> > alright, i've uploaded src:python-ppmd right now, which is just a
> > rename of the src:ppmd package.
> >
> > Sean, do you need me to file a RM for src:ppmd or will dak
> > automagically take care of it?
>
> I don't believe it will happen automatically.
ok, i've filed #985326 for src:ppmd
Hello,
On Mon 15 Mar 2021 at 08:47PM -04, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> alright, i've uploaded src:python-ppmd right now, which is just a
> rename of the src:ppmd package.
>
> Sean, do you need me to file a RM for src:ppmd or will dak
> automagically take care of it?
I don't believe it will happen
Hello,
On Sun 14 Mar 2021 at 09:39PM -04, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Per Policy 3.2.2 this is actually RC, and there is no length of time
>> after which it's Policy-compliant to reuse package name--version pairs:
>> "the version numbers which a binary package must not reuse includes the
>> version
alright, i've uploaded src:python-ppmd right now, which is just a
rename of the src:ppmd package.
Sean, do you need me to file a RM for src:ppmd or will dak
automagically take care of it?
Regards,
Sandro
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 9:51 PM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 21:44 -0400,
On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 21:44 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> but other paragraphs do (i think) :)
Ah, I see!
> there's no guarantee (althought i find it highly unlikely) that
> src:ppmd will not reach the same version of the old ppmd that used to
> be present in the archive a decade ago.
The
> > Per Policy 3.2.2 this is actually RC, and there is no length of time
> > after which it's Policy-compliant to reuse package name--version pairs:
> > "the version numbers which a binary package must not reuse includes the
> > version numbers of any versions of the binary package ever accepted
> Per Policy 3.2.2 this is actually RC, and there is no length of time
> after which it's Policy-compliant to reuse package name--version pairs:
> "the version numbers which a binary package must not reuse includes the
> version numbers of any versions of the binary package ever accepted into
>
On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 18:34 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Per Policy 3.2.2 this is actually RC, and there is no length of time
> after which it's Policy-compliant to reuse package name--version pairs:
> "the version numbers which a binary package must not reuse includes the
> version numbers of
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #985245 [src:ppmd] src:ppmd: reintroduced with lower version number,
different project?
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
985245: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985245
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
9 matches
Mail list logo
