Your message dated Sat, 03 Jul 2021 19:37:43 +0000
with message-id <e1lzlsr-0004sl...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#984734: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #980885,
regarding manpages-es-extra: Suitable for Bullseye?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
980885: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980885
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: manpages-es-extra
Version: 0.8a-19.1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: Mario Blättermann <mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com>

Hello Javier,
as stated in the description, manpages-es-extra is really outdated
with no hope of receiving any further updates. Is this really suitable
for bullseye? Manpages-es is already (long) gone.

Manpages-l10n is in the process of importing all previous spanish
translations (where possible). By using po4a, we are able to keep all
pages up to date. If enough content (>= 80%) is still translated, the
page is shipped (with all outdated paragraphs in english), while the
remaining pages are not shipped (but might be reactivated later). We
also attempt to unfuzzy trivial strings (like version number changes
or updated markup), so some pages with only editorial changes might
actually still reach 80% (and thus being shipped). And if further
translators come along, they can much more easily pick up and
recomplete/update the pages.

So far, we haven't imported any of the pages from manpage-es-extra,
but this will happen soon, but too late before the freeze. 

So there are two possible approaches: 
1. If the release-managers agree we will update manpages-l10n in March
   *with* pages form manpages-es-extra (those which make 80%). Then
   they are proper in Bullseye.

2. We provide backports for manpages-es, which will include pages from
   manpages-es-extra (newer, but of course file conflicts).

So I suggest to remove manpages-es-extra from Bullseye. This would
ease 1. above (i.e. increase the chances for late acceptance in March
of a new version with updated pages). Also please consider if the
outdated manpages-es-extra still does users a service?

Of course, if 1. does not work out, these man pages will only be 
available via backports, i.e. 2.

Mario (the upstream maintainer of manpages-l10n and the primary
importer of the pages from manpages-es-extra) is in CC, he can give
more details where necessary.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')

manpages-es-extra depends on no packages.

Versions of packages manpages-es-extra recommends:
pn  manpages-es  <none>

Versions of packages manpages-es-extra suggests:
ii  konqueror [man-browser]  4:20.12.0-4
ii  man-db [man-browser]     2.9.3-2

-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     deb...@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8a-19.1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package manpages-es-extra has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/984734

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sean Whitton (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to