which I reported upstream[3], is due to a wrong configuration (in config.hpp) of the iconv arguments used. Attached there is a copy

Bug#712797: libtorrent-rasterbar: FTBFS on kfreebsd

2013-06-19 Thread Pino Toscano
Ciao! Alle mercoledì 19 giugno 2013, Cristian Greco ha scritto: Thank you for your prompt help with this patch, I really appreciate it! Although the patch seems more than reasonable, I'd prefer to wait for a bit of feedback from Arvid before introducing it. That's ok for me -- I opened the