Hi Valentin,
Thanks for more background.
On 16-09-2021 15:27, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> Perhaps it be possible not to use tmpfs for $AUTOPKGTEST_TMP, or was that
> the goal in the first place?
That was the goal, yes. So, until issue
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/debci/-/issues/166 is fixed
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:34:06AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> It was pointed out to me on IRC that the mount of /tmp with `nodev` is
> probably the issue here. I'm discussion if we should just drop that.
The failing test does not use a device so this probably won't help. I
tried
Hi Valentin,
> Yes, tmpfs seems to be the problem since it doesn't support O_DIRECT that
> is being requested here:
It was pointed out to me on IRC that the mount of /tmp with `nodev` is
probably the issue here. I'm discussion if we should just drop that.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 09:24:08PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on amd64
> because with a recent upload of glibc the autopkgtest of ocfs2-tools
> fails in testing. It seems to me that the failures are related to the
> worker that the test
Source: ocfs2-tools
Version: 1.8.6-6
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on amd64
because with a recent upload of glibc the
5 matches
Mail list logo
