On Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:10:13 PM CET Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello Thorsten,
> I have upload a fix for 2.2, probably will not be able to spend any time
> on 1.x or 2.4 before the weekend.
Looks like 2.4 is fixed upstream a couple of years
Dixi quod…
>I just tested the 2.2 patch on gnupg1, and it applies cleanly,
>[…]
>For gnupg1, the B-D are also already installable, so there’s no
>current need to modify them there, just apply the same patch as
>was applied in gnupg2 2.2 and upload.
It finished building with the patch, so please
Hi again,
>on 1.x or 2.4 before the weekend.
I just tested the 2.2 patch on gnupg1, and it applies cleanly,
and configure also seems happy:
[…]
checking whether the resolver is usable... yes
checking whether LDAP via "-lldap" is present and sane... yes
checking for ldap_get_option... yes
Hi Andreas
>I have upload a fix for 2.2
OK, that should help.
>probably will not be able to spend any time on 1.x or 2.4 before the weekend.
They can probably wait until then, no worries.
>It is fixed in 2.4 and I am very reluctant to backport major packaging
>updates to 2.2
For some values
On 2024-03-13 Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> clone 1066137 -1
> reassign -1 gnupg1 1.4.23-1.1
> retitle -1 gnupg1: fails to build gpgkeys_ldap, probably due to
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
> thanks
> Dixi quod…
> >This matches the following failure mode at the end of the build:
> Same
5 matches
Mail list logo
