Source: dvbackup
Version: 1:0.0.4-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: nas
Version: 1.9.4-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: binutils-h8300-hms
Version: 2.16.1-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely
Source: php8.2
Version: 8.2.16-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: libmpeg3
Version: 1.8.dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: palp
Version: 2.20-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: code-saturne
Version: 6.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: tk707
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: libtextwrap
Version: 0.1-16
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: xjdic
Version: 24-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: armci-mpi
Version: 0.3.1~beta-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: fcitx-fbterm
Version: 0.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: libtranscript
Version: 0.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: radvd
Version: 1:2.19-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: mono
Version: 6.8.0.105+dfsg-3.5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: gtk-chtheme
Version: 0.3.1-6.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: ftpcopy
Version: 0.6.7-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: citadel-client
Version: 916-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: ldns
Version: 1.8.3-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: golang-github-linuxkit-virtsock
Version: 0.0~git20170720.0.0416e3d-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
Source: ippl
Version: 1.4.14-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: soundmodem
Version: 0.20-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: hfsutils
Version: 3.2.6-15
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: cyrus-sasl2
Version: 2.1.28+dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: slrn
Version: 1.0.3+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: gcin
Version: 2.9.0+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: ats2-lang
Version: 0.4.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: libfreefare
Version: 0.4.0-2.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: aprsdigi
Version: 3.10.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: htdig
Version: 1:3.2.0b6-19
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: mrpt
Version: 1:2.11.10+ds-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: asmix
Version: 1.5-4.3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: kbuild
Version: 1:0.1.9998svn3589+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely
Source: speech-dispatcher
Version: 0.11.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: recode
Version: 3.6-25
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: rubiks
Version: 20070912-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: byacc-j
Version: 1.15-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: libdbd-sybase-perl
Version: 1.14-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: wv
Version: 1.2.9-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: gbatnav
Version: 1.0.4cvs20051004-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: asmail
Version: 2.1-5.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: a56
Version: 1.3+dfsg-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change
Source: pacman4console
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: qm-dsp
Version: 1.7.1-7.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: adasockets
Version: 1.12-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Source: nstreams
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 1065610 1:1.52.0-3
Bug #1065610 {Done: Hilko Bengen } [libguestfs0t64]
libguestfs0t64: All appliance dependencies lost during time_t transition
No longer marked as fixed in versions libguestfs/1:1.52.0-3.
> notfixed 1065610 1:1.52.0-4
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1066032
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/494
Bug #1066032 [src:gobject-introspection] pygobject: FTBFS on armhf: time_t
build test failure
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1066032 + sid
Bug #1066032 [src:gobject-introspection] pygobject: FTBFS on armhf: time_t
build test failure
Added tag(s) sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1066032:
Source: mtree-netbsd
Version: 20180822-7
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
As part of the time64 transition, -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
was enabled in default build flags. This makes mtree-netbsd fail to
build from source. A build ends with:
| gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wdate-time
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:09:03PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 05:51:43AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > | configure:7811: gcc -c -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
> > | -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong
> > | -fstack-clash-protection
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:46:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066117: fixed in proftpd-dfsg 1.3.8.b+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066117,
regarding FTBFS: missing build-dep on libnsl-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:48:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1065723: fixed in slang2 2.3.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065723,
regarding slang2: FTBFS: Testing timestamp functions...ERROR: Mar 09, 2024
11:42:29 --> 1709898149, expected 1709984549
to be marked
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 21:42:50 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: opam
> Version: 2.1.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 05:51:43AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> | configure:7811: gcc -c -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
> | -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong
> | -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fPIE
> | -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 11:19:48PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> hmm/hmm.c: In function ‘invert’:
> hmm/hmm.c:703:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dgetrf_’
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 703 | ret = dgetrf_(, , a, , ipiv, ); /* ret should
> be zero,
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 10:42:33PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
> -I../.. -I../../src/include -I../../src -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g
> -O2
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 09:54:29PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../lib/driver
> -I../../include -I../../include/ -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2
>
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:26:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1065751: fixed in pristine-tar 1.50+nmu2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065751,
regarding Incomplete fix for xz -T1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> So, assuming this is the cause here, the fix is pretty simple:
(...)
> +#ifdef INET6
> if (if6_is_up)
> sif6down(0);
> +#endif
This was silently done as part of
commit 80b8744eb42c7493794f3e3fe0bf1ce14f53e6dd
Author: Eivind Næss
Date: Fri Aug 6
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 07:34:06PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Not really, these arches now default to a 64-bit time_t and therefore
> you get the conflicting types (suseconds_t is a long int,
> __suseconds64_t a long long int). This has nothing to do with implicit
> function declarations.
It's
On Tuesday, March 12, 2024 11:56:48 PM CET Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Source: gnupg2
> Version: 2.2.40-1.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: ftbfs
> X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
>
> Trying to binNMU gnupg2 to make it installable during t64 transition,
> I notice the following configury output:
The patch below builds for me on the hppa platform.
Testcases needs verifying on physical hardware though.
Helge
diff -up ./testsuite/path.c.org ./testsuite/path.c
--- ./testsuite/path.c.org 2024-03-13 07:01:04.610222544 +
+++ ./testsuite/path.c 2024-03-13 07:11:16.630339502 +
@@
Source: mate-equake-applet
Version: 1.3.8.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Due to the time64 transition -Werror=implicit-function-declaration was
turned on by default in unstable. This change makes mate-equake-applet
fail to build from source. Relevant snippet:
| equake_processdata.c: In
Hi,
On 2024-03-12 23:22, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
> On 12.03.2024 21:59, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> > Starting with glibc 2.31, support for NIS (libnsl library) has been
> > moved to a separate libnsl2 package. In order to allow a smooth
> > transition, a libnsl-dev has been added
701 - 765 of 765 matches
Mail list logo