Étienne Mollier writes:
> Wow, thanks for the comprehensive background information. In
No problem.
> case someone else (me in a not so near future for instance)
> stumbles upon this again, I keep note that reducing the size of
> BLASTDB_LMDB_MAP_SIZE a bit might help:
One final
Hi Aaron,
Aaron M. Ucko, on 2020-09-14 17:36:14 -0400:
>
> Thanks for clarifying. AFAICT, this environment imposes a tighter limit
> than native arm64 hardware, and versions 2.10.0-1 and 2.10.0-3 both hit
> it. Rough bisection via the BLASTDB_LMDB_MAP_SIZE environment variable
> gives an
Étienne Mollier writes:
> I worked within an arm64 schroot built with sbuild-createchroot,
> on a native amd64 machine.
Thanks for clarifying. AFAICT, this environment imposes a tighter limit
than native arm64 hardware, and versions 2.10.0-1 and 2.10.0-3 both hit
it. Rough bisection via the
Hi Aaron,
Aaron M. Ucko, on 2020-09-13 22:44:00 -0400:
> Étienne Mollier writes:
>
> > regression looks still there in version 2.10.0-3, at least on
> > arm64 architecture.
>
> How can I reproduce it?
I worked within an arm64 schroot built with sbuild-createchroot,
on a native amd64 machine.
Étienne Mollier writes:
> regression looks still there in version 2.10.0-3, at least on
> arm64 architecture.
How can I reproduce it? AFAICT python-biopython's autopkgtest boils
down to the upstream test suite, which runs fine as part of a build of
revision 15084ca (immediately preceding your
Control: tag -1 reopen
Greetings,
Étienne Mollier, on 2020-09-08 21:10:18 +0200:
> Aaron M. Ucko, on 2020-09-07 21:55:45 -0400:
> > Étienne Mollier writes:
> > > Thanks for your work on this topic. I attempted to remove the
> > > patches to address #960756 in Biopython. While the problem is
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
