Thank you for the patch, Aurelien! I’ve applied it to the 20220623.1
release and uploaded it to unstable as 20220623.1-2.
On 2023-08-04 08:53, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2023-08-03 21:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2023-08-02 14:27, Benjamin Barenblat wrote:
> > > I’ve been procrastinating on starting the transition because of some
> > > lingering MIPS issues. I think they’ve all been sorted out, and I
Source: abseil
Followup-For: Bug #1037567
Dear Maintainer,
I'm terribly sorry if I'm suddenly intruding on this thread.
For riscv64, We need abseil more than anything else at this point in my
view. Because there are several dependencies chains that even end up
pointing to abseil.
Ideally we
On 2023-08-03 21:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-08-02 14:27, Benjamin Barenblat wrote:
> > I’ve been procrastinating on starting the transition because of some
> > lingering MIPS issues. I think they’ve all been sorted out, and I just
> > uploaded my latest work to experimental. If
Hi,
On 2023-08-02 14:27, Benjamin Barenblat wrote:
> I’ve been procrastinating on starting the transition because of some
> lingering MIPS issues. I think they’ve all been sorted out, and I just
> uploaded my latest work to experimental. If that passes the buildds,
> I’ll request a transition
I’ve been procrastinating on starting the transition because of some
lingering MIPS issues. I think they’ve all been sorted out, and I just
uploaded my latest work to experimental. If that passes the buildds,
I’ll request a transition slot and do the transition as quickly as
possible.
If waiting
Hi,
On 2023-06-26 12:55, Benjamin Barenblat wrote:
> Control: fixed -1 20230125.3
> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/issues/1366
> Control: owner -1 !
> Control: tags -1 upstream fixed-upstream fixed-in-experimental
>
> This has been resolved in the 20230125 series,
7 matches
Mail list logo
