Control: fixed -1 2021.9.0-2
I agree.
On Thu, 2023-08-03 at 00:32 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [M. Zhou]
> > The issue still exists with armel:
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb
>
> If so, this is a duplicate of
> https://bugs.debian.org/1042009 >, which is about
[M. Zhou]
> The issue still exists with armel:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb
If so, this is a duplicate of
https://bugs.debian.org/1042009 >, which is about the armel issue,
and should be closed.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
The issue still exists with armel:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb
On Wed, 2023-08-02 at 22:46 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [M. Zhou]
> > I'm aware of this issue. I'm slightly faster than buildd for
> > toolchain
> > upgrades. The issue will automatically disappear
[M. Zhou]
> I'm aware of this issue. I'm slightly faster than buildd for toolchain
> upgrades. The issue will automatically disappear once our amd64 buildd
> migrates to gcc-13. The gcc-12 will lead to the FTBFS you see now.
Is this still an issue?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Source: onetbb
Version: 2021.9.0-1
Severity: serious
I'm aware of this issue. I'm slightly faster than buildd for toolchain
upgrades. The issue will automatically disappear once our amd64 buildd
migrates to gcc-13. The gcc-12 will lead to the FTBFS you see now.
Local sbuild with gcc-13 has no
5 matches
Mail list logo
