Package: libcamera
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: ftbfs
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Dear maintainers,
libcamera fails to build from source on 32-bit architectures under 64-bit
time_t, because it has a module that
+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2
> -
Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2024 04:50:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057549: fixed in crowdsec 1.4.6-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057549,
regarding crowdsec: FTBFS: FAIL: TestOneShot/permission_denied
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:03:57 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2
> > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1057549 [src:crowdsec] crowdsec: FTBFS: FAIL: TestOneShot/permission_denied
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1057549: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057549
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1057549 in crowdsec reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2024 04:06:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060915: fixed in golang-entgo-ent 0.11.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060915,
regarding golang-entgo-ent: Flaky tests due to relying on default result
ordering
to be marked as done.
This means that
Hi Paul,
Paul Mars (2024-01-16):
> Here is a patch to fix the issue.
Sorry, I didn't spot this bug report right away (its metadata got
adjusted along the way). Thanks for the bug report and the patch,
on their way to unstable!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX --
: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for xpm.h... no
> checking X11/xpm.h usability... yes
> checking X11/xpm.h
: trixie sid ftbfs
User:lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more
Package: nbd-client
Version: 1:3.26.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Hilko Bengen
Dear Maintainer,
While investigating libnbd build failures (see ##1066766), I stumbled
across a bug that makes nbd-server crash without an error message when
trying to read its configuration
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1066207 [src:mrpt] mrpt: FTBFS: xstimestamp.c:145:34: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘timegm’; did you mean ‘time’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1066207:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066207 in mrpt reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more
Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: wpewebkit
Version: 2.42.5-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your
--- Begin Message ---
Source: wv
Version: 1.2.9-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
---
Source: libquicktime
Version: 2:1.2.4-15
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pcb-rnd
Version: 3.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dino-im
Version: 0.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all
: seyon
Version: 2.20c-34
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg
Hi David,
Le 09/03/2024 à 11:49, David Prévot a écrit :
Also, this package has no reverse dependencies. Given the amount of care
it brought in the last few years, I believe it should be removed from
the archive. Bumping the severity to see it removed from testing ASAP,
maybe it should also be
...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: poa
Version: 2.0+20060928-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64
Message ---
Source: openwince-jtag
Version: 0.5.1-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely
Dixi quod…
>Suggested fix:
>
>+ AC_CHECK_HEADERS(gssapi/gssapi_krb5.h)
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS(gsskrb5_register_acceptor_identity)
> if test "$ac_cv_func_gsskrb5_register_acceptor_identity" = no ; then
>- AC_CHECK_HEADERS(gssapi/gssapi_krb5.h)
>
>If it’s really that, anyway.
At least it allows the
Dixi quod…
>I just tested the 2.2 patch on gnupg1, and it applies cleanly,
>[…]
>For gnupg1, the B-D are also already installable, so there’s no
>current need to modify them there, just apply the same patch as
>was applied in gnupg2 2.2 and upload.
It finished building with the patch, so please
Source: alsa-oss
Version: 1.1.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=alsa-oss=armhf=1.1.8-2%2Bb1=1710256499=0
libtool: compile: gcc
Source: plptools
Version: 1.0.13-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=plptools=armhf=1.0.13-2%2Bb1=1710265542=0
libtool: compile: g++
...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: wmstickynotes
Version: 0.7-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<>'
> sh -e make-tinyssh.sh
> === Tue
: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --mode=link --tag=disable-static
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wl,--as-need
: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -o r -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/build/reproducible-path/r-base-4.3.3=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -
sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build --with python3 --buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_update_autotools_
sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -o libjri.so Rengine.o jri.o Rcallbacks.o Rinit.o globals.o rjava.o
> rjstring.o -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z
with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: qfits
Version: 6.2.0-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64
Source: linuxtv-dvb-apps
Version: 1.1.1+rev1500-1.4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
Message ---
Source: lcrq
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1.2.6-3.1~exp1
Bug #1061493 {Done: Michael Hudson-Doyle }
[src:consolekit2] consolekit: install PAM module and udev files into /usr
The source 'consolekit2' and version '1.2.6-3.1~exp1' do not appear to match
any binary packages
Marked as found in
...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: daligner
Version: 1.0+git20240119.335105d-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:29:55 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: AW: AW: Bug#1064950: apache2: (Legacy?) "Depends:
apache2-data (= ${source:Version})," in debian/control breaks binNMU builds.
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064950,
regarding apache2: (Legacy?) "Depends:
Source: apr-util
Version: 1.6.3-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=apr-util=armhf=1.6.3-1.1=1709086833=0
testldap: SUCCESS
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1066633 [src:poa] poa: FTBFS: fasta_format.c:48:9: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘stringptr_cat_pos’; did you mean ‘stringptr_cat’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1066633:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066633 in poa reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 05:39:49PM +0100, gregor herrmann via
pkg-perl-maintainers wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:34:57 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > > 80s not ok 5 - Errno is in libperl5.38 or perl-base (or only perl-base
> > > for perl < 5.22)
> > libperl5.38 or as it's called nowadays:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1066534 [src:daligner] daligner: FTBFS: ONElib.c:1792:29: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘vasprintf’; did you mean ‘vsprintf’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1066534:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066534 in daligner reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Message ---
Source: emoslib
Version: 2:4.5.9-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1065547 src:pygobject 3.47.0-1
Bug #1065547 [src:gst-python1.0] gst-python1.0 FTBFS: TypeError: function takes
at most 0 arguments
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gst-python1.0' to 'src:pygobject'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Andrey Rakhmatullin dixit:
>On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:36:37PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> > gssapi.c:1600:9: error: implicit declaration of function
>> > ‘gsskrb5_register_acceptor_identity’
>> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> > 1600 |
Hi Adrian,
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 02:03:55AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags 1064967 + patch
> Control: tags 1064967 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for fontforge (versioned as 1:20230101~dfsg-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if
Hi again,
>on 1.x or 2.4 before the weekend.
I just tested the 2.2 patch on gnupg1, and it applies cleanly,
and configure also seems happy:
[…]
checking whether the resolver is usable... yes
checking whether LDAP via "-lldap" is present and sane... yes
checking for ldap_get_option... yes
Source: cyrus-sasl2
Version: 2.1.28+dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
cyrus-sasl2, before aborting the build due to #1066214, spews
several warnings like the following:
[…]
otp.c:648:43: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sphinxtrain
Version: 1.0.8+5prealpha+1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64
--- Begin Message ---
Source: multitail
Version: 6.5.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 108 + pending
Bug #108 [src:sphinxtrain] sphinxtrain: FTBFS: lexicon.c:202:19: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘str2words’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1066393 https://github.com/mjakeman/extension-manager/issues/590
Bug #1066393 [src:gnome-shell-extension-manager] gnome-shell-extension-manager:
FTBFS: ../src/main.c:168:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘waitpid’
On 13 March 2024 at 19:06, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
| control: reassign 1066403 r-base-dev
| control: reassign 1066452 r-base-dev
| control: reassign 1066455 r-base-dev
| control: reassign 1066456 r-base-dev
| control: forcemerge 1066403 1066452 1066455 1066456
| control: affects 1066403 rjava
|
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 1066473 + pending
Bug #1066473 [src:multitail] multitail: FTBFS: mt.c:707:25: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘waddnwstr’; did you mean ‘waddnstr’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 07:03:29PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2024-03-13 13:08 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Source: tack
> > Version: 1.08-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> > User: lu...@debian.org
Hi Andreas
>I have upload a fix for 2.2
OK, that should help.
>probably will not be able to spend any time on 1.x or 2.4 before the weekend.
They can probably wait until then, no worries.
>It is fixed in 2.4 and I am very reluctant to backport major packaging
>updates to 2.2
For some values
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc version 13.2.0 (Debian 13.2.0-18)
> ... rest of stderr output d
tag 1066473: + pending
thanks
Hi,
Am 13.03.24 um 12:53 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Interesting. I almost wanted to tag it unreproducible since it didn't
happen in my already-existing chroot... But it definitely
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source bc
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'bc'
Limit currently set to 'source':'bc'
> tags 1043703 + pending
Bug #1043703 [src:bc] bc: Fails to build source after successful build
Added tag(s) pending.
>
On 2024-03-13 Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> clone 1066137 -1
> reassign -1 gnupg1 1.4.23-1.1
> retitle -1 gnupg1: fails to build gpgkeys_ldap, probably due to
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
> thanks
> Dixi quod…
> >This matches the following failure mode at the end of the build:
> Same
: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/build'
> make[4]: Nothing to be done for 'insta
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:06:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066137: fixed in gnupg2 2.2.40-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066137,
regarding gnupg2: -Werror=implicit-function-declaration failure testing for
ldap_open
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
> reassign 1066403 r-base-dev
Bug #1066403 [r-base-dev] r-base-dev: missing dependency on libtirpc-dev
Bug #1066452 [r-base-dev] r-base-dev: missing dependency on libtirpc-dev
Bug #1066455 [r-base-dev] r-base-dev: missing dependency on libtirpc-dev
Bug #1066456
Processing control commands:
> reassign 1066403 r-base-dev
Bug #1066403 [r-base-dev] r-base-dev: missing dependency on libtirpc-dev
Bug #1066452 [r-base-dev] r-base-dev: missing dependency on libtirpc-dev
Bug #1066455 [r-base-dev] r-base-dev: missing dependency on libtirpc-dev
Bug #1066456
Processing control commands:
> reassign 1066403 r-base-dev
Bug #1066403 [r-base-dev] r-base-dev: missing dependency on libtirpc-dev
Bug #1066452 [r-base-dev] r-base-dev: missing dependency on libtirpc-dev
Bug #1066455 [r-base-dev] r-base-dev: missing dependency on libtirpc-dev
Bug #1066456
Processing control commands:
> reassign 1066403 r-base-dev
Bug #1066403 [src:rjava] rjava: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -ltirpc: No such file or
directory
Bug reassigned from package 'src:rjava' to 'r-base-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions rjava/1.0-11-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
control: reassign 1066403 r-base-dev
control: reassign 1066452 r-base-dev
control: reassign 1066455 r-base-dev
control: reassign 1066456 r-base-dev
control: forcemerge 1066403 1066452 1066455 1066456
control: affects 1066403 rjava
control: affects 1066403 rapache
control: affects 1066403 littler
On 2024-03-13 13:08 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: tack
> Version: 1.08-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in
Processing control commands:
> reassign 1066422 libdcmtk-dev
Bug #1066422 [libdcmtk-dev] libdcmtk-dev: missing dependency on libnsl-dev
Bug #1066423 [libdcmtk-dev] libdcmtk-dev: missing dependency on libnsl-dev
Ignoring request to reassign bug #1066422 to the same package
Ignoring request to
Processing control commands:
> reassign 1066422 libdcmtk-dev
Bug #1066422 [src:plastimatch] plastimatch: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lnsl: No
such file or directory
Bug reassigned from package 'src:plastimatch' to 'libdcmtk-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2.
control: reassign 1066422 libdcmtk-dev
control: reassign 1066423 libdcmtk-dev
control: forcemerge 1066422 1066423
control: retitle 1066422 libdcmtk-dev: missing dependency on libnsl-dev
control: affects 1066422 plastimatch
control: affects 1066423 sight
Hi,
There are 2 packages using dcmtk
---
Source: silo-llnl
Version: 4.11-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libtfbs-perl
Version: 0.7.1+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 5:16 PM Jeremy Bícha wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 4:13 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2024-03-12 09:26:32 [-0400], Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> > > > Could someone check this, please?
> > >
> > > Did you try running autopkgtests on this version? The
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:46:49PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ../fonttosfnt/util.c: In function ‘vsprintf_alloc’:
> > ../fonttosfnt/util.c:89:10: error: implicit declaration of function
> > ‘vasprintf’; did you mean ‘vsprintf’?
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Looks like it's
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/10613
On 2024-02-17 18:53 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Control: severity -1 grave
>
> On 2024-02-17 13:35 +0100, Lorenzo Beretta wrote:
>
>> Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
>> Version: 24.0.1-1
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Dear
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/10613
Bug #1064123 [libgl1-mesa-dri] libgl1-mesa-dri: latest version crashes X, can't
use mouse/keyboard
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/10613'.
--
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1066716 [src:libtfbs-perl] libtfbs-perl: FTBFS:
./lib/pwm_searchPFF.c:55:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘announce’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1066716:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066716 in libtfbs-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:35:55PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > stack.c: In function ‘dc_binop’:
> > stack.c:40:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘checkferror_output’
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >40 | checkferror_output(stderr); \
> >
=implicit-function-declaration]
Source: xli
Version: 1.17.0+20061110-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64
Processing control commands:
> tags 1066351 + patch
Bug #1066351 [src:aalib] aalib: FTBFS: aainfo.c:12:9: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1066351 + pending
Bug #1066351 [src:aalib] aalib: FTBFS: aainfo.c:12:9:
Control: tags 1066351 + patch
Control: tags 1066351 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for aalib (versioned as 1.4p5-51.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/4. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
WBR, wRAR
diff -Nru aalib-1.4p5/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge 1066137 1066744
Bug #1066137 [src:gnupg2] gnupg2: -Werror=implicit-function-declaration failure
testing for ldap_open
Bug #1066744 [src:gnupg2] gnupg2: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files,
aborting
Added tag(s) experimental.
Bug #1066137
Control: forcemerge 1066137 1066744
Control: found 1066137 2.4.3-2
On 2024-03-12 Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Source: gnupg2
> Version: 2.2.40-1.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: ftbfs
> X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
> Trying to binNMU gnupg2 to make it installable during t64 transition,
> I
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-nouveau/-/issues/569
Bug #1066382 [src:xserver-xorg-video-nouveau] xserver-xorg-video-nouveau:
FTBFS: ../../src/nv_driver.c:1451:23: error: implicit declaration of function
‘wfbScreenInit’; did
tbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
> -Werror=implicit-function-d
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:36:37PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > gssapi.c:1600:9: error: implicit declaration of function
> > ‘gsskrb5_register_acceptor_identity’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 1600 | gsskrb5_register_acceptor_identity(keytab_path);
> > |
: wmrack
Version: 1.4-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6
with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: wims
Version: 2:4.27a+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64
: rasterio
Version: 1.3.9-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ifupdown-ng
Version: 0.12.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
: 1:1.4.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for byacc... no
> checking f
: 0.36.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/debian/build/atlas_io/tests &
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:41:13PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > audio/synthesizers.c: In function ‘mpeg3audio_synth_stereo’:
> > audio/synthesizers.c:36:9: error: implicit declaration of function
> > ‘mpeg3audio_dct64’; did you mean ‘mpeg3audio_dopcm’?
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1066233 1065781
Bug #1066233 [src:libmpeg3] libmpeg3: FTBFS: audio/synthesizers.c:36:9: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘mpeg3audio_dct64’; did you mean
‘mpeg3audio_dopcm’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Bug #1065781
1 - 100 of 765 matches
Mail list logo
