Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1069586 https://crbug.com/329678163
Bug #1069586 [chromium] Chromium native Wayland support broken
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://crbug.com/329678163'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 forwarded https://crbug.com/329678163
Unknown tag/s: forwarded, https://crbug.com/329678163.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream
pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed
Your message dated Sun, 21 Apr 2024 03:34:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066674: fixed in gramophone2 0.8.13a-3.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066674,
regarding gramophone2: FTBFS: GRAMophone.c:94:9: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘usageError’; did you mean
[Not reassigning yet to openjdk-17-jre-headless, as the change
was done on purpose, but Cc-ing the OpenJDK Team.]
Hi,
Since no-one looked at this issue in a month and gnucash-docs
has now been removed from testing...
On 2024-03-20 22:03:18 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
> > Exception in
Galera 25.3.37 was last release from upstream in 3.x series. I suspect
the best resolution here is to wait a bit and then just file removal
request for galera-3 in sid/trixie when we are confident there is no
MariaDB 10.1/2/3 users out there anymore.
On 4/19/24 11:31, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Control: tags 1064293 + patch
Control: tags 1064293 + pending
Control: tags 1068938 + patch
Control: tags 1068938 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for less (versioned as 590-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 21:36:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1067547: fixed in wmweather+ 2.19~alpha+ds-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067547,
regarding FTBFS: "vsnprintf is so broken we can't compensate. Sorry."
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 21:35:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061546: fixed in srcpd 2.1.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061546,
regarding srcpd: installs file into aliased location
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: /<>/lib/libtbt
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 openmpi
Bug #1069433 [src:gtg-trace] gtg-trace: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gtg-trace' to 'openmpi'.
No longer marked as found in versions gtg-trace/0.2-3-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1069433 to the
Hi,
On 20-04-2024 3:22 p.m., Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: libreoffice-draw-nogui but it is
not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
apt-get failed.
I recall rene
Control: reassign -1 openmpi
Control: affects -1 gtg-trace
Hello,
Lucas Nussbaum, le sam. 20 avril 2024 14:52:03 +0200, a ecrit:
> > --
> > Sorry! You were supposed to get help about:
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # failed on buildds:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sstp-client=amd64=1.0.19-1%2Bb2=1713643682=0
> severity 1010992 serious
Bug #1010992 [src:sstp-client] sstp-client FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds
Severity set to 'serious' from
Hi Lucas,
* Lucas Nussbaum [2024-04-20 15:21]:
Relevant part (hopefully):
self =
@pytest.mark.skipif(IS_WASM, reason="fp errors don't work in wasm")
@pytest.mark.skipif(arm_softfloat,
reason='platform/cpu issue with FPU (gh-413,-15562)')
def
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 19:53:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069337: fixed in thunderbird 1:115.10.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069337,
regarding Update Depends for the time64 library renames
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 dh-python 6.20240401
Bug #1068255 [dnf] dnf: dnf aborts with ImportError: cannot import name
'_module' from partially initialized module 'libdnf'
Bug reassigned from package 'dnf' to 'dh-python'.
No longer marked as found in versions dnf/4.14.0-4.1.
Control: reassign -1 dh-python 6.20240401
Control: retitle -1 dh-python: dh_python3 loses cpython module name when
renaming shared object
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:47:12 +0300 Michael Ivanov
wrote:
> Package: dnf
> Version: 4.14.0-4.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1063501 wishlist
Bug #1063501 [src:less] building less from source fails the island test
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1063501:
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:22:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056901: fixed in network-manager-fortisslvpn 1.4.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056901,
regarding network-manager-fortisslvpn: 1.4.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 11:09:17AM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday, 18 April 2024 19:21:55 CEST you wrote:
> > Source: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl
> > Version: 3.004
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > Justification: fails to build from source
>
> This really looks like a bug
Done. I haev uploaded a NMU with the referenced patch.
On 20/04/24 at 19:11 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> gcc-i686-linux-gnu is in Build-Depends-Indep, it’s only used to build Arch:
> all packages. Is there a requirement that these build on armhf? Given that
> armhf doesn’t have gcc-i686-linux-gnu, I’m not sure how I would go about
> fixing this, short
Hi Lucas,
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 14:46:39 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: bochs
> Version: 2.8+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
>
> Hi,
&
Control: tags -1 patch
On 2024-04-19 Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> Source: courier
> Version: 1.0.16-3.2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=courier=armel=1.0.16-3.2%2Bb4=1712019536=0
> checking for locking method... configure: error: must specify
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1069307 [src:courier] FTBFS: configure: error: must specify
--with-locking-method option
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1069307: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069307
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
> severity 1062405 testing
Severity level `testing' is not known.
Recognized are: critical, grave, serious, important, normal, minor, wishlist,
fixed.
> tags 1062405 moreinfo
Bug #1062405 [src:dolfin] dolfin: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s)
Source: dolfin
Followup-For: Bug #1062405
Control: severity 1062405 testing
Control: tags 1062405 moreinfo
This time_t patch was never applied. Is it not needed after all?
Can we close this bug now?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # also happens in amd64
> retitle 1069370 shasta: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot continue due to
> the error above
Bug #1069370 [src:shasta] shasta: FTBFS on arm64: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot
continue due to the error above
Changed Bug
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1056901 [src:network-manager-fortisslvpn] network-manager-fortisslvpn:
1.4.0-1
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> tags -1 ftbfs
Bug #1056901 [src:network-manager-fortisslvpn] network-manager-fortisslvpn:
1.4.0-1
Added tag(s)
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1056898 [src:pptpd] pptpd: Build failures with ppp-2.5.0
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> tags -1 ftbfs
Bug #1056898 [src:pptpd] pptpd: Build failures with ppp-2.5.0
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
--
1056898:
On 2024-04-20 at 16:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 07:54 -0400, P. J. McDermott wrote:
> > Then the salvage procedure can play out for the full 28+ days
> > specified
> > by developers-reference (21 days to allow the maintainer to object
> > followed by a DELAYED/7
essage ---
Source: osmo-iuh
Version: 1.3.0+dfsg1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hop
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:09:17 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> This really looks like a bug with prove:
>
> $ perl t/reorder.t
> ok 1 - test re-ordered list
> 1..1
> $ prove -l -v -p t/reorder.t
> t/reorder.t ..
> ok 1 - test re-ordered list
> 1..1
> Failed 1/1 subtests
>
> Test
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 14:55:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066574: fixed in xbill 2.1-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066574,
regarding xbill: FTBFS: Game.c:258:21: error: implicit declaration of function
‘strncasecmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1069390 https://gitlab.com/gnutls/guile/-/issues/25
Bug #1069390 [src:guile-gnutls] guile-gnutls: FTBFS on arm64: dh_auto_test:
error: cd b4deb && make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1
returned exit code 2
Set Bug
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1069259 [src:haskell-termonad] haskell-termonad: FTBFS on armhf:
callStackDoc, called at compiler/GHC/Utils/Panic.hs:182:37 in
ghc:GHC.Utils.Panic
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
1069259:
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:48PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-termonad=armhf=4.5.0.0-1%2Bb4=1713092640=0
This appears to be a GHC bug. I have requested the removal of
haskell-termonad from armhf, for now.
--
---
Source: kvirc
Version: 4:5.2.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 10:28 PM Mathias Gibbens wrote:
>
> Hi Anthony,
>
> A few weeks ago you uploaded a new version of golang-google-protobuf
> to unstable which caused a FTBFS in golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5
> v1.5.3 [1,2,3]. This has been blocking the transition of various golang
>
Hi Anthony,
A few weeks ago you uploaded a new version of golang-google-protobuf
to unstable which caused a FTBFS in golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5
v1.5.3 [1,2,3]. This has been blocking the transition of various golang
packages from unstable to testing.
I've verified that v1.5.4 of
[Cc'ing t...@debian.org as I probably should have done with the nmudiff.
Apologies]
On 2024-04-18, at 21:37:40 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> Control: tags 1067547 + patch
> Control: tags 1067547 + pending
>
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for wmweather+ (versioned as
On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 07:54 -0400, P. J. McDermott wrote:
> Then the salvage procedure can play out for the full 28+ days
> specified
> by developers-reference (21 days to allow the maintainer to object
> followed by a DELAYED/7 adoption upload). I've already soft-proposed
> to
> salvage in bug
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 13:49:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1067560: fixed in deepin-log-viewer 5.9.7+ds1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067560,
regarding FTBFS on 32-bit time64 architectures: cannot convert ‘long int*’ to
‘const time_t*’ {aka ‘const long long
On 20/04/24 at 15:39 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 20.04.2024 15:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> [..]
> > This is part of a mass rebuild, first building on arm64 and then on
> > armhf and armel. So I'm not suggesting anything. :-)
>
> Aha.
>
> > Is this failing because the build is trying to build
Tags: +acknowledge
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:02:13PM +0200, Miriam Espana Acebal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In ubuntu we applied the upstream's fix at
> https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/pull/196. I adapted it to a pair of
> patches that I attach here for fixing this FTBFS.
>
> I am sending this
Source: rovclock
Version: 0.6e-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc
Source: libkdumpfile
Version: 0.5.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: xsd
Version: 4.0.0-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gtk-d
Version: 3.10.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: winff
Version: 1.6.3+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: freecontact
Version: 1.0.21-13.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: racket
Version: 8.12+dfsg1-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: kvirc
Version: 4:5.2.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: haskell-yesod-auth-hashdb
Version: 1.7.1.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part
Source: libkolabxml
Version: 1.2.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: ktorrent
Version: 22.12.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: mame
Version: 0.264+dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: octave
Version: 8.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: haskell-gi-vte
Version: 2.91.31-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: haskell-gi-dbusmenugtk3
Version: 0.4.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part
Source: zeroc-ice
Version: 3.7.10-2.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: haskell-crypton-x509-store
Version: 1.6.9-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part
Source: softhsm2
Version: 2.6.1-2.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: glib-d
Version: 2.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: galera-3
Version: 25.3.37-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pycryptodome
Version: 3.20.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 13:19:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069331: fixed in cegui-mk2 0.8.7+git20220615-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069331,
regarding Not installable due to hardcoded pre-t64 library deps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Source: dune-istl
Version: 2.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # i've noticed this problem before, but it is intermittent
> found 1069399 ruby3.1/3.1.2-8
Bug #1069399 [src:ruby3.1] ruby3.1: FTBFS on arm64: Errno::EADDRINUSE: Address
already in use - listen(2)
Marked as found in versions ruby3.1/3.1.2-8.
>
Source: rcs-blame
Version: 1.3.1-4.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: mumudvb
Version: 1.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: tua
Version: 4.3-14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc
Source: libchdr
Version: 0.0~git20230918.9108f34+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part
Source: libevdevplus
Version: 0.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: libnginx-mod-http-srcache-filter
Version: 0.33-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part
Source: sbcl
Version: 2:2.3.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: rl-renderpm
Version: 4.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: libss7
Version: 2.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -g
Source: haskell-yesod-bin
Version: 1.6.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: patat
Version: 0.11.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-udatetime
Version: 0.0.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: abinit
Version: 9.10.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: projecteur
Version: 0.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: drogon
Version: 1.8.7+ds-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: eclib
Version: 20240408-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: trophy
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: isochron
Version: 0.9~rc4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: elpa
Version: 2022.11.001-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: mpgrafic
Version: 0.3.19-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: r-cran-metamix
Version: 0.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: dc3dd
Version: 7.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc
Source: prelude-lml
Version: 5.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: tmperamental
Version: 1.4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc
Source: haskell-gtk-strut
Version: 0.1.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libosmo-sccp
Version: 1.6.0+dfsg1-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: haskell-pandoc-server
Version: 0.1.0.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part
Source: input-utils
Version: 1.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: haskell-cryptostore
Version: 0.3.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: mtbl
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: libx86emu
Version: 3.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -g
1 - 100 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
