Package: didiwiki
Version: 0.5-11
Tags: patch + pending
Severity: critical
A user has privately sent me a security patch for the didiwiki
package, that I maintain. The current installation allows any of the
system's the user to access any file on the filesystem. To reproduce
it:
apt-get
Hello,
Failing to have more info, and being unable to reproduce this bug (see
latest piuparts also), I am reducing the severity to important. Please
follow-up should you not approve this.
Thanks.
Ignace M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
merge 695284 728124
thanks
I'm merging the two bug reports as they are due to the same outdated
version of erlang.
I should be uploading a new upstream version soon, correcting those
two bug reports.
Ignace M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
tags 754922 + moreinfo
Hi Axel,
I am unfortunately unable to reproduce this bug. I have tested this on
my local machine (Debian/testing) and my development machine
(Debian/unstable).
Also, it seems that the latest piuparts tests did not detect the
described behavior [1].
The daemon is stopped
Hi Stuart,
Thanks for your report.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Stuart Freeman
stuart.free...@et.gatech.edu wrote:
Tsung crashes with output that looks like:
$ tsung -f tsung.xml start
Starting Tsung
Log directory is: /home/stuart/.tsung/log/20130109-1449
{Kernel pid
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Julián Moreno Patiño jul...@debian.org wrote:
tags 695284 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for tsung (versioned as 1.4.2-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Hi Julián,
Thank you
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Julián Moreno Patiño jul...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Ignace,
Hey Julián,
Thanks for your prompt response.
Unfortunately we are on the freeze cycle and it's not good idea change many
things. Only fixes to RC bugs are recommended.
I test #691354 and I can't
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
Source: python-scrapy
Version: 0.14.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 15:43 -0500, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
Philipp, if you need any help packaging it, I would be glad to give you
a hand. ;)
Hi Philipp,
Any news on this? May be can I NMU this package? Would you be alright
with this?
Thanks,
Ignace M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
FTR
- Forwarded Message -
From: Andreas Ulm andreas@unister.de
To: Ignace Mouzannar ignace.mouzan...@enovance.com
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 4:34:25 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [mytop] can't use Config:IniFiles for my.cnf
Hi,
On 26.01.2012 02:20 02:20, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
On Thu
Hi,
Looking a bit more closely at the package, I found that the bug was due
to a patch that was applied in the Debian package (attached):
/src/mytop-1.6$ head -n12 debian/patches/520421.my.cnf.diff
I have attached a patch that adds support for reading the mytop config
from the
standard MySQL
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:48 +0200, Andreas Ulm wrote:
Package: mytop
Version: 1.6-6
Severity: grave
(snip)
Hi,
because of the usage of Config::IniFiles you can't use all parameters
which can be set in my.cnf.
If you e.g. use skip-external-locking the CPAN Config::IniFiles
can't
reassign 629345 kiki 0.5.6-5
thanks
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 21:07, Ralf Treinen trei...@free.fr wrote:
(...)
Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
(according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
slightly out of sync):
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 22:41, Ignace Mouzannar mouzan...@gmail.com wrote:
I am reassigning this bug against the kiki package. Should another bug
be opened against python-omniorb-omg?
The bug has just been cloned by Floris [1].
Cheers,
Ignace M
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for reporting this bug.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 20:57, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
In any case, is there any reason why kiki modules are installed as public?
If there is none, the easiest way to solve the bug is to move them e.g. to
/usr/share/kiki/.
The kiki module
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 18:27, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote:
What keeps me from uploading is that
- Ansgar was dealing with this package already
- I'm not sure if the changes are not a bit too much for a freeze
exception at that point
Hi gregor,
Sorry for the late response. I
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:02, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
Hi,
Hey,
tenshi-0.11-2 looks good for me, but I'll suggest you to check it
with piuparts.
0m18.2s DUMP:
(Reading database ... 10298 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing tenshi ...
Purging
merge 606789 605240
thanks
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 18:49, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
Package: tenshi
Version: 0.11-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: instest-20101211 instest
Hi,
While testing the installation of all packages in squeeze, I
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 20:36, Sebastian Harl tok...@debian.org wrote:
forcemerge 573638 574727
thanks
Hi,
Hello Sebastian,
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 04:09:53PM +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
After upgrading to rrdtool 1.4.2-1, my package iptotal [1] became unusable.
It seems like the RRD
severity 574121 important
thanks
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 15:01, John Parejko parej...@speakeasy.net wrote:
Package: iptotal
Version: 0.3.3-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
Hi John,
Sorry for the delay in replying to your report.
I installed 0.3.3-11
Bug reports #557253 and #549869 are duplicates; only their severity differ.
Should the #557253's severity be set back to 'grave' in order to merge
these two bugs?
Regards,
Ignace M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
tags 572144 + pending
thanks
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 13:08, Maximiliano Curia m...@debian.org wrote:
Hola Ignace Mouzannar!
Bonjour Maximiliano,
El 01/03/2010 a las 23:42 escribiste:
Hello Piotr,
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 22:11, Piotr Minkina likemandr...@o2.pl wrote:
In example I can run
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:57, Ignace Mouzannar mouzan...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just uploaded the new version of lshell (0.9.9) on m.d.n.
As a minor bug was filled on the 0.9.9 version of lshell [1] , I have
released a new version (0.9.10) correcting it.
The new package has been uploaded
Hello Ernesto,
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 17:05, Ernesto Domato edo...@gmail.com wrote:
The package depends on apache2 or httpd. I tried to install it on a machine
that has lighttpd package that fulfills the httpd requirement but the iptotal
package tries to reload apache2 without checking if it
tags 572246 + pending
thanks
I have just sent a request for sponsorship on m.d.n [1].
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Regards,
Ignace M
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/03/msg00047.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hello Piotr,
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 22:11, Piotr Minkina likemandr...@o2.pl wrote:
In example I can run echo $(/bin/sh) or echo $(/bin/su), or every other
command.
Thank you for reporting this. You are absolutely right that the
default configuration of lshell permits this, and it should not.
and Replaces lines
from the debian/control file, and changing the package's priority to
optional in order to comply with the Policy.
Thank you for your consideration.
Kind regards,
Ignace Mouzannar
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (501
(not the .deb package). Nevertheless, the
fact that they are kept in /usr/lib/, after a purge, is not right.
I will be uploading a new release correcting this very soon.
Regards,
Ignace Mouzannar
[1] http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft/html/ch-issues.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
28 matches
Mail list logo
