The patch you attached appears to have been mixed up. For the
afterworld, could you please send the right one to the BTS?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing
Package: gettext-base
Version: 0.14.1-10
Severity: serious
Justification: incomplete dependencies
Tags: sid sarge
The package blender recently failed to build on hppa due to a strange
gettext-related error:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
gcc-3.3 fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder. (With the segmenetation fault line having 16604 rather than
23793 on it.)
if grep '^[^-]' needed-options
Package: kernel-image-2.4.18-k6
Version: 2.4.18-5
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
Hello
I have send a email with the exploid found on my server 3 days ago to Herbert
Xu but no response.
The exploit for a based on do_brk attack work always still on this
kernelversion.
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:39:08AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Please test http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/ .
Seems to work:
2005-05-04T11:56:38+0200 ppp0 up
2005-05-04T20:20:43+0200 ppp0 up
2005-05-04T21:49:25+0200 ppp0 up
2005-05-04T22:07:21+0200 ppp0 up
2005-05-05T04:24:08+0200 ppp0 up
and no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 307752 security
Bug#307752: kernel-image-2.4.18-k6: root exploit based on do_brk attack found
and exploitable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
End of message,
Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 18:03:34 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closed in new version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 307707 304124
Bug#304124: FTBFS: missing build-depends
Bug#307707: unison: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
Merged 304124 307707.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 23:02 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The build dependency on p2c can't be fulfilled in sarge.
Thanks for reporting this problem.
I decided to switch to p2c since the alternative (using free pascal)
doesn't produce quality binaries as I would expect (only statically
linked,
Hi Roland,
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:26:55AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 23:02 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The build dependency on p2c can't be fulfilled in sarge.
Thanks for reporting this problem.
I decided to switch to p2c since the alternative (using free pascal)
I duplicated the bug on my athalon xp 2000+ system running the latest
2.6.8 k7 sid kernel 2.6.8-15.
System information attached.
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is
On Wed, 04 May 2005 14:08:05 +, Brian M Carlson said:
* Update to 1.4.1.
I'd really prefer that. 1.4.1 has been released more than 6 weeks ago
and fixes quite some bugs we figured out in 1.4.0. The case with
1.4.0 was that people don't care anymore about RC releases and start
complaining
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 304124 - fixed
Bug#304124: FTBFS: missing build-depends
Tags were: fixed sarge
Bug#307707: unison: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
Tags removed: fixed
End of
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 04:32:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306981: fixed in rsync 2.6.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hello Steve
On 2005-05-04 Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:45:44AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
I'm currently preparing a new upload to unstable which has SNMP disabled
and an explanation about the reasons as well as a small hint how to
compile it oneself in
I am in the same situation and have the same problem.
I want to PURGE revelation but this is not possible as the OP has
already noted.
Also because of this apt-get -f install wants to install a number of
packages which I do not want and are prerequisites of revelation:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
On Thu, 05 May 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
I duplicated the bug on my athalon xp 2000+ system running the latest
2.6.8 k7 sid kernel 2.6.8-15.
System information attached.
could you post your oops?
i guess with the kernel-image-2.6.11 that problem disappears?
--
Blars Blarson
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package revelation
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: revelation
tags 307764 +patch
Bug#307764: FTBFS subsequent builds
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
tags 306901 +patch
Bug#306901: revelation: can not be upgraded due to an error on removal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
package revelation
tags 307764 +patch
tags 306901 +patch
thanks mate
revelation (0.4.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Urgency high due to RC bug fix.
* etc/gconf/schemas - usr/share/gconf/schemas (Closes: #306901)
*
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:54:38AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:01:41PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we can remove jakarta-log4j as soon as #306754 is fixed.
Is someone working on those?
If not, I can have a look
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 306414 + fixed
Bug#306414: figfonts: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 306621 grave
Bug#306621: chown: cannot access `/var/cache/approx': No such file or directory
Severity set to `grave'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 07:32:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306266: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.14-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Stefan Strasser a écrit :
Package: libciao-dev
Version: 5.4.2.1.0-3
Severity: grave
Components.idl is not provided with this package which renders it useless
because it is included in any cidl file.
Please see
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ace-devel/2005-May/000485.html
and more
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and
libpam-ldap need to be linked against the same ldap (either 'ldap' or
'ldap_r'). I thought I had done this for both, but apparently not.
Linking against
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 09:23:33PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
Since it does not happen here, with tonight's sid, I am downgrading to
normal for now, and tagging. Let me know if you can dig out any
additional information that may be pertinent. I woul dsuggest
rebuilding the package with
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and
libpam-ldap need to be linked against the same ldap (either 'ldap' or
'ldap_r'). I thought I had done this for both, but apparently not.
Linking against
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 306299 moreinfo
Bug#306299: postfix: fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 306577 moreinfo
Bug#306577: postfix-tls: Unable to install package with postfix due to
unsatisfied dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 305122 - fixed
Bug#305122: /usr/bin/ld:/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libc.so:1: parse error
Tags were: patch fixed
Tags removed: fixed
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 305122 + patch
Bug#305122: /usr/bin/ld:/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libc.so:1: parse error
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 07:47:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#305518: fixed in evolution-data-server1.2 1.2.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:58:32PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Andreas == Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas This bug can now be reproduced in a current i386/testing
Andreas environment (openafs version 1.3.81-3 is now in sarge).
Oops yeah.
This is not so good. I
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 08:02:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307275: fixed in phpmyadmin 4:2.6.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
This one time, at band camp, Frank Lichtenheld said:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 09:23:33PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
Since it does not happen here, with tonight's sid, I am downgrading to
normal for now, and tagging. Let me know if you can dig out any
additional information that may be
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:42:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Eric, this makes the package uninstallable and unremovable, so i am
upping the severity.
I had two problems with it, it tried to do stuff with
/var/cache/approx, while i had it configured in my approx.conf to
use another dir, and
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Allan Lyons wrote:
Package: ldapdiff
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security fixed-upstream
The change logs for ldapdiff report that a security hole in
ldapdiff.conf path construction was fixed in version 1.1.1
Upgrading to the current upstream version
Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 13:58:29 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307770: [amd64] Can't access to non-free at sid.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 276103 patch
Bug#276103: kcdlabel: crash on save
Tags were: help
Tags added: patch
tags 276103 - help
Bug#276103: kcdlabel: crash on save
Tags were: patch help
Tags removed: help
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6
severity 306512 grave
Bug#306512: bad libc-2.3.2.so causes segfaults
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 306512 305122
Bug#305122: /usr/bin/ld:/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libc.so:1: parse
Is there a schedule for the next delivery ?
The server used to work with the previous release of Apache (2.0.53) and it is
now down ;-(
I do not how to revert to the previous release - will it work with the new libc
upgraded the same day than 2.0.54-2 ?
I'm looking for ANY solution to be able
Package: pam-pgsql
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The problem reported in BUG#230875 and marked as fixed (NMU upload) was open
again. The changes have disappeared. Please see the patch attached to
Bug#230875
This one time, at band camp, Frank Lichtenheld said:
Actually a gdb backtrace on a unstripped kcdlabel pointed me to the
right locations. The following patch seems to fix both segfaults:
Also good :)
But given the quality of the code I've seen during my search I would
really recommend to
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:30:13PM +0200, Emmanuel Blot wrote:
Is there a schedule for the next delivery ?
The server used to work with the previous release of Apache (2.0.53) and it
is now down ;-(
I do not how to revert to the previous release - will it work with the new
libc upgraded
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and
libpam-ldap need to be linked against the same ldap (either 'ldap' or
'ldap_r'). I thought I had done this
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:58:32PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Andreas == Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas This bug can now be reproduced in a current i386/testing
Andreas environment (openafs version 1.3.81-3 is now in
Package: hplip
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
the configury gets the wrong python installation, for which no python
qt modules are available.
See the diffs to configure and configure.in for a patch to get the
default python version.
http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/hplip.diff
Package: xosd
Version: 2.2.14-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
Hi,
building the package xosd in a clean sarge build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC
Package: xtradius
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is no user input verification whatsoever. In
/contrib/authmysql/authmysql.c username
supplied by user is fed directly to database.
Primoz Bratanic
- --
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:18:38PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
...
However, running with a uid an gid other than proxy is not supported.
Also the spool-dir shouldn't really be changed, especially to /var/tmp
as it it unpredictable what may happen if all sorts of non-wwwoffle
files are
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:48:23PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
CAN-2005-0469 describes a buffer overflow in the slc_add_reply()
function. It has already been fixed in krb5, but is present in
krb4 as well. I'm not familiar with the krn4 code base, but the
fix from krb5 seems applicable as
Hi,
in a minute, I will upload the attached changes to p2c. Josip (or the
respective p2c maintainer), please incorporate them into the next
maintainer upload.
Thanks.
bye,
Roland
--
diff -ruN ../p2c-1.21alpha2/debian/changelog p2c-1.21alpha2/debian/changelog
---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
retitle 306141 CAN-2005-0468/CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflows in
slc_add_reply() and env_opt_add()
Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflow in slc_add_reply()
Changed Bug title.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 306141 woody sarge sid
Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0468/CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflows in slc_add_reply()
and env_opt_add()
Tags were: security patch
Tags added: woody, sarge, sid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 305412 + fixed
Bug#305412: p2c segfaults on specific input
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
tag 307706 + fixed
Bug#307706: m-tx: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:48:23PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
CAN-2005-0469 describes a buffer overflow in the slc_add_reply()
function. It has already been fixed in krb5, but is present in
krb4 as well. I'm not familiar with the krn4 code base, but the
fix from krb5 seems applicable as
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
CAN-2005-0469 describes a buffer overflow in the slc_add_reply()
function. It has already been fixed in krb5, but is present in
krb4 as well. I'm not familiar with the krn4 code base, but the
fix from krb5 seems applicable as well. It's attached, but please
The bug 304367 appears to have been fixed for 21 days, but it has not
been pushed into testing. This package is priority important. The fix
(already done) is not to build certain packages that are also in
openldap2.2, as this would make security support impossible.
Torsten, et al., is this
Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 16:22:20 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 16:19:47 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Thu, 5 May 2005 13:02:38 +0200,
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:54:38AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:01:41PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we can remove jakarta-log4j as soon as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 307167 patch
Bug#307167: affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege
escalation
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:11:05PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
I hadn't checked it yet, it was still on the list of TODOs along with
netkit-telnet and netkit-telnet-ssl. I just checked and it is in
fact vulnerable for CAN-2005-0469 as well. I can send a patch later
if you haven't prepared
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 263870 RM: jakarta-log4j -- RoQA; RC bug, obsoleted by
jakarta-log4j1.2
Bug#263870: ITA: jakarta-log4j -- Logging library for Java
Changed Bug title.
reassign 263870 ftp.debian.org
Bug#263870: RM: jakarta-log4j -- RoQA; RC bug, obsoleted by
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 11:32:22 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307749: fixed in gettext 0.14.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Quoting Tomas Hoger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
I think it is an FTBFS bug. The following should generally work:
apt-get source qmail
cd qmail-*
dpkg-buildpackage
For qmail, this does not work because of the missing Build-Depends on
groff-base and because of the missing users/groups.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 304933 patch
Bug#304933: openafs-krb5: FTBFS: asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments to
function `afsconf_AddKey'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
End of message,
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 12:17:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#217678: fixed in apt-file 2.0.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Blars,
I wasn't able to reproduce this bug you reported (celestia: ftbfs
[sparc] no KDE libraries installed) on i386.
Please:
- send your config.log
- test whether version 1.3.0-1 in sarge has the same issue
TIA
Adrian
--
Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out
Package: cweb
Severity: grave
Sid:
cweb is a dummy package.
cweb depends on tetex-bin.
tetex-bin conflicts with cweb.
cweb is therefore not installable
Sarge:
cweb is a real package.
cweb recommends tetex-bin.
tetex-bin conflicts with cweb.
cweb is therefore hardly usable.
It might be
Hello
On 2005-05-05 Sean Finney wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:34:47AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
I think the following will work:
1. Seting Woodies debconf answer to false once MySQL 4.0 or 4.1 gets
installed so that his danger is voided once for all.
sounds like a good
Hi.
gettext_0.14.4-2, just uploaded for unstable, fails to build from
source on at least the following archs:
mipsel
hppa
sparc
arm
mips
The error is always the same:
jikes-classpath: Depends: classpath but it is not going to be installed
Seems like a serious bug somewhere, but not in
Package: anon-proxy
Severity: serious
The use of GDFL is questionable for manual pages. Please change the
licence to GPL, because GFDL is known to caus elot of problem when
texts are changed (embedded / copied).
My use of Severity: serious derives from my attempt to interpret
Debian Guidelines
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 307683 +sarge +moreinfo
Unknown tag/s: +moreinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental
tags 307683 +sarge +moreinfo
thanks
Funnily enough, it builds here just fine without gawk installed. Are
you sure you have all of build-essential installed in your chroot,
including an awk interpreter (mawk is Priority: required, and thus not
listed in b-e but should be present nonetheless)?
On
Looking for popular sfotware, but tight on budget?
We are selilng world bestseslers at the chaepest prcices around! Why so csheap? We don't sel'll
progrmas in a fancy box, with printed documentation, etc., meaning we do not shell out on CD manufacturing.
The sosft is only what you get -
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:01:45PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
So it's: if ( dh_answer==true and no_other_installed_server ) purge();
okay, that makes sense.
the no_other_installed_server could probably be simplified, now that i'm
thinking of it. since this is in the postrm, the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 304786 phpmyadmin
Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf
Bug reassigned from package `apache2-common' to `phpmyadmin'.
severity 304786 critical
Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf
Severity
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 14:47:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306261: fixed in ppp 2.4.3-20050321+2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 300432 normal
Bug#300432: Spontaneously reboots server...
Severity set to `normal'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Sorry, somehow I forgot to answer.
While I agree that the runlevel may be too early I do not agree on this
part of the bug report:
for now I can only say that it should not restart computer in a case of
single failure (upgrade of deamons)
I want my system to be rebooted on a single failure. I
Package: fai
Version: 2.8.1
Severity: serious
The script lib/updatebase creates unsecure temp file when called from
task softupdate. This violates the policy.
--
regards Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 307632 normal
Bug#307632: creates /tmp/fai directory unconditionally (insecure tempfile)
Severity set to `normal'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
severity 307632 normal
thanks
This bug is not RC and is not a security issue. The piece of policy
quoted is intended to warn against attacks such as symlink attacks that
can be performed on unsafely created temp files. The program in question
is run during a fai install, before the system is
Hi
On 2005-05-05 Sean Finney wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:01:45PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
So it's: if ( dh_answer==true and no_other_installed_server ) purge();
okay, that makes sense.
the no_other_installed_server could probably be simplified, now that i'm
thinking of
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 15:47:53 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307820: fixed in anon-proxy 00.02.39-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 307820 sarge-ignore
Bug#307820: anon-proxy: [manual] GFDL license is unsuitable for manual pages
(use GPL)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore
End of message,
Just a reminder that it's been 5 days since you promised a fix for this
RC bug shortly.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 5/5/05, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:08:12PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
It seems the environment variable AWK is set somewhere to gawk, I
just have no idea where.
I'm seeing this only in my amd64 chroot it seems. When I try the
same in my i386 chroot,
severity 306878 normal
thanks
I'll leave closing the bug up to the maintainer, but based on Allan
Lyons's review, this bug is not RC so I'm downgrading it.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 307167 + fixed
Bug#307167: affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege
escalation
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 230875 - fixed
Bug#230875: libpam-pgsql: Some notes about pam_pgsql security
Tags were: fixed security
Tags removed: fixed
severity 307784 grave
Bug#307784: pam-pgsql:
libapache-mod-php4.postinst:cp /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/php.ini
$phpini
libapache2-mod-php4.postinst: cp /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/php.ini
$phpini
php4-cgi.postinst: cp /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/php.ini $phpini
php4-cli.postinst:cp
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:05:49PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 05-May-05 13:53, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
retitle 307521 ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Compilation with 'gcc-3.4
-m32' does not work
tags 307521 +patch
thanks
I made
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:41:13PM +0200, Primoz Bratanic wrote:
Package: pam-pgsql
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
The problem reported in BUG#230875 and marked as fixed (NMU upload) was open
again. The changes have disappeared. Please see the patch
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:30:29PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
ifndef HOST
HOST=$(shell hostname).$(shell domainname)
Also, /bin/domainname is provided by the 'nis' package, how is this
supposed to work? I wonder why this doesn't cause a FTBFS too,
considering that $HOST isn't
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
Could be something in how r-base is built on amd64... Dirk, any ideas?
I think it has something to do with /usr/lib/R/etc/Renviron.
It says:
## Use configure values
AWK=${AWK-'gawk'}
While on i386 it says:
## Use configure values
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 307706 - fixed
Bug#307706: m-tx: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
Tags were: fixed sarge
Tags removed: fixed
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
severity 307632 critical
Bug#307632: creates /tmp/fai directory unconditionally (insecure tempfile)
Severity set to `critical'.
tags 307632 security
Bug#307632: creates /tmp/fai
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 307816 sid
Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
