Bug#817954: Does this bug prevent firefox from entering backports also?

2020-06-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 08:25:10PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 7:31 am, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:22:40PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:10:45 +0200 Johannes Rohr > > > wrote: > > > > It would be great to have

Bug#817954: Does this bug prevent firefox from entering backports also?

2020-06-14 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 7:31 am, Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:22:40PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:10:45 +0200 Johannes Rohr wrote: > It would be great to have firefox (or the next firefox-esr) in > buster-backports, as it has important new

Bug#817954: Does this bug prevent firefox from entering backports also?

2020-06-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:22:40PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:10:45 +0200 Johannes Rohr wrote: > > It would be great to have firefox (or the next firefox-esr) in > > buster-backports, as it has important new functionality relevant for > > privacy and data protection,

Bug#817954: Does this bug prevent firefox from entering backports also?

2020-06-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:10:45 +0200 Johannes Rohr wrote: > It would be great to have firefox (or the next firefox-esr) in > buster-backports, as it has important new functionality relevant for > privacy and data protection, such as the multi account containers > function. However, this bug

Bug#817954: Does this bug prevent firefox from entering backports also?

2019-07-25 Thread Johannes Rohr
It would be great to have firefox (or the next firefox-esr) in buster-backports, as it has important new functionality relevant for privacy and data protection, such as the multi account containers function. However, this bug prevents firefox from entering testing, which in my understanding