Processed: block 631019 with 624671 641790 646142 643488 650598

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 631019 with 624671 641790 646142 643488 650598 Bug #631019 [release.debian.org] transition: hdf5 1.8.x Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 631019: 624671, 643488, 650598, 646142, and 641790 thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#639590: binutils-z80: unbuildable in unstable

tags 639590 +patch thanks Hi! * Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [110828 14:22]: binutils-z80 build-depends on binutils-source ( 2.21.53), but unstable now has 2.21.53.20110823-3 thus rendering -z80 unbuildable. Attached is a patch for an qa upload to fix this bug (and do some

Processed: Re: Bug#639590: binutils-z80: unbuildable in unstable

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 639590 +patch Bug #639590 [binutils-z80] binutils-z80: unbuildable in unstable Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 639590:

Bug#651391: wicd-daemon: Unable to connect/configure

Package: wicd-daemon Version: 1.7.1~b3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable ciao :-) after upgrade to the latest version, wicd was unable to connect to wireless networks (both the famous eduroam one, and a non encrypted one). I tried to check the configuration for the

Processed: severity of 619274 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 619274 serious Bug #619274 [myspell-gv] myspell-gv: Remove unconditional call to soon to disappear 'update-openoffice-dicts' Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#651391: wicd-daemon: Unable to connect/configure

On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:12:25 +0100, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: ciao :-) Ciao Salvo, after upgrade to the latest version, wicd was unable to connect to wireless networks (both the famous eduroam one, and a non encrypted one). I tried to check the configuration for the eduroam network and the

Bug#651391: wicd-daemon: Unable to connect/configure

What template did you use there? I don't remember any template being renamed, this bug sounds weird to me :) I am using a custom template, attaching. Does it happen with wicd-gtk too? no, it connects to the encrypted one but seems to fail to connect to the open one (which works with the

Bug#651402: iulib: FTBFS: Checking for inflate() in C library tiff... no

Source: iulib Version: 0.4.4+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source iulib in experimental FTBFS: |debian/rules override_dh_auto_build | make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-iulib_0.4.4+ds-1-s390x-VaiIvL/iulib-0.4.4+ds' | scons -j5 prefix=/usr soversion=0d |

Bug#650856: Crash on restore GUI startup

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Pietro Battiston m...@pietrobattiston.it wrote: Package: deja-dup Version: 20.2-1 Severity: grave Deja-dup just crashes when started with the --restore argument. Backup instead works fine. At the end of this email is the output when ran in gdb, including a

Bug#651257: marked as done (Unsatisfied build dependency on libdbusmenu-gtk3-dev)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:47:24 + with message-id e1rycrg-0001c4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651257: fixed in deja-dup 20.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #651257, regarding Unsatisfied build dependency on libdbusmenu-gtk3-dev to be marked as done. This means

Bug#650717: marked as done (deja-dup: i386 package for unstable not available)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:47:24 + with message-id e1rycrg-0001c4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651257: fixed in deja-dup 20.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #651257, regarding deja-dup: i386 package for unstable not available to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#651412: DBUS error when trying to connect since 1.7.1~b3-1

Package: wicd-daemon Version: 1.7.1~b3-1 Severity: grave Since upgrading to 1.7.1~b3-1, wicd-curses and wicd-gtk have become unusable. That's to say, I can no longer connect to any wireless network using either of these clients. Trying to connect to a network with either of these prints the

Bug#651412: DBUS error when trying to connect since 1.7.1~b3-1

On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:45:15AM -0500, Ryan Kavanagh wrote: I'm downgrading to 1.7.0+ds1-9 and but can provide additional debugging information if needed (unfortunately, I can't guarantee timeliness in doing so since it's exam season). To whomever gets bit by this bug, you'll have to purge

Bug#607267: /usr/bin/scp: fails to notice close() errors

FWIW this is unreproducible as of kernel 3.2 rc2 so I guess this is squeeze only for cifs shares (as can be verified by running the test on a squeeze live CD). If there are other filesystems that might produce the same behaviour under some circumstances in current kernel I don't know. However,

Bug#625102: aplus-fsf: diff for NMU version 4.22.1-4.1

tags 625102 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for aplus-fsf (versioned as 4.22.1-4.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' :

Processed: aplus-fsf: diff for NMU version 4.22.1-4.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 625102 + pending Bug #625102 [src:aplus-fsf] aplus-fsf: FTBFS: ../MSTypes/MSTypeData.H:54:23: error: declaration of 'operator new' as non-function Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#651433: error: ‘vtkPythonGetObjectFromPointer’ was not declared in this scope

Package: wrapitk-python Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS I cannot get wrapitk-python to build with the new VTK 5.8.0-5 upload. It fails with: [ 99%] Building CXX object WrapITK/ExternalProjects/ItkVtkGlue/Wrapping/CMakeFiles/_ItkVtkGluePython.dir/wrap_itkImageToVTKImageFilterPython.o cd

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 649339 with 651433 Bug #649339 [release.debian.org] vtk 5.8 transition Was blocked by: 650936 650025 Added blocking bug(s) of 649339: 651433 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649339:

Bug#651412: DBUS error when trying to connect since 1.7.1~b3-1

Hello Ryan, On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 07:45:15 -0500, Ryan Kavanagh wrote: Since upgrading to 1.7.1~b3-1, wicd-curses and wicd-gtk have become unusable. That's to say, I can no longer connect to any wireless network using either of these clients. Trying to connect to a network with either of these

Bug#651437: UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xa8 in position 41: invalid start byte

Package: boost1.48 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, Thanks for providing boost 1.48, however I cannot build it on my squeez system, it fails with: dh_python2 W: dh_python2:94: Python 2.6 should install files in /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/. Did you forget --install-layout=deb?

Bug#649625: webkit unmaintained security-wise (again)

Hey, On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 21:00 +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: If the situation persists, it may be worth warning *squeeze* users, through a dedicated DSA/d-security-announce, as well as a dedicated paragraph in the next point release announce ? Yeah, that sounds sane. Unfortunately we

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.6

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#643438: m16c-flash: FTBFS: cm16flash.cxx:230:24: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 02:34:25PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote: Source: m16c-flash Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs hardening-format-security hardening Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all

Processed: bug 629699 is forwarded to https://bitbucket.org/bbangert/webhelpers/issue/61

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 629699 https://bitbucket.org/bbangert/webhelpers/issue/61 Bug #629699 [src:webhelpers] webhelpers: FTBFS: test_distance_of_time_in_words fails. Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bitbucket.org/bbangert/webhelpers/issue/61'.

Bug#632889: Build static library

package libgpg-error-dev tags 632889 +patch thanks Hi, According to ./configure --help: --enable-static[=PKGS] build static libraries [default=no] Using an attached patch it builds and installs the static library successfully. Thanks, -- YOSHINO Yoshihito yy.y.ja...@gmail.com diff -urN

Processed: Build static library

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: package libgpg-error-dev Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'libgpg-error-dev' Limit currently set to 'package':'libgpg-error-dev' tags 632889 +patch Bug #632889 [libgpg-error-dev] static library missing Added

Bug#650856: Crash on restore GUI startup

Il giorno gio, 08/12/2011 alle 12.43 +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo ha scritto: On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Pietro Battiston m...@pietrobattiston.it wrote: [...] At the end of this email is the output when ran in gdb, including a backtrace. Could you install deja-dup-dbg package

Bug#643438: marked as done (m16c-flash: FTBFS: cm16flash.cxx:230:24: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:03:18 + with message-id e1ryhno-0005q0...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#643438: fixed in m16c-flash 0.1-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #643438, regarding m16c-flash: FTBFS: cm16flash.cxx:230:24: error: format not a string literal and no

Bug#646582: qpopper: should this package be removed?

retitle 646582 RM: qpopper -- RoQA; Orphaned; RC-buggy reassign 646582 ftp.debian.org severity 646582 normal thanks On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:48:02PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: Package: qpopper Version: 4.0.9.dfsg-1.2 Severity: serious Justification: unmaintained, FTBFS, multiple RC bugs,

Processed: Re: Bug#646582: qpopper: should this package be removed?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 646582 RM: qpopper -- RoQA; Orphaned; RC-buggy Bug #646582 [qpopper] qpopper: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to 'RM: qpopper -- RoQA; Orphaned; RC-buggy' from 'qpopper: should this package be removed?' reassign 646582

Processed: found in 1.10-0.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: package libgpg-error-dev Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'libgpg-error-dev' Limit currently set to 'package':'libgpg-error-dev' found 632889 1.10-0.1 Bug #632889 [libgpg-error-dev] static library missing Bug

Bug#651412: DBUS error when trying to connect since 1.7.1~b3-1

Hello David, On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:05:38PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: Would you please tell me if: $ dbus-send --system --dest=org.wicd.daemon --print-reply \ --type=method_call /org/wicd/daemon/wireless \ org.wicd.daemon.wireless.GetCurrentNetwork works for you? I get the

Bug#615766: marked as done (predict: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:03:18 + with message-id e1ryijs-0005lq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#615766: fixed in predict 2.2.3-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #615766, regarding predict: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#630419: marked as done (predict: FTBFS in Ubuntu Oneiric (gcc 4.6))

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:03:18 + with message-id e1ryijs-0005lq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#615766: fixed in predict 2.2.3-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #615766, regarding predict: FTBFS in Ubuntu Oneiric (gcc 4.6) to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#630418: marked as done (predict: FTBFS in Ubuntu Oneiric (gcc 4.6))

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:03:18 + with message-id e1ryijs-0005lq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#615766: fixed in predict 2.2.3-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #615766, regarding predict: FTBFS in Ubuntu Oneiric (gcc 4.6) to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#521750: Should package mocka be orphaned?

Dear Torsten, the package has an open FTBS bug report since march 2009. You did not respond until now (at least not in the BTS). How to proceed with your package? Kind regards, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#651331: setting ovito FTBFS to wishlist until muparser is in unstable

severity 651331 wishlist thanks muparser isn't in unstable yet. I'll promote to RC when it is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: setting ovito FTBFS to wishlist until muparser is in unstable

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 651331 wishlist Bug #651331 [ovito] ovito FTBFS: libmuparser transition Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 651331:

Processed: tagging 642609

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 642609 + wheezy Bug #642609 [src:adabrowse] adabrowse: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libasis2008-dev Added tag(s) wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 642609:

Bug#642722: NMU diff

On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 08:36:27PM +0200, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: Source: jcal Version: 0.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

Source: illuminator Version: 0.11.0-8.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org See

Bug#651453: petsc: FTBFS on armel (Illegal instruction)

Source: petsc Version: 3.1.dfsg-11.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) (x-debbugs-cc to the NMUer) See the build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=petscarch=armelver=3.1.dfsg-11.1stamp=1321433035 Cheers, Julien

Bug#642722: marked as done (jcal: FTBFS: ./autogen.sh: 189: local: --copy: bad variable name)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:02:35 + with message-id e1ryjep-0003c3...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#642722: fixed in jcal 0.4.0-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #642722, regarding jcal: FTBFS: ./autogen.sh: 189: local: --copy: bad variable name to be marked as done.

Processed: block 631019 with 651452 651453

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 631019 with 651452 651453 Bug #631019 [release.debian.org] transition: hdf5 1.8.x Was blocked by: 624671 643488 650598 646142 641790 Added blocking bug(s) of 631019: 651452 and 651453 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:47:53PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Moritz Mühlenhoff: Florian, what's the status of openjdk6 for stable/oldstable? I've released the pending update for squeeze. lenny will eventually follow, and so will the pending updates for squeeze, but judging by my

Bug#651463: honeyd: FTBFS (tagging.h:89:6: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '(' token)

Source: honeyd Version: 1.5c-10 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=honeyd x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./compat/libdumbnet -I./compat -I/usr/include -I/usr/include

Processed: block 631018 with 651463

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 631018 with 651463 Bug #631018 [release.debian.org] [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition Was blocked by: 648010 632763 650670 648039 647996 648018 648032 650825 632764 622278 648031 648023 647994 648015 647992 648035 648008 632762 650812 Added

Bug#651464: vxl: FTBFS(kfreebsd)

Package: src:vxl Version: 1.14.0-12 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-*

Processed: reopening 645546

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 645546 Bug #645546 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org} [src:clang] clang: FTBFS(kfreebsd): error: Operating system is unknown, configure can't continue 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you

Processed: reopening 651109

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 651109 Bug #651109 {Done: Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net} [src:ntfs-3g] ntfs-3g: FTBFS(kfreebsd): ntfs-3g-udeb missing files (sbin/mount.*), aborting 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a

Bug#649711: marked as done (Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common.)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:03:40 + with message-id e1ryl80-b5...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#649711: fixed in ball 1.4.1+20111206-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #649711, regarding Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. to be marked as done. This

Bug#646448: marked as done (libexosip2: FTBFS: eXutils.c:1378:3: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:06:45 + with message-id e1rylaz-kz...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#646448: fixed in libexosip2 3.3.0-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #646448, regarding libexosip2: FTBFS: eXutils.c:1378:3: error: format not a string literal and no

Bug#634526: marked as done (ssldump: FTBFS: configure: error: Couldn't find PCAP library: needed for ssldump)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:18:37 + with message-id e1rylmt-0002ek...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#634526: fixed in ssldump 0.9b3-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #634526, regarding ssldump: FTBFS: configure: error: Couldn't find PCAP library: needed for ssldump to be

Bug#641436: marked as done (package ftbfs with ld --as-needed)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:18:37 + with message-id e1rylmt-0002ek...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#634526: fixed in ssldump 0.9b3-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #634526, regarding package ftbfs with ld --as-needed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#638244: marked as done (Needs to be adapted for libav/0.7.1)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:08:26 + with message-id e1rylcc-00017m...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#638244: fixed in picard 0.16-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #638244, regarding Needs to be adapted for libav/0.7.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#609300: input-utils: 609300: please fix this!

Ping, any news from the maintainer? regards, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#643967: debdelta as well is affected

hi, 'debdelta-upgrade' uses 'prelink -u' in ssytems where prelink is used, to recover the original version of the file; so this bug is affecting it as well; please give it a look a. -- Andrea Mennucc E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa! (Tonino Carotone) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#609300: input-utils: 609300: please fix this!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-12-08 22:10, Michael Prokop wrote: Ping, any news from the maintainer? Yes! Expect an upload within a week. Cheers, Marcus -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -

Bug#651472: python-apt: FTBFS(kfreebsd,ia64,hurd,): testsuite error KeyError: The cache has no package named 'libc6'

Package: src:python-apt Version: 0.8.3 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the

Bug#651412: DBUS error when trying to connect since 1.7.1~b3-1

Hello Ryan, On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 07:45:15 -0500, Ryan Kavanagh wrote: Since upgrading to 1.7.1~b3-1, wicd-curses and wicd-gtk have become unusable. That's to say, I can no longer connect to any wireless network using either of these clients. Trying to connect to a network with either of these

Bug#651203: procps: SONAME breakage

On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:30:06PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: Is libproc considered to be a public shared library or not? And this, is really, the crux of the whole matter. Is it? Was it supposed to be? Can it be? Well, it seems that as there are at least 3 packages (maybe more) that depend

Processed: tagging 651412, tagging 651391

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 651412 + upstream Bug #651412 [wicd-daemon] DBUS error when trying to connect since 1.7.1~b3-1 Added tag(s) upstream. tags 651391 + upstream Bug #651391 [wicd-daemon] wicd-daemon: Unable to connect/configure Added tag(s) upstream. thanks

Bug#617315: policy /usr/local edge case failure

retitle 617315 policy /usr/local edge case failure reassign 617315 debian-policy severity 617315 normal thanks Policy requires that creation/removal of directories in /usr/local never fail, but its example does fail as seen in this bug report. Apparently the problem is that the chown or chmod

Processed: policy /usr/local edge case failure

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 617315 policy /usr/local edge case failure Bug #617315 [debhelper] dh_usrlocal: snippets added fail at read-only mounted /usr/local (Debian Policy 9.1.2) Changed Bug title to 'policy /usr/local edge case failure' from 'dh_usrlocal:

Bug#651203: procps: SONAME breakage

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 08:47:21 +1100, Craig Small wrote: Given that, it needs to be fixed and made into a proper and well-behaving library package, so I'm proposing that: * libproc be split into its own package, probably libprocfs0 * the library file will have a proper SONAME that is

Bug#418480: marked as done (multicd: Depend on wodim)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:15:24 + with message-id e1rymfq-0002hy...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651302: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #418480, regarding multicd: Depend on wodim to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#601482: marked as done (multicd: depends-on-obsolete-package cdrecord)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:15:24 + with message-id e1rymfq-0002hy...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651302: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #418480, regarding multicd: depends-on-obsolete-package cdrecord to be marked as done. This means

Bug#548383: marked as done (qpopper: The PAM configuration file does not fit to the latest libpam-modules package)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:16:40 + with message-id e1rymge-0002oq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#646582: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #548383, regarding qpopper: The PAM configuration file does not fit to the latest libpam-modules

Bug#573522: marked as done (qpopper: error msg.: fetchmail: Query status=3 (AUTHFAIL))

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:16:40 + with message-id e1rymge-0002oq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#646582: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #548383, regarding qpopper: error msg.: fetchmail: Query status=3 (AUTHFAIL) to be marked as done.

Bug#577466: marked as done (hyperlatex: please remove any requirement for emacs22)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:14:48 + with message-id e1rymeq-0002gm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#621632: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #571122, regarding hyperlatex: please remove any requirement for emacs22 to be marked as done. This

Bug#571122: marked as done (hyperlatex: (Build-)Depends on emacs22)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:14:48 + with message-id e1rymeq-0002gm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#621632: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #571122, regarding hyperlatex: (Build-)Depends on emacs22 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#573522: marked as done (qpopper: error msg.: fetchmail: Query status=3 (AUTHFAIL))

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:16:40 + with message-id e1rymge-0002oq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#646582: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #573522, regarding qpopper: error msg.: fetchmail: Query status=3 (AUTHFAIL) to be marked as done.

Bug#548383: marked as done (qpopper: The PAM configuration file does not fit to the latest libpam-modules package)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:16:40 + with message-id e1rymge-0002oq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#646582: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #573522, regarding qpopper: The PAM configuration file does not fit to the latest libpam-modules

Bug#577466: marked as done (hyperlatex: please remove any requirement for emacs22)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:14:48 + with message-id e1rymeq-0002gm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#621632: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #577466, regarding hyperlatex: please remove any requirement for emacs22 to be marked as done. This

Bug#571122: marked as done (hyperlatex: (Build-)Depends on emacs22)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:14:48 + with message-id e1rymeq-0002gm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#621632: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #577466, regarding hyperlatex: (Build-)Depends on emacs22 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#601482: marked as done (multicd: depends-on-obsolete-package cdrecord)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:15:24 + with message-id e1rymfq-0002hy...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651302: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #601482, regarding multicd: depends-on-obsolete-package cdrecord to be marked as done. This means

Bug#418480: marked as done (multicd: Depend on wodim)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:15:24 + with message-id e1rymfq-0002hy...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651302: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #601482, regarding multicd: Depend on wodim to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#621974: marked as done (qpopper: FTBFS: pop_tls_openssl.c:323: undefined reference to `SSLv2_server_method')

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:16:40 + with message-id e1rymge-0002oq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#646582: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #621974, regarding qpopper: FTBFS: pop_tls_openssl.c:323: undefined reference to

Bug#632263: marked as done (Invalid maintainer address)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:16:40 + with message-id e1rymge-0002oq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#646582: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #632263, regarding Invalid maintainer address to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#639477: marked as done (slony1: Please move from postgresql-8.4 to postgresql-9.1)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:17:34 + with message-id e1rymhw-0002sv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651450: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #639477, regarding slony1: Please move from postgresql-8.4 to postgresql-9.1 to be marked as done.

Bug#651412: DBUS error when trying to connect since 1.7.1~b3-1

On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 07:45:15 -0500, Ryan Kavanagh wrote: Occasionally, simply starting wicd-curses causes this message to be printed: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/wicd/curses/wicd-curses.py, line 755, in set_connecting_status ': ' +

Processed: severity of 651316 is grave

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # package should not enter testing as it is severity 651316 grave Bug #651316 [libdrm-intel1] libdrm-intel1: X.org crashes when I try to play a video Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#625102: aplus-fsf: diff for NMU version 4.22.1-4.1

That's fine. Thanks. On 12/08/2011 09:48 AM, gregor herrmann wrote: tags 625102 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for aplus-fsf (versioned as 4.22.1-4.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- Neil Roeth

Bug#620919: marked as done (audacious-dumb: FTBFS for +b1: fatal error: audacious/util.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:47:08 + with message-id e1ryngc-0004bo...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#620919: fixed in audacious-dumb 0.65-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #620919, regarding audacious-dumb: FTBFS for +b1: fatal error: audacious/util.h: No such file or

Bug#629495: marked as done (audacious-dumb: not installable in sid (needs recompilation?))

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:47:08 + with message-id e1ryngc-0004br...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#629495: fixed in audacious-dumb 0.65-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #629495, regarding audacious-dumb: not installable in sid (needs recompilation?) to be marked as done.

Bug#633479: marked as done (ICE: gcc-4.6: ICE on armel+armhf with mksh, on armhf with oss4-4.2-build2004-1)

++ Library v3 (shared library subset kit) Closes: 622699 633479 635126 642127 650318 Changes: gcc-4.6 (4.6.2-6) unstable; urgency=low . * Update to SVN 20111208 (r182120) from the gcc-4_6-branch. - Fix PR c++/51265, PR bootstrap/50888, PR target/51393 (ix86), PR target/51002 (AVR), PR

Bug#633469: marked as done (ICE: gcc-4.6: ICE on armhf with traverso-0.49.2-3)

) Closes: 622699 633479 635126 642127 650318 Changes: gcc-4.6 (4.6.2-6) unstable; urgency=low . * Update to SVN 20111208 (r182120) from the gcc-4_6-branch. - Fix PR c++/51265, PR bootstrap/50888, PR target/51393 (ix86), PR target/51002 (AVR), PR target/51345 (AVR), PR debug/48190

Bug#635126: marked as done (gcc-4.6: miscompilation with -ftree-sra)

: 622699 633479 635126 642127 650318 Changes: gcc-4.6 (4.6.2-6) unstable; urgency=low . * Update to SVN 20111208 (r182120) from the gcc-4_6-branch. - Fix PR c++/51265, PR bootstrap/50888, PR target/51393 (ix86), PR target/51002 (AVR), PR target/51345 (AVR), PR debug/48190

Bug#651484: [digikam] confict with /usr/share/applications/kde4/dngconverter.desktop (also in kipi-plugins)

Package: digikam Version: 4:2.3.0-1 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- There is a confict with /usr/share/applications/kde4/dngconverter.desktop: $apt-get install digikam=4:2.3.0-1 Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information...

Bug#651463: honeyd: FTBFS (tagging.h:89:6: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '(' token)

tag 651463 upstream thanks Thanks for the heads up, it seems that the bug-fix upload I sent yesterday triggered a rebuild of the package in all architectures and those who have libevent2 now in unstable do not compile any more. The issue is already known by upstream maintainer Niels Provos, who

Processed: Re: Bug#651463: honeyd: FTBFS (tagging.h:89:6: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '(' token)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 651463 upstream Bug #651463 [src:honeyd] honeyd: FTBFS (tagging.h:89:6: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '(' token) Added tag(s) upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#649905: marked as done (blackbox: FTBFS: libbt0.symbols 64-bit specific)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:02:15 + with message-id e1ryrf5-0004vv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#649905: fixed in blackbox 0.70.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #649905, regarding blackbox: FTBFS: libbt0.symbols 64-bit specific to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#650411: marked as done (blackbox: binary-indep doesn't build libbt)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:02:15 + with message-id e1ryrf5-0004vy...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#650411: fixed in blackbox 0.70.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #650411, regarding blackbox: binary-indep doesn't build libbt to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#650511: marked as done (libbt0: undeclared Conflicts/Replaces with libbt)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:02:15 + with message-id e1ryrf5-0004vb...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#650511: fixed in blackbox 0.70.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #650511, regarding libbt0: undeclared Conflicts/Replaces with libbt to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#651437: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#651437: UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xa8 in position 41: invalid start byte

severity 651437 normal thanks The upload is for sid; failing to build on squeeze is not Release Critical. On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:12:21PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Thanks for providing boost 1.48, however I cannot build it on my squeez system, it fails with: dh_python2 W:

Processed: Re: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#651437: UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xa8 in position 41: invalid start byte

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 651437 normal Bug #651437 [boost1.48] UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xa8 in position 41: invalid start byte Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need