Quoting Tomas Hoger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
I think it is an FTBFS bug. The following should generally work:
apt-get source qmail
cd qmail-*
dpkg-buildpackage
For qmail, this does not work because of the missing Build-Depends on
groff-base and because of the missing users/groups.
I am including a fix for the missing build-depends line in the control file.
However, I am not changing how the package presently handles creating the users.
qmail-src is not in the main package repository. It's in the non-free
repository, which, in reality, means it's not officially part of
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:41 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Jon Marler wrote:
All of that inetd.conf stuff is old legacy code from a migration long
long ago before update-inetd was available. I believe I will just
remove it all together as it is no longer necessary, and probably
never
On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:23 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jon Marler wrote:
If you use fakeroot to call dpkg-buildpackage, it works prefectly.
Something is wrong with the way that dpkg-buildpackage is calling
fakeroot. The chown calls work perfect, and you can build
If you use fakeroot to call dpkg-buildpackage, it works prefectly.
Something is wrong with the way that dpkg-buildpackage is calling
fakeroot. The chown calls work perfect, and you can build the package
using a different syntax.
Not sure what you need done here.
Jon
On Jun 12, 2008, at
485956 serious
thanks
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:09:14PM -0500, Jon Marler wrote:
severity 485956 minor
Erm, no, this is a FTBFS bug, and deserves the severity I gave it.
The package fails to build with standard Debian tools, called in their
standard ways, and violates a policy MUST.
Please see
On Sep 13, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#patch didnt touch debian/rules
found 485956 qmail/1.03-46
Fixed in -47
Cheers!
Jon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Quoting Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think you are letting your crankiness interfere with your logic. The
people arguing that qmail is non-free are a different group than those
that have anything to do with funding anything. If you can't adequately
maintain the package, say so instead
Quoting Alex Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As others have said there is no need to compile the source when
building a source as binary package. Hence there is no need to have
depandancies on specific users when building the qmail-src deb from
the qmail source deb.
There are two ways of solving
Quoting Thomas Huriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (21/12/2006):
Quoting Thomas Huriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Note also that once this is fixed, you should update the description of
the qmail-src package.
I am not exactly sure what pbuilder is doing here, but I don't
Thanks for the report.
All of that inetd.conf stuff is old legacy code from a migration long
long ago before update-inetd was available. I believe I will just
remove it all together as it is no longer necessary, and probably
never was in the first place.
I have a release that I am
11 matches
Mail list logo
