Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (= 3.0.10~)

Hi Emmanuel, Quoting Emmanuel Bourg (2015-06-04 10:45:57) Thank you for the detailed analysis Johannes. I removed the libmx4j-java dependency on jetty, is it any better now? I now noticed that you uploaded src:jetty 6.1.26-5 without a build dependency on libmx4j-java two days ago. So I guess

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (= 3.0.10~)

Le 06/06/2015 10:57, Johannes Schauer a écrit : In any case, for what it's worth, jython is not part of the B-D-transitive essential set anymore :) Great, thank you for confirming. Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (= 3.0.10~)

Hi, Quoting Emmanuel Bourg (2015-06-04 10:45:57) Thank you for the detailed analysis Johannes. I removed the libmx4j-java dependency on jetty, is it any better now? removing dependencies (or moving them to recommends) always helps at least a little bit, yes. But the question is whether the

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (= 3.0.10~)

Thank you for the detailed analysis Johannes. I removed the libmx4j-java dependency on jetty, is it any better now? Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (= 3.0.10~)

Hi, Quoting tony mancill (2015-06-03 15:38:02) However, I'd like to understand how jython figures into the transitive set (and why - maybe we get it out of the essential set), and how a developer can determine this. [...] So is there a tool I can use to view the entire tree to see where

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (= 3.0.10~)

On 06/02/2015 10:29 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote: Hi, Quoting Miguel Landaeta (2015-06-02 21:54:29) Thanks for the report, we are aware of the issue and we are waiting for FTPmaster jnr-posix approval to solve this bug and others. thanks for the clarification. Could you next time please

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (= 3.0.10~)

Source: jython Version: 2.5.3-6 Severity: grave Justification: fails to build from source Hi, jython Build-Depends on libjnr-posix-java (= 3.0.10~) but the version of libjnr-posix-java in unstable is only 1.1.8-3. Here is the relevant dose3 output for the build failure: native-architecture:

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (= 3.0.10~)

tags 787562 + pending confirmed thanks On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:28:17PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: Source: jython Version: 2.5.3-6 Severity: grave Justification: fails to build from source Hi, jython Build-Depends on libjnr-posix-java (= 3.0.10~) but the version of

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (= 3.0.10~)

Hi, Quoting Miguel Landaeta (2015-06-02 21:54:29) Thanks for the report, we are aware of the issue and we are waiting for FTPmaster jnr-posix approval to solve this bug and others. thanks for the clarification. Could you next time please hold off on doing such an upload until the reverse