Bug#1068035: marked as done (FTBFS: wrong --link-doc target)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 05:50:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068035: fixed in mdbtools 1.0.0+dfsg-1.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068035, regarding FTBFS: wrong --link-doc target to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1069888: marked as done (node-bunyan: FTBFS: failing tests)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 05:36:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069888: fixed in node-bunyan 2.0.5+~cs4.4.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069888, regarding node-bunyan: FTBFS: failing tests to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Re: FTBFS: wrong --link-doc target

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1068035 [src:mdbtools] FTBFS: wrong --link-doc target Added tag(s) patch. -- 1068035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068035 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1068035: FTBFS: wrong --link-doc target

2024-04-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: mdbtools Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-1.2 Followup-For: Bug #1068035 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Hi Jean-Michel, I am unclear how there are binaries in the archive for mdbtools 1.0.0+dfsg-1.2, given this bug is present

Processed: Bug#1069888 marked as pending in node-bunyan

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1069888 [src:node-bunyan] node-bunyan: FTBFS: failing tests Added tag(s) pending. -- 1069888: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069888 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1069888: marked as pending in node-bunyan

2024-04-26 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1069888 in node-bunyan reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: found 1057581 in 8.0.1-1, fixed 1057581 in 8.0.1-11

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1057581 8.0.1-1 Bug #1057581 {Done: Yadd } [node-get-stream] node-clipanion: FTBFS: error TS2307: Cannot find module 'get-stream' or its corresponding type declarations. Marked as found in versions node-get-stream/8.0.1-1 and reopened. >

Processed: reassign 1057581 to node-get-stream, affects 1057581

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1057581 node-get-stream Bug #1057581 {Done: Yadd } [src:node-clipanion] node-clipanion: FTBFS: error TS2307: Cannot find module 'get-stream' or its corresponding type declarations. Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-clipanion' to

Bug#1069518: marked as done (projecteur: FTBFS on armhf: deviceinput.cc:697:64: error: narrowing conversion of ‘(int32_t)ie.DeviceInputEvent::value’ from ‘int32_t’ {aka ‘int’} to ‘__u16’ {aka ‘short u

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 02:36:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069518: fixed in projecteur 0.10-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069518, regarding projecteur: FTBFS on armhf: deviceinput.cc:697:64: error: narrowing conversion of ‘(int32_t)ie.DeviceInputEvent::value’

Bug#1067622: marked as done (FTBFS: error: missing initializer for member ‘input_event::value’)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 02:36:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067622: fixed in projecteur 0.10-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067622, regarding FTBFS: error: missing initializer for member ‘input_event::value’ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1065976: marked as done (python-levenshtein: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: Levenshtein/_levenshtein.c:749:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘PyUnicode_AS_UNICODE’; did you mean ‘PyUnicode_AsUCS4’

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 02:36:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065976: fixed in python-levenshtein 0.25.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065976, regarding python-levenshtein: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: Levenshtein/_levenshtein.c:749:15: error: implicit declaration of

Bug#1061434: marked as done (python 3.12 extension not working)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 02:36:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061434: fixed in python-levenshtein 0.25.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061434, regarding python 3.12 extension not working to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1069518: marked as pending in projecteur

2024-04-26 Thread Stuart Prescott
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1069518 in projecteur reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1067622: marked as pending in projecteur

2024-04-26 Thread Stuart Prescott
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1067622 in projecteur reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1069518 marked as pending in projecteur

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1069518 [src:projecteur] projecteur: FTBFS on armhf: deviceinput.cc:697:64: error: narrowing conversion of ‘(int32_t)ie.DeviceInputEvent::value’ from ‘int32_t’ {aka ‘int’} to ‘__u16’ {aka ‘short unsigned int’} [-Werror=narrowing] Added tag(s)

Processed: Bug#1067622 marked as pending in projecteur

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1067622 [src:projecteur] FTBFS: error: missing initializer for member ‘input_event::value’ Added tag(s) pending. -- 1067622: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067622 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1069805: marked as done (scikit-build tries pip install during build)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:49:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069805: fixed in scikit-build 0.17.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069805, regarding scikit-build tries pip install during build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1068849: cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem with missing libgcc_s.so.1

2024-04-26 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Sat, 2024-04-27 at 03:15 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > Yup that'd make sense to me (and I see you did that already), thanks! :-) Unfortunately I doubt it will be possibly to do some fully generic solution. So best we'll get is probably either an unconditional inclusion or some simpler

Bug#1068849: cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem with missing libgcc_s.so.1

2024-04-26 Thread Guilhem Moulin
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 02:07:21 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > So you say it's a glibc thingy, that this doesn't show up anymore? Yup, that's what I wrote https://bugs.debian.org/1032235#97 | It was intentional, see the article |

Bug#1069374: marked as done (python-grpc-tools: FTBFS: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes in grpc_tools/_protoc_compiler.cpp (generated by cython))

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:49:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069374: fixed in python-grpc-tools 1.14.1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069374, regarding python-grpc-tools: FTBFS: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes in grpc_tools/_protoc_compiler.cpp

Bug#1068849: cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem with missing libgcc_s.so.1

2024-04-26 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Sat, 2024-04-27 at 01:48 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > built using glibc ≥2.34.  AFAICT the “if the ldd output includes > libpthread then run copy_libgcc()” logic from initramfs-tools is > mostly moot > now Ah, I just realised glibc "merged" libpthread ^^ Therefore... > but despite what I

Bug#1064089: marked as done (gutenprint: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:19:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064089: fixed in gutenprint 5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064089, regarding gutenprint: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1064088: marked as done (gutenprint: FTBFS in unstable)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:19:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064088: fixed in gutenprint 5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064088, regarding gutenprint: FTBFS in unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1068849: cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem with missing libgcc_s.so.1

2024-04-26 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey Guilhem On Sat, 2024-04-27 at 01:48 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > Even it weren't, libpthread wouldn't show up since src:argon2 from > bookworm > and later is built using glibc ≥2.34. When argon2 builds, it uses -pthread ... not really sure what that does exactly, the manpage merely says it

Bug#1068849: cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem with missing libgcc_s.so.1

2024-04-26 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Hi, On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 00:33:51 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Now the problem is that argon2 is statically linked, so there's no > libpthread showing up in its ldd, and thus copy_exec doesn't realise it > needs to invoke copy_libgcc. Even it weren't, libpthread wouldn't show up

Bug#1066348: marked as done (hplip: FTBFS: scan/sane/hpaio.c:364:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘orblite_init’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 23:35:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066348: fixed in hplip 3.22.10+dfsg0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066348, regarding hplip: FTBFS: scan/sane/hpaio.c:364:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘orblite_init’

Processed: tagging 1064282, reassign 1069433 to src:openmpi, tagging 1069433, tagging 1069840 ...

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1064282 + experimental Bug #1064282 [src:poppler] poppler: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Added tag(s) experimental. > reassign 1069433 src:openmpi 4.1.6-3 Bug #1069433 [openmpi] gtg-trace: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail Bug reassigned

Bug#1068849: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#1068849: cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem with missing libgcc_s.so.1

2024-04-26 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey guys. I kinda ran into a similar issue. I use my own OpenPGP keyscript which is highly improved upon that ("decrypt_gnupg") shipped by the package. One thing that I do is offer optionally feeding the entered passphrase trough argon2 (the standalone tool from the package of the same name)

Bug#1069703: marked as done (dynamips: requires rebuild for t64 transition)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:03:29 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: dynamips: requires rebuild for t64 transition has caused the Debian Bug report #1069703, regarding dynamips: requires rebuild for t64 transition to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1069545: [Pkg-erlang-devel] Bug#1069545: erlang: FTBFS on armel: make[4]: *** [/<>/make/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/otp.mk:325: ../pdf/wx-2.2.2.1.pdf] Error 1

2024-04-26 Thread Sergei Golovan
notfound 1069545 1:25.3.2.11+dfsg-1 thanks Hi Lucas, Java throwing an out-of-memory exception on armel doesn't count as a bug, I reckon. On the other hand, my previous thought about sufficient memory size on builds is irrelevant because builds build only architecture dependent packages, and

Processed: Re: [Pkg-erlang-devel] Bug#1069545: erlang: FTBFS on armel: make[4]: *** [/<>/make/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/otp.mk:325: ../pdf/wx-2.2.2.1.pdf] Error 1

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 1069545 1:25.3.2.11+dfsg-1 Bug #1069545 {Done: Sergei Golovan } [src:erlang] erlang: FTBFS on armel: make[4]: *** [/<>/make/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/otp.mk:325: ../pdf/wx-2.2.2.1.pdf] Error 1 No longer marked as found in versions

Processed: Bug#1069374 marked as pending in python-grpc-tools

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1069374 [src:python-grpc-tools] python-grpc-tools: FTBFS on arm64: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes in grpc_tools/_protoc_compiler.cpp Added tag(s) pending. -- 1069374: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069374

Bug#1069374: marked as pending in python-grpc-tools

2024-04-26 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1069374 in python-grpc-tools reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1069904: Autopkgtests failed

2024-04-26 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Package: python3-gnupg Version: 0.5.2-1 Severity: serious https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-gnupg/unstable/amd64/45884087/ 277s + python3.11 test_gnupg.py 493s ...F... 493s == 493s FAIL:

Bug#1067616: marked as done (FTBFS: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:49:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067616: fixed in clanlib 1.0~svn3827-11.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067616, regarding FTBFS: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’ to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1069385: marked as done (FTBFS: dh_installdocs: error: Requested unknown package libclanapp-1.0v5 via --link-doc, expected one of: libclanapp-1.0t64 ...)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:49:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069385: fixed in clanlib 1.0~svn3827-11.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069385, regarding FTBFS: dh_installdocs: error: Requested unknown package libclanapp-1.0v5 via --link-doc, expected one of:

Processed: clanlib FTBFS

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1069385 patch Bug #1069385 [src:clanlib] FTBFS: dh_installdocs: error: Requested unknown package libclanapp-1.0v5 via --link-doc, expected one of: libclanapp-1.0t64 ... Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1069385 to the same tags previously set --

Bug#1067616: clanlib FTBFS

2024-04-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Control: tags 1069385 patch Please find attached a comprehensive NMU patch for both the time_t conversion and the FTBFS errors. I am uploading this now as a 0-day NMU. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on,

Processed: clanlib FTBFS

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1069385 patch Bug #1069385 [src:clanlib] FTBFS: dh_installdocs: error: Requested unknown package libclanapp-1.0v5 via --link-doc, expected one of: libclanapp-1.0t64 ... Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1069385 to the same tags previously set --

Processed: clanlib FTBFS

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1069385 patch Bug #1069385 [src:clanlib] FTBFS: dh_installdocs: error: Requested unknown package libclanapp-1.0v5 via --link-doc, expected one of: libclanapp-1.0t64 ... Added tag(s) patch. -- 1062074: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062074

Processed: tagging 1069878, tagging 1069350, tagging 1069549, found 1069433 in 4.1.6-5, affects 1069433 ...

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1069878 + sid trixie Bug #1069878 [dm-writeboost-dkms] dm-writeboost-dkms: kernel module fails to build for Linux 6.7.12: error: too few arguments to function ‘dm_io’ Added tag(s) sid and trixie. > tags 1069350 - sid trixie Bug #1069350

Bug#1056196: marked as done (python3-onelogin-saml2: Please package new version 1.16.0, as current version will FTBFS soon)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:20:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1056196: fixed in python3-onelogin-saml2 1.16.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056196, regarding python3-onelogin-saml2: Please package new version 1.16.0, as current version will FTBFS soon to be

Bug#1067474: gxr-openvr: package Build-Depends on libgxr-0.15-0 whic is no longer built

2024-04-26 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1067474 Control: tag -1 pending Hi, I've just uploaded a NMU (diff attached) to DELAYED/2 fixing this issue, a followup issue (from Ubuntu) and cleaning up some cruft. Please let me know if I should delay it longer. Andreas PS: the Vcs-* variables point to the repository of

Processed: Re: gxr-openvr: package Build-Depends on libgxr-0.15-0 whic is no longer built

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1067474 [src:gxr-openvr] gxr-openvr: package Build-Depends on libgxr-0.15-0 whic is no longer built Added tag(s) pending. -- 1067474: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067474 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1069756: readability: build time test error: lxml.html.clean module is now a separate project lxml_html_clean

2024-04-26 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Colin, Colin Watson, on 2024-04-26: > Based on https://github.com/buriy/python-readability/issues/179, it > looks as though upstream intends to switch to bleach; I think we can > just patch setup.py in Debian in the meantime though. I'll do that. Looks good to me, thanks for tackling this!

Bug#1065777: marked as done (clblas: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/src/library/blas/gens/symv.c:955:29: error: implicit declaration of function ‘abs’; did you mean ‘fabs’? [-Werror=implicit-fu

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:19:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065777: fixed in clblas 2.12-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065777, regarding clblas: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/src/library/blas/gens/symv.c:955:29: error: implicit declaration of function ‘abs’; did

Bug#1021924: networking-mlnx: FTBFS test failures: sqlalchemy.exc.InvalidRequestError: A transaction is already begun on this Session.

2024-04-26 Thread Santiago Vila
El 17/10/22 a las 14:04, Michael Biebl escribió: Source: networking-mlnx Version: 1:16.0.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs networking-mlnx FTBFS in unstable It appears to be trigger lots of test suite failures and is killed eventually I think it's even worse than that: The test suite seems

Bug#1069842: marked as done (rjava: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldeflate: No such file or directory)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:52:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069842: fixed in r-base 4.4.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069842, regarding rjava: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldeflate: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1069756: marked as done (readability: build time test error: lxml.html.clean module is now a separate project lxml_html_clean)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:25:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069756: fixed in readability 0.8.1+dfsg1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069756, regarding readability: build time test error: lxml.html.clean module is now a separate project lxml_html_clean to be

Bug#1069844: More debug info

2024-04-26 Thread Alex Bennée
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 16:48, Julian Andres Klode < julian.kl...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 09:10:08PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Alex Bennée writes: > > > > > Julian Andres Klode writes: > > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 06:30:52PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > > >>> >

Bug#1058322: marked as done (supertuxkart: FTBFS: SpirvIntrinsics.h:120:10: error: ‘variant’ in namespace ‘std’ does not name a template type)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:52:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1057463: fixed in supertuxkart 1.4+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1057463, regarding supertuxkart: FTBFS: SpirvIntrinsics.h:120:10: error: ‘variant’ in namespace ‘std’ does not name a template type

Bug#1068805: marked as done (python3-pywt: distutils not available in Python 3.12)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:50:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068805: fixed in pywavelets 1.4.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068805, regarding python3-pywt: distutils not available in Python 3.12 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1066357: marked as done (ldapvi: FTBFS: diff.c:218:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ldap_bv2dn_x’; did you mean ‘ldap_bv2dn’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:47:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066357: fixed in ldapvi 1.7-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066357, regarding ldapvi: FTBFS: diff.c:218:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ldap_bv2dn_x’; did you mean ‘ldap_bv2dn’?

Bug#1057581: marked as done (node-clipanion: FTBFS: error TS2307: Cannot find module 'get-stream' or its corresponding type declarations.)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:49:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1057581: fixed in node-get-stream 8.0.1-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #1057581, regarding node-clipanion: FTBFS: error TS2307: Cannot find module 'get-stream' or its corresponding type declarations. to

Bug#1069844: More debug info

2024-04-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 09:10:08PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > Alex Bennée writes: > > > Julian Andres Klode writes: > > > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 06:30:52PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > >>> > >>> Continuing to debug on QEMU it seems there is an incompatibility with > >>> the images and the

Bug#1069756: marked as pending in readability

2024-04-26 Thread Colin Watson
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1069756 in readability reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1069756 marked as pending in readability

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1069756 [src:readability] readability: build time test error: lxml.html.clean module is now a separate project lxml_html_clean Added tag(s) pending. -- 1069756: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069756 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1069756: readability: build time test error: lxml.html.clean module is now a separate project lxml_html_clean

2024-04-26 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:16:17AM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > As far as I could witness, replacing the python3-lxml build > dependency by python3-lxml-html-clean resolved the issue at > least for the bulid time test. The package is subject to > autodep8 python3 test, which raises that the

Processed: ldapvi: diff for NMU version 1.7-11

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1066357 + patch Bug #1066357 [src:ldapvi] ldapvi: FTBFS: diff.c:218:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ldap_bv2dn_x’; did you mean ‘ldap_bv2dn’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1066357 + pending Bug #1066357

Bug#1066357: ldapvi: diff for NMU version 1.7-11

2024-04-26 Thread Boyuan Yang
Control: tags 1066357 + patch Control: tags 1066357 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ldapvi (versioned as 1.7-11) and uploaded it to DELAYED/0. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru ldapvi-1.7/debian/changelog ldapvi-1.7/debian/changelog

Bug#1069608: marked as done (topplot: missing test-depends on python3-all)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:05:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069608: fixed in topplot 0.2.2+repack-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069608, regarding topplot: missing test-depends on python3-all to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1069360: marked as done (python-cytoolz: FTBFS on arm64: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:03:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069360: fixed in python-cytoolz 0.12.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069360, regarding python-cytoolz: FTBFS on arm64: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12

Bug#1067366: marked as done (mirrorbits: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:22: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:01:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067366: fixed in mirrorbits 0.5.1+git20240203.4e34d9b+ds1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067366, regarding mirrorbits: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:22: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25 to be

Processed: Bug#1069608 marked as pending in topplot

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1069608 [src:topplot] topplot: missing test-depends on python3-all Added tag(s) pending. -- 1069608: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069608 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1069608: marked as pending in topplot

2024-04-26 Thread Colin Watson
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1069608 in topplot reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: retitle 1069367 to qemu: FTBFS: arch:all packages can only be built on amd64 ..., tagging 1069367

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1069367 qemu: FTBFS: arch:all packages can only be built on amd64 Bug #1069367 [src:qemu] qemu: FTBFS on arm64: build-dependency not installable: gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu Changed Bug title to 'qemu: FTBFS: arch:all packages can only be

Bug#1069815: marked as done (wesnoth-1.8-server: new package installs systemd unit in aliased location)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:57:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069815: fixed in wesnoth-1.18 1:1.18.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069815, regarding wesnoth-1.8-server: new package installs systemd unit in aliased location to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: Re: testing: MISSING ARCHS on debian mirrors: amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el ppc64el riscv64 s390x

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:gnutls28 3.8.3-1 Bug #1069882 [libgnutls30] testing: MISSING ARCHS on debian mirrors: amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el ppc64el riscv64 s390x Bug reassigned from package 'libgnutls30' to 'src:gnutls28'. No longer marked as found in versions

Processed: Bug#1069360 marked as pending in python-cytoolz

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1069360 [src:python-cytoolz] python-cytoolz: FTBFS on arm64: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1069360:

Bug#1069360: marked as pending in python-cytoolz

2024-04-26 Thread Colin Watson
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1069360 in python-cytoolz reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1069882: testing: MISSING ARCHS on debian mirrors: amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el ppc64el riscv64 s390x

2024-04-26 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: reassign -1 src:gnutls28 3.8.3-1 Control: severity -1 normal Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:41:45 +0200 Dirk Lehmann wrote: Package: libgnutls30 Version: 3.8.3-1 since yesterday the .deb files for the architectures * amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el ppc64el riscv64

Bug#1057463: marked as pending in supertuxkart

2024-04-26 Thread Reiner Herrmann
Hi Vincent, On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 06:03:51AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Hi Reiner, > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 1:03 PM Reiner Herrmann > wrote: > > > > Use system shaderc instead of embedded copy > > > > Closes:

Bug#1069195: librust-prost-build-dev: FTBFS

2024-04-26 Thread Peter Green
Unsatisfiable build-dependency on librust-heck-0.5+default-dev There seems to be an error here. the version of librust-prost-dev in sid (build-)depends on librust-heck-0.4+default-dev. The version in experimental does depend on librust-heck-0.5+default-dev as it's first choice, but that's

Bug#1069817: marked as done (Autopkgtests fail)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:12:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069817: fixed in python-exceptiongroup 1.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069817, regarding Autopkgtests fail to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1057463: marked as pending in supertuxkart

2024-04-26 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Reiner, On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 1:03 PM Reiner Herrmann wrote: > > Control: tag -1 pending > > Hello, > > Bug #1057463 in supertuxkart reported by you has been fixed in the > Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit > message below and you can check the diff of the fix

Bug#1069816: marked as done (Autopkgtests fail)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:52:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069816: fixed in python-argcomplete 3.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069816, regarding Autopkgtests fail to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1060134: kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who ships depmod

2024-04-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Marco d'Itri (2024-04-26): > On Apr 26, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > > So, should I disable module utils in busybox-udeb now? > I think so. I haven't gotten any requests / seen any reasons to keep it; so, yes, please feel free to remove it whenever is convenient for you. > > Is kmod udeb ready

Bug#1069888: node-bunyan: FTBFS: failing tests

2024-04-26 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:node-bunyan Version: 2.0.5+~cs4.4.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary

Bug#1067316: marked as done (gnucash-docs: FTBFS: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/libfontmanager.so: libharfbuzz.so.0: cannot open sha

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:35:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067316: fixed in gnucash-docs 5.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067316, regarding gnucash-docs: FTBFS: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:

Processed: Bug#1067316 marked as pending in gnucash-docs

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1067316 [src:gnucash-docs] gnucash-docs: FTBFS: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/libfontmanager.so: libharfbuzz.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Bug#1069818: marked as done (FTBFS: tests failed)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:05:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069818: fixed in toolz 0.12.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069818, regarding FTBFS: tests failed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#1067316: marked as pending in gnucash-docs

2024-04-26 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1067316 in gnucash-docs reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Re: Bug#1069835: libreoffice-kf5: documents may get lost on SMB shares

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1069835 [libreoffice-kf5] libreoffice-kf5: documents may get lost on SMB shares Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 1069835: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069835 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1069818: marked as pending in toolz

2024-04-26 Thread Colin Watson
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1069818 in toolz reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1069818 marked as pending in toolz

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1069818 [src:toolz] FTBFS: tests failed Added tag(s) pending. -- 1069818: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069818 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: antlr4-maven-plugin: please provide debian-versioned maven coordinates

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1065660 [antlr4-maven-plugin] antlr4-maven-plugin: please provide debian-versioned maven coordinates Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > tags -1 - ftbfs Bug #1065660 [antlr4-maven-plugin] antlr4-maven-plugin: please provide

Bug#1065660: antlr4-maven-plugin: please provide debian-versioned maven coordinates

2024-04-26 Thread Andrius Merkys
Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 - ftbfs Hi, On 2024-04-25 19:12, Santiago Vila wrote: I noticed that chemicaltagger currently FTBFS and I believe it is because of this problem, so to avoid duplicate reports, I'm raising this one to serious. A build log for chemicaltagger is

Bug#1069882: testing: MISSING ARCHS on debian mirrors: amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el ppc64el riscv64 s390x

2024-04-26 Thread Dirk Lehmann
Package: libgnutls30 Version: 3.8.3-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Dear Maintainer, since yesterday the .deb files for the architectures * amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el ppc64el riscv64 s390x on the Debian Apt mirrors are not listed/available anymore: * MISSING:

Bug#1069064: marked as done (util-linux-extra: insufficient Replaces for util-linux due to /usr-move)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:44:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069064: fixed in util-linux 2.40-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069064, regarding util-linux-extra: insufficient Replaces for util-linux due to /usr-move to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1064715: marked as done (zabbix: FTBFS: make[4]: *** [Makefile:623: zabbix.com/cmd/zabbix_agent2] Error 1)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:45:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064715: fixed in zabbix 1:6.0.29+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064715, regarding zabbix: FTBFS: make[4]: *** [Makefile:623: zabbix.com/cmd/zabbix_agent2] Error 1 to be marked as done. This means

Processed: Re: reassign 1067188 to src:gcc-mingw-w64, found 1067188 in 25.2, fixed 1067188 in 26.1, affects 1067188

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1067188 Bug #1067188 [src:gcc-mingw-w64] gdb-mingw-w64: FTBFS in trixie Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1067188: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067188

Bug#1069064: marked as pending in util-linux

2024-04-26 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1069064 in util-linux reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1069064 marked as pending in util-linux

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1069064 [util-linux-extra] util-linux-extra: insufficient Replaces for util-linux due to /usr-move Added tag(s) pending. -- 1069064: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069064 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: bullseye-pu: package cpu/1.4.3-14~deb11u1

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1067439 with -1 Bug #1067439 {Done: Andreas Beckmann } [cpu] cpu: undefined symbol globalLdap in libcpu_ldap.so on Debian 12 1067439 was not blocked by any bugs. 1067439 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1067439: 1069880 > affects -1 +

Processed: tagging 1060134

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1060134 + pending Bug #1060134 [kmod-udeb,busybox-udeb] kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who ships depmod Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1060134:

Bug#1060134: kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who ships depmod

2024-04-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
Ok, I'm removing whole modutils from busybox udeb (besides depmod, this is lsmod, insmod, rmmod, and modprobe). All these are provided by kmod-udeb as far as I can see (as symlinks to kod). -- GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24. New key: rsa4096/61AD3D98ECDF2C8E

Bug#1060134: kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who ships depmod

2024-04-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Apr 26, Michael Tokarev wrote: > So, should I disable module utils in busybox-udeb now? I think so. > Is kmod udeb ready and used in d-i already, or does it need some > prep first? AFAIK it works. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1068490: marked as done (netperf: Netserver remove /dev/null in some cases, breaking many things)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 09:24:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068490: fixed in netperf 2.7.0-0.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068490, regarding netperf: Netserver remove /dev/null in some cases, breaking many things to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1069876: libsbml: autopkgtest regression

2024-04-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 09:27:55AM +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > 95s autopkgtest [21:29:51]: test autodep8-python3: [--- > 95s Testing with python3.12: Short note: If I understood upstream correctly they currently support Python3.11 only. In any case they

Bug#1068936: marked as done (libcanberra-gtk3-module: hard-coded dependency on libgtk-3-0)

2024-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2024 09:10:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068936: fixed in libcanberra 0.30-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068936, regarding libcanberra-gtk3-module: hard-coded dependency on libgtk-3-0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

  1   2   >