retitle 552480 eclipse: GTK dialog stopped working
tags 552480 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi
Could you try if setting GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=1 (and exporting it) makes
eclipse work? If not, please provide the logs (if it does not tell you
where to find it, then try $WORKSPACE/.metadata/.log)
~Niels
Niels Thykier wrote:
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 21:41:24, Niels Thykier a =E9crit :
Dear mentors,
Hi Niels,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0-10 of my package
jlgui.
Some comments:
- debian/jlgui.sh use /usr/lib/kaffe/jre/lib/rt.jar but kaffe
forcemerge 553131 553133
retitle 553131 eclipse: FTBFS - native libraries are not built from source.
tags 553131 = confirmed
reassign 553131 src:eclipse
thanks
Hi
It turns out (by looking at the build logs) that this is caused by the
3.4.1 build passing a misspelled path to dpkg-shlibdeps. I
tags 552480 = confirmed
thanks
Hi
Thanks for testing it - this is a known problem then and we have partly
fixed it in our VCS[1] and it will be fixed by upstream in eclipse 3.6
(and possibly also 3.5.2).
~Niels
[1] Partly fixed as in our VCS version suffers from fewer of these
problems
Hi
Upstream has released 5.1.12 now (DEHS has only picked up 5.1.11),
perhaps this is fixed in either of those.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
found 570972 3.4.1-1
tags 570972 + sid squeeze
thanks
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
* Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net [2010-02-22 16:10:52 CET]:
forcemerge 553131 570972
thanks
Your forcemerge removed the version information from the bug(s). This
made the bug appear to also affect
Hi
Have you looked at #560056?
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Teodor MICU wrote:
[...]
PS: how can I receive any responses on this bug without CC:me ?
Hi
I believe [1] will do the trick.
~Niels
[1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#subscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: src:azureus
Severity: serious
Hi
GPL and EPL are not compatible[1], yet azureus contains quite a few files under
GPL while Depending on SWT, which is under EPL. Furthermore the source itself
contains multiple files under CPL, which is also incompatible with GPL.
The file
gregor herrmann wrote:
[...]
What I don't understand is why the .jar is in /usr/lib/java/ and not
in /usr/share/java in the first place. It's put there explicitly by
debian/libswt-gtk-3.5-java.install.
Installing it to /usr/share/java and adjusting
debian/libswt-gtk-3.5-java.links would
Package: libsysactivity
Version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: serious
src/*BSD/cpu.c
* This program may be freely redistributed,
* but this entire comment MUST remain intact.
Does not explicitly allow modification.
The parts under this license was found under the BSD license (from the
same author)
Hi
Just a reminder: you should remember to update JAVA_HOME in
debian/ant-wrapper to point to /usr/lib/jvm/default-java as well.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# reopen'ing as upstream appears to be interested in changing this.
reopen 580856
found 580856 1.3-2
severity 580856 important
thanks
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
Package: eclipselink
Severity: serious
Hi
As the title says - here is the relevant part of the log:
[...]
dh --with javahelper build
dh_testdir
dh_auto_configure
jh_linkjars
debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
make[1]: Entering directory
Barry deFreese and I packed the new upstream release ago and I RFS'ed it
in December; I just bumped the RFS earlier today and hopefully I will
get a reply on it soon.
On a related note: I tried to mail the maintainer twice in start/mid
December though I have not heard from him yet.
~Niels
tags 558693 + confirmed
thanks
Hi
I know some people have experienced this e.g. by having translation
packages for eclipse installed (there is a bug about this on the Ubuntu
side requesting that the default limit is increased).
You can work around this by changing the limit of open files. (e.g.
Package: cowbuilder
Version: 0.58
Severity: serious
Hi
Running cowbuilder with --login --bindmounts results in cowbuilder trying to
purge
a bindmounted /proc if the command-line specified bindmount fails.
$ sudo cowbuilder --login --bindmounts `pwd`/aginw
- Copying COW directory
forking: rm
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Severity: serious
Hi
java-gcj-compat-dev cannot be installed in unstable due to conflicts between
gjdoc and gcj-jdk.
java-gcj-compat-dev (1.0.80-5.1) Depends on ..., gcj, ..., gjdoc (= 0.7.8), ...
gcj (4:4.4.2-1) Depends on ..., gcj-jdk (= 4:4.4.2-1)
gcj-jdk
forcemerge 507536 560162 556780
thanks
Hi
Thank you for spending time to report these bugs and for helping to
triaging them. I have (thanks to Jeff Wallance) determined that
these bugs are both one of the many manifestations of #507536[1]
(xulrunner problem).
We are preparing to upload
forcemerge 507536 560398
thanks
Hi Lukas Czerner
Thank you for taking your time to report this bug. I believe you are
suffering from #507536[1] in one of its many forms. There some who have
reported a workaround that you can try[2].
We are preparing an upload of eclipse soon; but I seriously
Hi
Sorry, I missed your reply. Yes it is the problem. See [1].
~Niels
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00065.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi
Could you please check if you have a broken swt symlink or is missing an
swt.jar symlink in /usr/share/java[1]? The broken symlinks are usually
fixed by reinstalling libswt-gtk-3.5-java. Please see #568940[2] for
more information.
~Niels
[1] The output of
ls -l /usr/share/java/swt*.jar
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libjbcrypt-java
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100602 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
gpe wrote:
Package: pdfsam
Version: 1.1.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
pdfsam failed to start with this message:
=
pdfsam
JAVA: java
JAVA_OPTS: -Xmx256m
CLASSPATH:
Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi,
Well, CDT 3.1.2 won't work with eclipse 3.5 in unstable, it works with
eclipse 3.2.
We should upgrade this to CDT 6.0.x.
http://www.eclipse.org/cdt/downloads.php
BTW...where's the source for that? I couldn't find it... ;(
Should we get it from CVS?
I think it is too early to tag it pending. While we got the updated
sources, it does not build yet. Also, neither of its dependencies (emf
and rse) are uploaded to the archive yet.
You are more than welcome to join the effort of getting the new
release of eclipse-cdt packaged. We could
Package: jabsorb
Severity: serious
Hi
jabsorb contains some java files licensed under the non-free JSON license.
I suspect these are an embedded library.
I will try to see if I can find a solution or if it has to move to non-free.
~Niels
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
retitle 558693 eclipse: Too many files open - possible workaround
tags 558693 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi
I came across a blog [1] that offered a different solution that I am
considering to adopt for the eclipse package. I would like to get some
feedback on this solution.
I believe the file the
Hi Sam Clegg
Any news or ETA on this one? It is almost a month ago you said you would
apply the patch from Onkar Shinde (which will also fix #548810).
Thank you in advance,
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
clone 491537 -1
retitle -1 RM: vmware-package -- RoQA: May contain undistributable files
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
severity -1 important
thanks
Hi
Since this issue has not been resolved for over a year and not even a
comment from the maintainer(s), I think this should be removed.
On a
# This is the same problem really - just represented differently
# in different versions and later versions support xulrunner 1.9
forcemerge 507536 538871
retitle 507536 eclipse: fails to start due to xulrunner
tags 507536 = confirmed
severity 507536 grave
# These two are solved by the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I had a look around and there has been a similar problem in eclipse
version 3.2 [1], which may be of use in finding and fixing this problem.
Could I have you post the output of:
javap -classpath
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Niels Thykier schrieb:
[...]
[...]
Your comments:
java does not support the -c option.
No package provides a usr/bin/javap, I also tried out kaffe,
sun-java6-jdk, the open pendant etc..
Interesting, javap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Niels Thykier schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Niels Thykier schrieb:
[...]
[...]
Your comments:
java does not support the -c option.
No package provides a usr/bin/javap, I also tried out kaffe,
sun-java6-jdk, the open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Niels Thykier schrieb:
Sadly, by looking at the class file alone I am unable to determine if
the problem exists... But if you can send it to me, I can use javap on it.
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/eclipse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again
I noticed RedHat had bug report similar to this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483832 [1]
Could I have you test if:
echo org.eclipse.ui/showIntro=false /tmp/noWelcomeScreen.ini
eclipse -pluginCustomization
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Searched a bit and found this topic:
http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5250409
(mostly a reminder to self)
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Mostly a note to self)
Located here: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=268651
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Could you check if this problem persists in eclipse 3.4.1-1 (experimental)?
As far as I can tell this was fixed upstream in somewhere between 3.2.2
and 3.4.1 - the amd64 versions do not show this problem in 3.4.1.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Niels Thykier schrieb:
Hi again
I noticed RedHat had bug report similar to this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483832 [1]
Could I have you test if:
echo org.eclipse.ui/showIntro=false /tmp
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Ralf Treinen trei...@free.fr wrote:
Package: libjgrapht-java-doc,libjgrapht0.6-java-doc
Version: libjgrapht-java-doc/0.6.0-5
Version: libjgrapht0.6-java-doc/0.6.0-8
libjgrapht0.6-java-doc/0.6.0-8 in main replaces
libjgrapht-java-doc/0.6.0-5 in contrib. That
tags 529505 + patch
thanks
Hi
I have created a patch that fixes this problem and also replaces kaffe
with default java as (Build-)Depends.
~Niels
diff -u nice-deb-orig/control nice-deb-mod/control
--- a/debian/control 2009-09-13 00:10:58.0 +0200
+++ b/debian/control 2009-09-13
tags 528066 + patch
thanks
Hi
I have created a patch that removes jikes and kaffe as build-depends for
this package and instead uses default-jdk.
~Niels
--010905080905030507040008
Content-Type: text/x-diff;
name=528066.patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
tags 528055 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libgnu-regexp-java (versioned as 1.1.4-3.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
Niels Thykier
--00030105080906040304
Content-Type: text/x-diff;
name
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for nice (versioned as 0.9.13-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
Niels Thykier
diff -u nice-0.9.13/debian/rules nice-0.9.13/debian/rules
--- nice-0.9.13/debian/rules
+++ nice-0.9.13/debian
Package: vnc-java
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi
I have created a patch that replaces jikes and kaffe with default-jdk.
The reason for also removing kaffe is that the java team is planning to remove
it as
well [1][2].
~Niels
[1]
Hi again
Could you please tell me which of the following libraries (if any) you
have installed and which package (w. version) provide them?
/usr/lib/mozilla/libgtkembedmoz.so
/usr/lib/firefox/libgtkembedmoz.so
/usr/lib/xulrunner{,1.9,1.9.1}/libgtkembedmoz.so
Hi
Those of you who have experienced this problem, could you please write
which version of xulrunner you have and whether it fixed it?
Those you still experiencing the problem, please check if your version
of xulrunner is listed here[1] next to the matching version of eclipse.
At least xulrunner
Florian Weimer wrote:
Package: libxalan2-java
Version: 2.7.1-5
Severity: grave
Running java -jar /usr/share/java/xalan2.jar -DIAG -XSL t.xsl -IN
References.html, I receive the following error message:
(Location of error unknown)java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response
code:
tags 543105 + confirmed
owner 543105 !
thanks
Hi
I can reproduce on i386 as well and I will have a go at fixing it.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 543073 + patch confirmed
thanks
Hi
I have tested Luke's patch and this package successfully builds with it
on my machine. Though I cannot verify its runtime correctness (I do
not know this library nor does its build have tests/checks).
That being said - I think this patch is only fixing
Hi
I noticed that you decided to use some sequence of shell commands to set
JAVA_HOME. I can recommend using /usr/lib/jvm/default-java instead
(and build-depending on default-jdk which you are already doing).
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java is a symlink to openjdk6 on all arch
supporting openjdk and
Can you still reproduce this issue in sid? We recently received a report
that it is not reproducible[1].
~Niels
[1]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D569002#25
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi
from the log:
STDERR: Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad
version number in .class file
Perhaps the JVM dependency and the class file versions do not match up.
freemind depends on
openjdk-6-jre | java2-runtime | sun-java5-jre | java2-runtime
But are you certain that
Christian Marillat wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.4.1-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
eclipse doesn't start :
==
searching for compatible vm...
testing /usr/lib/jvm/default-java...not found
testing
Christian Marillat wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
[...]
Thanks for the bug report. Beginning with the next upload, eclipse will
use /usr/bin/java by default (and thus respecting your local alternative).
start with this dialogbox :
,
| This Eclipse build doesn't
tags 574607 + confirmed
thanks
Sam Morris wrote:
Package: eclipse-platform-data
Version: 3.5.2-1
Severity: serious
When upgrading today:
Unpacking eclipse-platform-data (from
.../eclipse-platform-data_3.5.2-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
block 574611 by 441313
thanks
Sam Morris wrote:
Package: eclipse-cdt
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Please call me stupid if I've overlooked something, but having installed
eclipse and eclipse-cdt, I can't find any mention of C or C++ features
# We are nearly ready to RM this package.
tags 563884 + wontfix
thanks
Hi
Thank you for taking the time to report this problem; however we are not
working on fixing this issue since this package has been superseded by
libexcalibur-logkit-java.
We will have this package removed when we have
Hi
With ries back up and the upload of libfreemarker-java accepted, I have
filed an RM of liblogkit-java (see #576349).
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Olivier Berger wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:36:58PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
#552480: eclipse: GTK dialog stopped working
It has been closed by Debian Orbital Alignment Team
pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.
* Added workaround for gtk problems.
I believe the javax package is optional, so more a that gcj does not
have all the javax extensions.
Note these classes appear to be in libmx4j-java and libjboss-jmx-java;
which may allow it to be used even without openjdk-6 or sun-java6
=20
I am working on this. I just fixed this package
Torsten Werner wrote:
Package: jftp
Version: 1.52-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hi,
the upstream tarball ships a lot of prebuilt binaries. The package
cannot be built after removing those binaries:
[javac]
Hi
Is this bug still valid? It appears to be filed against a non-existent
binary package; the question is whether it should be reassigned to the
current version of the binary or just closed.
It is currently listed as blocked by #488989 in a package (java-common)
that I co-maintain and I would
Package: sat4j
Version: 2.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi Michael Tautschnig, Release people and Java people.
In light of #587657, I have decided to file an RC bug against sat4j to prevent
it from migrating to testing and quite possibly breaking eclipse-platform in
testing.
I strongly suspect that
Package: eclipse-pde
Version: 3.5.2-5
Severity: serious
As the title says, working on a patch.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
tags 592181 + confirmed
thanks
Hi
User feedback in #587657 and talking with a Fedora eclipse maintainer
supports my suspicious. Apparently Fedora currently handles this by
building with a static qualifier for sat4j (and other packages).
Supposedly
On 2010-08-15 09:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libsysactivity
Version: 0.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100815 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
To help upstream debug the kfreebsd-amd64 failure[1], would it possible
to get the following extra information from the machine?
On 2010-08-19 19:13, Carlos Olmedo Escobar wrote:
I guess what is the problem but just to try to reproduce it, can
Package: libsysactivity
Version: 0.5.4-2
Severity: grave
Tags: squeeze sid upstream
Hi
The current libsysactivity has known flaws with calculating the memory on
kfreebsd machines if they have over 4 GB of RAM. A related issue is that
it has other issues with the amd64, where some values are
Tags: patch
Hi
These are the patches I got the problem from upstream so far;
unfortunately I am a bit busy and do not have time the next couple of
days[1]. Anyone interested in working with this is welcome to have a look.
The patches need to be tested on kfreebsd i386 and amd64 machines with a
Package: liblucene2-java
Version: 2.9.3+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Hi
See #587657 and #592181 for the long story. Basically eclipse is very picky with
the OSGi metadata of some of its dependencies (liblucene2-java being one of
them).
Once you have uploaded lucene2 with a breaks, I will reupload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-09-03 13:38, Niels Thykier wrote:
Package: liblucene2-java
Version: 2.9.3+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Hi
See #587657 and #592181 for the long story. Basically eclipse is very picky
with
the OSGi metadata of some of its dependencies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
severity 595356 important
thanks
On 2010-09-03 14:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2010-09-03 13:38, Niels Thykier wrote:
Package: liblucene2-java
Version: 2.9.3+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Hi
See #587657 and #592181 for the long story. Basically
causes build
+failures due to false positives.
+
+ -- Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:11:25 +0200
+
libsysactivity (0.5.4-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Applied patch from upstream to fix an issue with calculating memory
diff --git a/debian/patches/disable-cpu-idle-test.patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Package: jetty
Version: 6.1.24-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Regression in init script
X-Debbugs-CC: Michele Renda mic.re...@email.it
On 2010-07-19 20:39, Michele Renda wrote:
Hello Niels
Hi
I tried to install Jetty 6.1.24-4 on Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
As the subject suggests I am considering to do a stable upload of
tomcat5.5. I intend to fix:
#589864 - Missing security policy prevents proper logging ...
#532366 - Various Security issues
#576261 - missing dependency declaration on a JDK
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-02-06 06:19, Martin Millnert wrote:
An update.
My first assumption seems to be wrong, but something else seems to be
seriously wrong:
root@sslvpn-test:/usr/src# aptitude why libxerces2-java gcj-4.4-base
p libxerces2-java
Package: ant
Version: 1.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: help
Justification: FTBFS
Hey
As the title suggests, ant does not do too well on s390[1]. I had ant
given back a couple of days and it gave exactly the same error, so I
doubt it is a temporary issue. By the looks of it, my best guess is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-05-30 20:50, tony mancill wrote:
Niels,
Building from the trunk of the packaging repo works fine - any concerns with
me
bumping the standards versions and uploading to address this bug?
Thanks,
tony
Hey,
Nope, not at all... I
tags 599967 - experimental
thanks
Hi
I disagree that this bug is experimental only, since it affects ia64
and sparc in unstable. Also it partly blocks getting the fix for
#545625 migrated into testing.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tags: patch
See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1037779
(sorry for double mail to pkg-java list)
On 2010-12-29 18:29, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Package: tomcat6
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE
severity 645793 normal
reassign 645793 wnpp
retitle 645793 O: lprfax - Utility to allow printing to a fax modem
thanks
Hi,
I am orphaning lprfax[1] on behalf of Camm Maguire (see #645793).
Due to its RC bugs and its very low popcon I intend to request the
removal of this package in about 14
Package: nice
Severity: serious
Hi,
As far as I can tell, the maintainer of nice is also the (sole)
upstream developer for nice. By the looks of it, upstream is dead and
this implies that this package is silently unmaintained.
If you are still around to maintain this package, please respond to
Hi Andrew,
I see you have filed a bug against augeas-tools in debian, but your
report lists the version of a backported package. If this issue only
happens with the backported package, we should move this issue to
debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org (CC'ed).
However, if it also happens in a pure
Source: bittorrent
Severity: serious
Hi,
It appears to me this package is being NMU maintained. Furthermore
it seems that upstream has dropped support for Linux (I could only see
a Windows and a Mac download plus a uTorrent link).
If you will want to maintainer this package, please write back
Hi,
This is, indeed, most likely caused by the above mentioned bug. The bug
was caused by libarchive-zip-perl and requires a rebuild against the
patched version. As the package is architecture all, it cannot be
binNMU'ed, so source upload is required. I can recommend bumping the
versioned
Hi Wookey,
The javahelper bug has been fixed now, so you can proceed with this. :)
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: freebsd-libs
Version: 8.3~svn229725-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Log from the buildd[1]:
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/build/buildd-freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725-3-kfreebsd-i386-AkvhUR/freebsd-libs-8.3~svn229725/lib/libcam
cc -Wall -g -pipe -fPIC -I.
reassign 659094 release.debian.org
retitle 659094 binNMUs for libcryptsetup bump
severity 659094 normal
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags binnmu
thanks
Hi,
For no change-rebuilds, please file a binNMU request against
release.debian.org (exception being for arch:all packages).
Source: spring
Version: 85.0+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package FTBFS during an binNMU to rebuild it against a new version of the
glew libraries[1].
[...]
/usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report
Source: tcos
Version: 0.89.85
Severity: serious
Hi,
tcos-core is uninstallable on armel.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
sushi appears to be affected by the API changes in gupnp/gupnp-igd
(#639871). The gupnp-igd commit relevant the particular failure appears
to be [1].
~Niels
[1]
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gupnp-igd/commit/?id=1c51ad2a9520c9bf9b0624eb46319a8ab9ff83f0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: amsn
Version: 0.98.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
We were recompiling amsn as a part of the gssdp/gupnp transition and
it failed to build on several architectures.
The last part of the amd64 log on the buildd[1]:
Package: leave
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.9 - must directive
User: lint-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: debian-rules-not-a-makefile debian-rules-missing-required-target
debian-rules-missing-recommended-target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
4.9 Main building
Package: amoeba-data
Severity: serious
Justification: Violating Policy required directive (4.9)
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: debian-rules-missing-required-target
debian-rules-missing-recommended-target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
4.9 Main building script:
Package: crash-whitepaper
Severity: serious
Justification: Violating Policy required directive (4.9)
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: debian-rules-missing-required-target
debian-rules-missing-recommended-target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Package: ocaml-book
Severity: serious
Justification: Violating Policy required directive (4.9)
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: debian-rules-missing-required-target
debian-rules-missing-recommended-target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
4.9 Main building script:
Hi
This email is BCC'ed to #631061 and #631382; please consider following
up to d-java@l.d.o as it makes coordination easier.
I have managed to successfully compile eclipse 3.7 using part of the
debian packaging I just pushed to the git repository[1]. There are at
least six issues atm.
First
Package: gclcvs
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
I noticed this package have two RC bugs that appears to have gotten
no attention since March and April (repsectively). Furthermore it
was removed from testing on the 3rd of July due to #618127.
If you still
1 - 100 of 763 matches
Mail list logo
