tags 646481 + patch
tags 646481 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for uw-imap (versioned as 8:2007e~dfsg-3.2) and
uploaded it. Please find attach the diff.
Regards,
Ana
diff -u uw-imap-2007e~dfsg/debian/changelog uw-imap-2007e~dfsg/debian/changelog
---
tags 643466 + patch
tags 643466 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for remind (versioned as 03.01.10-1.1) and
uploaded it. Please find attached the diff.
Regards,
Ana
diff -Nru remind-03.01.10/debian/changelog remind-03.01.10/debian/changelog
---
tags 646502 + patch
tags 646502 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sipcalc (versioned as 1.1.4-2.1) and
uploaded it. Please find attached the diff.
Regards,
Ana
diff -u sipcalc-1.1.4/debian/changelog sipcalc-1.1.4/debian/changelog
--- sipcalc-1.1.4/debian/changelog
+++
tags 643420 + patch
tags 643420 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libcsoap (versioned as 1.1.0-17.1) and
uploaded it. Please find attached the diff.
Regards,
Ana
diff -Nru libcsoap-1.1.0/debian/changelog libcsoap-1.1.0/debian/changelog
---
Control: tags 753988 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for anthy (versioned as 9100h-23.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru anthy-9100h/debian/changelog anthy-9100h/debian/changelog
---
Control: tags 754025 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for scala-mode-el (versioned as 20111005-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u scala-mode-el-20111005/debian/changelog
Control: tags 734568 + pending
Control: tags 753643 + patch
Control: tags 753643 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for munge (versioned as 0.5.11-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 02:58:21AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: libopensm5
Version: 3.3.18-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
libopensm5 ships three libraries with independent soversions:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libopensm.so.5.2.1
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:50:24PM +0100, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
I'll upload the package to experimental (well, NEW) as soon as I can, will
check the affected packages - not a lot of them and they are all maintained
by the ofed team - and I'll find with the RT the best solution.
#770712
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:53:18PM +0200, rollopack wrote:
Package: yakuake
Version: 2.9.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
with konsole 4:14.12.3-1 yakuake on opening a tab report the error: Yakuake
was unable to load the Konsole component.
A
Hi doko,
I think it would be a useful time investement for you to read:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu
Ana
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Matthias,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:23:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 07/08/2015 08:15 PM, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
Hi doko,
Matthias
I think it would be a useful time investement for you to read:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:30:43PM +0100, Chris West (Faux) wrote:
Source: mstflint
Version: 4.0.1+1.43.g97d7275-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Tags: sid stretch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC:
Thanks a lot Eriberto!
I'm going to upload this orphaning the package.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:40:24PM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> Control: tags 808760 patch
> Control: tags 808760 upstream
>
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch will fix this issue.
>
> Regards,
>
> Eriberto
> Description:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 05:03:55PM -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: mstflint
> Version: 4.1.0+1.46.gb1cdaf7-1
> Severity: important
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-literal-suffix
>
> This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released
>
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:54:22PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 09:21:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >...
> > ibutils (1.5.7-5) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> >* Fix Depends lines:
> > - libibdm-dev: add depends on libibdm1 (= ${binary:Version})
unarchive 807666
reopen 807666
notfixed 807666 mpich/3.2-1~exp1
found 807666 3.3-2
forwarded 807666
https://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/2019-March/011160.html
kthxbye
Hi,
This bug wasn't closed properly. While a rebuild of the package with
the new upload fixed the problem temporarily,
Package: cycle
Version: 0.3.1-16
Severity: grave
Hi,
This new version of cycle, ported to python3, doesn't read the data file
( under .cycle) and prompts to create a new user.
Not creating a new user and downgrading to the version in buster (-14), allows
to continue using the application with
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:18:51AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
...
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:11:47PM +0200, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
...
> > Your current python3 porting is not helping here since many people will
> > start
> > the application, will be
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 06:12:56AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:47:14PM +0200, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
> > > Thanks to you. I'd be happy if you could check master[1] and confirm
> > > that it is OK. I can even give you commit permissi
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 06:39:51PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> Dear Ana,
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 05:41:27PM +0200, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
> > This new version of cycle, ported to python3, doesn't read the data file
> >
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:06:59PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:56:23AM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > Is there any hope for a Python 3 port of cycle, or should it just be RM'd?
>
> Ana, could you please have a last word about this?
>
Thanks Andreas.
I haven't given
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 12:17:28AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Ana Guerrero Lopez]
> > Please, keep debian-timeline out of bookworm, the installed HTML doesn't
> > show the timeline like it should so the package is useless.
>
> Are you talking about the issue in #655
Source: debian-timeline
Version: 45
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-public...@lists.debian.org
Please, keep debian-timeline out of bookworm, the installed HTML doesn't
show the timeline like it should so the package is useless.
24 matches
Mail list logo
