Bug#629204: Fixed version ready for test

2011-08-30 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi, I've written a patch that seems to work with both gnustep-base/1.20 and 1.22. I'm waiting for upstream's approval [1], it can be grabbed here [2] if anyone wants to test it. Cheers, Federico [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnustep-dev/2011-08/msg00095.html [2]

Bug#622674: Updated package due to bug 622674, CVE 2011-1522

2011-04-18 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi, i am one of the maintainers of the doctrine debian package. A security related bug has arised recently [1] and i've prepared a new package following upstream recomendations [2]. The fix involves upgrading to a new upstream version, i've tested it and all seems to work fine, although i don't

Bug#622674: [Pkg-symfony-maint] Bug#622674: CVE-2011-1522: SQL injection

2011-04-14 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi, thanks for your bug report. I'll try to prepare a fixed package as soon as posible. Cheers, Federico On 04/13/2011 08:45 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: doctrine Severity: grave Tags: security Please see http://www.doctrine-project.org/blog/doctrine-security-fix This has

Bug#618181: gnustep-dl2: FTBFS: EOModelerEditor.m:52:38: fatal error: GNUstepBase/GSCategories.h: No such file or directory

2011-03-16 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
On 03/15/2011 05:39 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote: Without investigation: most probably this is related to the new behavior of GCC 4.5 to bail out immediately if an #include'd header is not present. Thanks Yavor, i'll prepare the fixed package. Cheers Federico signature.asc Description:

Bug#591115: Bug forwarded

2010-11-30 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi Alexander, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Hi! [...] Has there been any progress with this bug? None so far... I see the new package is still on mentors, but I don't think the release managers will accept a new upstream release at this stage of the freeze, therefore I'm currently

Bug#591115: Bug forwarded

2010-10-11 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi Julien, Julien Cristau wrote: did you manage to make any progress on this? I haven't received any response from upstream. After this problem raised a new version of doctrine came out, this time without the test suite. Since the cause of the FTBFS is a failing test (the package didn't

Bug#595344: php-xml-serializer uses deprecated return value of new by reference

2010-09-05 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi Thomas, El 05/09/2010, a las 01:10, Thomas Goirand escribió: Hi, I don't agree. Some scripts (like mine) run with error_reporting(E_ALL); In my case, I run it from a cron job, and this would send me a mail every 10 minutes (because it outputs to the standard error). Did you try the

Bug#595344: php-xml-serializer uses deprecated return value of new by reference

2010-09-04 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi Thomas, this warning only appears if you require 'XML/Unserializer.php' (that is, you are going to unserialize a xml string) and only if you have set your error level to show warnings at the output. So, it won't make the package unusable for most users, because if an user wants to return a

Bug#595344: php-xml-serializer uses deprecated return value of new by reference

2010-09-04 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
review it and let me know if it works for you? Cheers Federico Federico Gimenez Nieto wrote: Hi Thomas, this warning only appears if you require 'XML/Unserializer.php' (that is, you are going to unserialize a xml string) and only if you have set your error level to show warnings at the output

Bug#595344: php-xml-serializer uses deprecated return value of new by reference

2010-09-03 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi Thomas, thanks for the bug report. Could you please explain a bit more about the conditions in which the warnings raised? I have been trying the examples of XML generation at [1] and all of them worked without problems and without noticing any warning. [1]

Bug#591115: Bug forwarded

2010-08-30 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
forwarded 591115 http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/browse/DC-772 thanks Hi, thanks for the bugreport and sorry for the late response. The bug has been already forwarded upstream, it seems that, although not stated anywhere in the documentation, there are some arch-dependent features, at least

Bug#594443: Workaround: libsteptalk0 replaces steptalk

2010-08-27 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Yavor Doganov wrote: I think you actually need Conflicts, because Replaces would sneakily replace libraries in the old package, Ok, it is corrected and reuploaded, i'll try to find a sponsor now. Thanks Federico signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#594443: Workaround: libsteptalk0 replaces steptalk

2010-08-26 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi, i've uploaded a new version of gnustep-dl2 stating that libgnustep-dl2-0d replaces libgnustep-dl2-0. I hope that this will resolve the issue, could you please take a look [1]? [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-dl2/gnustep-dl2_0.12.0-5.dsc Cheers Federico Yavor Doganov

Bug#581934: GNUstep transition

2010-08-23 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi, Yavor Doganov wrote: I'm afraid I don't understand the question. If upstream bumps the SONAME, it isn't distro-specific in anyway, right? AFAICT, (in Debian at least; I'm not aware of other practices) a distro-specific SONAME for a library is introduced when 1) An ABI breaking

Bug#581934: GNUstep transition

2010-08-23 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Yavor Doganov wrote: В 09:58 +0200 на 23.08.2010 (пн), Federico Gimenez Nieto написа: Thanks for the clarification, i am pretty lost here. I'd be glad to explain in detail if you let me know what you find confusing. Thanks, with your previous explanations i understand the big picture

Bug#581934: GNUstep transition

2010-08-23 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Do you have a sponsor for this upload? If not, I can upload it. I'll just wait for gorm.app and renaissance to be available on all architectures and then proceed with the upload. Is this ok for you? Of course, thanks a lot! :) Cheers, Federico signature.asc

Bug#583006: Bug#581934: gnustep-dl2: FTBFS with gnustep-base/1.20.0: EONSAddOns.m:102: error: ‘GSMethodList’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2010-05-27 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 22:03 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: Thanks, now it is bulding without problems, it is uploaded at mentors [1] [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-dl2/gnustep-dl2_0.12.0-3.dsc (The GSMethodList FTBFS is gnustep-base/1.20.x-specific so you can't notice

Bug#583006: Bug#581934: gnustep-dl2: FTBFS with gnustep-base/1.20.0: EONSAddOns.m:102: error: ‘GSMethodList’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2010-05-26 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 13:30 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: I bet that once you fix the above in the usual way (i.e. conditionally define `debug', not `OPTLFAG'), you'll be able to reproduce it with gnustep-base/1.20.0. It is strange, conditionally defining 'debug=yes' leads to the same

Bug#544405: #544405 already fixed?

2009-10-13 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi Jonas, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Sorry - I am unable to verify due to bug#548015. :-( If you want to give it a try i have a qemu sid image at [1] (209mb and slightly outdated, apt-get upgrade required). root password is 'fossy' [1]

Bug#546164: Already fixed

2009-09-23 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi, This seems to be fixed after the upload of 5.2.11.dsfg.1-1. Thanks, Federico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#544405: #544405 already fixed?

2009-09-23 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Hi Jonas, cid:part1.02050506.00090002@coit.esThis seems to be fixed with the latest version of php-pear, 5.2.11.dsfg.1-1, could you please check if it is properly working? Thanks, Federico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.