Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 565765 1.9.1.376-1
Bug #565765 [src:ruby1.9.1] ruby1.9.1: FTBFS on sparc
Bug Marked as found in versions ruby1.9.1/1.9.1.376-1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
found 565765 1.9.1.376-1
thanks
On 07/03/10 at 09:46 +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes:
Something else that puzzles me is that ruby1.9.1 1.9.1.376-1 (the
version currently in testing) built fine on sparc back in August, when
it was uploaded.
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes:
Something else that puzzles me is that ruby1.9.1 1.9.1.376-1 (the
version currently in testing) built fine on sparc back in August, when
it was uploaded. See
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:30:29PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Any chance of upgrading one of the buildds to 2.6.32 to see if it
helps?
DSA told me that they do not want to run any non-standard (aka,
non-Debian stable) kernel on these machines, not even for short
tests. I'm not sure
On 25/02/10 at 11:29 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:30:29PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Any chance of upgrading one of the buildds to 2.6.32 to see if it
helps?
DSA told me that they do not want to run any non-standard (aka,
non-Debian stable) kernel on
On 22/02/10 at 17:30 +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org writes:
On spontini:
Linux spontini 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Thu Feb 11 03:39:06 UTC 2010
sparc64 GNU/Linux
cat /proc/cpuinfo
cpu : TI UltraSparc II (BlackBird)
fpu :
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:06:04PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 22/02/10 at 17:30 +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org writes:
On spontini:
Linux spontini 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Thu Feb 11 03:39:06 UTC 2010
sparc64 GNU/Linux
cat /proc/cpuinfo
Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org writes:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:06:04PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I think that the two remaining options are:
(1) remove the ruby1.9.1 binaries for sparc, and have ruby1.9.1 added to
P-a-s on sparc.
(2) accept that ruby1.9.1 can only be built on porter
Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org writes:
On spontini:
Linux spontini 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Thu Feb 11 03:39:06 UTC 2010
sparc64 GNU/Linux
cat /proc/cpuinfo
cpu : TI UltraSparc II (BlackBird)
fpu : UltraSparc II integrated FPU
prom: OBP 3.11.26
Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org writes:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:22:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the
failure there and getting more information about it (logs are
Marc Brockschmidt m...@marcbrockschmidt.de writes:
[ruby1.9.1 woes]
Sorry for the delay. I've now done a test-build on lebrun, which got
further than our last build-log. I didn't finish the build, though, as
CPU cycles on sparc are currently needed for the build queue.
I've given back
Hi,
Outcome of the discussion on debian-qa@ about this issue:
- ruby1.9.1 still fails on both lebrun and spontini
- needs to be tried on smetana (porter box with the higher chances to
reproduce the failure)
Any help is welcomed...
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 05:09:58PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Marc Brockschmidt m...@marcbrockschmidt.de writes:
[ruby1.9.1 woes]
Sorry for the delay. I've now done a test-build on lebrun, which got
further than our last build-log. I didn't finish the build, though, as
CPU cycles on
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:01:10PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 05:09:58PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Marc Brockschmidt m...@marcbrockschmidt.de writes:
[ruby1.9.1 woes]
Sorry for the delay. I've now done a test-build on lebrun, which got
further than our last
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 08:17:51AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/01/10 at 12:04 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:22:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 11:41:51AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the
failure there and getting more information about it (logs are not
very
informative)? I'm a bit reluctant to do a porter upload knowing that
On 23/01/10 at 12:04 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:22:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the
failure there and getting more information
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:33:47PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 18/01/10 at 23:59 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: src:ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.1.378-1
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:22:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the
failure there and getting more information about it (logs are not very
informative)? I'm a bit
Package: src:ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.1.378-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
ruby1.9.1 FTBFS on sparc with the following error:
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.1.378-1-sparc-KMvrBv/ruby1.9.1-1.9.1.378'
compiling bigdecimal
Aborted
make[1]: *** [mkmain.sh] Error 134
make: ***
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: src:ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.1.378-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
ruby1.9.1 FTBFS on sparc with the following error:
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.1.378-1-sparc-KMvrBv/ruby1.9.1-1.9.1.378'
On 18/01/10 at 23:59 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: src:ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.1.378-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
ruby1.9.1 FTBFS on sparc with the following error:
make[2]: Leaving directory
22 matches
Mail list logo
