Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 692852 + sid
Bug #692852 [dolfin] dolfin: Avoid hardcoding the swig2.0 version
Added tag(s) sid.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692852: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692852
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:17:30PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:20:48 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
This has now made python-dolphin not installable in sid since the version of
swig in sid has passed to 2.0.8-1 on 2012-10-31. However, python-dolphin
still
Package: clementine
Version: 1.0.1+dfsg-2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
After d-u clementine isn't usable anymore, and I have a segmentation fault from
Konsole.
Thanks for your help.
*** End of the template - remove these lines ***
-- System
Hi,
sorry, I’m too tied up in other work that keeps popping
up to check the new version if it’s ready for uploading
in a timely manner.
Just saying. If nobody pops up, I’ll do it eventually,
of course, but it’s not on the top of my stack, so *if*
someone else wants to help, be our guest.
(Plus,
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 18:59:46 -0700
Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org wrote:
This resulted in all my local configuration in /etc/dovecot/ being
trashed, and overwritten with the shipped dovecot-core versions.
Ian, neither Helmut nor Lisandro could reproduce the bug report you
submitted.
Can you
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote:
Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
decide what to do with Ruby 1.9.X on ia64. It has been broken for
months, and hasn't seen any activity in Debian (#539141) or upstream
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:21:56PM +0100, Tobias Hansen wrote:
My impression after a short test of the game is that it is quite buggy
also without this bug.
Yeah, just look at the list of bugs in our BTS. The bug that requires
disabling sound is enough for me, and it's not the only one.
The
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 694846 with 677721
Bug #694846 [dicomscope] dicomscope: Exception in thread main
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError
694846 was not blocked by any bugs.
694846 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 694846: 677721
thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 664895
Bug #664895 {Done: Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org} [squirrelmail]
squirrelmail: completely broken with PHP 5.4
Unarchived Bug 664895
reopen 664895
Bug #664895 {Done: Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org} [squirrelmail]
tags 591969 + wheezy-ignore
thanks
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:56:11PM +0100, Christian Welzel wrote:
Am 05.12.2012 13:07, schrieb Neil McGovern:
Can someone explain: 1) Why there were no updates to the bug
between December 2010 and June 2012?
The bug could not be resolved, so i didnt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 591969 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #591969 [src:typo3-src] typo3-src: does not build .swf files from source
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
591969:
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:47:56 +
with message-id e1tgzvo-0001rk...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#692650: fixed in axis 1.4-16.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692650,
regarding axis: CVE-2012-5784
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:49:09 +
with message-id e1tgzwz-00034i...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#695192: fixed in bind9 1:9.9.2.dfsg.P1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695192,
regarding bind9: CVE-2012-5688
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:51:29 +
with message-id e1tgzzf-0004ms...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#694271: fixed in freevo 1.9.2b2-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #694271,
regarding freevo: missing Breaks+Replaces: freevo-doc ( 1.9.2b2)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:11:04 +
with message-id e1tgaic-0007hr...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#694810: fixed in plib 1.8.5-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #694810,
regarding plib: CVE-2012-4552
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:11:15 +
with message-id e1tgain-0007p9...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#694285: fixed in proofgeneral 4.2~pre120605-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694285,
regarding proofgeneral-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: proofgeneral ( 4)
to be marked as
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:12:25 +
with message-id e1tgajv-0008ac...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#665642: fixed in xarchiver 1:0.5.2+20090319+dfsg-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #665642,
regarding xarchiver fails to open 7z archives
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:12:25 +
with message-id e1tgajv-0008ac...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#665642: fixed in xarchiver 1:0.5.2+20090319+dfsg-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #665642,
regarding [xarchiver] crashes when opening 7z archives
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:12:15 +
with message-id e1tgajl-00084l...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#677650: fixed in unhide.rb 13-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677650,
regarding unhide.rb: in `module:LibC': uninitialized constant DL::Importable
(NameError)
to be
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:12:25 +
with message-id e1tgajv-0008ac...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#665642: fixed in xarchiver 1:0.5.2+20090319+dfsg-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #665642,
regarding xarchiver: don't show correct file list with 7zip archive
to be
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:12:04 +
with message-id e1tgaja-0007uh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#687848: fixed in syslinux 2:4.06+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #687848,
regarding extlinux-update: fails to correctly update changed syslinux debian
themes
to be
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:25:45PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:17:11PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
for the protocol. ;-) So others won't be
Package: liblockfile1
Version: 1.09-4
Severity: serious
Steps taken:
Install liblockfile1:amd64. Observe that it ships
/usr/share/doc/liblockfile1. Install liblockfile1:i386. Observe that
/usr/share/doc/liblockfile1 is still correctly there. Remove
liblockfile1:i386, but not liblockfile1:amd64.
Hi Roger,
On 12/06/2012 01:15 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:25:45PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:17:11PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
Hi,
I just NMUed the package with the suggested patch to DELAYED/3.
I'll file an unblock request once the package might have hit unstable.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi All,
I've prepared the patch with the problem pointed by David fixed (thanks
David). It also fixes a bug related to wildcard certificates.
The first patch is backported from httpclient 4.0 and apache synapse.
This second patch backports some fixes from httpclient 4.2
The patch differ a lot
Description: Fixed CN extraction from DN of X500 principal and wildcard validation
axis (1.4-16.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed CN extraction from DN of X500 principal and wildcard validation
Author: Alberto Fernández MartÃnez inf...@gmail.com
Origin: other
Bug-Debian:
Hi,
I uploaded the suggested patch to DELAYED/3. I will file an unblock
request once the package might have hit unstable.
Remark: Peter, I usually commit changes to some packaging VCS if the
package is maintained in a DD-accessible VCS. It seems that this is
not the case for the gri package
Hi Alberto,
thanks for your continuous work on this. As I said in my previous mail
please remember to reopen the according bugs to make sure the previous
solution will not migrate to testing. I'll volunteer to sponsor your
new version if you confirm that this is needed to finally fix the issue.
Package: libphone-utils0
Version: 0.1+git20110523-1.2
Severity: serious
It is technically possible to install libphone-utils0:amd64 and
libphone-utils0:i386 in parallel. If I then purge libphone-utils0:i386,
/etc/phone-utils.conf will disappear even though it is still needed by
Hi,
when debchecking out speech-dispatcher Vcs-Git I noticed there is some
work going on done by people who are usually known to do a reasonable
job. Before I fiddle around with this package to apply the quite simple
patch for the bug I would like to ping those people mentioned in the
latest
Hi Salvatore,
the fix was just uploaded.
Do we need a release excpetion for this to be accepeted ?
--
Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 692650
Bug #692650 {Done: Alberto Fernández Martínez inf...@gmail.com} [axis] axis:
CVE-2012-5784
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Package: libparse-debian-packages-perl
Version: 0.03-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Using libparse-debain-packages-perl, the following problem arises when parsing
stanzas with more than 1 multiline entry:
If a multiline entry is found, all lines of
Package: src:dspam
Version: 3.10.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Let me give an example of the general issue in libdspam7. All the other
issues are of similar nature.
It is possible to install libdspam7:amd64 and libdspam7:i386 in
parallel. Now a user could purge libdspam7:i386, but still use
Hi,
I did a
debcheckout phpunit-story
and noticed that the patch for bug #694361 is applied and the new
version even tagged - any reason it did not made its way to unstable?
Please tell me if I should sponsor some upload.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To
block 677943 by 694790
block 694355 by 694790
block 675377 by 694790
block 676798 by 694790
block 678662 by 694790
block 687495 by 694790
block 687715 by 694790
block 689291 by 694790
block 690711 by 694790
block 691309 by 694790
block 691390 by 694790
block 691327 by 694790
block 691448 by 694790
Hi,
I considered NMUing ssdeep to fix this bug. When debcheckout-ing the
packaging repository I noticed that there is a changelog entry
* Adding the missing Breaks+Replaces (Closes: #694368).
for a not yet released version 2.9-1.
Could you please confirm that you understood that you can
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 03:53:06PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Please tell me if I should sponsor some upload.
I just upload the package to mentors, it will be great if you could check it
and sponsor it, after that i will ask for unblock.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 695274 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=81744
Bug #695274 [libparse-debian-packages-perl] libparse-debian-packages-perl:
Problem parsing stanzas with more than 1 multiline entry
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 695274 + confirmed
Bug #695274 [libparse-debian-packages-perl] libparse-debian-packages-perl:
Problem parsing stanzas with more than 1 multiline entry
Added tag(s) confirmed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 677943 by 694790
Bug #677943 [munin] /etc/apache2/conf.d/munin removed on upgrade
677943 was not blocked by any bugs.
677943 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 677943: 694790
block 694355 by 694790
Bug #694355 [munin-doc]
Hi Luis,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:23:26AM -0500, Luis Uribe wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 03:53:06PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Please tell me if I should sponsor some upload.
I just upload the package to mentors, it will be great if you could check it
and sponsor it,
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:47:42 +
with message-id e1tgdfq-0001b4...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#694361: fixed in phpunit-story 1.0.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694361,
regarding phpunit-story: missing Breaks+Repalces: phpunit ( 3.6.10)
to be marked as done.
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:06:06 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
But rebuilding it in sid now with the proposed patch would make it
uninstallable in wheezy, which still has swig2.0 2.0.7.
I guess we should tag this bug 'sid' for the time being?
I agree, this bug only applies to sid. Setting the sid
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:37:33 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
when debchecking out speech-dispatcher Vcs-Git I noticed there is some
work going on done by people who are usually known to do a reasonable
job. Before I fiddle around with this package to apply the quite simple
patch for the bug I
Hi Enrico,
I'm currently busy to squash all missing Breaks+Replaces bugs opened
by the other Andreas. Just let me know if you need a helping hand to
NMU the package.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: tsung
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I run `tsung -f tsung.xml start` it says:
Erlang version has changed ! [5.8.5] != [5.9.1]
Must create new boot files (you may have to run this one time as root ! )
creating boot file for tsung
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:22:00 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote:
Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
decide what to do with Ruby 1.9.X on ia64. It has been broken for
months, and
Am 06.12.2012 12:07, schrieb Neil McGovern:
So, it looks like this bug isn't going to get fixed :(
I'm unsure, if flex-sdk can compile AS1 code, but it can compile AS3
code. So at least the AS3 part can be fixed, whenever flex-sdk enters
debian.
Hrm. This doesn't quite cover the expected
Hi,
since we have gnat-4.6 in wheezy and gnat-4.4 does not build anymore
(see #669513), can gnat-4.4 be removed?
Best regards,
Tobias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Source: ssdeep
Source-Version: 2.7-2
Hi Christophe
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 03:08:03PM +0100, Christophe Monniez wrote:
the fix was just uploaded.
Thanks!
Do we need a release excpetion for this to be accepeted ?
Just fill a bug for pseudopackage release.debian.org for a unblock
request.
Michael Stapelberg dijo [Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:22:00AM +0100]:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote:
Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
decide what to do with Ruby 1.9.X on ia64. It has been broken for
months, and
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible moreinfo
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:29:04AM +0100, phileom wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
After d-u clementine isn't usable anymore, and I have a segmentation fault
from
Konsole.
Unable to reproduce. See http://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace for
some info about
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #695254 [clementine] clementine does not start
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
--
695254: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695254
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
What is broken about it? Has anyone estimated how much effort it would take
to fix? Are we talking needing assembly language bindings or just some dumb
SIGBUS error?
Patrick Baggett
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org wrote:
Michael Stapelberg dijo [Thu, Dec 06, 2012
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed patch
Bug #695284 [tsung] tsung compiled with outdated erlang version
Added tag(s) confirmed and patch.
--
695284: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695284
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed patch
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:53:48AM -0500, Stuart Freeman wrote:
When I run `tsung -f tsung.xml start` it says:
Erlang version has changed ! [5.8.5] != [5.9.1]
Must create new boot files (you may have to run this one time as root ! )
creating boot file for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 695050 grave
Bug #695050 [python-webob] python-webob: webob last stable version 1.1.1
response header bug
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695050:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:13:31PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:22:00 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote:
Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
decide
Hi
I've uploaded new packages to mentors. I'll be out until Monday, so feel
free to review the patches and sponsor the new version if all you are
confident it's all ok
I think now it's fine , but if you find some other bug or improvement,
I'll be happy to correct it.
I'll insist next week
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
severity 695239 important
reassign 695239 wine 1.4.1-1
retitle 695239 wine meta-package is not multiarch
kthxbye
Hi,
this bug is in the wine metapackage rather than in winetricks. I also
think it is not grave because what you did is not what the
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Simon
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 03:11:27PM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
Version: 0.03-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Using libparse-debain-packages-perl, the following problem arises when parsing
stanzas with more
Processing control commands:
severity -1 important
Bug #695274 [libparse-debian-packages-perl] libparse-debian-packages-perl:
Problem parsing stanzas with more than 1 multiline entry
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
695274: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695274
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 695239 important
Bug #695239 [winetricks] winetricks won't install alongside wine:i386
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
reassign 695239 wine 1.4.1-1
Bug #695239 [winetricks] winetricks won't install alongside wine:i386
Bug
Your message dated Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:13:24 +0100
with message-id 20121206181324.ga2...@elende.valinor.li
and subject line Re: Bug#694368: libfuzzy{2,-dev}: missing Breaks+Replaces:
ssdeep ( 2.6)
has caused the Debian Bug report #694368,
regarding libfuzzy{2,-dev}: missing Breaks+Replaces: ssdeep
On Sat, April 7, 2012 17:22, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
We'll have to investigate how to best fix this.
I'm currently preparing a patch in cooperation with upstream.
Cheers,
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
The package FTBFS in a clean environment:
=
gfortran seclf1.F
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/geant321-3.21.14.dfsg/build/geant321/matx55'
cd /tmp/buildd/geant321-3.21.14.dfsg/lib ln -s
../src/geant321/data/xsneut95.dat xsneut95.dat
/bin/sh: 1: cd: can't cd to
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 07:02:54PM +0100, Alberto Fernández wrote:
Hi
I've uploaded new packages to mentors. I'll be out until Monday, so feel
free to review the patches and sponsor the new version if all you are
confident it's all ok
I admit I'm no Java programmer and I do not feel
Tobias Hansen writes:
since we have gnat-4.6 in wheezy and gnat-4.4 does not build anymore
(see #669513), can gnat-4.4 be removed?
Yes but maybe notify the maintainers of the sole package still depending
on it, ghdl. This package is the reason I've refrained from asking for
removal of gnat-4.4
Am 06.12.2012 20:44, schrieb Ludovic Brenta:
Tobias Hansen writes:
since we have gnat-4.6 in wheezy and gnat-4.4 does not build anymore
(see #669513), can gnat-4.4 be removed?
Yes but maybe notify the maintainers of the sole package still depending
on it, ghdl. This package is the reason
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 05:17:58PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
See also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258974 and
Hi
I've reopened the two bugs.
The first patch was incomplete, as pointed by David and by other bug
i've found reviewing the code.
The bug pointed by David can occur in some rare cases where the CA
issues malformed certificates. It's rare, but there are may CA...
The other bug it's about
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:32:24 +
with message-id e1tgj3q-0005up...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#694521: fixed in libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-2+squeeze6
has caused the Debian Bug report #694521,
regarding libxml2: CVE-2012-5134
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:48:48 +
with message-id e1tgjji-0002ft...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#692130: fixed in vlc 2.0.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #692130,
regarding vlc: CVE-2012-5470
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:56:07 +0100
with message-id 20121206215607.gx5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695248: mesa: CVE-2012-5129
has caused the Debian Bug report #695248,
regarding mesa: CVE-2012-5129
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 683010 - squeeze-ignore + wheezy sid
Bug #683010 [src:evolvotron] FTBFS on ia64: one or more PCH files were found,
but they were invalid
Removed tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Bug #683010 [src:evolvotron] FTBFS on ia64: one or more PCH files were
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:32:30 +
with message-id e1tgjza-0006ka...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#683010: fixed in evolvotron 0.6.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683010,
regarding FTBFS on ia64: one or more PCH files were found, but they were invalid
to be marked as
Control: severity -1 important
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:07:24PM +0400, Vladimir Lysikov wrote:
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package has uses beyond compilation.
Data.FFI module is contained in ffi subdirectory of source tarball.
It is needed for compilation
Processing control commands:
severity -1 important
Bug #695216 [agda-stdlib] agda-stdlib: Package does not contain Data.FFI
haskell module needed for compilation
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
695216: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695216
Debian Bug Tracking
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 693288 + wheezy-ignore squeeze-ignore
Bug #693288 [src:jsxgraph] src:jsxgraph: maintainer address bounces
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore and wheezy-ignore.
# bouncing mail addresses are not relevant for releases, they need to be
fixed in sid,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 695272 + patch
Bug #695272 [libphone-utils0] libphone-utils0: harmful postrm purge action in
M-A:same package
Added tag(s) patch.
kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695272:
Hi,
Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org writes:
Unfortunately, the upload is broken currently due to me canceling it
and dcut being stalled for some reason. Anyway, I will upload this
package ASAP (hopefully within the next few days).
This is now uploaded to DELAYED/5.
--
Best regards,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 694295 + pending
Bug #694295 [libspeechd-dev] libspeechd-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces:
speech-dispatcher ( 0.7.1-6)
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
694295:
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes:
# The version-specific site-lisp dir, say emacs/21.1/site-lisp, needs
# to be in share/FLAVOR so that as we upgrade from 21.1 to 21.2,
# etc., add-on package bits don't get left behind.
Hmm. I suppose if an add-on is removed
Hello,
I'm having a look and committing things in the git repository, thanks
for the heads-up.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Fri, 07 Dec 2012 01:32:34 +
with message-id e1tgmnq-0006mk...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#694295: fixed in speech-dispatcher 0.7.1-6.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694295,
regarding libspeechd-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: speech-dispatcher (
0.7.1-6)
to be
I don't know Ruby AT ALL, but I did a bit of googling and this appears
to make unhide.rb work with 1.9:
--- unhide.rb.orig 2012-12-06 23:53:57.0 -0500
+++ unhide.rb 2012-12-06 23:52:51.0 -0500
@@ -29,7 +29,11 @@
# Support for libc functions not covered by the standard Ruby
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 695250 + pending
Bug #695250 [tomcat6] tomcat6: CVE-2012-4534 CVE-2012-4431 CVE-2012-3546
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695250:
On 12/05/2012 11:43 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: tomcat6
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
More Tomcat security issues have been disclosed:
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
The page contains links to the upstream fixes.
BTW, is there a
90 matches
Mail list logo
