Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2022 05:34:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011824: fixed in vega.js 5.22.1+ds+~3.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011824,
regarding vega.js: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:12:
override_dh_auto_build] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2022 05:33:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011833: fixed in node-yargs 16.2.0+~16.0.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011833,
regarding node-yargs: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1011828 [src:node-domutils] node-domutils: FTBFS:
node_modules/@types/jest/index.d.ts(503,30): error TS2307: Cannot find module
'jest-matcher-utils' or its corresponding type declarations.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1011828:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1011828 in node-domutils reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1011833 [src:node-yargs] node-yargs: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8:
binary] Error 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1011833: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011833
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1011833 in node-yargs reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2022 05:18:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011792: fixed in ts-node 10.7.0+~cs7.0.20-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011792,
regarding ts-node: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:7: override_dh_auto_build]
Error 2
to be marked as done.
This
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1011792 [src:ts-node] ts-node: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:7:
override_dh_auto_build] Error 2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1011792: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011792
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1011792 in ts-node reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On 2022-05-26, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Thanks for doing the rebuild testing!
> Relevant part (hopefully):
Would it be at all possible to update your script to compress and attach
data over a certain size? This
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1011824 [src:vega.js] vega.js: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:12:
override_dh_auto_build] Error 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1011824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011824
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1011824 in vega.js reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 929165 with 985212
Bug #929165 [ubuntu-keyring] ubuntu-keyring removes configuration files without
checking
No valid blocking bug(s) given; not doing anything
Failed to set blocking bugs of 929165: Unknown/archived blocking bug(s):985212.
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 23:32:06 + (UTC)
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011769: fixed in cups 2.4.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011769,
regarding cups: CVE-2022-26691: authorization bypass when using "local"
authorization
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: android-platform-system-tools-hidl
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm, sid
android-platform-system-tools-hidl build-depends on android-libcrypto-utils-dev.
android-libcrypt-utils-dev is built from the android-platform-system-core source
package which was recently removed from testing at
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1009422 accountsservice/22.08.8-1
Bug #1009422 {Done: Gunnar Hjalmarsson }
[src:accountsservice] accountsservice: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd
obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=8 meson test returned
exit code 10
Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2022 00:55:33 +0200
with message-id <16a3aa7e-d51a-b129-b891-3b0b4af08...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1009422: accountsservice: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=8 meson test
returned exit code 10
has
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 22:36:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011878: fixed in rust-compiler-builtins 0.1.70-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011878,
regarding rust-compiler-builtins: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
/usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build returned exit code
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 21:43:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011895: fixed in gtk-vnc 1.3.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011895,
regarding gnome-boxes: FTBFS: Package 'libpulse-simple', required by
'gvncpulse-1.0', not found
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 21:43:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011876: fixed in gtk-vnc 1.3.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011876,
regarding gnome-connections: FTBFS: Package 'libpulse-simple', required by
'gvncpulse-1.0', not found
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 21:43:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1005145: fixed in oz 0.17.0-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005145,
regarding oz: FTBFS against python 3.10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 21:43:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011872: fixed in libnet-server-mail-perl 0.28-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011872,
regarding libnet-server-mail-perl: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 test
TEST_VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
to
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:13:03PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Thank you! Feel free to speed up if you want
Thanks, rescheduled for immediate upload.
> /Simon
cu
Adrian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1011876 src:gtk-vnc 1.3.0-2
Bug #1011876 [gtk-vnc] gnome-connections: FTBFS: Package 'libpulse-simple',
required by 'gvncpulse-1.0', not found
Bug reassigned from package 'gtk-vnc' to 'src:gtk-vnc'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1011872 in libnet-server-mail-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1011872 [src:libnet-server-mail-perl] libnet-server-mail-perl: FTBFS:
dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 test TEST_VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1011872: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011872
Debian Bug
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 05:34:02AM +, Debian testing autoremoval watch
wrote:
> passwdqc 2.0.2-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-06-30
>
> It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
> 1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183,
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 958853 anki: old version beginning to fail with newer Python releases
Bug #958853 [anki] anki: Upstream new version
Bug #965258 [anki] anki: upgrade to newer version of Anki
Changed Bug title to 'anki: old version beginning to fail with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1011876 gtk-vnc 1.3.0-3
Bug #1011876 [src:gnome-connections] gnome-connections: FTBFS: Package
'libpulse-simple', required by 'gvncpulse-1.0', not found
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gnome-connections' to 'gtk-vnc'.
No longer marked
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 958853 serious
Bug #958853 [anki] anki: Upstream new version
Bug #965258 [anki] anki: upgrade to newer version of Anki
Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist'
Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist'
> title 958853 anki: old version
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source php-symfony-polyfill
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of
'php-symfony-polyfill'
Limit currently set to 'source':'php-symfony-polyfill'
> tags 1011786 + pending
Bug #1011786 [src:php-symfony-polyfill]
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 20:39:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#995411: fixed in ruby-omniauth-ultraauth 0.0.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #995411,
regarding ruby-omniauth-ultraauth: autopkgtest needs update for new version of
ruby-omniauth-openid-connect: Could
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 20:39:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#979748: fixed in rio 1.07-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #979748,
regarding rio: FTBFS with glibc 2.32
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 20:39:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011899: fixed in php-twig 3.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011899,
regarding php-twig: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:92:
override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 20:33:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010526: fixed in libxml2 2.9.4+dfsg1-7+deb10u4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010526,
regarding libxml2: CVE-2022-29824: integer overflows in xmlBuf and xmlBuffer
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 20:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010526: fixed in libxml2 2.9.10+dfsg-6.7+deb11u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010526,
regarding libxml2: CVE-2022-29824: integer overflows in xmlBuf and xmlBuffer
to be marked as done.
This means that
Source: trilinos
Version: 13.2.0-1
Severity: serious
This is a side-product of a rebuild test against libtbb-dev/experimental
==> CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log <==
Performing C++ SOURCE FILE Test
On 26/05/2022 20:52, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: node-domutils
Version: 3.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Package: pypy
Version: 7.3.9+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm sid
Control: block -1 by 983470 938168 937510 932820
After all the pain influcted on developers and users by pushing the
Python2 removal before bullseye, it feels absurd that we still ship
at least two Python2 interpreters in
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 983470 938168 937510 932820
Bug #1011926 [pypy] pypy shouldn't be shipped in bookworm
1011926 was not blocked by any bugs.
1011926 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1011926: 983470, 937510, 938168, and 932820
--
1011926:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1006588 + fixed
Bug #1006588 {Done: Timo Lindfors } [src:tboot] tboot:
FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0
Added tag(s) fixed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1006588:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1010311 + ftbfs
Bug #1010311 [src:python-duniterpy, src:silkaj] python-duniterpy breaks silkaj
autopkgtest: cannot import name 'BlockUID' from 'duniterpy.documents'
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing control commands:
> tags 1005145 + patch
Bug #1005145 [oz] oz: FTBFS against python 3.10
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1005145 + pending
Bug #1005145 [oz] oz: FTBFS against python 3.10
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1005145: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005145
Debian Bug
Control: tags 1005145 + patch
Control: tags 1005145 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for oz (versioned as 0.17.0-5.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru oz-0.17.0/debian/changelog oz-0.17.0/debian/changelog
---
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1000612 in python-cassandra-driver reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1000612 [src:python-cassandra-driver] python-cassandra-driver: flaky test
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1000612 to the same tags previously set
--
1000612: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000612
Debian Bug Tracking
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 19:40:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000861: fixed in eggdrop 1.8.4+repack1-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000861,
regarding eggdrop: orig tarball doesn't match the attached upstream signature
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1011786 + patch
Bug #1011786 [src:php-symfony-polyfill] php-symfony-polyfill: FTBFS: make[1]:
*** [debian/rules:53: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
Added tag(s) patch.
> forcemerge 1011786 1007203
Bug #1011786 [src:php-symfony-polyfill]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source php-twig
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'php-twig'
Limit currently set to 'source':'php-twig'
> tags 1011899 + pending
Bug #1011899 [src:php-twig] php-twig: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:92:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 1011897 1011754
Bug #1011897 [src:interimap] interimap: FTBFS: tests fail
Bug #1011754 [src:interimap] interimap: autopkgtest failure with openssl 3
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
Merged 1011754 1011897
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1010972 1011919
Bug #1010972 [src:libmojolicious-plugin-authentication-perl]
libmojolicious-perl breaks libmojolicious-plugin-authentication-perl
autopkgtest: Your secret passphrase needs to be changed
Bug #1011919
Source: ktimer
Version: 4:21.12.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: libmojolicious-plugin-authentication-perl
Version: 1.37-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: node-pbkdf2
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: haskell-pango
Version: 0.13.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: poolcounter
Version: 1.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: lsof
Version: 4.95.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: haskell-swish
Version: 0.10.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-mimic-response
Version: 3.1.0-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pkg-php-tools
Version: 1.42
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: haskell-warp
Version: 3.3.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: node-css-what
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: node-glob-parent
Version: 6.0.2+~5.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: networking-baremetal
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: node-gulp-concat
Version: 2.6.1+~0.0.15+git20190329.179bb8c+~1.0.3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Source: node-rollup-plugin-commonjs
Version: 21.0.1+repack-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libvirt-python
Version: 8.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: prismatic-plumbing-clojure
Version: 0.5.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: interimap
Version: 0.5.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: php-twig
Version: 3.3.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-browserify-cipher
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: haskell-gtk3
Version: 0.15.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: gnome-boxes
Version: 42.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: node-y18n
Version: 5.0.8+~5.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: rbac-client-clojure
Version: 0.9.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1002863 serious
Bug #1002863 [src:node-react-audio-player] node-react-audio-player: FTBFS with
webpack5: Error: Invalid webpack options
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1002869 serious
Bug #1002869 [src:node-vue-resource] node-vue-resource: FTBFS with webpack5:
Error: Invalid webpack options
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1002862 serious
Bug #1002862 [src:node-prop-types] node-prop-types: FTBFS with webpack5: Error:
Invalid webpack options
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Source: node-immutable
Version: 4.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: node-rollup-plugin-sass
Version: 1.2.6~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: haskell-tldr
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: python-libzim
Version: 1.0.0+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: orthanc-dicomweb
Version: 1.7+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-lunr
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-define-lazy-prop
Version: 3.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ordered-clojure
Version: 1.5.9-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: coffeescript
Version: 1.12.8~dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: haskell-wcwidth
Version: 0.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot
Source: php-dapphp-radius
Version: 2.5.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: ring-basic-authentication-clojure
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: node-browserify-sign
Version: 4.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gnome-connections
Version: 42.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rust-compiler-builtins
Version: 0.1.52-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: haskell-glib
Version: 0.13.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools
Version: 0.9.0+git20220423.g0105384-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on
Source: puppetlabs-ring-middleware-clojure
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libnet-server-mail-perl
Version: 0.28-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: hscolour
Version: 1.24.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: node-rollup-pluginutils
Version: 4.2.1~ds+~2.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: trapperkeeper-status-clojure
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
1 - 100 of 338 matches
Mail list logo