Bug#1070733: linux-image-5.10.0-29-amd64 fails to boot with Error 16: Inconsistent filesystem structure

2024-05-07 Thread Dan Poltawski
Package: src:linux Version: 5.10.216-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, After upgrading to linux-image-5.10.0-29 the system fails to boot with grub 'Error 16: Inconsistent filesystem structure'. Booting into linux-image-5.10.0-28-amd64 and the system is

Bug#1061421: Fails to start after an upgrade

2024-05-07 Thread duck
Quack, On 2024-04-22 00:44, Jeremy Bícha wrote: There have been a huge amount of changes, but most of those changes were in Unstable and haven't reached Testing yet. I can confirm the problem is still there in latest unstable. Marc, there is a fix for sway 1.9 in wlgreet 0.5. Do you want to

Bug#1069410: efitools: FTBFS on arm64: make[1]: *** [Make.rules:130: HelloWorld-signed.efi] Error 1

2024-05-07 Thread Steve McIntyre
Control: tags -1 +confirmed On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 02:01:48PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >Source: efitools >Version: 1.9.2-3 >Severity: serious >Justification: FTBFS >Tags: trixie sid ftbfs >User: lu...@debian.org >Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64 > >Hi, > >During a

Processed: Re: Bug#1069410: efitools: FTBFS on arm64: make[1]: *** [Make.rules:130: HelloWorld-signed.efi] Error 1

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +confirmed Bug #1069410 [src:efitools] efitools: FTBFS on arm64: make[1]: *** [Make.rules:130: HelloWorld-signed.efi] Error 1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1069410: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069410 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1005165: marked as done (fwupd-amd64-signed uninstallable for a few weeks now)

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 7 May 2024 22:14:08 +0100 with message-id <20240507211408.ga2949...@tack.einval.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1005165: fwupd-amd64-signed uninstallable for a few weeks now has caused the Debian Bug report #1005165, regarding fwupd-amd64-signed uninstallable for a few weeks

Processed: Re: Bug#1070706: gtk4 udeb has unsatisfiable dependencies

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity 1070706 normal Bug #1070706 [gtk4] gtk4 udeb has unsatisfiable dependencies Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > severity 1070714 normal Bug #1070714 [src:vte2.91] libvte-2.91-0-udeb depends on both GTK 3 and GTK 4 Severity set to 'normal' from

Bug#1070706: gtk4 udeb has unsatisfiable dependencies

2024-05-07 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: severity 1070706 normal Control: severity 1070714 normal On Tue, 07 May 2024 at 22:53:33 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Simon McVittie (2024-05-07): > > do the release/installer teams consider udeb dependencies > > on non-udeb packages, by udebs that d-i does not currently need or use,

Bug#1066624: marked as done (xfireworks: FTBFS: etc.c:11:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘time’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 21:08:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066624: fixed in xfireworks 1.3-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066624, regarding xfireworks: FTBFS: etc.c:11:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘time’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Bug#1069452: marked as done (purelibc: FTBFS on armhf: ccPREIBJ.s:380: Error: symbol `readdir64' is already defined)

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 20:50:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069452: fixed in purelibc 1.0.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069452, regarding purelibc: FTBFS on armhf: ccPREIBJ.s:380: Error: symbol `readdir64' is already defined to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1070706: gtk4 udeb has unsatisfiable dependencies

2024-05-07 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 07 May 2024 at 22:02:12 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote: > > The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this > > is not a regression. > > Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on libpng16-16t64-udeb > where

Bug#1070720: tpm2-tss: test/unit/tcti-spidev failure on 32bit with 64bit time_t

2024-05-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: tpm2-tss Version: 4.1.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=tpm2-tss=4.1.0-1 ... SKIP: test/unit/tcti-libtpms WARNING:test:test/unit/tcti-libtpms.c:1793:main() _FILE_OFFSET == 64 would produce cmocka errors. SKIP

Bug#1070706: gtk4 udeb has unsatisfiable dependencies

2024-05-07 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote: The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this is not a regression. Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on libpng16-16t64-udeb where the version in testing depends on libpng16-16-udeb. The later

Bug#1061216: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17

2024-05-07 Thread Gregor Riepl
If a fix for this can't be released on time, I'm requesting an exception for llvm-15. Removing OpenVDB from Debian will affect Blender, which is is relatively high-profile and should not just be axed for the sake if a pruning operation. You still have time, we aren't going to release the

Processed: Re: kdeconnectd: should not listen on all interfaces by default

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity 998197 serious Bug #998197 [kdeconnect] kdeconnectd: should not listen on all interfaces by default Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > tags 998197 + security Bug #998197 [kdeconnect] kdeconnectd: should not listen on all interfaces by default Added

Bug#978511: marked as done (gcc-python-plugin: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-9))

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 18:59:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026175: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #978511, regarding gcc-python-plugin: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-9) to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#963999: marked as done (gcc-python-plugin: FTBFS: invalid literal for int() with base 10)

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 18:59:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026175: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #963999, regarding gcc-python-plugin: FTBFS: invalid literal for int() with base 10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1000213: marked as done (gcc-python-plugin: Don't use -Werror=deprecated-declarations)

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 18:59:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026175: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1000213, regarding gcc-python-plugin: Don't use -Werror=deprecated-declarations to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1067285: whitakers-words in Debian, gnat-13 transition

2024-05-07 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Hello. The package needs to build with gnat-13 in order to be part of next Debian release. Are you planning a new upload in the near future? Else, are you OK with a non maintainer upload fixing this specific bug?

Bug#1068755: closing 1068755

2024-05-07 Thread Reinhard Tartler
close 1068755 20.10.25+dfsg1-3 thanks docker.io 20.10.25+dfsg1-3 comes with a backported patch that addresses this FTBFS

Processed: closing 1068755

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1068755 20.10.25+dfsg1-3 Bug #1068755 [src:docker.io] docker.io: FTBFS: failing tests Marked as fixed in versions docker.io/20.10.25+dfsg1-3. Bug #1068755 [src:docker.io] docker.io: FTBFS: failing tests Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping

Bug#1068389: marked as done (src:pcp: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: python3-bpfcc)

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 18:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068389: fixed in pcp 6.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068389, regarding src:pcp: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: python3-bpfcc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: Bug#1070706: gtk4 udeb has unsatisfiable dependencies

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + d-i Bug #1070706 [gtk4] gtk4 - udebs broken. Added tag(s) d-i. > found -1 4.12.5+ds-3 Bug #1070706 [gtk4] gtk4 - udebs broken. There is no source info for the package 'gtk4' at version '4.12.5+ds-3' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for

Bug#1070706: gtk4 udeb has unsatisfiable dependencies

2024-05-07 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tags -1 + d-i Control: found -1 4.12.5+ds-3 Control: retitle -1 gtk4 udeb has unsatisfiable dependencies Control: clone -1 -2 Control: retitle -2 libvte-2.91-0-udeb depends on both GTK 3 and GTK 4 Control: reassign -2 src:vte2.91 0.75.92-1 On Tue, 07 May 2024 at 15:44:02 +0100, Peter

Bug#1026061: [+externe Mail+] Re: Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)

2024-05-07 Thread Uecker, Martin
Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 19:23 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > El 7/5/24 a las 18:50, Uecker, Martin escribió: > > Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 17:59 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > > > El 1/1/23 a las 16:55, Uecker, Martin escribió: > > > In the meantime, I became member of debian-med, so

Bug#1026061: [+externe Mail+] Re: Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)

2024-05-07 Thread Santiago Vila
El 7/5/24 a las 18:50, Uecker, Martin escribió: Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 17:59 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: El 1/1/23 a las 16:55, Uecker, Martin escribió: In the meantime, I became member of debian-med, so in theory, I could fix this myself via team upload. Would you prefer that I take

Bug#1070711: python-werkzeug: CVE-2024-34069

2024-05-07 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: python-werkzeug Version: 3.0.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for python-werkzeug. CVE-2024-34069[0]: | Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web

Bug#1070710: python-html-sanitizer: CVE-2024-34078: Arbitrary HTML present after sanitization because of unicode normalization

2024-05-07 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: python-html-sanitizer Version: 2.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for python-html-sanitizer. CVE-2024-34078[0]: | html-sanitizer is an

Bug#1026061: [+externe Mail+] Re: Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)

2024-05-07 Thread Uecker, Martin
Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 17:59 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > El 1/1/23 a las 16:55, Uecker, Martin escribió: > > I can apply the patch, but I do not have much time now. > > Is there some urgency? > > Hello. A lot of time passed without activity on this bug. > > In the meantime, I became

Bug#1066228: marked as done (xjdic: FTBFS: xjdsa.c:84:31: error: implicit declaration of function ‘Kstrcmp’; did you mean ‘strcmp’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 16:51:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066228: fixed in xjdic 24-11.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066228, regarding xjdic: FTBFS: xjdsa.c:84:31: error: implicit declaration of function ‘Kstrcmp’; did you mean ‘strcmp’?

Bug#1066228: xjdic: FTBFS: implicit declaration of functions

2024-05-07 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU that fixes this. Please find the debdiff attached that builds on the experimental version.diff -Nru xjdic-24/debian/changelog xjdic-24/debian/changelog --- xjdic-24/debian/changelog 2023-10-02 10:05:01.0 + +++ xjdic-24/debian/changelog 2024-05-07

Processed: Re: ghdl: various suggestions for the packaging

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1067446 patch Bug #1067446 [src:ghdl] ghdl fails to build with gnat-13 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1067686 patch Bug #1067686 [src:ghdl] ghdl 4.0 available, builds on s390x Added tag(s) patch. -- 1067446:

Bug#1067320: marked as done (topal: FTBFS: debian/rules:8: /usr/share/ada/debian_packaging.mk: No such file or directory)

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 16:21:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067320: fixed in topal 84-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067320, regarding topal: FTBFS: debian/rules:8: /usr/share/ada/debian_packaging.mk: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)

2024-05-07 Thread Santiago Vila
El 1/1/23 a las 16:55, Uecker, Martin escribió: I can apply the patch, but I do not have much time now. Is there some urgency? Hello. A lot of time passed without activity on this bug. In the meantime, I became member of debian-med, so in theory, I could fix this myself via team upload. Would

Bug#1040375: marked as done (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/simplescreenrecorder/libssr-glinject.so: Segmentation fault when used with anything)

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 14:50:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1040375: fixed in simplescreenrecorder 0.4.4-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1040375, regarding /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/simplescreenrecorder/libssr-glinject.so: Segmentation fault when used with

Bug#1070706: gtk4 - udebs broken.

2024-05-07 Thread Peter Michael Green
Package: gtk4 Version: 4.12.5+dfsg-6 Severity: serious According to britney, gtk4's udebs are uninstallable. * ∙ ∙ libgtk-4-1-udeb/amd64 has unsatisfiable dependency * ∙ ∙ libgtk-4-1-udeb/arm64 has unsatisfiable dependency * ∙ ∙ libgtk-4-1-udeb/i386 has unsatisfiable dependency * ∙ ∙

Bug#1040375: marked as pending in simplescreenrecorder

2024-05-07 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1040375 in simplescreenrecorder reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1040375 marked as pending in simplescreenrecorder

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1040375 [simplescreenrecorder-lib] /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/simplescreenrecorder/libssr-glinject.so: Segmentation fault when used with anything Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1040375 to the same tags previously set -- 1040375:

Processed: Re: Bug#1069258: ruby-curb: test regression with curl 8.7.1: client read function EOF fail, only only 4/5 of needed bytes read

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/taf2/curb/issues/451 Bug #1069258 [src:ruby-curb] ruby-curb: test regression with curl 8.7.1: client read function EOF fail, only only 4/5 of needed bytes read Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#1069258: ruby-curb: test regression with curl 8.7.1: client read function EOF fail, only only 4/5 of needed bytes read

2024-05-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/taf2/curb/issues/451 Hi, I forwarded this upstream. Lucas

Processed: librnd: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1062610 serious Bug #1062610 {Done: Benjamin Drung } [src:librnd] librnd: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#1070491: marked as done (rust-pipewire FTBFS on 32bit with 64bit time_t)

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 13:34:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1070491: fixed in rust-pipewire 0.8.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1070491, regarding rust-pipewire FTBFS on 32bit with 64bit time_t to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1069372: marked as done (efibootguard: FTBFS on arm64: kernel-stub/fdt.c:169:49: error: passing argument 2 of ‘CopyMem’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-quali

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 13:19:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069372: fixed in efibootguard 0.17-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069372, regarding efibootguard: FTBFS on arm64: kernel-stub/fdt.c:169:49: error: passing argument 2 of ‘CopyMem’ discards ‘const’

Processed: Mark gnat time_t/64 as notfound where necessary

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 1067224 ahven/2.8-9 Bug #1067224 {Done: Nicolas Boulenguez } [src:ahven] libahven ftbfs on time_t64 architectures No longer marked as found in versions ahven/2.8-9. > notfound 1067071 libaunit/24.0.0-2 Bug #1067071 {Done: Nicolas

Bug#1070699: gdb can not be started on testing

2024-05-07 Thread Michael Becker
Package: gdb Version: 13.2-1+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable mmediately stops with the error: gdb: symbol lookup error: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython3.11.so.1.0: undefined symbol: XML_SetReparseDeferralEnabled libpython3.11.so.1.0 is part of libpython3.11t64 --

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#1068349: nbsphinx/nbconvert broken by lxml 5.2: lxml.html.clean

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1068349 nbconvert/6.5.3-5 Bug #1068349 [python3-nbconvert,python3-lxml] nbsphinx/nbconvert broken by lxml 5.2: lxml.html.clean Marked as fixed in versions nbconvert/6.5.3-5. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#1066624: xfireworks: FTBFS: etc.c:11:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘time’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-05-07 Thread Yukiharu YABUKI
Hi, Thanks for your comment. I'll try to enable -Werror=implicit-function-declaratin On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:58:32 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [snip] > This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see >

Bug#1068349: nbsphinx/nbconvert broken by lxml 5.2: lxml.html.clean

2024-05-07 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: reopen -1 On 2024-05-07 11:25:05 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > What's the status of this bug? > > apt-listbugs still reports python3-lxml as buggy: > > serious bugs of python3-lxml (5.1.0-1 → 5.2.1-1) > b1 - #1068349 - nbsphinx/nbconvert broken by lxml 5.2: lxml.html.clean >

Processed: Re: Bug#1068349: nbsphinx/nbconvert broken by lxml 5.2: lxml.html.clean

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #1068349 {Done: Colin Watson } [python3-nbconvert,python3-lxml] nbsphinx/nbconvert broken by lxml 5.2: lxml.html.clean 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to

Bug#1070638: marked as done (kde-spectacle: Build-depends on NBS libkcolorpicker-dev)

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 11:05:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1070638: fixed in kde-spectacle 23.08.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1070638, regarding kde-spectacle: Build-depends on NBS libkcolorpicker-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: Bug#1070515: dipy: FTBFS with nocheck profile

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 help Bug #1070515 [src:dipy] dipy: FTBFS with nocheck profile Added tag(s) help. -- 1070515: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070515 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1070515: dipy: FTBFS with nocheck profile

2024-05-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help thanks Hi Grahamm Am Mon, May 06, 2024 at 02:08:25PM + schrieb Graham Inggs: > Source: dipy > Version: 1.8.0-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs patch thanks a lot for the patch which looks perfectly sensible. Unfortunatly the build runs into a different error as you

Processed: found 1070690 in 1:1.14.19-1, severity of 1070690 is serious

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1070690 1:1.14.19-1 Bug #1070690 [libupnp-dev] libupnp-dev: pkgconfig file no longer carries version information Marked as found in versions pupnp/1:1.14.19-1. > severity 1070690 serious Bug #1070690 [libupnp-dev] libupnp-dev: pkgconfig

Bug#1066211:

2024-05-07 Thread Matthew Danish
Thanks, this is very timely, I was just discussing it with upstream a couple days ago. On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 23:39, Arvin Sedererdj wrote: > Control: tags -1 + patch > > >

Processed: update status for Ada time_t 64 bugs

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 1067070 adacgi/1.6-34 Bug #1067070 {Done: Nicolas Boulenguez } [src:adacgi] adacgi: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: gprbuild: raised CONSTRAINT_ERROR : a-calend.adb:371 overflow check failed Bug #1067219 {Done: Nicolas Boulenguez } [src:adacgi]

Bug#1068349: nbsphinx/nbconvert broken by lxml 5.2: lxml.html.clean

2024-05-07 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-04-07 22:06:05 +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > To avoid being blocked by this bug, the pandas version I just uploaded > temporarily disables the documentation. > > This is also an option for any other affected packages that urgently need to > be uploaded. (I don't know whether the

Bug#1069370: shasta: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot continue due to the error above

2024-05-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Hi, I pushed some potential fix to Git but this does not help[1]. :-( Any idea is welcome Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/shasta/-/jobs/5695708 -- https://fam-tille.de

Processed: Re: Bug#1069370: shasta: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot continue due to the error above

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 help Bug #1069370 [src:shasta] shasta: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library shasta.cpython-311-aarch64-linux-gnu.so needed by debian/shasta/usr/bin/shasta Added tag(s) help. -- 1069370:

Processed: found 1069552 in 1.0.21-13

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1069552 1.0.21-13 Bug #1069552 [src:freecontact] freecontact: FTBFS on armel: make[1]: *** [Makefile:469: all-recursive] Error 1 Marked as found in versions freecontact/1.0.21-13. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#1070652: marked as done (how-can-i-help: explicitly require 'ostruct')

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 08:34:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1070652: fixed in how-can-i-help 18 has caused the Debian Bug report #1070652, regarding how-can-i-help: explicitly require 'ostruct' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Tagging help

2024-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 help Bug #1070459 [src:psortb] psortb: FTBFS: binding.c:52:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘free’ Added tag(s) help. -- 1070459: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070459 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1070459: Tagging help

2024-05-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help thanks

Bug#1070020: autopkgtest: (unrelated) packages not found

2024-05-07 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2024-04-28 19:34:07) > unfortunately, this problem is not transient but reproducible. The problem > is, that the involved libraries which are 404 have alternative 64bit time_t > versions in unstable: > > libssl3 -> libssl3t64 > libdb5.3 ->

Bug#1040375: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/simplescreenrecorder/libssr-glinject.so: Segmentation fault when used with anything

2024-05-07 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Bernhard Übelacker] > As far as I see the crash happens because it wants to print this message: > > 57 GLINJECT_PRINT("Error: Can't open libdl.so!"); > > But unfortunately libstdc++ seems not yet prepared to output the > error. Thank you very much for the analysis and links.

Bug#1070677: fail2ban fails: "Failed during configuration: Have not found any log file for sshd jail"

2024-05-07 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 07/05/2024 à 03:57, Vincent Lefevre a écrit : On 2024-05-07 03:28:28 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: May 07 03:01:28 qaa fail2ban-server[557228]: 2024-05-07 03:01:28,226 fail2ban [557228]: ERROR Failed during configuration: Have not found any log file for sshd jail I