Bug#1068755: docker.io: FTBFS: failing tests

2024-05-06 Thread Tianon Gravi
On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 17:00, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'm adding Tianon to the loop explicitly since I'm definitely no Docker > (or Go) expert, in case some time can be spared to look into this > problem. Otherwise I'll try and come up with something. I think the backport by Reinhard[1][2] is

Bug#1061358: marked as done (gnumeric: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 02:46:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061358: fixed in gnumeric 1.12.57-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061358, regarding gnumeric: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1070677: fail2ban fails: "Failed during configuration: Have not found any log file for sshd jail"

2024-05-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-05-07 03:57:44 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > sshd_backend = systemd BTW, that would fix the issue only for sshd. But what about the other jails the user could have enabled in /etc/fail2ban/jail.local? The user configuration may rely on systemd being the default backend, at least the

Bug#1070677: fail2ban fails: "Failed during configuration: Have not found any log file for sshd jail"

2024-05-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-05-07 03:28:28 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > May 07 03:01:28 qaa fail2ban-server[557228]: 2024-05-07 03:01:28,226 fail2ban >[557228]: ERROR Failed during configuration: Have not found > any log file for sshd jail I suppose that this is because sshd no longer uses the

Bug#1070677: fail2ban fails: "Failed during configuration: Have not found any log file for sshd jail"

2024-05-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: fail2ban Version: 1.1.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After the upgrade to 1.1.0-1, "systemctl status" gives × fail2ban.service - Fail2Ban Service Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/fail2ban.service; enabled; preset: enabled) Active: failed

Processed: found 1070652 in 17

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1070652 17 Bug #1070652 [how-can-i-help] how-can-i-help: explicitly require 'ostruct' Marked as found in versions how-can-i-help/17. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1070652:

Bug#1040375: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/simplescreenrecorder/libssr-glinject.so: Segmentation fault when used with anything

2024-05-06 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:01:54 +0100 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Petter Reinholdtsen] > I do not use ssr much myself, and have not had time to test. I applied the upstream commit in git branch fix-1040375-glinject and tested it on Bookworm, but alas, the .so file still segfaults with a useless

Bug#1068755: docker.io: FTBFS: failing tests

2024-05-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Santiago, And thanks for the report. Santiago Vila (2024-04-10): > Package: src:docker.io > Version: 20.10.25+dfsg1-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Dear maintainer: > > During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: > > === FAIL: distribution/xfer >

Processed: retitle 1070652 to how-can-i-help: explicitly require 'ostruct'

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1070652 how-can-i-help: explicitly require 'ostruct' Bug #1070652 [how-can-i-help] ruby-json: breaks how-can-i-help Changed Bug title to 'how-can-i-help: explicitly require 'ostruct'' from 'ruby-json: breaks how-can-i-help'. > thanks

Processed: reassign 1070652 to how-can-i-help

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1070652 how-can-i-help Bug #1070652 [ruby-json] ruby-json: breaks how-can-i-help Bug reassigned from package 'ruby-json' to 'how-can-i-help'. No longer marked as found in versions ruby-json/2.7.2+dfsg-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed

Bug#1070498: marked as done (libvirt attempts to write to $HOME during the build)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 23:40:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1070498: fixed in libvirt 10.3.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1070498, regarding libvirt attempts to write to $HOME during the build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1069265: tzdata: Upgrade from 2023c-2 to 2024 corrupts zoneinfo files

2024-05-06 Thread Plasma (David Paul)
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 23:39:14 + IvanAbs wrote: > On 2024-04-17 several of my servers running Debian 10 received an > update for the tzdata package via Debian unattended-upgrade. However, > this update resulted in corruption of files within the > /usr/share/zoneinfo directory. I, too,

Bug#1068665: marked as done (cfengine3: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: 1 of 60 tests failed)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 23:20:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068665: fixed in cfengine3 3.21.4-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068665, regarding cfengine3: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: 1 of 60 tests failed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1070652: [DRE-maint] Bug#1070652: ruby-json: breaks how-can-i-help

2024-05-06 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi! I am reassigning this bug to the `how-can-i-help` package. Indeed, the script `/usr/bin/how-can-i-help` uses implicitly the OpenStruct class, without requiring explicitly 'ostruct'. The class was loaded transitively from the json gem it seems. Adding below line 35 the following line:

Bug#997441: marked as done (squirrel3: FTBFS: '! LaTeX Error: File `tgtermes.sty' not found.')

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 23:06:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#997441: fixed in squirrel3 3.1-8.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #997441, regarding squirrel3: FTBFS: '! LaTeX Error: File `tgtermes.sty' not found.' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1069793: marked as done (wrong package name mnt-reform-setup-wizard -- should be reform-setup-wizard)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 23:05:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069793: fixed in reform-setup-wizard 1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069793, regarding wrong package name mnt-reform-setup-wizard -- should be reform-setup-wizard to be marked as done. This means

Processed: Bug#1070498 marked as pending in libvirt

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1070498 [src:libvirt] libvirt attempts to write to $HOME during the build Added tag(s) pending. -- 1070498: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070498 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1070498: marked as pending in libvirt

2024-05-06 Thread Andrea Bolognani
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1070498 in libvirt reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1070069: fossil: CVE-2024-24795 unreleated breakage

2024-05-06 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
Well, it would certainly be simple enough: the source code should compile fine, and the debian/* scripts would need only the very most minor tweaks.

Bug#1063409: marked as done (mpi4py accesses the net for the build)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 22:49:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1063409: fixed in mpi4py 3.1.5-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1063409, regarding mpi4py accesses the net for the build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1066837: marked as done (mpi4py: FTBFS: Unable to generate documentation)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 22:49:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066837: fixed in mpi4py 3.1.5-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066837, regarding mpi4py: FTBFS: Unable to generate documentation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1014539: squirrel3: CVE-2022-30292

2024-05-06 Thread Matthias Geiger
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:40:58 +0200 Matthias Geiger wrote: > > //I have prepared a fix; however this needs the FTBFS in #997441 > adressed first. > > Will attach a debdiff once that has happened. > See attachement. best, -- Matthias Geiger Debian Maintainer diff -Nru

Bug#1066211:

2024-05-06 Thread Arvin Sedererdj
Control: tags -1 + patch Description: explicitly declare returntype of main bootstrap sourcefile dpkg version 1.22.6 makes -Werror=implicit-function-declaration mandatory which breaks ATS2 build. this adds ats_int_type as return type of functions that breaks the build. (keep in mind

Processed:

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #1066211 [src:ats2-lang] ats2-lang: FTBFS: prelude/ats_main_prelude_dats.c:72:1: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ATS_2d0_2e2_2e12_2prelude_2DATS_2basics_2edats__dynload’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. --

Bug#1063409: marked as pending in mpi4py

2024-05-06 Thread Drew Parsons
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1063409 in mpi4py reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1066837 marked as pending in mpi4py

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066837 [mpi4py] mpi4py: FTBFS: Unable to generate documentation Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066837: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066837 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066837: marked as pending in mpi4py

2024-05-06 Thread Drew Parsons
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1066837 in mpi4py reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1063409 marked as pending in mpi4py

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1063409 [src:mpi4py] mpi4py accesses the net for the build Added tag(s) pending. -- 1063409: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063409 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: FTBFS due to /usr/include/aarch64-linux-gnu/bits/math-vector.h

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity 1070441 important Bug #1070441 [src:cbmc] cmbc: arm64 FTBFS with glibc 2.38 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > block 1070668 by 1070441 Bug #1070668 [src:glibc] glibc: packages FTBFS caused by vector math library header on arm64 1070668 was not

Bug#1070441: FTBFS due to /usr/include/aarch64-linux-gnu/bits/math-vector.h

2024-05-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
control: severity 1070441 important control: block 1070668 by 1070441 control: severity 1070443 important control: block 1070668 by 1070443 control: severity 1070444 important control: block 1070668 by 1070444 control: severity 1070446 important control: block 1070668 by 1070446 Dear

Bug#1052376: lxpanel: no longer obeys its geometry settings

2024-05-06 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 17:12:54 +0300 jim_p wrote: [...] > > Since there is no interest from the maintainers in fixing a 6+ month old grave > bug, I want to ask. Has anyone moved away from lxpanel or even lxde? [...] Hello! I am the original submitter of this bug report. I have recently moved

Bug#1070069: fossil: CVE-2024-24795 unreleated breakage

2024-05-06 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Le lundi 29 avril 2024, 18:40:39 UTC Barak A. Pearlmutter a écrit : > Bastien, > > Okay, got it. Thanks for letting me know. > > I can cherry-pick that fossil commit, but you know the right magic for > a versioned apache2 breakage and how to deal with proposed-updates. > So I think it would make

Bug#1070420: marked as done (src:vagrant: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: ruby-net-ftp (>= 0.2) | ruby-net-ftp (>= 0.2))

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 20:15:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1070420: fixed in vagrant 2.3.7+git20230731.5fc64cde+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1070420, regarding src:vagrant: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: ruby-net-ftp (>= 0.2) | ruby-net-ftp (>=

Bug#1066213: marked as done (slrn: FTBFS: misc.c:376:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘VA_COPY’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 20:15:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066213: fixed in slrn 1.0.3+dfsg-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066213, regarding slrn: FTBFS: misc.c:376:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘VA_COPY’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] to

Bug#1069009: marked as done (dub: hard-coded dependeny on pre-t64 libraries)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 19:28:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069009: fixed in dub 1.36.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069009, regarding dub: hard-coded dependeny on pre-t64 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1067825: marked as done (dub: FTBFS on armhf, mips64el, ppc64el)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 19:28:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067825: fixed in dub 1.36.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067825, regarding dub: FTBFS on armhf, mips64el, ppc64el to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1070420: marked as pending in vagrant

2024-05-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1070420 in vagrant reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1070420 marked as pending in vagrant

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1070420 [src:vagrant] src:vagrant: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: ruby-net-ftp (>= 0.2) | ruby-net-ftp (>= 0.2) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1070420: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070420 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1070663: Unable to lock an existing session

2024-05-06 Thread martin f krafft
Package: xautolock Version: 1:2.2-8 Severity: critical This may be related to #1022781 or not. I have xautolock running: % ps -fC xautolock UID PIDPPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD madduck 27332421 0 May05 ?00:00:53 xautolock -time 3 -locker xsecurelock &&

Bug#1070459: psortb: FTBFS: binding.c:52:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘free’

2024-05-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I've fixed the original error in Git but Salsa CI shows another one[1] which is more tricky since it involves a header file for a perl module and I have no idea how to fix this. Any help from the team is welcome. Kind regards Andreas. [1]

Processed: Re: Bug#1070644: gnome-remote-desktop: System .service file enabled but not the user one?

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1070644 > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop/-/merge_requests/260 Bug #1070644 [gnome-remote-desktop] gnome-remote-desktop: System .service file enabled but not the user one? Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:newsboat

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:newsboat > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package > src:golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:openttd

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:openttd > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

Bug#1070644: gnome-remote-desktop: System .service file enabled but not the user one?

2024-05-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop/-/merge_requests/260 It looks like upstream is proposing to split gnome-remote-desktop's new systemd systemd service into two system services to fix this issue. It's unclear whether they will land this in 46.x Thank you,

Bug#1070444: marked as done (cxref: arm64 FTBFS with glibc 2.38)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 17:19:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1070444: fixed in cxref 1.6e-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1070444, regarding cxref: arm64 FTBFS with glibc 2.38 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1064486: rnp: FTBFS: Errors while running CTest

2024-05-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream On 2024-05-05 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2024-05-04 Santiago Vila wrote: > > found 1064486 0.16.3-1 > > tags 1064486 + ftbfs bookworm trixie sid > > thanks > > El 20/4/24 a las 14:12, Andreas Metzler escribió: > > > FWIW I also get testsuite errors on current

Processed: Re: Bug#1064486: rnp: FTBFS: Errors while running CTest

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 fixed-upstream Bug #1064486 [src:rnp] rnp: FTBFS: Errors while running CTest Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. -- 1064486: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064486 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1070658: FTBFS: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘maxLength’

2024-05-06 Thread Stefano Rivera
Source: clickhouse Version: 18.16.1+ds-7.4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: ftbfs clickhouse FTBFS in unstable: [ 87%] Building CXX object dbms/CMakeFiles/dbms.dir/src/Storages/MergeTree/LevelMergeSelector.cpp.o cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/dbms && /usr/bin/c++

Processed: Re: mpi4py: FTBFS: Segmentation fault in tests

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 ftbfs Bug #1066449 [src:mpi4py] mpi4py: FTBFS: Segmentation fault in tests Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1066449 to the same tags previously set -- 1066449: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066449 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1066449: mpi4py: FTBFS: Segmentation fault in tests

2024-05-06 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: mpi4py Followup-For: Bug #1066449 Control: tags -1 ftbfs The bug report stopped scanning at the first "error", which is not an error (it's a check). The last error is the relevant one testIReadIWrite (test_io.TestIOSelf.testIReadIWrite) ... ok testIReadIWriteAll

Processed: tagging 1069799

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1069799 + ftbfs Bug #1069799 [rust-multihash-derive-impl] rust-multihash-derive-impl - (build-)depends unsatisfiable. Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1069799:

Processed: Re: Bug#1070644: gnome-remote-desktop: System .service file enabled but not the user one?

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1070644 [gnome-remote-desktop] gnome-remote-desktop: System .service file enabled but not the user one? Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 1070644: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070644 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1070652: ruby-json: breaks how-can-i-help

2024-05-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: ruby-json Version: 2.7.2+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This new ruby-json version breaks how-can-i-help: [...] Unpacking ruby-json:amd64 (2.7.2+dfsg-1) over (2.6.3+dfsg-1+b2) ... Setting up ruby-json:amd64 (2.7.2+dfsg-1) ...

Bug#1068610: marked as done (dico: binary-all FTBFS)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 14:37:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068610: fixed in dico 2.11-4.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068610, regarding dico: binary-all FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#1070638: kde-spectacle: Build-depends on NBS libkcolorpicker-dev

2024-05-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Mon, 06 May 2024 10:33:54 -0400 Scott Kitterman wrote: > Source: kde-spectacle > Version: 22.12.3-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > Once kcolorpicker is decrufted, this package will FTBFS. Please update

Bug#1070638: kde-spectacle: Build-depends on NBS libkcolorpicker-dev

2024-05-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
Source: kde-spectacle Version: 22.12.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Once kcolorpicker is decrufted, this package will FTBFS. Please update your build-depends. Scott K

Bug#1069387: marked as done (distro-info: FTBFS on arm64: Can't write the issue template for the crash in /<>/debian/.debhelper/generated/_source/home/.cache/pylint/pylint-crash-2024-04-2

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 16:12:31 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1069387: distro-info: FTBFS on arm64: Can't write the issue template for the crash in /<>/debian/.debhelper/generated/_source/home/.cache/pylint/pylint-crash-2024-04-20-04-31-27.txt because of: '[Errno

Bug#1070515: dipy: FTBFS with nocheck profile

2024-05-06 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: dipy Version: 1.8.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch Hi Maintainer dipy FTBFS when built with the 'nocheck' profile. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. The following patch worked for me: --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -111,11 +111,11 @@ ;

Processed (with 3 errors): Merge duplicates

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1069460 src:openmpi Bug #1069460 [src:bitshuffle] bitshuffle: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail Bug reassigned from package 'src:bitshuffle' to 'src:openmpi'. No longer marked as found in versions bitshuffle/0.5.1-1.2. Ignoring request to alter

Bug#1069404: marked as done (lua-luaossl: FTBFS on arm64: ld: cannot find -lz: No such file or directory)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 13:49:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069404: fixed in lua-luaossl 20220711-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069404, regarding lua-luaossl: FTBFS on arm64: ld: cannot find -lz: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: Bug is still in experimental

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 1066704 Bug #1066704 {Done: Michael R. Crusoe } [src:libcgns] libcgns: FTBFS: tkogl.c:602:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘TkWmAddToColormapWindows’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Unarchived Bug 1066704 > found

Bug#1069356: marked as done (lua-cqueues: FTBFS on arm64: ld: cannot find -lz: No such file or directory)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 13:18:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069356: fixed in lua-cqueues 20200726-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069356, regarding lua-cqueues: FTBFS on arm64: ld: cannot find -lz: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1061519: marked as done (shim: CVE-2023-40546 CVE-2023-40547 CVE-2023-40548 CVE-2023-40549 CVE-2023-40550 CVE-2023-40551)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 13:04:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061519: fixed in shim 15.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061519, regarding shim: CVE-2023-40546 CVE-2023-40547 CVE-2023-40548 CVE-2023-40549 CVE-2023-40550 CVE-2023-40551 to be marked as done. This

Bug#1057606: marked as done (shim: FTBFS: ./debian/generate_dbx_list: 23: efisiglist: not found)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 13:04:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1057606: fixed in shim 15.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1057606, regarding shim: FTBFS: ./debian/generate_dbx_list: 23: efisiglist: not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: tagging 1059228

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1059228 + ftbfs Bug #1059228 [src:s2geometry] build system hard-codes -std=c++11 Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1059228:

Bug#1054661: blastem: Segfault when trying to open rom or access system settings

2024-05-06 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 12:52:30 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed Here's a backtrace when clicking on Settings -> System. Thread 1 "blastem" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. tern_foreach_int (head=, fun=0x555c12a0 , data=0x7fffd7f0, keybuf=0x7fffd8c0

Bug#1070498: libvirt attempts to write to $HOME during the build

2024-05-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: libvirt Version: 10.3.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libvirt=amd64=10.3.0-1=1714824148=0 ... 53) completion-command... In '/<>/tests/virshtestdata/completion-command.out': Offset 6 Expect

Bug#1056677: marked as done (build-depends on atlas, which is obsolete and scheduled for removal)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 12:09:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1056677: fixed in hpcc 1.5.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056677, regarding build-depends on atlas, which is obsolete and scheduled for removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1070497: webrtc-audio-processing/experimental FTBFS with gcc 13

2024-05-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: webrtc-audio-processing Version: 1.0-0.2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/experimental/amd64/webrtc-audio-processing.html https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=webrtc-audio-processing=riscv64=1.0-0.2=1706028598=0 ... FAILED:

Processed: notforwarded 1070335

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notforwarded 1070335 Bug #1070335 [samba-dev] samba-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: libwbclient-dev (<< 2:4.20) Unset Bug forwarded-to-address > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1070335:

Processed: forwarded 1070335 https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/2064916

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1070335 https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/2064916 Bug #1070335 [samba-dev] samba-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: libwbclient-dev (<< 2:4.20) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/2064916'. >

Processed: notfound 1070236 in 2:4.19.6+dfsg-3

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 1070236 2:4.19.6+dfsg-3 Bug #1070236 {Done: Michael Biebl } [python3-samba] python3-samba: SyntaxError during configuration phase of package on upgrade No longer marked as found in versions samba/2:4.19.6+dfsg-3. > thanks Stopping

Bug#1070188: marked as done (python3-spyder: uninstallable in unstable due to pylint)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 11:22:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1070188: fixed in spyder 5.5.1+ds-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1070188, regarding python3-spyder: uninstallable in unstable due to pylint to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1070017: marked as done (google-android-installers: depends on pre-64 libraries)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 13:23:37 +0200 with message-id <22975850.EfDdHjke4D@debian> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #1070017, regarding google-android-installers: depends on pre-64 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1070492: mixxx: Tries to use the network during build

2024-05-06 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:mixxx Version: 2.4.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] --- LOG END --- error:

Bug#1070491: rust-pipewire FTBFS on 32bit with 64bit time_t

2024-05-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: rust-pipewire Version: 0.8.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=rust-pipewire=0.8.0-4 ... error[E0308]: mismatched types --> src/thread_loop.rs:142:43 | 142 | nix::sys::time::TimeSpec::new(abstime.tv_sec, abstime.tv_nsec)

Bug#1070489: rust-hypothesis FTBFS: test failures

2024-05-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: rust-hypothesis Version: 0.11.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=rust-hypothesis=0.11.1-1 https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=rust-hypothesis=0.11.1-2 ... Running

Bug#1070460: marked as done (translate-toolkit: FTBFS: failing tests)

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 10:51:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1070460: fixed in translate-toolkit 3.13.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1070460, regarding translate-toolkit: FTBFS: failing tests to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: bug 1069310 is forwarded to https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/514

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1069310 https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/514 Bug #1069310 [golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse-dev] FTBFS: tests failed Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/514'. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#1069310: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-05-06 Thread Reinhard Tartler
I spent about half an hour looking at this, and wanted to share my thoughts: - the build / tests succeed on all architectures but mips64el - the panic in question appears to come from here: https://sources.debian.org/src/golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse/2.4.2-2/fuse/print_linux.go/#L13 -- a

Bug#1068755: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-05-06 Thread Reinhard Tartler
please ignore the above, it was meant to be sent to #1069310 instead On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 6:34 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > I spent about half an hour looking at this, and wanted to share my > thoughts: > > - the build / tests succeed on all architectures but mips64el > - the panic in

Bug#1068755: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-05-06 Thread Reinhard Tartler
I spent about half an hour looking at this, and wanted to share my thoughts: - the build / tests succeed on all architectures but mips64el - the panic in question appears to come from here: https://sources.debian.org/src/golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse/2.4.2-2/fuse/print_linux.go/#L13 -- a

Processed: Re: Bug#1070463: gnome-remote-desktop: 46 has failing build tests

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1070463 [src:gnome-remote-desktop] gnome-remote-desktop: 46 has failing build tests Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > unblock 1050237 by -1 Bug #1050237 [release.debian.org] transition: mutter/gnome-shell 45 1050237 was blocked

Bug#1070463: gnome-remote-desktop: 46 has failing build tests

2024-05-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 important Control: unblock 1050237 by -1 On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 1:15 PM Jeremy Bícha wrote: > The build tests were passing with version 45. It is not clear to me > why the tests are failing in Debian Experimental but passing in Ubuntu > 24.04 LTS. I have ignored

Processed: your mail

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1061216 > https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openvdb/issues/1804 Bug #1061216 [src:openvdb] openvdb: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-18 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#1066662: hping3: FTBFS: script.c:1351:29: error: implicit declaration of function ‘asprintf’; did you mean ‘vsprintf’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-05-06 Thread Michael Prokop
* Lucas Nussbaum [Wed Mar 13, 2024 at 12:51:29PM +0100]: [...] > This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see > https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration

Processed: tagging 1066662

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 102 + patch Bug #102 [src:hping3] hping3: FTBFS: script.c:1351:29: error: implicit declaration of function ‘asprintf’; did you mean ‘vsprintf’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping

Bug#1061216: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17

2024-05-06 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 06/05/2024 à 10:27, Gregor Riepl a écrit : Which LLVM versions are you planning to remove? 15, 16 soon. 17 later. Would it be possible to keep at least LLVM 15 until upstream has upgraded their code base? Sounds very unlikely for the next Debian release. If a fix for this can't be

Bug#1068058: marked as done (libgtkada: FTBFS on armhf ( compilation of gtkada-canvas_view.adb failed))

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2024 08:39:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068058: fixed in libgtkada 24.0.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068058, regarding libgtkada: FTBFS on armhf ( compilation of gtkada-canvas_view.adb failed) to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1061216: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17

2024-05-06 Thread Gregor Riepl
Which LLVM versions are you planning to remove? 15, 16 soon. 17 later. Would it be possible to keep at least LLVM 15 until upstream has upgraded their code base? Sounds very unlikely for the next Debian release. If a fix for this can't be released on time, I'm requesting an exception for

Processed: reassign 1059874 to src:uhd, tagging 1063948, tagging 1061744, tagging 1070419, tagging 1062881 ...

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1059874 src:uhd 4.6.0.0+ds1-5 Bug #1059874 [libuhd4.6.0] libuhd4.6.0: Segfault in gqrx related to libuhd 4.6.0 Warning: Unknown package 'libuhd4.6.0' Bug reassigned from package 'libuhd4.6.0' to 'src:uhd'. No longer marked as found in

Processed: tagging 1067724, reassign 1067724 to src:openvr ...

2024-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1067724 + sid trixie Bug #1067724 [libopenvr-dev] libopenvr-dev: Please upgrade opevr to version 2 Added tag(s) sid and trixie. > reassign 1067724 src:openvr 1.23.7~ds1-2 Bug #1067724 [libopenvr-dev] libopenvr-dev: Please upgrade opevr to