Bug#848077: dateutils FTBFS on many architectures with parallel build issues

2016-12-14 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
Am 13.12.2016 um 21:26 schrieb Adrian Bunk: Source: dateutils Version: 0.4.0-1 Severity: serious I haven't been able to reproduce this, but I assume passing --no-parallel to dh should be enough to workaround it. Thank you very much for this hint, I've just uploaded a new version to unstable.

Bug#848077: dateutils FTBFS on many architectures with parallel build issues

2016-12-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:26:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: dateutils > Version: 0.4.0-1 > Severity: serious > > I haven't been able to reproduce this, but I assume passing > --no-parallel to dh should be enough to workaround it.

Bug#848077: dateutils FTBFS on many architectures with parallel build issues

2016-12-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: dateutils Version: 0.4.0-1 Severity: serious I haven't been able to reproduce this, but I assume passing --no-parallel to dh should be enough to workaround it.