Package: clamav-freshclam
Version: 0.98.5~rc1+dfsg-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Fails on start. I imagine this wasn't tested?
Setting up clamav-freshclam (0.98.5~rc1+dfsg-3) ...
[] Starting ClamAV virus database updater: freshclamERROR: This tool
requires
On 2014-11-13 01:16:25 [-0700], Jesse Molina wrote:
Severity: grave
I would downgrade it to important. Scott?
Fails on start. I imagine this wasn't tested?
You imagine wrong. But this case in particular wasn't.
Setting up clamav-freshclam (0.98.5~rc1+dfsg-3) ...
[] Starting ClamAV virus
On Thursday, November 13, 2014 13:25:34 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2014-11-13 01:16:25 [-0700], Jesse Molina wrote:
Severity: grave
I would downgrade it to important. Scott?
Serious due to incomplete depends. I don't recall the exact policy paragraph,
but it's a fails to comply
Sorry, I opened this bug when I was tired. My apologies for the lack of
detail.
I did a global upgrade, which is how I ended up in that situation.
libclamav6 was held back. Seems obvious that the package needed to be
upgraded but wasn't, but I was not thinking right at the time.
Seems
severity 769384 serious
tags 769384 + pending
thanks.
On 2014-11-13 05:23:09 [-0800], Jesse Molina wrote:
Sorry, I opened this bug when I was tired. My apologies for the lack of
detail.
No problem, it all worked out :)
I did a global upgrade, which is how I ended up in that situation.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 769384 serious
Bug #769384 [clamav-freshclam] ERROR: This tool requires libclamav with
functionality level 79 or higher (current f-level: 77)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
tags 769384 + pending
Bug #769384 [clamav-freshclam]
Hi,
On 13.11.2014 13:55, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday, November 13, 2014 13:25:34 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
We have depends on libclamav6 based on library functions / ABI. Now the
ABI remains unchanged but stops working. This was neither tested nor
expected.
The problem is that
Hi,
On 13.11.2014 22:37, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
The correct fix is to bump the minimal version requirement of
cl_retflevel to 0.98.5~rc1, which is the upstream version in which
CL_FLEVEL changed the last time.
I have now reverted Sebastian's workaround and added this fix.
Now the packages
8 matches
Mail list logo
